Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 43:1 (2020) ► pp. 3754
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2018The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, André
2016Language contact in Upper Mangdep: a comparative grammar of verbal constructions. Sydney: University of Sydney BA thesis.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 371–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 161. 529–564.Google Scholar
van Driem
2007Dakpa and Dzala form a related subgroup within East Bodish, and some related thoughts. In Ronald Bielmeier & Felix Haller (eds.), Linguistics of the Himalayas and beyond, 71–84. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Hann, Ferdinand
1999Evidentiality and epistemic modality: setting boundaries. South-west Journal of Linguistics. 181. 83–102.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
2010Basic linguistic theory, Volume 2: grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren, & Nathan W. Hill
(eds.) 2017Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2012Mirativity does not exist. Linguistic Typology 161. 389–433.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Brian H.
1853Sifan and Horsok vocabularies. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 221. 117–151.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2017A Grammar of Kurtöp. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn, & Karma Tshering
2010Preliminary notes on Dakpa (Tawang Monpa). In Stephen Morey & Mark W. Post (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics 21, 3–21 New Delhi: Cambridge University Press/Foundation. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, & Charles D. Fennig
(eds.) 2017Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Twentieth edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1997Describing Morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, Robert
1954The linguistic position of Dwags. Oriens, Zeitschrift der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Orientforschung 71. 348–356.Google Scholar
1955Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages. Word 21. 94–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
2008Arguments against the concept of ‘Conjunct’ / ‘Disjunct’ in Tibetan. In B. Huber, M. Volkart, P. Widmer, & P. Schwieger (eds), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek. Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281–308. Halle (Saale): International Institue for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy J. LaPolla
2014Towards a new approach to evidentiality: issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. 37(2). 240–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yliniemi, Juha
2018Copulas in Denjongkhe or Sikkimese Bhutia. In Lauren Gawne and Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages, 297–350. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar