Part of
Language-Learner Computer Interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applicationsEdited by Catherine Caws and Marie-Josée Hamel
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 2] 2016
► pp. 117–136
Edited by Catherine Caws and Marie-Josée Hamel
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 2] 2016
► pp. 117–136
Learner personas and the effects of instructional scaffolding on working behaviour and linguistic performance
This chapter examines data-driven learner personas and instructional scaffolding in the form of preemptive feedback in an ICALL environment. Ninety-three beginner learners of L2 German participated in a study by performing a sentence completion task as part of their regular course assignments throughout a semester. On the basis of their access to help throughout the study, participants were classified into three distinctive learner profiles, or personas: No Help, Sporadic Help, and Frequent Help personas. The study then investigated the effects of access to different amounts of help on the learners’ working behaviour and linguistic performance. Study results indicate that the three learner personas showed significant differences in their working behaviour and linguistic performance, but by investigating the effects of the instructional scaffolding the CALL system provided, results suggest that two learner personas are sufficient to capture learners’ differences. With the ultimate goal of understanding learner personas and instructional scaffolding as it relates to learning outcomes, satisfaction and success in CALL, this paper provides possible explanations of these study results and suggests areas for future research and development.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References (32)
Bertin, J.C. and Gravé, J.P. (2010). In favor of a model of didactic ergonomics. In J.C. Bertin, P. Gravé and J.P. Narcy-Combes (Eds.), Second language distance learning and teaching: theoretical perspectives and didactic ergonomics (pp. 1-36). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. 
Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk. New York, NY: Norton.
Calabria, T. (2004). An introduction to personas and how to create them. KM Column. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Caws, C. (2013). Evaluating a web-based video corpus through an analysis of user interactions. ReCALL, 25(1), 85–104.
Caws, C., & Hamel, M.-J. (2013). From analysis to training: Recycling interaction data into learning processes. OLBI Working Papers, 5, 25–36.
Chang, W., & Sun, Y. (2009). Scaffolding and web concordancers as support for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 283–302.
Colpaert, J. (2004).
Design of online interactive language courseware: Conceptualization, specification and prototyping. Research into the impact of linguistic-didactic functionality on software architecture
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Netherlands.
Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis, IN: SAMS.
Di Donato, R., Clyde, M.D., & Vansant, J. (2008). Deutsch: Na klar! An introductory German course. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 91-113.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407–432.
Farrokhi, F., Ansarin, A., & Mohammadnia, Z. (2008). Preemptive focus on form: Teachers’ practices across proficiencies. The Linguistics Journal, 3(2), 7-30.
Gass, S.M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ge, X., Chen, C.H., & Davis, K.A. (2005). Scaffolding novice instructional designers’ problem-solving processes using question prompts in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 219–248.
Guzdial, M. (1994). Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 1–44.
Hamel, M.-J. (2012). Testing aspects of the usability of an online learner dictionary prototype: Process and product oriented analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4), 339–365.
Heift, T. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 416–431.
. (2008). Modeling learner variability in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(4), 305–321.
. (2010). Developing an intelligent language tutor. CALICO, 27(3), 443–459.
. (2013). Preemptive feedback in CALL. InA. Mackey & K. McDonough(Eds.), Interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 189–207). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Heift, T., & Rimrott, A. (2012). Task-related variation in computer assisted language learning. Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 525–543.
Hubbard, P. (2011). Evaluation of courseware and websites. InL. Ducate & N. Arnold(Eds.), Present and future perspectives of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (2nd ed., pp. 407–440). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.
Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. InB. van Patten & J. Williams. (Eds.), Explaining second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lilley, M., Pyper, A., & Attwood, S. (2012). Understanding the student experience through the use of personas. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Science, 11(1), 4–13.
Long, M.H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. InK. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch(Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. InC. Doughty & J. Williams(Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–63). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Nielsen, L. (2013). Personas – User focused design. London, United Kingdom: Springer.
Quintana, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R., … Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386.
Raby, F. (2005). A user-centered ergonomic approach to CALL research. InJ.L. Egbert & G.M. Petrie(Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 179–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.
Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Kirschner, P.A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5–13.