Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 45:2 (2022) ► pp.171–210

Bayesian phylogenetics illuminate shallower relationships among Trans-Himalayan languages in the Tibet-Arunachal area

| Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
| SOAS University of London
| Uppsala University

Kho-Bwa, Hrusish, Mishmic, Tani, and Tshangla are language clusters that have been recurrently proposed as subgroups of the Trans-Himalayan (also known as Tibeto-Burman and Sino-Tibetan) language family. Nonetheless, their internal classification, as well as the relation with each other and with other linguistic groups in the family, is hitherto unresolved. We use lexical data on these groups and dated phylogenies to investigate such internal classifications. We base our examination on previous research into the language family in the Tibet-Arunachal area, and follow a computer-assisted approach of language comparison to perform Bayesian phylolinguistic analysis. As earlier phylogenetic studies on this family included little data related to this geographic area, we took a subset of the best available dataset and extended it with vocabularies for the Kho-Bwa and Hrusish clusters, also including one Mishmic, two Tani, two Tshangla, and five East Bodish languages to cover the major languages and linguistic subgroups neighboring these clusters. Our results shed light on the internal and external classification of the Kho-Bwa, Hrusish and Bodish languages, and allow us to share valuable experience on the extent to which similar approaches can be applied to the phylogenetic analysis of the Trans-Himalayan language family.

Keywords: Tibeto-Arunachal, Trans-Himalayan, Bayesian phylogenetic analysis, language classification, historical linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Languages of Arunachal Pradesh and Tibet
  • 3.Material and methods
    • 3.1Lexical data
      • 3.1.1Kho-Bwa
      • 3.1.2Hrusish
      • 3.1.3Tshangla
      • 3.1.4Bodish
      • 3.1.5Tani and Mishmic
    • 3.2Concept selection
    • 3.3Cognate judgments
    • 3.4Loanword handling
    • 3.5Bayesian phylogenetic analysis
    • 3.6The workflow
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Findings and interpretations
    • 5.2Interpretation about the internal structure of Kho-Bwa and Hrusish
    • 5.3The undetermined position of Tshangla
    • 5.4Limitations
      • 5.4.1Issues related to word compounding
      • 5.4.2Issues related to cross-semantic cognates
      • 5.4.3Issues about sampling bias
      • 5.4.4Insufficient archaeological and population genetic evidence
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.21019.wu
References
Abraham, Binny, Kara Sako, Elina Kinny & Isapdaile Zeliang
2018 [2005] Sociolinguistic research among selected groups in Western Arunachal Pradesh: Highlighting Monpa. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
2019 CLDF dataset derived from Abraham et al.’s “Sociolinguistic research on Monpa” from 2018 [2005]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aldenderfer, Mark
2011 Peopling the Tibetan Plateau: Insights from archaeology. High Altitude Medicine & Biology 12(2).141–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Gregory. D. S.
2014 On the classification of the Hruso (Aka) language. Paper presented at the 20th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Singapore, July 16–18, 2014.
Ashraf, A. A.
1990 Prehistoric Arunachal: A report on archaeological exploration and excavation at Kamla Valley with reference to Parsi Parlo of Lower Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh. Itanagar: Directorate of Research, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul K.
1972 Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blench, Roger
2017 The ‘Mishmi’ languages, Idu, Tawra and Kman: a mismatch between cultural and linguistic relations. Draft circulated for International Consortium for Eastern Himalayan Ethnolinguistic Prehistory 2017. [URL]
Blench, Roger & Mark W. Post
2014 Rethinking Sino-Tibetan phylogeny from the perspective of North East Indian languages. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics, 71–104. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bodt, Timotheus A.
2012 The new lamp clarifying the history, people, languages and traditions of Eastern Bhutan and Eastern Mon (2nd edition). Wageningen: Monpasang Publications.Google Scholar
2014a Ethnolinguistic survey of westernmost Arunachal Pradesh: A fieldworker’s impressions. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2).198–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b Notes on the settlement of the Gongri river valley of Western Arunachal Pradesh. In Anna Balikci Denjongpa & Jenny Bentley (eds.), The dragon and the hidden land: social and historical studies on Sikkim and Bhutan. Proceedings of the Bhutan-Sikkim panel at the 13th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, July 21–27, 2013, 153–190. Gangtok, Sikkim: Namgyal Institute of Tibetology.Google Scholar
2017 Dikhyang Bugun language data: Overview file. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 The Duhumbi perspective on Proto-Western Kho-Bwa rhymes. Die Sprache 52(2).141–176.Google Scholar
2020 Grammar of Duhumbi (Chugpa). Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
2021 The Duhumbi perspective on Proto-Western Kho-Bwa onsets. Journal of Historical Linguistics 11(1).1–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bodt, Timotheus A. & Ismael Lieberherr
2015 First notes on the phonology and classification of the Bangru language of India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38 (1), 66–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bodt, Timotheus A. & Johann-Mattis List
2019 Testing the predictive strength of the comparative method: An ongoing experiment on unattested words in Western Kho-Bwa languages. Papers in Historical Phonology 4(1).22–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco R., Timothy G. Vaughan, Joëlle Barido-Sottani, Sebastián Duchêne, Mathieu Fourment, Alexandra Gavryushkina, Joseph Heled, Graham Jones, Denise Kühnert, Nicola De Maio, Michael Matschiner, Fábio K. Mendes, Nicola F. Müller, Huw A. Ogilvie, Louis du Plessis, Alex Popinga, Andrew Rambaut, David Rasmussen, Igor Siveroni, Marc A. Suchard, Chieh-Hsi Wu, Dong Xie, Chi Zhang, Tanja Stadler & Alexei J. Drummond
2019 BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLOS Computational Biology 15(4).e1006650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco. R.
2010 DensiTree: making sense of sets of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 26(10).1372–1373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David
1997 Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 14: Tibeto-Burman Languages of the Himalayas [Pacific Linguistics Series A-86], 1–72. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
2002 The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Christopher Beckwith (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages [International Association for Tibetan Studies Proceedings 9 and Brill Tibetan Studies Library 2], 73–112. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Brass, Tom
2012 Scott’s “Zomia”, or a populist post-modern history of nowhere. Journal of Contemporary Asia 42(1).123–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bryant, David & Vincent Moulton
2004 Neighbor-net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(2).255–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burling, Robbins
2003 The Tibeto-Burman languages of Northeastern India. In Graham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (1st edition). [Routledge Language Family Series], 169–192. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins & James A. Matisoff
1980 Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The ’organic’ approach to linguistic comparison. Language 56(4).888–891. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Currie, Thomas E., Andrew Meade, Myrtlle Guillon & Ruth Mace
2013 Cultural phylogeography of the Bantu languages of sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280(1762). 20130695. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2013 Creolization in the divergence of the Tibeto-Burman languages. In Thomas Owen-Smith and Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 41–70. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Driem, George
2001 Languages of the Himalayas: An ethnolinguistic handbook of the greater Himalayan Region. [Handbook of oriental studies. Section two, India, Handbuch der Orientalistik. Indien.] Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2007 The diversity of the Tibeto-Burman language family and the linguistic ancestry of Chinese. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 1(2).211–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Trans-Himalayan. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics, 11–40. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Synoptic grammar of the Bumthang language. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 6 1.1–77.Google Scholar
2021 Ethnolinguistic prehistory: The peopling of the world from the perspective of language, genes and material culture. [Number volume 26 in Brill’s Tibetan studies library. Languages of the Greater Himalayan region.] Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Alexei J., Simon Y. W. Ho, Matthew J. Phillips & Andrew Rambaut
2006 Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLOS Biology 4(5).e88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Alexei J. & Andrew Rambaut
2007 BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Alexei J., Marc A. Suchard, Dong Xie & Andrew Rambaut
2012 Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29(8).1969–1973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dusu, Sambyo
2013 Akas of Arunachal Pradesh: A historical study till 1947 AD. Arunachal Pradesh: Department of History, Rajiv Gandhi University, Arunachal Pradesh PhD dissertation.
Dzongkha Development Commission
2017 Dzongkha-English-dZalakha lexicon. Thimphu: Dzongkha Development Commission.Google Scholar
2018 Bumthangkha-Dzongkha-English lexicon. Thimphu: Dzongkha Development Commission.Google Scholar
Eberhard, David, Gary Simons & Chuck Fennig
2019 Ethnologue: Languages of the world. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Forkel, Robert, Simon Greenhill & Hans-Jörg Bibiko
2021 Pylexibank: The Python curation library for Lexibank [software library, version 2.8.2]. [URL]
Forkel, Robert & Johann-Mattis List
2020 CLDFBench: Give your cross-linguistic data a lift. In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 6995–7002. Marseille: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Forkel, Robert, Johann-Mattis List, Simon J. Greenhill, Christoph Rzymski, Sebastian Bank, Michael Cysouw, Harald Hammarström, Martin Haspelmath, Gereon A. Kaiping & Russel D. Gray
2018 Cross-Linguistic Data Formats, advancing data sharing and re-use in comparative linguistics. Scientific Data 5 (1).80205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fürer-Haimendorf, Christophn von
1982 Tribes of India: the struggle for survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gamerman, Dani & Hedibert Freitas Lopes
2006 Markov chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference (2nd edition). [Number 68 in Texts in statistical science series.] Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavryushkina, Alexandra, David Welch, Tanja Stadler & Alexei J. Drummond
2014 Bayesian inference of sampled ancestor trees for epidemiology and fossil calibration. PLOS Computational Biology 10(12).e1003919. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol
2016 The Tibeto-Burman languages of South Asia: The languages, histories, and genetic classification. In Hans Henrich Hock & Elena Bashir (eds.), The languages and linguistics of South Asia: A comprehensive guide [The World of Linguistics, Volume 7.], 130–155. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gerber, Pascal & Selin Grollmann
2018 What is Kiranti? A critical account. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 11(1–2).99–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilks, W. R., S. Richardson & D. J. Spiegelhalter
(eds.) 1996 Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Good, Jeff & Michael Cysouw
2013 Languoid, doculect, and glossonym: Formalizing the notion ‘language’. Language Documentation & Conservation 71. 331–359.Google Scholar
Gray, Russell D., Alexei J. Drummond & Simon J. Greenhill
2009 Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323(5913).479–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Paul Heggarty & Russell D. Gray
2020 Bayesian phylolinguistics. New Jersey: John Wiley Sons, Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewal, Dalvindar Singh
1992 The Aka Miji and their kindred in Arunachal Pradesh: An enquiry into determinants of their identity. Siliguri: University of North Bengal, Siliguri, India, PhD thesis.
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank
2021 Glottolog 4.4. Leipzig. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hazarika, Manjil
2016 Tracing post-Pleistocene human movements and cultural connections of the eastern Himalayan region with the Tibetan plateau. Archaeological Research in Asia 51.44–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Prehistory and archaeology of Northeast India: multidisciplinary investigation in an archaeological Terra incognita. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Toni
2020 Source of life: Revitalisation rites and bon shamans in Bhutan and the Eastern Himalayas. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huber, Toni & Stuart Blackburn
2012 Origins and migrations in the extended Eastern Himalayas. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huelsenbeck, John P.
