Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 43:1 (2020) ► pp.2–18

‘Pour out libation to all the gods!’

Exhaustive constructions in Northern Prinmi ritual speech

| La Trobe University
| Lijiang Pumi Research Association
Ritual speech in many languages around the world shows grammar distinct from grammar used in daily speech. In Northern Prinmi ritual speech we found a significant use of two exhaustive constructions, one of which is not attested in daily speech; the other is only minimally attested. We argue that exhaustive constructions are strong expressions of the utmost degree which makes them particularly useful to the serious occasions in which ritual speech is used, such as when pronouncing blessings or invoking the gods. We also discuss two possible grammaticalization pathways, but find no conclusive evidence for either.
Keywords: Tibeto-Burman, Qiangic, Prinmi, Pumi, ritual speech, exhaustive construction, universal quantification, grammaticalization, dialectal variation, speaker-dependent variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Exhaustive construction #1
  • 3.Exhaustive construction #2
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 28 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.19011.dau
References (19)
References
Allen, Nicholas J. 1978. Sewala puja bintila puja: Notes on Thulung ritual language. Kailash 6(4). 237–256.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1981. Differences between colloquial and ritual Seneca and how oral literature is literary. In Alice Schlichter, Wallace L. Chafe & Leanne Hinton (eds.), Reports from the survey of California and other Indian languages, Report #1, 131–145.Google Scholar
Daudey, Henriëtte. 2014a. Volition and control in Wǎdū Pǔmǐ. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1). 75–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. A grammar of Wadu Pumi. La Trobe University: Unpublished PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Daudey, Henriëtte & Gerong Pincuo. 2018. Documentation of Northern Prinmi oral art, with a special focus on ritual speech. London: SOAS, Endangered Languages Archive. URL: [URL]
Ding, Picus Sizhi. 2014. A grammar of Prinmi, based on the central dialect of northwest Yúnnán, China. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Language endangerment and loss of traditional knowledge: The case of Prinmi. In Picus Sizhi Ding & Jamin Pelkey (eds.), Sociohistorical linguistics in Southeast Asia: New horizons for Tibeto-Burman studies in honor of David Bradley, 53–73. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. 1997. Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Gaenszle, Martin. 2002. Ancestral voices: Oral ritual texts and their social contexts among the Mewahang Rai in East Nepal. Münster: Lit.Google Scholar
Gaenszle, Martin, Balthasar Bickel, Goma Banjade, Elena Lieven, Netra Paudyal, Ichchha Rai, Manoj Rai, Novel Kishore Rai & Sabine Stoll. 2005. Worshiping the King God: A preliminary analysis of Chintang ritual language in the onvocation of Rajdeo. In Yogendra P. Yadava (ed.), Contemporary issues in Nepalese linguistics, 33–47. Kathmandu: Linguistic Society of Nepal.Google Scholar
Gaenszle, Martin, Balthasar Bickel, Narayan P. Sharma, Judith Pettigrew, Arjun Rai, Shree Kumar Rai, & Diana Schackow. 2011. Binomials and the noun-to-verb ratio in Puma Rai ritual speech. Anthropological Linguistics 53(4). 365–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerong Pincuo & Henriëtte Daudey. 2013. Too much loving-kindness to repay: Funeral speeches of the Wenquan Pumi. Asian Highlands Perspectives 281. 81–128.Google Scholar
Hansson, Inga-Lill. 1991. The language of Akha ritual texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 7(1). 63–115.Google Scholar
. 2013. Grammatical aesthetics of ritual texts in Akha. In Jeffrey P. Williams (ed.), The aesthetics of grammar: Sound and meaning in the languages of Mainland Southeast Asia, 280–288. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2016. Complementation in Japhug. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 39(2). 222–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee Wen-Yao 李文窈. 2014. Jiā de gǔ, rén de gēn: Zhōngguó Diān xīběi Yǒngníng Pǔmǐzúrén yánxù zài dìjǐng shang de rénqún gòuchéng 《家的骨，人的根：中國滇西北永寧普米族人延續在地景上的人群構成》 Bone of the house, root of the people: The sociality and landscape of the Pumi speaking people of Yong-ning in Southwestern China. Táiwān: National Táiwān University 國立臺灣大學 MA thesis.Google Scholar
Ozerov, Pavel & Henriëtte Daudey. 2017. Copy-verb constructions in Tibeto-Burman and beyond. Linguistic Typology 21(1). 53–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rai, Ichchha Purna, Balthasar Bickel, Elena Lieven, Goma Banjade, Martin Gaenszle, Manoj Rai, Netra Prasad Paudyal, Novel Kishore Rai, Sabine Stoll & Toya Nath Bhatta. 2009. Mundun: A case study of Chintang ritual language. In R. Mukherjee & M. N. Rajesh (eds.), Locality, history, memory: the making of the citizen in South Asia, 20–33. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Walker, Anthony R. 1980. “Kh’awv k’ov ve”: A Lahu Nyi (Red Lahu) rite of spirit exorcism. Oriens Extremus 27(2). 227–248.Google Scholar