Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 44:1 (2021) ► pp.27–54

Characteristics of numerals and classifiers in Darmdo Minyag

| Minzu University of China
| La Trobe University
Based on first-hand data obtained during fieldwork, our article analyses numerals and frequently employed numeral classifiers of Darmdo Minyag. Numeral classifiers are obligated to follow a numeral when counting. There are three different roots for ‘ten’: /ɦa~ʁo/ used in the numbers 10–19; /ʁuɑ/ used in the numbers 20–49; and /ɡa/ used in the numbers 50–99. The presence of multiple roots for ‘ten’ with an initial glottal, uvular or velar stop or fricative has been attested in many languages of the Qiangic area. Although Tibetan forms may be used for all numerals, native forms up to 99 have been attested in Darmdo Minyag. The influence of Tibetan on cardinal and ordinal numerals, approximate, multiple and fractional numbers is noted as well. Darmdo Minyag has a rich inventory of sortal and mensural classifiers. Shape is the most important feature according to which nouns are categorized. Mensural classifiers may be divided into arrangement classifiers and units of measure. Units of measure are of two types: the first acts as a classifier, the second type is a [noun numeral+classifier] construction. Darmdo Minyag has two types of verbal action classifiers: several verbal action classifiers of unknown origin which modify semantically rich verbs, and numeral-verb combinations which modify a semantically empty verb. The main functions of classifiers are classification and individualization.
Keywords: Darmdo Minyag, Muya, Qiangic, numeral, number, classifier, quantifier
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Numerals of Darmdo Minyag
    • 2.1Cardinal numbers
    • 2.2Ordinals
      • 2.2.1General ordinals
      • 2.2.2Temporal ordinals
    • 2.3Approximate number
    • 2.4Multiple numbers
    • 2.5Fraction numbers
  • 3.Classifiers of Darmdo Minyag
    • 3.1Noun classifiers
      • 3.1.1Sortal classifiers
      • 3.1.2Mensural classifiers
    • 3.2Verbal action classifiers
    • 3.3Quantifiers derived from numeral-classifier compounds
  • 4.Functions of Darmdo Minyag numerals and classifiers
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 11 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.00009.dro
References (39)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers. A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, David. 2001. Counting the family: family group classifiers in Yi (Tibeto-Burman) languages. Anthropological Linguistics 43(1). 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Why do numerals show ‘irregular’ correspondence patterns in Tibeto-Burman? Some Southeastern Tibeto-Burman examples. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 34(2). 221–238.Google Scholar
Bai, Junwei. 2019a. A grammar of Munya. Cairns: James Cook University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2019b. Numeral classifiers in Munya, a Tibeto-Burman language. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Elena I. Mihas (eds.), Genders and classifiers: A cross-linguistic typology, 282–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirkova, Katia. 2009. Shǐxīng, a Sino-Tibetan language of South-West China: a grammatical sketch with two appended texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32(1). 1–89.Google Scholar
Daudey, Henriëtte. 2014. A grammar of Wadu Pumi. Bundoora: La Trobe University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Ding, Picus Sizhi. 2014. A grammar of Prinmi. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. 1997. Anthropological linguistics. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Gao, Yang. 2015. Description de la langue Menya: phonologie et syntaxe. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Gāo, Yáng & Ráo Mǐn 高扬、饶敏. 2016. Mùyǎyǔ dòngcí de rénchēng hòuzhuì 木雅语动词的人称后缀 [The person suffixes of Muya]. Mínzú Yǔwén《民族语文》 [Minority Languages of China] 51. 1–12.Google Scholar
. 2017. Mùyǎyǔ de qūxiàng qiánzhuì 木雅语的趋向前缀 [Orientation prefixes in Muya]. Zhōngyāng Mínzú Dàxué Xuébào《中央民族大学学报》（哲学社会科学） [Journal of Minzu University in China] 441. 158–167.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2018. Le rgyalrong zbu: une langue tibéto-birmane de Chine du Sud-Ouest. Une étude descriptive, typologique et comparative. Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales (INALCO) PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Huáng, Bùfán 黄布凡. 1985. Mùyǎyǔ gàikuàng 木雅语概况 [A brief description of the Muya language]. Mínzú Yǔwén 《民族语文》 [Minority Languages of China] 31. 62–77.Google Scholar
. 1991. Qiāngyǔzhī 羌语支 [The Qiangic branch], In: Mǎ Xuéliáng 马学良 (ed.), Hàn-Zàngyǔ Gàilùn 《汉藏语概论》（上／下） [A general introduction to Sino-Tibetan Languages (2 vols.)], 208–369. Beijing: Beijing University Press 北京大学出版社.Google Scholar
Ikeda, Takumi. 1998. Mùyǎyǔ yǔyīn jiégòu de jǐge wèntí 木雅语语音结构的几个问题 [Some phonological features of modern Mu-nya (Minyak) language]. Studies on the Inner Asian Languages 13(9). 83–91.Google Scholar
