Book review
Review of Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill. (eds). 2016. Evidential systems of Tibetan languages
Article outline
- 1.Tibetan evidentiality systems and their relevance for the typology of evidentiality
- 2.General introduction
- 3.Papers on typology and history
- 4.Lhasa and Diasporic Tibetan
- 5.Papers on other Tibetan languages
- 6.Remarks on the terms “conjunct/disjunct” and “egophoricity”
- 7.Summary
- Notes
-
Abbreviations
-
References
References (28)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bartee, Ellen. 2011. The role of animacy in the verbal morphology of Dongwang Tibetan. In Mark Turin & Bettina Zeisler (eds), Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax, 133–182. Leiden: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caplow, Nancy J. 2016. Inference and deferred evidence in Tibetan. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds), Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages, 225–257. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 1985. Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 65–72.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3): 289–321. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 2003. Lhasa Tibetan. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 270–288. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan [London Oriental and African Language Library 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garrett, Edward J. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gonzales, Geny & Martine Bruil. 2016. On the existence of egophoricity in Nam Trik. Paper presented at the Symposium on Evidentiality, Egophoricity, and Engagement: Descriptive and Typological Perspectives, Stockholm, 17–18 March.
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite egophoric and allophoric verb forms in Newari. In Stephen A. Wurm (ed.), Papers in South East Asian Linguistics 7 [Pacific Linguistics A 53], 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hargreaves, David J. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newari. Himalayan Linguistics Journal 51: 1–48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin & Andrea D. Sims. 2010. Morphology, 2nd edn. London: Hodder Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hein, Veronika. 2001. The role of the speaker in the verbal system of the Tibetan dialect of Tabo/Spiti. LTBA 24(1): 35–48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, Kees & Marize Mattos Dall’Aglio Hattnher. 2015. Four types of evidentiality in the native languages of Brazil. Linguistics 53(3): 479–524. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rule, William. M. 1977. A Comparative Study of the Foe, Huli and Pole Languages of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
San Roque, Lila & Robyn Loughnane. 2012. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 161: 111–167. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
San Roque, Lila, Simeon Floyd & Elisabeth Norcliffe. 2017. Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua, 120–143. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tournadre, Nicholas & Sange Dorje. 2003. Manual of Standard Tibetan: Language and Civilization. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1991. The rhetorical use of the Tibetan ergative. LTBA 14(1): 93–107.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1996. L’ergativité en Tibétain. Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée [Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale 33]. Leuven: Peeters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2008. Arguments against the concept of “egophoric” / “allophoric” in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart & Paul Widmer (eds), Chomolongma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281–308. Halle: International Insitute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Driem, George. 1998. Dzongkha. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African and Amerindian Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Widmer, Manuel & Fernando Zúñiga. 2017. Egophoricity, involvement, and semantic roles in Tibeto-Burman languages. Person and knowledge: From participant-role to epistemic marking, special section of Open Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Widmer, Manuel. 2017. A Grammar of Bunan [Mouton Grammar Library 71]. Berlin: de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yukawa, Yasutoshi (湯川恭敏). 1975. チベット語の述部 Chibettogo no jutsugo (The predicates of Tibetan). アジア・アフリカ文法研究 Ajia Afurika bunpō kenkyū / Asian & African Linguistics 41: 1–14. Tokyo: ILCAA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Chen, Hao, Yonghao Liu, Hong Li & Suonan Jiancuo
2020.
Research on Tibetan Language Resource Construction Based on Tibetan Natural Language Processing.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1648:2
► pp. 022079 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.