Bruner, J.S.
(1961) The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.Google Scholar
Curry, M.J.
(2014) Graphics and invention in academic engineers’ writing for publication. In M. J. Curry & D. I. Hanauer (Eds.), Language, literacy, and learning in STEM education: Research methods and perspectives from applied linguistics (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Desai, K.V., Gatson, S.N., Stiles, T.W., Stewart, R.H., Laine, G.A., & Quick, C.M.
(2008) Integrating research and education at research-extensive universities with research-intensive communities. Advances in Physiological Education, 32, 136–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J.
(1938) Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Giacomini, M.K., & Cook, D.J.
(2000) Qualitative research in health care: Are the results of the study valid? Journal of the Americal Medical Association, 284(3), 357–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gross, A.G.
(1990) The rhetoric of science (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, A.G., Harmon, J.E., & Reidy, M.S.
(2002) Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D.I.
(1998) The genre-specific hypothesis of reading: Reading poetry and reading encyclopedic items. Poetics, 26(2), 63–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Silence, voice and erasure: Psychological embodiment in graffiti at the site of Prime Minister Rabin’s assassination. Psychotherapy in the Arts, 31(1), 29–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Scientific discourse: Multiliteracy in the classroom. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D.I., & Englander, K.
(2011) Quantifying the burden of writing research articles in a second language: Data from Mexican scientists. Written Communication, 28(4), 403–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Writing science in a second language. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Hanauer, D.I., Frederick, J., Fotinakes, B., & Strobel, S.
(2012) Linguistic analysis of project ownership for undergraduate research experiences. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11, 378–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D.I., Hatfull, G.F., & Jacobs-Sera, D.
(2009) Active assessment: Assessing scientific inquiry. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, T.Y., & Nesbit, C.
(2003) Science notebooks: Tools for increasing achievement across the curriculum (ERIC Digest ED482720). ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2000) Hedges, boosters and lexical invisibility: Noticing modifiers in academic texts. Language Awareness, 9(4), 179–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Salager-Meyer, F.
(2008) Scientific writing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 297–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunter, A.B., Laursen, S.L., & Seymour, E.
(2006) Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K.
(1981) The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S.
(1986) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, G.
(1990) Writing biology. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation
(2000) Foundations: Inquiry, thoughts, views and strategies for the K-5 classroom. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M.A.
(1998) On the use of students’ science journals as an assessment tool: A scoring approach. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, School of Education.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Li, M., & Shavelson, R.J.
(2002) Looking into students’ science notebooks: What do teachers do with them? (CSE Technical Report 562). Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F., Defives, G., & Hamelinsck, M.
(1996) Epistemic modality in 19th and 20th century medical English written discourse: A principal component analysis. Interface. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 95–117.Google Scholar
Sarini, M., Blanzieri, E., Giogini, P., & Moser, C.
(2004) From actions to suggestions: Supporting the work of biologists through laboratory notebooks. In F. Darses, R. Dieng, C. Simone, & M. Zackland (Eds.), Cooperative systems design: Scenario-based design of collaborative systems (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J.M.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, R.P.
(1990) Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wood, W.B.
(2003) Inquiry-based undergraduate teaching in the life sciences at large research universities: A perspective on the Boyer Commission Report. Cell Biology Education, 2, 112–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Canagarajah, Suresh
2018. English as a spatial resource and the claimed competence of Chinese STEM professionals. World Englishes 37:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Doody, Sara & Natasha Artemeva
2022. “Everything Is in the Lab Book”: Multimodal Writing, Activity, and Genre Analysis of Symbolic Mediation in Medical Physics. Written Communication 39:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Minakova, Valeriya & Suresh Canagarajah
2023. Monolingual ideologies versus spatial repertoires: language beliefs and writing practices of an international STEM scholar. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26:6  pp. 708 ff. DOI logo
Sharma, Bal Krishna & Suresh Canagarajah
2023. Spatial repertoires in the disciplinary communication of international STEM scholars. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26:6  pp. 665 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.