2002 Testing a covariotide model of DNA substitution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19(5).698–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huson, Daniel H. & David Bryant
2005 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2).254–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huáng, Bùfán and Qìngxià Dài
(eds.) 1992 Zàngmiǎn yǔzú yǔyán cíhuì 《藏缅语族语言词汇》 [A Tibeto-Burman Lexicon]. Běijīng: Zhōngyāng Mínzú Dàxué [中央民族大学].Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2013 On the internal phylogeny of East Bodish. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Mark W. Post & Stephen Morey (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics, Vol. 51, 91–110. India: Foundation Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 A preliminary reconstruction of East Bodish. In Nathan Hill & Thomas Owen-Smith (eds.), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, 155–179. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn & Jade d’Alpoim Guedes
2020 Linguistic evidence supports a long antiquity of cultivation of barley and buckwheat over that of millet and rice in Eastern Bhutan. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 30(4).571–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Jade d’Alpoim Guedes & Shuya Zhang
2021 Yak domestication: A review of linguistic, archaeological, and genetic evidence. Ethnobiology Letters 12(1).103–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacquesson, François
2015 An introduction to Sherdukpen language [Volume 39 of Diversitas linguarum ]. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Jeong, Choongwon, Andrew T. Ozga, David B. Witonsky, Helena Malmström, Hanna Edlund, Courtney A. Hofman, Richard W. Hagan, Mattias Jakobsson, Cecil M. Lewis, Mark S. Aldenderfer, Anna Di Rienzo & Christina Warinner
2016 Long-term genetic stability and a high-altitude East Asian origin for the peoples of the high valleys of the Himalayan arc. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(27).7485–7490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2008 Approaching lexical typology. In Martine Vanhove (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change [Number 106 in Studies in Language Companion Series], 3–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krithika, S. & T. S. Vasulu
2018 Folklore versus genetics: A mitochondrial DNA investigation about the origin and antiquity of the Adi sub-tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leyden, John
1808 On the languages and literature of the Indo-Chinese nations. London: Asiatic Researches 101.158–289.Google Scholar
Lieberherr, Ismael
2015 A progress report on the historical phonology and affiliation of Puroik. In Linda Konnerth, Stephen Morey, Prizankoo Sarmah & Amos Teo (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics (NEIL) 7 1, 235–286. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics Open Access.Google Scholar
2017 A grammar of Bulu Puroik. Bern, Switzerland: Universität Bern PhD thesis.
Lieberherr, Ismael & Timotheus A. Bodt
2017 Sub-grouping Kho-Bwa based on shared core vocabulary. Himalayan Linguistics 16(2).26–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Victor
2010 A zone of refuge in Southeast Asia? Reconceptualizing interior spaces. Journal of Global History 5(2).333–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis
2016 Beyond cognacy: Historical relations between words and their implication for phylogenetic reconstruction. Journal of Language Evolution 1(2).119–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 Edictor. a web-based interactive tool for creating and editing etymological datasets. [URL]
List, Johann-Mattis, Robert Forkel, Simon J. Greenhill, Christoph Rzymski, Johannes Englisch & Russell D. Gray
2021 Lexibank: A public repository of standardized wordlists with computed phonological and lexical features. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis, Simon J. Greenhill, Tiago Tresoldi & Robert Forkel
2019 LingPy. A Python library for quantitative tasks in historical linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis, Christoph Rzymski, Simon Greenhill, Nathanael Schweikhard, Kristina Pianykh, Annika Tjuka, Carolin Hundt & Robert Forkel
(eds.) 2021 Concepticon 2.5.0. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis, Mary Walworth, Simon J. Greenhill, Tiago Tresoldi & Robert Forkel
