Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 41:1 (2018) ► pp. 106127
References

References

Amsterdamska, Olga
1987Schools of Thought: The Development of Linguistics from Bopp to Saussure. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bässler, Paul
1884Klaproth (Martin Heinrich). In Johann Samuel Ersch und Johann Gottfried Gruber (eds.), Allgemeine Encyclopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste, Zweite Sektion, 36. Band, 360–361. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Bayer, Theophilus Sigefridus
1730Mvsevm Sinicvm, In quo Sinicae Linguae et Literaturae ratio explicatur (two vols.). Petropoli [St. Petersburg]: Typographia Academiae Imperatoriae.Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav, a Michal Kovář
2013Z historie uralistiky: pionýrské období (9. stol. – 1850). Linguistica Brunensia 61 (1–2): 273–292.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert
2009The Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bodman, Nicholas Cleaveland
1973Some Chinese reflexes of Sino-Tibetan s- clusters. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1 (3): 383–396.Google Scholar
[ p. 122 ]
1980Proto-Chinese and Sino-Tibetan: data towards establishing the nature of the relationship. In Frans van Coetsem and Linda R. Waugh (eds.), Contributions to Historical Linguistics: Issues and Materials. 34–199. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
van Boxhorn, Marcus Zuerius
1647aBediedinge van de tot noch toe onbekende Afgodinne Nehalennia, over de duſent ende ettelicke hondert Jaren onder het ſandt begraven, dan onlancx ontdeckt op het ſtrandt van VValcheren in Zeelandt. Leyden: Willem Christiaens van der Boxe.Google Scholar
1647bVraagen voorgheſtelt ende Opghedraaghen aan de Heer Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn over de Bediedinge van de tot noch toe onbekende Afgodinne Nehalennia, onlangs by Hem uytgegeven. Leyden: Willem Christiaens van der Boxe.Google Scholar
1647cAntwoord van Marcus Zuerius van Boxhorn op de Vraaghen, hem voorgeſtelt over de Bediedinge van de tot noch toe onbekende Afgodinne Nehalennia, onlancx uytgegeven. In welcke de ghemeine herkomſte van der Griecken, Romeinen, ende Duytſchen Tale uyt den Scythen duydelijck beweſen, ende verſcheiden Oudheden van deſe Volckeren grondelijck ontdeckt ende verklaert. Leyden: Willem Christiaens van der Boxe.Google Scholar
1662 [posthumous]. V.Cl. Marci Zuerii Boxhornii Epistolæ & Poemata. Amstelodami [i.e. Amsterdam]: Ex Officinâ Caſpari Comelini.Google Scholar
Bradley, David
1997Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman Languages of the Himalayas, Pacific Linguistics A-86, 1–71. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
2002The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Christopher Beckwith (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman Languages, 73–112. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bryson, Megan
2012Mahākāla worship in the Dali kingdom (937–1253): A study and translation of the Dahei tianshen daochang yi . Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 35 (1–2): 3–69.Google Scholar
2017Between China and Tibet: Mahākāla worship and esoteric Buddhism in the Dali kingdom. In Yael Bentor and Meir Shahar (eds.), Chinese and Tibetan Esoteric Buddhism, 402–428. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Burnett, James, Lord Monboddo
1774Of the Origin and Progress of Language, Vol. I (Second Edition). Edinburgh: J. Balfour.Google Scholar
Campbell, Archibald
1840Note on the Limboos, and other Hill Tribes hitherto undescribed. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal IX (CII), Part I: 595–615.Google Scholar
Castrén, Matthias Alexander
1850De Affixis Personalibus Linguarum Altaicarum (Dissertatio). Helsingforsiae: Litteris Frenckelianis.Google Scholar
Cordier, Henri
1917Un orientaliste allemand: Jules Klaproth. Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 61 (4): 297–308.Google Scholar
Cust, Robert N.
1878A Sketch of the Modern Languages of East India. London: Trübner and Company.Google Scholar
Dahl, Otto Christian
1951Malgache et maanyan: une comparaison linquistique [Avhandlinger utgitt av Instituttet, 3]. Oslo: Egede Instituttet.Google Scholar
Dann, Georg Edmund
1958Martin Heinrich Klaproth, ein deutscher Apotheker und Chemiker: sein Weg und seine Leistung. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
1977Klaproth, Martin Heinrich. In Fritz Wagner et al. (eds.), Neue Deutsche Biographie, Vol. XI, 707–709. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
[ p. 123 ]
DeLancey, Scott
forthcoming. The comparative method, subgrouping and the antiquity of verb agreement in Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan).
van Driem, George
1991Tangut verbal agreement and the patient category in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies LIV (3): 520–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993aA Grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993bLanguage change, conjugational morphology and the Sino-Tibetan Urheimat . Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 26: 45–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Sino-Bodic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, LX (3): 455–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region, containing an Introduction to the Symbiotic Theory of Language (2 vols.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2002Tibeto-Burman replaces Indo-Chinese in the 1990s: Review of a decade of scholarship. Lingua 111: 79–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Sino-Austronesian vs. Sino-Caucasian, Sino-Bodic vs. Sino-Tibetan, and Tibeto-Burman as default theory. In Yogendra Prasada Yadava, Govinda Bhattarai, Ram Raj Lohani, Balaram Prasain and Krishna Parajuli (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Nepalese Linguistics, 285–338 Kathmandu: Linguistic Society of Nepal.Google Scholar
2007The diversity of the Tibeto-Burman language family and the linguistic ancestry of Chinese. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 1 (2): 211–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Tibeto-Burman subgroups and historical grammar. Himalayan Linguistics 10 (1): 31–39.Google Scholar
2014Trans-Himalayan. In Thomas Owen-Smith and Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, 11–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2017Converging views on Asian prehistory from different windows on the past. Man In India 97 (1): 5–16.Google Scholar
Eyriès, Jean-Baptiste Benoît
1857Klaproth (Jules-Henri), orientaliste célèbre. In Louis-Gabriel Michaud (ed.), Biographie universelle ancienne et moderne (nouvelle édition), Vol. 22, 1–11. Paris: Madame C. Desplaces.Google Scholar
Forbes Charles, James F. S.
1878On Tibeto-Burman languages. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 10: 210–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von der Gabelentz, Georg
1884Klaproth (Heinrich Julius). In Johann Samuel Ersch und Johann Gottfried Gruber (eds.), Allgemeine Encyclopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste, Zweite Sektion, 36. Band, 359–360. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Handel, Zev
2008Sino-Tibetan: A snapshot. Language and Linguistics Compass 2/3: 422–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hedin, Sven Anders
1909Transhimalaya: Upptäckter och äfventyr i Tibet (three vols.). Stockholm: Albert Bonniers Förlag.Google Scholar
1909Transhimalaja: Entdeckungen und Abenteuer in Tibet (three vols.). Leipzig: Friedrich Arnold Brockhaus.Google Scholar
1909Trans-Himalaya: Discoveries and Adventures in Tibet (two vols.). London: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
[ p. 124 ]
Hill, Nathan Wayne
2013Come as Lord of the Black-Headed. In Christoph Cüppers, Robert Mayer and Michael Walter (eds.), Tibet after Empire: Culture, Society and Religion between 850–1000 (Lumbini International Research Institute Proceedings Series, Volume 4: Proceedings of the seminar held in Lumbini, Nepal, March 2011), 169–179. Lumbini: Lumbini International Research Institute.Google Scholar
2015The contribution of Tangut to Trans-Himalayan comparative linguistics. Archiv Orientální 83: 187–200.Google Scholar
forthcoming. Word families, allofams and the comparative method.
Hodgson, Brian Houghton
1857Comparative vocabulary of the languages of the broken tribes of Népál. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 26: 317–371.Google Scholar
Houghton, Bernard
1896Outlines of Tibeto-Burman linguistic palæontology. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 1896: 23–55.Google Scholar
de Houtman, Frederick
1603Spraeck ende woord-boeck, Inde Maleyſche ende Madagaſkarsche Talen met vele Arabiſche ende Turcſche Woorden: Inhoudende twaelf tſamenſprekinghen inde Maleyſche ende drie inde Madagaſkarſche ſpraken met alderhande woorden ende namen, gheſtelt naer ordre vanden A.B.C. alles int Nederduytſch verduyſst. Amsterdam: Jan Evertsz. Cloppenburch.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2014Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2016Tangut, Gyalrongic, Kiranti and the nature of person indexation in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan. Linguistics Vanguard. ISSN (online) 2199–174X, Crossref, May 2016.Google Scholar
2017Genetic position of Chinese. In Rint Sybesma, et al. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, Vol. II, 297–306. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jones, William
1807a [1786]The third anniversary discourse, on the Hindus, delivered 2 February, 1786. In John Shore, Lord Teignmouth (ed.), The Works of Sir William Jones, Vol. III, 24–46. London: John Stockdale.Google Scholar
1807b [1792]The ninth anniversary discourse, on the origin and families of nations, delivered 23 February, 1792. In John Shore, Lord Teignmouth (ed.), The Works of Sir William Jones, Vol. III, 185–204. London: John Stockdale.Google Scholar
1807c [1793]The tenth anniversary discourse, on Asiatick history, civil and natural, delivered 28 February, 1793. In John Shore, Lord Teignmouth (ed.), The Works of Sir William Jones, Vol. III, 205–228. London: John Stockdale.Google Scholar
ten Kate, Lambert Hermansz
1699Verhandeling over de Klankkunde [manuscript formerly kept in the library of the Athenaeum Illustre on the Oudezijds Voorburgwal, which was transformed into the gemeentelijke universiteit van Amsterdam in the second half of the 19th century, currently Universiteit van Amsterdam, and the contents of which were later largely incorporated into ten Kate (1723)].Google Scholar
1710Gemeenſchap tuſſchen de Gottiſche Spraeke en de Nederduytſche. Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar
1723Aanleiding tot de Kenniſſe van het Verhevene Deel der Nederduitſche Sprake. Amsterdam: Rudolph en Gerard Wetstein.Google Scholar
Kepping, Ksenija Borisovna
1994The conjugation of the Tangut verb. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies LVII (2): 339–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 [posthumously]. The black-headed and the red-faced in Tangut indigenous texts. Studia Orientalia 95: 275–298.Google Scholar
[ p. 125 ]
von Klaproth, Julius
1802Aſiatiſches Magazin (two vols.). Weimar: im Verlage des Induſtrie-Comptoirs.Google Scholar
1822Sur la langue des indigènes de l’Île de Formose. Journal Asiatique I: 193–202.Google Scholar
1823Asia Polyglotta [the first volume includes the separate instalment « Leben des Budd‛a nach mongolischen Nachrichten » on pp. 121–144 following p. 384, and the rarer second volume contains an atlas and diagrams]. Paris: J. M. Eberhart.Google Scholar
1830Réponse à quelques passages de la préface du roman chinois intitule: Hao khieou tchhouan, traduit par M. J. F. Davis. Journal Asiatique V: 112–113.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Ernst
1883Ueber Herkunft und Sprache der transgangetischen Völker. Festrede zur Vorfeier des Allerhöchsten Geburts- und Namensfestes Seiner Majestät des Königs Ludwig II., gehalten in der öffentlichen Sitzung der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München am 25. Juli 1881. München: Verlag der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie.Google Scholar
1889Beiträge zur Sprachenkunde Hinterindiens (Sitzung vom 2. März 1889). Sitzungsberichte der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (München), Philosophisch-philologische Classe II: 189–236.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Franz Felix Adalbert
1845Zur ältesten Geschichte der indogermanischen Völker. Berlin: Nauck.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas Samuel
1970The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (second edition, enlarged). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy John
1992On the dating and nature of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies LV (2): 298–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Parallel grammaticalizations in Tibeto-Burman: Evidence of Sapir’s “drift”. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 17 (1): 61–80.Google Scholar
2001The role of migration and language contact in the development of the Sino-Tibetan language family. In Robert Malcolm Ward Dixon and Alexandra Yurievna Aikhenvald (eds.), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Case Studies in Language Change, 225–254. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012aComments on methodology and evidence in Sino-Tibetan comparative linguistics. Language and Linguistics 13 (1): 117–132.Google Scholar
2012bOnce again on person-marking in Tibeto-Burman: A reply to DeLancey 2010. Unpublished paper presented at the 45th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 26 October 2010.
2013Subgrouping in Tibeto-Burman: Can an individual-identifying standard be developed? How do we factor in the history of migrations and language contact? In Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson and Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language Typology and Historical Contingency, 463–474. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Once again on methodology and argumentation in linguistics: Problems with the arguments for recasting Sino-Tibetan as “Trans-Himalayan”. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 39 (2): 282–297.Google Scholar
Lepsius, Carl Richard
1861Über die Umschrift und Lautverhältnisse einiger hinterasiatischer Sprachen, namentlich der Chinesischen und der Tibetischen. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, aus dem Jahre 1860: 449–496.Google Scholar
[ p. 126 ]
Lessing, Ferdinand Diedrich, and Mattai Haltod, John Gombojab Hangin and Serge Kassatkin
1960Mongolian-English Dictionary. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Malte-Brun, Conrad, Pierre Lapie et Jean-Baptiste Poirson
1810Précis de la géographie universelle, ou description de toutes les parties du monde sur un plan nouveau, d’après les grandes divisions naturelles du globe: Collection de cartes géographiques dirigées par M. Malte-Brun, dressées par MM. Lapie et Poirson (eight vols.). Paris: François Buisson.Google Scholar
Malte-Brun, Conrad
1832 [posthumous]. Précis de la géographie universelle, ou description de toutes les parties du monde sur un plan nouveau, d’après les grandes divisions naturelles du globe: Nouvelle édition, revue, corrigée, mise dans un nouvel ordre et augmentée de toutes les nouvelles découvertes par J. J. N. Huot (six vols.). Bruxelles: Th. Lejeune.Google Scholar
Melnick, Alison, and Christopher Bell
Michailovsky, Boyd
1981Grammaire de la langue Hayu (Népal). University of California at Berkeley: Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
1988La langue hayu (Collection «Sciences du Langage»). Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Muniev, B. D.
(ed.) 1977Калмыцко-русский словарь [Kalmycko-russkij slovar’]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Russkij Jazyk.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen O.
1980Gatekeepers and the Chomskian revolution. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, XVI (1): 73–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Theory Groups and the Study of Language in North America: A Social History. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Friedrich Max
1872Über die Resultate der Sprachwissenschaft: Vorlesung gehalten in der kaiserlichen Universitæt zu Strassburg am XXIII. Mai MDCCCLXXII. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner, und London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Naundorf, Gert
1977Klaproth, Heinrich Julius. In Fritz Wagner et al. (eds.), Neue Deutsche Biographie, Vol. XI, 706–707. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Pictet, Adolphe
1859, 1863Les origines indo-européennes ou les aryas primitifs: Essai de paléontologie linguistique (première partie, seconde partie). Paris: Joël Cherbuliez.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, Gustaf John
1935Kalmückisches Wörterbuch. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
1957 [posthumous]. Einführung in die altaische Sprachwissenschaft: Lautlehre [Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia, Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne, 104, 1]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seura.Google Scholar
Relandus, Hadrianus [i.e Adriaan van Reeland
] 1706, 1707, 1708Dissertationum Miscellanearum, Pars Prima, Pars Altera, Pars Tertia et Ultima. Trajecti ad Rhenum (i.e. Alphen aan den Rijn): Gulielmus Broedelet (esp. Pars Tertia et Ultima, Chapter XI “Dissertatio de linguis insularum quarundam orientalium”).Google Scholar
Ritter von Xylander, Joseph
1835Die Sprache der Albanesen oder Schkipetaren. Frankfurt am Main: die Andreäische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Salmasius, Claudius
1643De Hellenistica commentarius, controversiam De Lingua Hellenistica decidens, & plenissimè pertractans Originem & Dialectos græcæ Linguæ. Leiden: Elseviers.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1925Les Langues du Monde, par un groupe de linguistes sous la direction de A. MEILLET et MARCEL COHEN (Collection Linguistique publiée par la Société Linguistique de Paris, XVI; Paris, Librairie Ancienne Edouard Champion, 1924. 811 pp., 18 plates of maps). Modern Language Notes XL (6): 373–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 127 ]
Schmidt, Wilhelm
1904Grundzüge einer Lautlehre der Khasi-Sprache in ihren Beziehungen zu derjenigen der Mon-Khmer-Sprachen, mit einem Anhang: Die Palaung-, Wa- und Riang-Sprachen der mittleren Salwin. München: Kaiserliche Akademie.Google Scholar
von Siebold, Philipp Franz Balthazar
1832aVerhandeling over de afkomst der Japanners. Verhandelingen van het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen 13: 183–275.Google Scholar
1832bNippon: Archiv zur Beschreibung von Japan (four vols.). Leyden: ausgegeben unter dem Schutze Seiner Majestät des Königs der Niederlande bei dem Verfasser.Google Scholar
Simon, Walter
1929Tibetisch-chinesische Wortgleichungen, ein Versuch. Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen an der Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Berlin XXXII (1): 157–228.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergej Anatol’evič
1994The reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti. Paper presented at the 27ème Congrès International sur les Langues et la Linguistique Sino-Tibétaines, Centre International d’Études Pédagogiques, Sèvres, 14 octobre 1994.
Walravens, Hartmut
1999Julius Klaproth (1783–1835): Leben und Werk. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2002Julius Klaproth (1783–1835): Briefwechsel mit Gelehrten, großenteils aus dem Akademiearchiv in St. Petersburg. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2006Julius Klaproth: His life and works with special emphasis on Japan. Japonica Humboldtiana 10: 177–191.Google Scholar
Witsen, Nicolaes
1692Noord en Oost Tartarye, ofte Bondigh Ontwerp van Eenige dier Landen, en Volken, zo als voormaels bekent zyn geweeſt, Beneffens Verſcheide tot noch toe onbekende, en meeſt noit voorheen beſchreve Tarterſche en nabeurige geweſten, lantſtreken, ſteden, rivieren, en plaetzen, in de Noorder en Oosterlykste Gedeelten van Asia en Europa (2 vols.). Amsterdam: François Halma.Google Scholar