Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 42:2 (2019) ► pp. 260279
References

References

Bickel, Balthasar
1999Nominalization and focus constructions in some Kiranti languages. In Yogendra P. Yadava & Warren G. Glover (eds.), Topics in Nepalese Linguistics, 271–296. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981The formation of relative clauses. In B. Lloyd & J. Gay (eds.), Universals of human thought: some African evidence, 215–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 278 ]
1989Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
2002Typology and language acquisition: The case of relative clauses. In Anna Ramat (ed.), Typology and second language acquisition, 19–37. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, & Edward L. Keenan
1979Noun phrase accessibility revisited. Language 55(3): 649–664. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2006Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique, tome 2, la phrase. Paris: Hermes Science Publications.Google Scholar
Delancey, Scott
1999Relativization in Tibetan. In Yogendra P. Yadava & Warren W. Glover (eds.), Topics in Nepalese linguistics, 231–249. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1979Ergativity. Language 55(1): 59–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2005Order of relative clause and noun. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures, 366–367. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007Noun phrase structure. In Timothy Shopen (eds.), Language typology and syntactic description, Second Edition, Volume II: Complex Constructions, 151–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Patrick
2005Grammatical relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A.
1987The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy reinterpreted: Subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis?. Language 63(4): 856–870. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol, Ellen Bartee, Alec Coupe, Kristine Hildebrandt, & You jing Lin
2008Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2): 97–144.Google Scholar
Huang, Chenglong
2008Relativization in Qiang. Language and Linguistics 9(4): 735–768.Google Scholar
Jiang, Li
2015A grammar of Guiqiong: a language of Sichuan. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2016Subjects, objects and relativization in Japhug. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 44(1): 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L., & Bernard Comrie
1977Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1): 63–99.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy
2008aRelative Clause Structures in the Rawang Language. Language and Linguistics 9(4): 797–812.Google Scholar
2008bNominalization in Rawang. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31.2: 45–66.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Daniel N.
1979Strategies of relativization and NP accessibility. Language 55(2): 352–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1997Versatile nominalizations. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman, & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type. Dedicated to T. Givon, 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Nominalizations in Bodic languages. Typological Studies in Language 76: 219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Song, Lingli
2011贵琼语研究 Guiqiongyu yanjiu . 北京:民族出版社 Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
[ p. 279 ]
Sun, Hongkai
1983 Liujiang liuyu de minzu yuyan ji qi xishu fenlei « 六江流域的民族语言及其系属分类 » [Languages in the six valleys and their language branches]. Yunnan Minzuxuebao, « 民族学报» 3: 99–274.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
2003Caodeng rGyalrong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 490–502. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. (孫天心)
2006 Caodeng Jiarongyu de Guanxiju 草登嘉戎語的關係句 [Relatives in Caodeng rGyalrong]. Yuyan ji Yuyanxue 語言暨語言學 [Language and Linguistics] 7(4): 905–933.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Danluo Shi
2002Caodeng Jiarongyu yu rentong dengdi xiangguan de yufa xianxiang [Caodeng Rgyalrong and grammatical phenomena related to the Empathy Hierarchy]. Language and Linguistics 3(1): 79–99.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert & Randy LaPolla
1997Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vries, Mark de
2001Patterns of relative clauses. In Ton van der Wouden & Hans Broekhuis (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001, 231–243. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
2002The Syntax of relativization. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Wu, Tong
2011The syntax of prenominal relative clauses: A typological study. Linguistic Typology 15(3): 569–623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2006Deixis and alignment. Inverse systems in indigenous languages of the Americas (Typological Studies in Language 70). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar