Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 43:1 (2020) ► pp. 147189
References

References

Benedict, Paul K.
1972Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bielenberg, Brian & Zhalie Nienu
2001Chokri (Phek dialect): Phonetics, phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24.(2). 85–122.Google Scholar
Bouchery, Pascal & Lemlila Sangtam
2012The Kinship terminology of the Sangtam Nagas. European Bulletin of Himalayan Research 41. 9–29.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Daniel Wayne
2014A phonological construction of Proto-Central Naga. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins
1999On “Kamarupan”. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 22.(2). 169–171.Google Scholar
2003The Tibeto-Burman languages of northeastern India. In Thurgood, Graham and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 169–191.Google Scholar
Clark, Mary Mead
[1893] 2002The Ao-Naga grammar. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.Google Scholar
Chao, Y.
1930A system of “tone-letters”. Le Maître Phonetique 30. 24–27.Google Scholar
Coupe, Alexander R.
2003A phonetic and phonological description of Ao: a Tibeto-Burman language of Nagaland, north-east India. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2007aA grammar of Mongsen Ao. Mouton Grammar Library 39. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007bConverging patterns of clause linkage in Nagaland. In Matti Miestamo & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), New challenges in typology: Broadening the horizons and redefining the foundations. [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 189], 339–361. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
[ p. 187 ]
(ed.) 2008Special issue on nominalization in Tibeto-Burman, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area Vol. 31.(2).Google Scholar
2011On core case marking patterns in two Tibeto-Burman languages of Nagaland. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34.(2). 21–47.Google Scholar
2012Overcounting numeral systems and their relevance to sub- grouping in the Tibeto-Burman languages of Nagaland. Language and Linguistics 13.(1). 193–220.Google Scholar
2013Phonological peculiarities of Sangtam: A preliminary investigation. Paper read at the 19th Himalayan Languages Symposium, The Australian National University, Canberra 6–7 September.
2014Strategies for analyzing tone languages. Language Documentation & Conservation 8: 462–489. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10125​/2461
2015Pre-stopped bilabial trills in Sangtam. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow. ISBN 978-0-85261-941-4. Paper no. 0734. 1–5.Google Scholar
2017Mongsen Ao. In Thurgood, Graham & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd Edn., 277–301. Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, & Charles D. Fennig
(eds.) 2019Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Twenty-second edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online edition: http://​www​.ethnologue​.com. Accessed 13/06/2019.
Everett, Daniel L. & Barbara Kern
1997Wari’. Routledge: London & New York.Google Scholar
Grierson, George Abraham
(ed.) 1967 Reprint. Linguistic survey of India. Vol 3, Part 2. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Series first published 1903–1928.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, André-Georges
1954De l’origine des tons en vietnamien. Journal Asiatique 242. 69–82.Google Scholar
Hutton, John Henry
1921The Angami Nagas, with some notes on neighbouring tribes. London: MacMillan and Co.Google Scholar
1986Reprint. Diaries of two tours in the unadministered area, east of the Naga Hills. Memoirs of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. 11, No. 1. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal. Delhi: Mittal Publications. First published 1929.Google Scholar
Imchen
2014Linguistic ecology of Sangtam. In War, J. and S. K. Singh and S. A. Lyngdoh & B. Khyriem (eds.), Tibeto-Burman linguistics of North-East India, 54–75. Guwahati: EBH Publishers.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle
1956Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, H. E.
1939Kurze Ethnographie der nördlichen Sangtam-Naga (Lophomi), Assam. Anthropos 34. 207–245.Google Scholar
Kumar, Braj Bihari
1973Hindi-Sangtam dictionary. Kohima: Nagaland Bhasha Parishad.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson
1996The sounds of the world’s languages. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Daniel Everett
1996The status of phonetic rarities. Language 72.(4). 794–800. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
1994Parallel grammaticalizations in the Tibeto-Burman languages: evidence of Sapir’s ‘drift’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 17(1). 61–80.Google Scholar
MacEachern, M. R., Kern, B., Ladefoged, P.
1997Wari’ phonetic structures. Journal of Amazonian Languages 1(1). 3–28.Google Scholar
[ p. 188 ]
Maddieson, Ian
2013Consonant inventories. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/1, Accessed on 2019-09-13.)
Marrison, Geoffrey Edward
1967The classification of the Naga languages of north-east India, Volume 1 (Text). Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1973Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Larry M. Hyman (ed.), Consonant types and tone, 71–95. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics No. 1. Los Angeles: Linguistics Program of the University of Southern California.Google Scholar
1989The bulging monosyllable, or the mora the merrier: Echo-vowel adverbialization in Lahu. In J. Davidson (ed.), South-East Asian Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Eugenie J. A. Henderson, 163–97. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
1991Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Present state and future prospects. Annual Review of Anthropology 20: 469–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999In defense of Kamarupan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 22(2). 173–182.Google Scholar
2003Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mills, John P.
1922The Lotha Nagas. London: MacMillan & Co.Google Scholar
1926The Ao Nagas. London: MacMillan & Co.Google Scholar
No author
2016Yusüp: Bilingual dictionary of Sangtam Naga. Dimapur, Nagaland: Sangtam Literature Board.Google Scholar
Reid, Robert
1942History of the frontier areas bordering on Assam, from 1883–1942. Shillong: Assam Government Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, Rodney
2011Nasal vowel evolution in Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Orlando FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Temsunungsang, T.
2009Aspects of the prosodic phonology of Ao: An inter-dialectal study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
Teo, Amos
2014A phonological and phonetic description of Sumi, a Tibeto-Burman language of Nagaland. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Weidert, Alfons
1987Tibeto-Burman tonology: A comparative account. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Witter, W. E.
1888Outline grammar of the Lhōtā Nāgā language: With a vocabulary and illustrative sentences. Calcutta: Supt. of Govt. Print.Google Scholar
Wolfenden, Stuart Norris
1929Outlines of Tibeto-Burman linguistic morphology. London: Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
[ p. 189 ]
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Evans, Jonathan P. & Johakso Manyu
2021. The sounds of Tawrã (Digaru-Mishmi), a Tibeto-Burman language. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 44:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.