Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 41:1 (2018) ► pp. 121
Benedict, Paul K.
1942Tibetan and Chinese kinship systems. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 6(3/4): 313–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohannon, Paul & John Middleton
(eds.) 1968Kinship and social organization. Garden City, NJ: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, David
1989Uncles and aunts: Burmese kinship and gender. In Jeremy H. C. S. Davidson (ed.), South-east Asian Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Eugénie J. A. Henderson, 147–161. University of London: SOAS.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & P. Trudgill
1998Dialectology (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, Victor S.
1974Gurung kinship. Kailash 2(4): 273–301.Google Scholar
Dousset, Laurent
2011Understanding human relations (kinship systems). In Nicholas Thieberger (ed.), Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork, 209–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dziebel, German V.
2007The genius of kinship: The phenomenon of human kinship and the global diversity of kinship. Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
Georg, Stephan
1996Marphatan Thakali. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Glover, Warren W., Jessie R. Glover & Dev Bahadur Gurung
1977Gurung-English-Nepali dictionary. Canberra: ANU Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank
2016Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. Available online at http://​glottolog​.org, Accessed on 2016-11-08.
Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
2013Converb and aspect marking polysemy in Nar. In Elena Mihas, Bernard Perley, Gabriel Rei-Doval, & Kathleen Wheatley (eds.), Responses to language endangerment: In honor of Mickey Noonan, 97–117. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Loanwords in Manange, a Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. In Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmoor (eds.), Loanword typology, 447–470. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007aTone in Tibeto-Burman languages: Typological and sociolinguistic approaches. In Matti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), New trends in typology: Young typologists’ contributions to linguistic theory, 67–90. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007bManange [Nyeshangte]. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, 283–300. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005A phonetic analysis of Manange segmental and suprasegmental properties. LTBA 28(1): 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004A grammar and dictionary of the Manange [Nyeshangte] language. In Carol Genetti (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal: Manange [Nyeshangte] and Sherpa, 2–189. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A. & Oliver Bond
2011Negation in Nar. In Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, David Nathan & Lutz Marten (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 31, 141–150. London: SOAS.Google Scholar
2017Manange. In Randy J. LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edition), 516–533. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A., Dubi Nanda Dhakal, Oliver Bond, Matthew Vallejo, & Andrea Fyffe
2015A sociolinguistic survey of the languages of Manang, Nepal: Co-existence and endangerment. Nepal Journal of Indigenous Nationalities 14(6): 106–124.Google Scholar
Hoshi, M.
1986An outline of the Prakaa grammar: A dialect of the Manang language. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Huang, Bufan & Dai, Qingxia
eds. 1992Zangmianyuzu yuyan cihui《藏緬語族語言詞匯 [A Tibeto-Burman lexicon]. Beijing: Central Institute of Minorities. Accessed via STEDT database http://​stedt​.berkeley​.edu​/search/ on 2016-11-08.
Jacques, Guillaume
2012The Tangut kinship system in Qiangic perspective. In Nathan W. Hill (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages IV, 211–258. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levi-Strauss, Claude
1969The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig
(eds.) 2016Ethnologue: Languages of the world (19th edition). Dallas: SIL International. Online version: http://​www​.ethnologue​.com. Accessed on 2016-11-08.
Matisoff, James A.
2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, Martine
1996An outline of the historical phonology of the dialects of Nar-Phu (Nepal). LTBA 19(1): 103–114.Google Scholar
Murdock, George Peter
1968Patterns of sibling terminology. Ethnology 7(1): 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagano, Y.
1984A Manang glossary [Anthropological and Linguistic Studies of the Gandaki Area in Nepal 12]. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Language and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
2003Nar-Phu. In Randy LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 336–352. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011Aspects of the historical development of nominalizers in the Tamangic languages. In Ha Yap Foong, Karen Grunow-Harsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages [Typological Studies in Language 96], 195–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
2017Nar-Phu. In Randy LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edition), 534–556. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pohle, P.
1990Useful plants of Manang District: A contribution to the ethnobotany of the Nepal Himalaya. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham
2017Sino-Tibetan: Genetic and areal subgroups. In Randy LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 3–39. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Toffin, G.
1986Unités de parenté, systèmed’alliance et de presentations chez les Tamang de l’Ouest (Népal). Anthropos 811: 21–45.Google Scholar
Turin, Mark
2008A grammar of the Thangmi language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2001Call me uncle: An outsider’s experience of Nepali kinship. Contributions to Nepalese Studies 28(2): 277–283.Google Scholar
Vinding, Michael
1998The Thakali: A Himalayan ethnography. London: Serindia Publications.Google Scholar
Yadava, Yogendra P.
2014Language use in Nepal. Population Monograph of Nepal Vol. II1, 51–72. Kathmandu: CBS.Google Scholar
Zeitlyn, David
2005Words and processes in Mambila kinship: The theoretical importance of the complexity of everyday life. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Hildebrandt, Kristine A., Oliver Bond & Dubi Nanda Dhakal
2018. Kinship in three Tamangic varieties. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.