Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 37:1 (2014) ► pp.75–103

Volition and control in Wǎdū Pǔmǐ

| CRLD, La Trobe University / SIL International
In this paper I will argue that verb inflection in the Wǎdū variety of Pǔmǐ is not based on actor-agreement or person-number agreement as has been attested for several other Pǔmǐ varieties, but is based rather on pragmatic notions of volition and control that tie in with evidentiality and egophoricity, similar to that reported for Tibetan dialects.
Keywords: egophoricity, verb inflection, Pum, evidentiality, Tibeto-Burman
Published online: 23 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.37.1.03dau
References (30)
Bradley, David. 1997. Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics No.14: Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, 1–72.Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, A-86.Google Scholar
2002. The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Christopher I. Beckwith (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages, 73–112. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Chirkova, Katia. 2009. Shǐxīng: a Sino-Tibetan language of south-west China: a grammatical sketch with two appended texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32(1):1–89.Google Scholar
2010. The Qiangic subgroup from an areal perspective: a case study of languages of Muli. Language and Linguistics 13(1):133–170.Google Scholar
Daudey, Henriette. Forthcoming. A grammar of Wadu Pumi. Ph.D. dissertation. Melbourne: LaTrobe University.
DeLancey, Scott. 1986. Evidentiality and volition in Tibetan. In Chafe & Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: the linguistic coding of epistemology, 203–213.Google Scholar
1992. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensa: International Journal of Linguistics 25(1):39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Connie. 2000. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24(2):379–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ding, Picus Sizhi. 1998. Fundamentals of Prinmi (Pumi): A Tibeto-Burman language of Northwestern Yunnan, China. Canberra: Australian National UniversityPh.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In R. Trail et al.. (eds.), Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics 7.95–106.Google Scholar
Haller, Felix. 2000. Verbal categories of Shigatse Tibetan and Themchen Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(2).175–191.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 51.1–48.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). Paris: Université Paris VII — Denis Diderot PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2011. Tonal alternations in the Pumi verbal system. Language and Linguistics 12(2).359–392.Google Scholar
Jiǎng Yǐng 蒋颖. 2012. Pǔmǐyǔ zìzhǔ zhùcí jí qí yǔfǎhùa 普米语自主助词 及其语法化 [A controllable auxiliary and its grammaticalization in Pǔmǐ]. Zhōngyāng Mínzú Dàxué Xuébào《中央民族大学学报》[Scholarly Journal of the Central University for Nationalities] 31.71–77.Google Scholar
Lù Shàozūn 陆绍尊. 1983. Pǔmǐyǔ jiǎnzhì《普米语简志》[Pǔmǐ language sketch]. Běijīng 北京:Mínzú Chūbǎnshè 民族出版社.Google Scholar
陆绍尊. 2001. Pǔmǐyǔ fāngyán yánjiū 《普米语方言研究》[A dialectal study of the Pǔmǐ language]. Běijīng 北京: Mínzú Chūbǎnshè 民族出版社.Google Scholar
Fù Àilán 傅爱兰. 1997. Pǔmǐyǔ dòngcí de yǔfá fànchóu 普米语动词的语法范畴 [The grammatical categories of Pǔmǐ verbs]. Class handout, 06.11.1997.Google Scholar
Fù Àilán 傅爱兰. 1998. Pǔmǐyǔ dòngcí de yǔfá fànchóu 普米语动词的语法范畴 [The grammatical categories of Pǔmǐ verbs]. Běijīng 北京: Zhōngguó Wénshǐ Chūbǎnshè 中国文史出版社.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. 2003. Morpho-syntax: An overview. In Graham Thurgood and Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 22–42. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lidz, Liberty A. 2007. Evidentiality in Yongning Na (Mosuo). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30.21:45–87.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1991. “Sino-Tibetan linguistics: present state and future prospects.” Annual Review of Anthropology 201: 469–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Satoko. 2009. “Directional prefixes in nDrapa and neighboring languages: an areal feature of Western Sichuan”. In Yasuhiko Nagano (ed.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman Historical Linguistics. Senri Ethnological Studies 751:7–20. Osaka, Japan: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Sūn, Hóngkāi 孙宏开. 1983. Liùjiāng liúyù de mínzú yǔyán jí qí xìshǔ fēnlèi. 六江流域的民族语言及其系数分类 Minority languages of the six river valley and their genetic classification. Mínzú Xuébào《民族学报》[Scholarly journal of nationalities] 31:99–273.Google Scholar
孙宏开. 2001. Lùn Zàng-Miǎn yǔzú zhōng de Qiāng yǔzhī yǔyán 论藏缅语族中的羌语支语言 [On the Qiangic branch of the Tibeto-Burman language family]. Language and Linguistics 2.1:157–181.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 1993. Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 631.945–1001.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 2003. A subgrouping of the Tibeto-Burman languages: the interaction between language contact, chance and inheritance. In Thurgood and LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 3–21. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas (with Konchok Jiatso). 2001. Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. In Person and Evidence in Himalayan Languages. LTBA special issue, Spring 20011, 177–239.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2008. Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Huber et al.. (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies. Vol. I1, 281–308.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Daudey, Henriëtte & Gerong Pincuo
2020. ‘Pour out libation to all the gods!’. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Zemp, Marius
2020. Evidentials and their pivot in Tibetic and neighboring Himalayan languages. Functions of Language 27:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Ozerov, Pavel & Henriëtte Daudey
2017. Copy-verb constructions in Tibeto-Burman and beyond. Linguistic Typology 21:1 DOI logo
Daudey, Henriëtte
2015. Review Article: A Grammar of Prinmi
. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 44:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2015. Review of Ding (2014): A grammar of Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38:2 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Jacques, Guillaume
2022. Egophoric marking and person indexation in Japhug. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.