2018 Sequence comparison in computational historical linguistics. Journal of Language Evolution 3(2).130–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lù, Shàozhūn
1986 cuò nà mén bā yǔ jiǎn zhì 《错那门巴语简志》 [A sketch grammar of Cuona Menba]. Běijīng: Mínzú chūbǎn shè [民族出版社].Google Scholar
2002 Ménbāyǔ fāngyán yánjìu 《门巴语方言研究》 [A study of Menba]. Běijīng: Mínzú chūbǎn shè [民族出版社].Google Scholar
Lǐ, Dàqín
2004 Sūlóngyǔ yánjīu 《苏龙语研究》 [A study of Sulong] (1st edition). Běijīng: Mínzú chūbǎn shè [民族出版社].Google Scholar
Macario, Florens Jean-Jacques
2015 The genetic position of Apatani within Tibeto-Burman. In Linda Konnerth, Stephen Morey, Prizankoo Sarmah & Amos Teo (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics (NEIL) 7 1, 213–233. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
2001 The interest of Zhangzhung for comparative Tibeto-Burman. New Research on Zhangzhung and Related Himalayan Languages (Bon Studies 3). Senri Ethnological Studies (19).155–180.Google Scholar
2009 Stable roots in Sino-Tibetan/Tibeto-Burman. In Y. Nagano and K. M. Hakubutsukan (eds.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics [Number 75 in Senri Ethnological Studies], 291–318. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
2015 The Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus project (STEDT). California: University of California.Google Scholar
Maurits, Luke, Robert Forkel, Gereon A. Kaiping & Quentin D. Atkinson
2017 BEASTling: A software tool for linguistic phylogenetics using BEAST 2. PLOS ONE 12(8).e0180908. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M., Ch.-Ch. Hofmann, A. M. D. Gemmell, E. Haslinger, H. Häusler & D. Wangda
2009 Holocene glacier fluctuations and migration of Neolithic yak pastoralists into the high valleys of Northwest Bhutan. Quaternary Science Reviews 28(13/14).1217–1237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd & Martine Mazaudon
1994 Preliminary notes on the languages of the Bumthang group. In Per Kvaerne (ed.), Tibetan Studies, Proceedings of the 6th seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Fagernes 1992, 545–557. Oslo: The institute for comparative research in human culture.Google Scholar
Michaud, Jean
2010 Editorial –Zomia and beyond. Journal of Global History 5(2).187–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Zomia and beyond. In A. Horstmann, M. Saxer, and A. Rippa (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Asian Borderlands, 73–88. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Modi, Yankee & Mark W. Post
2009 The sociolinguistic context and genetic position of Holon (Milang) in Tibeto-Burman. Paper presented at the 42th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Chiang Mai, November 2–4, 2009.
Nascimento, Fabrícia F., Mario dos Reis & Ziheng Yang
2017 A biologist’s guide to Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1(10).1446–1454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Opgenort, Jean Robert
2005 A grammar of Jero: With a historical comparative study of the Kiranti languages. [Brill’s Tibetan studies library.] Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W.
2007 A grammar of Galo. Melbourne, Australia: La Trobe University PhD thesis.
2017 The Tangam language: Grammar, lexicon and texts. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W. & Robbins Burling
2017 The Tibeto-Burman languages of Northeast India. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 213–242. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha S.
2010 Hmong-Mien language history. [Studies in language change.] Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ravenzwaaij, Don van, Pete Cassey & Scott D. Brown
2018 A simple introduction to Markov Chain Monte–Carlo sampling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25(1).143–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Remsangpuia
2008 Puroik phonology. Shillong: Don Bosco Centre for Indigenous Cultures.Google Scholar
Rinchin, Megejee
2011 Stratification and change among the Sherdukpens An anthropological study on a Buddhist Tribe of Arunachal Pradesh. Itanagar, India: Rajiv Gandhi University PhD thesis.
Rutgers, Leopold Roland
1999 Puroik or Sulung of Arunachal Pradesh. Paper presented at the 5th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Kathmandu, 13–15 September, 1999.
