Cover not available
Part of
Language-Learner Computer Interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications
Edited by Catherine Caws and Marie-Josée Hamel
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 2] 2016
► pp. 241–246

Engineering conditions of possibility in technology-enhanced language learning

 | Portland State University, USA & University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 14 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lsse.2.11tho
References (13)
References
Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P. (2009). General Introduction. InP. Hubbard(Ed.), Computer Assisted Language Learning, Volume 1: Foundations of CALL. Critical Concepts in Linguistics (pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norman, D.A. (2002). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, B. (2008). The other C in CMC: What alternative data sources can tell us about text-based synchronous computer-mediated communication and language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 227–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, J.C., & Pardo-Ballester, C. (Eds.). (2013). Design-based research in CALL. CALICO Monograph Series, Volume 8. San Marcos, TX: CALICO.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (2010). Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. InF.M. Hult(Ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics (Vol. 11, pp. 79–97). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S.L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar
. (2009). ‘Community’, semiotic flows, and mediated contribution to activity. Language Teaching, 42(1), 81–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Language learning, ecological validity, and innovation under conditions of superdiversity. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 6(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
. (in press, 2016). Cultures-of-use and morphologies of communicative action. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2).Google Scholar
Thorne, S.L., & Smith, B. (2011). Second language development theories and technology-mediated language learning. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 268–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Compagnoni, Ilaria & Graziano Serragiotto
2024. “We all contributed to tell stories to the best of our abilities”: collaborative digital storytelling to promote students’ positive interdependence in an online course of Italian as a foreign language. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 11:1 ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Leier, Vera Monika
2017. Learning Language Through Facebook. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 7:3 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Leier, Vera Monika
2019. Learning Language Through Facebook. In Computer-Assisted Language Learning, ► pp. 1604 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.