. 2002. On pitch accent in the Mu-nya language. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 25(2). 27–45.Google Scholar
. 2004. The Mu-nya language and the Tangut language: Some problems in their comparison. In Ying-chin Lin, Fang-min Hsu, Chun-chih Lee, Jackson T.-S. Sun, Hsiu-fang Yang & Dah-an Ho (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan Languages: Papers in Honor of Professor Hwang-Cherng Gong on his Seventieth Birthday, 383–402. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2006a. 200 Basic words of the Mu-nya language. Zinbun 391. 81–147.Google Scholar
. 2006b. Exploring the Mu-nya people and their language. Zinbun 391. 19–147.Google Scholar
. 2008. 200 example sentences in the Mu-nya language (Tanggu Dialect). Zinbun 40(3). 71–140.Google Scholar
. 2010. Xīxiàyǔ yú Mùyǎyǔ de cúnzài dòngcí 西夏語與木雅語的存在動詞 [Verbs of existence in Tangut and Munya]. In Niè Hóngyīn & Sūn Bǎijūn (eds.) 聂鸿音、孙伯君, Zhōngguó duō wénzì shídài de lìshǐ wénxiàn yánjiū 《中国多文字时代的历史文献研究》 [Research on Historical Records in the Periods of Multiple Scripts], 170–186. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press 社会科学文献出版社.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume & Alexis Michaud. 2011. Approaching the historical phonology of three highly eroded Sino-Tibetan languages: Naxi, Na and Laze. Diachronica 28(4). 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2017. The morphology of numerals and classifiers in Japhug. In Picus S. Ding & Jamin Pelkey (eds.), Sociohistorical linguistics in southeast Asia: New horizons for Tibeto-Burman, studies in honor of David Bradley, 135–148. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kangding County Annals Compiling Committee, Sichuan Province 四川省康定县志编纂委员会编纂. 1995. Kāngdìng xiànzhì《康定县志》 [Kangding County Annals].Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2017. Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. Paris: Université Paris III PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. with Chenglong Huang. 2003. A grammar of Qiang. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liú, Huī Qiáng 刘辉强. 1985. Mùyǎyǔ yánjiū 木雅语研究 [A study of Munya]. In Lǐ Shàomíng & Tóng Ēnzhèng (eds.) 李绍明、童恩正, Yǎlóngjiāng shàngyóu kǎochá bàogào 《雅砻江上游考察报告》 [Report on the Investigations of the Upperstream of Yalong River] (Vol. 21), 83–102. Chengdu: The Research Institute of China’s Southwestern Minorities & the People’s Government of Garzê Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture 中国西南民族研究学会，甘孜藏族自治州人民政府.Google Scholar
Luó, Měizhēn 罗美珍. 1996. Tántán wǒguó mínzú yǔyán de shùliàngcí 谈谈我国民族语言的数量词 [Concerning the numeral classifiers of our country’s minority languages]. Mínzú Yǔwén 《民族语文》 [Minority Languages of China] 21. 26–35.Google Scholar
Prins, Marielle. 2016. A grammar of rGyalrong, Jiǎomùzú (kyom-ko) dialects: a web of relations. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sūn Hóngkāi 孙宏开. 1983. Minority languages of the Six River Valleys and their genetic classification 六江流域的民族语言及其系属分类. Mínzú Xuébào 《民族学报》 [Journal of Nationality Research] 31. 99–274.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai. 1990. Languages of the Ethnic Corridor in Western Sichuan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 13(1). 1–31.Google Scholar
Tashi, Nyima & Hiroyuki Suzuki. 2019. Newly recognised languages in Chamdo: Geography, culture, history, and language. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 42(1). 38–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 2003. A sub-grouping of the Sino-Tibetan languages: the interaction between language contact, change and inheritance. In: Thurgood, Graham & Randy J. LaPolla, The Sino-Tibetan languages, 3–21. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
TBL. Bùfán, Huáng 黄布凡 (ed.), 1992. Zàng-Miǎn yǔzú yǔyán cíhuì 《藏缅语族语言词汇》 [A Tibeto-Burman Lexicon.] Beijing: Central Institute of Nationalities Press 中央民族学院出版社.Google Scholar
Wáng, Liánfēn 王联芬. 1987. Hànyǔ hé Zàngyǔ shùliàngcí de duìbǐ 汉语和藏语数量词的对比 [A comparison of Chinese and Tibetan numeral classifiers]. Mínzú Yǔwén 《民族语文》 [Minority Languages of China] 31. 27–31.Google Scholar
Zhang, Sihon. 2014. Numeral classifiers in Ersu. Language and Linguistics 15(6). 883–915.Google Scholar
Zí Téngjiā 紫藤嘉 & Lǐ Xuéqín 李学琴. 1999. Zàngyǔ de shùliàngcí 藏语的数量词 [Tibetan numeral classifiers]. Xīnán Mínzú Xuéyuàn Xuébào (Zhéxué shèhùi kēxué) 《西南民族学院学报》（哲学社会科学） [Journal of the Southwestern Nationalities College] 81. 25–29.Google Scholar
ZMYYC. 1991. 《藏面语语音和词汇》 Zàng-Miǎnyǔ Yǔyīn hé Cíhuì [A Tibeto-Burman Phonology and Lexicon]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Press 中国社会科学出版社.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Alice, Vittrant & Mouton Léa
2021. Systèmes De Classification Nominale En Asie Du Sud-Est : Les Différentes Fonctions Des Morphèmes Classificatoires. Faits de Langues 52:2 ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.