Rzymski, Christoph, Tiago Tresoldi, Simon Greenhill, Mei-Shin Wu, Nathanael E. Schweikhard, Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Volker Gast, Timotheus A. Bodt, Abbie Hantgan, Gereon A. Kaiping, Sophie Chang, Yunfan Lai, Natalia Morozova, Heini Ar-java, Nataliia Hübler, Ezequiel Koile, Steve Pepper, Mariann Proos, Briana Van Epps, Ingrid Blanco, Carolin Hundt, Sergei Monakhov, Kristina Pianykh, Sallona Ramesh, Russell D. Gray, Robert Forkel & Johann-Mattis List
2020 The database of cross-linguistic colexifications, reproducible analysis of cross- linguistic polysemies. Scientific Data 7(13).1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent
2011 The homeland of Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: where and when? Communication on Contemporary Anthropology 5(1).143–147/e21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List
2019 Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(21).10317–10322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schendel, Willem van
2002 Geographies of knowing, geographies of ignorance: Jumping scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20(6).647–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C.
2009 The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. [Yale agrarian studies series.] New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shafer, Robert
1947 Hruso. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 121.184–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1954 The linguistic position of Dwags. Oriens 7(2).348–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1955 Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages. Word 11(1).94–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Ivan M.
1979 Miji language guide. Shillong: Philological Section, Directorate of Research, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
1993 [1970] Aka language guide. Shillong: Research Department, North Eastern Frontier Agency.Google Scholar
Soja, Rai
2009 English-Puroik dictionary. Shillong: Living Word Communicators.Google Scholar
Stadler, Tanja, Denise Kühnert, Sebastian Bonhoeffer & Alexei J. Drummond
2013 Birth– death skyline plot reveals temporal changes of epidemic spread in HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(1).228–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stonor, C. R.
1952 The Sulung Tribe of the Assam Himalayas. Anthropos 47(5/6).947–962.Google Scholar
Sūn, Hongkai, Panghsin Ting, and Di Jiang
1991 Záng Miǎn yǔ yǔ yīn hé cí huì 《藏缅语语音和词汇》 [Tibeto-Burman phonology and lexicon]. Běijīng: Zhōngguó Shèhuì Kēxué Chūbǎnshè [中国社会科学出版社].Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
1992 Review of Zangmicmyu Yuyin He Cihui “Tibeto-Burman phonology and lexicon”. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 15(2).73–113.Google Scholar
1993 A historical-comparative study of the Tani (Mirish) branch in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley, USA: Univerisity of California at Berkeley PhD thesis.
Tada, Tage, J. C. Dutta & Nabajit Deori
2012 Archaeological heritage of Arunachal Pradesh: A book exclusively based on the findings of archaeological investigations of two decades (1991–2011). Itanagar: Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Department of Cultural Affairs, Directorate of Research.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham
2003 A subgrouping of the Sino-Tibetan languages: the interaction between language contact, change, and inheritance. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 3–21. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham & Randy J. LaPolla
(eds.) 2003 The Sino-Tibetan languages. [Number 3 in Routledge language family series.] London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Waskom, Michael L.
2021 Seaborn: statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software 6(60).3021. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Manuel
2014 A tentative classification of West Himalayish. In Manuel Widmer (ed.), A descriptive grammar of Bunan, 33–56. Bern: University of Bern.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E. Bourne, et al.
2016 The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data 3(1).1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Mei-Shin, Nathanael E. Schweikhard, Timotheus A. Bodt, Nathan W. Hill & Johann-Mattis List
2020 Computer-assisted language comparison: State of the art. Journal of Open Humanities Data 6(1).2. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yangzom, Deki & Marten Arkesteijn
1996 Khengkha lessonbook. Thimphu: SNV Bhutan.Google Scholar
Yu, Guangchuang
2020 Using ggtree to visualize data on tree-like structures. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 69(1).e96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Hanzhi, Ting Ji, Mark Pagel & Ruth Mace
2020 Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages. Scientific Reports 10(1).20792. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Menghan, Shi Yan, Wuyun Pan & Li Jin
2019 Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in Northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature 569(7754).112–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar