Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 45:1 (2022) ► pp.151–169

The kinship system of Tiwa

| Western Washington University
This paper provides a systematic description of the kinship system of Tiwa, a Boro-Garo language of northeast India. It complements existing partial descriptions by Ramirez (2014) and Bouchery and Longmailai (2018), including documentation of affinal relationship terminology and kinship-based politeness strategies. A key new finding of this work is that Tiwa has a series of dyadic group kin terms which behave in similar (though not identical) ways to what Bradley (2001) identifies as family group classifiers in several Ngwi languages. To my knowledge, this is the first time such dyadic kin terms have been identified beyond the Ngwi and Ersuic branches, suggesting they may be more widespread throughout the Tibeto-Burman family than previously believed.
Keywords: Tiwa, kinship, family group classifiers, dyadic kin terms
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Background on Tiwa
    • 1.2Data collection and methodology
  • 2.Tiwa’s sociocultural context
  • 3.Kinship terminology
    • 3.1Consanguineal relationships
    • 3.2Uncles, aunts, nephews and nieces
    • 3.3Other affinal relationships
    • 3.4‘Reincarnation’
  • 4.The pragmatics of kinship
    • 4.1Terms of address
    • 4.2Politeness relationships and plural marking
  • 5.Group kin terms
    • 5.1Description of Tiwa’s group kin terms
    • 5.2Numeral modification of group kin terms
    • 5.3Comparison to Ngwi and Ersuic family group classifiers
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.21020.daw
References (9)
References
Bouchery, Pascal & Monali Longmailai. 2018. The kinship terminology of Dimasa: Alternate generation equivalence in the Tibeto-Burman Area. Anthropological Linguistics 601.226–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David. 2001. Counting the family: Family group classifiers in Yi (Tibeto-Burman) languages. Anthropological Linguistics 131.1–17.Google Scholar
Dawson, Virginia. 2020. Existential quantification in Tiwa: Disjunction and indefinites. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley PhD dissertation.
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2021. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, twenty-fourth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: [URL]
Evans, N. 2006. Dyadic constructions. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd edition), 24–28. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, U. V. (ed.). 2014. Tiwa-English dictionary with English-Tiwa index. Shillong: Don Bosco Centre for Indigenous Cultures. Associate editors: Horsing Kholar, Juliana Maslai, Alfred Maslai, Bibiana Maslai, and Simon Mithi.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. & Robbins Burling. 2017. The Tibeto-Burman languages of Northeast India. In Graham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (2nd edition), 213–242. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Philippe. 2014. People of the margins: Across ethnic boundaries in North-East India. Guwahati: Spectrum Publications.Google Scholar
Zhang, Sihong. 2014. Numeral classifiers in Ersu. Language and Linguistics 151.883–915.Google Scholar