Article published in:
Language-Learner Computer Interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications
Edited by Catherine Caws and Marie-Josée Hamel
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 2] 2016
► pp. 117136


Bertin, J.C. and Gravé, J.P.
(2010) In favor of a model of didactic ergonomics. In J.C. Bertin, P. Gravé and J.P. Narcy-Combes (Eds.), Second language distance learning and teaching: theoretical perspectives and didactic ergonomics (pp. 1-36). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J.
(1983) Child’s talk. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Calabria, T.
(2004) An introduction to personas and how to create them. KM Column. Retrieved from http://​www​.steptwo​.com​.au​/papers​/kmc​_personas/Google Scholar
Caws, C.
(2013) Evaluating a web-based video corpus through an analysis of user interactions. ReCALL, 25(1), 85–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caws, C., & Hamel, M.-J.
(2013) From analysis to training: Recycling interaction data into learning processes. OLBI Working Papers, 5, 25–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, W., & Sun, Y.
(2009) Scaffolding and web concordancers as support for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 283–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colpaert, J.
(2004)  Design of online interactive language courseware: Conceptualization, specification and prototyping. Research into the impact of linguistic-didactic functionality on software architecture (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Netherlands.
Cooper, A.
(1999) The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis, IN: SAMS. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Donato, R., Clyde, M.D., & Vansant, J.
(2008) Deutsch: Na klar! An introductory German course. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1993) The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 91-113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S.
(2001) Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 407–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrokhi, F., Ansarin, A., & Mohammadnia, Z.
(2008) Preemptive focus on form: Teachers’ practices across proficiencies. The Linguistics Journal, 3(2), 7-30.Google Scholar
Gass, S.M., & Selinker, L.
(2001) Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ge, X., Chen, C.H., & Davis, K.A.
(2005) Scaffolding novice instructional designers’ problem-solving processes using question prompts in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 219–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guzdial, M.
(1994) Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, M.-J.
(2012) Testing aspects of the usability of an online learner dictionary prototype: Process and product oriented analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4), 339–365.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heift, T.
(2004) Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 416–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Modeling learner variability in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(4), 305–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Developing an intelligent language tutor. CALICO, 27(3), 443–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Preemptive feedback in CALL. InA. Mackey & K. McDonough(Eds.), Interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 189–207). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heift, T., & Rimrott, A.
(2012) Task-related variation in computer assisted language learning. Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 525–543. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, P.
(2011) Evaluation of courseware and websites. InL. Ducate & N. Arnold(Eds.), Present and future perspectives of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (2nd ed., pp. 407–440). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L.
(2006) Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. InB. van Patten & J. Williams. (Eds.), Explaining second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Levy, M., & Stockwell, G.
(2006) CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lilley, M., Pyper, A., & Attwood, S.
(2012) Understanding the student experience through the use of personas. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Science, 11(1), 4–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.H.
(1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. InK. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch(Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M., & Robinson, P.
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. InC. Doughty & J. Williams(Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–63). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, L.
(2013) Personas – User focused design. London, United Kingdom: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quintana, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R., … Soloway, E.
(2004) A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raby, F.
(2005) A user-centered ergonomic approach to CALL research. InJ.L. Egbert & G.M. Petrie(Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 179–190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1994) Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11–26.Google Scholar
Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Kirschner, P.A., & Kester, L.
(2003) Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar