Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 44:1 (2021) ► pp. 75112
References

References

Bajaj, Vandana
2014 hii at the semantic-pragmatic interface. Retrieved from http://​citeseerx​.ist​.psu​.edu​/viewdoc​/download​?doi​=10​.1​.1​.657​.1352​&rep​=rep1​&type​=pdf (Last accessed on February 28, 2019).
Basumatary, Prafulla
2017Verbal semantics in a Tibeto-Burman language: The Bodo verb. Oxford: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, Pramod Ch
1977A descriptive analysis of the Boro language. Guwahati: Guwahati University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, David M.
1998Cancellative discourse markers: a core/periphery approach. Pragmatics 8(4).515–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Nevertheless, still and yet: Concessive cancellative discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 421.1912–1927. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breugel, Seino van
2008A grammar of Atong. Melbourne: Research Center for Linguistic Typology, La Trobe University, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
1999Topic. In P. Rosch & R. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives, 142–165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2016(Contrastive) Topic. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure, 64–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins & U. V. Joseph
2009Boro tones. In Stephen D. Morey & Mark W. Post (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics 2, 45–58. Foundation Books. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Das, Kalyan & Shakuntala Mahanta
2018Distribution of lexical tones in Boro. Himalayan Linguistics 17(2).52–76.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon, Maria E. Hoffmann, Jan R. de Jong, Sie Ing Djiang, Harry Stroomer & Lourens de Vries
1981On the typology of focus phenomena. In T. Hoekstra, H. Van der Hulst & M. Moortgat (eds.), Perspectives on functional grammar, 41–74. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Endle, Sidney
1884Outline grammar of the Kachari (Boro) language as spoken in the district of Darrang, Assam. Shillong: Assam Secretariat Press.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana
2016Towards a typology for additive markers. Lingua 1801.69–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1990An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 141.383–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 311.931–952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker & Johan van der Auwera
2011Scalar additive operators in the languages of Europe. Language 87(1).2–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, G. C. & Jyotiprakash Tamuli
2003Asamiya. In D. Jain & G. Cardona (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 391–443. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2007Coordination. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 1–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Brian H.
1847On the aborigines of India. Essay the first: on the Kocch, Bodo, and Dhimal tribes. Kolkata: J. Thomas, Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
Imai, Takashi
1981On enclitic hi: in Hindi. Indian Linguistics 42(1/4).48–57.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko N.
2008Contrast, concessive, and corrective: Toward a comprehensive study of opposition relations. Journal of Pragmatics 401.646–675. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, F. & Lauri Karttunen
1977Even questions. In J. A. Kegl & A. Zaenen (eds.), North Eastern Linguistic Society no. 7, 115–134. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. Retrieved from http://​web​.stanford​.edu​/~laurik​/publications​/archive​/even​.pdf (Last accessed on January, 2021).
Karttunen, Lauri & Stanley Peters
1979Conventional implicature. In Ch. Oh & D. A. Dinnen (eds.), Syntax and semantics 11: Presupposition, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul
1990Even. Linguistics and Philosophy 13(1).59–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Konnerth, Linda
2014aAdditive focus and additional functions of Karbi (Tibeto-Burman) =tā . In K. Carpenter, O. David, F. Lionnet, Ch. Sheil, T. Stark & V. Wauters (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, California, 11–12 February 2012, 206–222. Berkeley: eLanguage (Linguistic Society of America).Google Scholar
2014bA grammar of Karbi. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Kӧnig, Ekkehard
1991The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1998Additive particles under stress. In D. Strolovitch & A. Lawson (eds.), Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 8, 111–129. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Lee, Chungmin
2003Contrastive topic and/or contrastive focus. In B. McClure (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics 121, 352–364. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Matic, Dejan
2015Tag questions and focus markers: Evidence from the Tompo dialect of Even. In M. M. J. Fernandez-Vest & R. D. van Valin (eds.), Information structuring of spoken language from cross-linguistic perspective, 167–190. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ozerov, Pavel, & Henriëtte Daudey
2017Copy-verb constructions in Tibeto-Burman and beyond. Linguistic Typology 21(1).53–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W.
2007A grammar of Galo. Melbourne: Research Center for Linguistic Typology, La Trobe University, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats E.
1985Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Unpublished PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
1992A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 11.75–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sarmah, Priyankoo
2004Some aspects of the tonal phonology of Bodo. Hyderabad: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages MPhil dissertation.Google Scholar
Skrefsrud, Lars O.
1889A short grammar of the Mech or Boro language, together with a small vocabulary. Ebenezer: Indian Home Mission’s Press.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watters, John
1979Focus in Aghem: A study of its formal correlates and typology. In L. M. Hyman (ed.), Aghem grammatical structure vol 1, 137–197. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar