Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:1 (2015) ► pp.66–123

First notes on the phonology and classification of the Bangru language of India

| University of Bern, Switzerland
| Tezpur University, India

This is the first description of the Bangru language spoken in a remote corner of Kurung Kumey district, Arunachal Pradesh, Northeast India. On the basis of our data and analysis, we identify Bangru as a Tibeto-Burman language with as its closest genetic relatives Miji and Hruso, spoken further to the southwest in East and West Kameng districts. Based on these preliminary data and their analysis, Bangru is described as having 18 distinctive consonants, seven distinctive simple vowels and three distinctive diphthong vowels. The basic syllable structure is Ci(G)V(Cf). Bangru is furthermore characterised by the retention of Proto-Tibeto-Burman prefixes as reduced syllables. This paper also provides additional evidence for the validity of Shafer’s ‘Hruso’, with Hruso itself as its most aberrant member.

Keywords: Bangru, Tibeto-Burman, Hruso, Hrusish, genetic classification, Trans-Himalayan, Miji, Aka, phonology
Published online: 10 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.38.1.03bod
References
Anderson, James Drummond
1896 A Short Vocabulary of the Aka Language. Shillong: Assam Secretariat Printing Office.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D.S
2014 On the classification of the Hruso (Aka) language. Paper presented at the 20th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Singapore, July 16 2014.
Abraham, P.T
2005 A Grammar of Nyishi Language. Delhi: Farsight Publishers.Google Scholar
Abraham, Binny, Sako, Kara, Kinny, Elina & Zeliang, Isapdaile
2005 A sociolinguistic esearch among selected groups in Western Arunachal Pradesh highlighting Monpa. Unpublished report.
Baxter, William & Sagart, Laurent
2014 Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Paul K
1972 Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blench, Roger & Post, Mark W
2014 Rethinking Sino-Tibetan phylogeny from the perspective of North East Indian languages. In Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds), 71–104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blench, Roger
2014 The origins of nominal affixes in MSEA languages: Convergence, contact and some African parallels. In Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, Nick J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds), 550–577. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Daniel W
2014 A Phonological Reconstruction of Proto-Central Naga. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. [URL] (16 June 2014).
van Driem, George
2011 The Trans-Himalayan phylum and its implications for population prehistory. Communication on Contemporary Anthropology 51: 135–142.Google Scholar
2014 Trans-Himalayan. In Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds), 11–40. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.Google Scholar
French, Walter T
1983 Northern Naga: A Tibeto-Burman Mesolanguage. PhD dissertation, The City University of New York.
Galo Welfare Society
2009 Galo-English Dictionary. Itanagar: Galo Welfare Society.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Tadmor, Uri
(eds) 2009 Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin ork: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph U.V., & Burling, Robbins
2006 The Comparative Phonology of the Boro Garo Languages. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Kansakar, Tej Ratna
2010 Baram wordlist. Ms. [URL] (9 June 2014).
von Klaproth, Julius Heinrich
1823 Asia Polyglotta. Paris: A. Schubart.Google Scholar
LaPolla Randy J
2003 Overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In The Sino-Tibetan languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 22–42. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lǐ, Dàqín
李大勤 2003 崩如语概况 Bēngrú-yǔ gaìkuàng (Bangru language overview). 民族语文 Mínzú Yǔwén (Minority Languages) 51: 64–80.Google Scholar
Manson, Ken
2010 Kayan-English/English-Kayan Dictionary. Ms. [URL] (9 June 2014).
Matisoff, James A
1978 Variational Semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The “Organic” Approach in Linguistic Comparison [Occasional Papers of the Wolfenden Society on Tibeto-Burman Linguistics VI]. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues (ISHI).Google Scholar
2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. Berkeley CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Mortensen, David R
2012 Database of Tangkhulic Languages. Ms. [URL] (9 June 2014).Google Scholar
Schubert, Johannes
1964 Hrusso-Vokabular. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Orientforschung 101: 295–350.Google Scholar
Shafer, Robert
1947 Hruso. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 12(1): 184–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1955 Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages. Word 11(1): 94–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Ivan Martin
1979 Miji Language Guide. Shillong: Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
1993 [1970] Aka Language Guide. Shillong: Directorate of Research, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
Sun, Tianshin Jackson
1993 A Historical-comparative Study of the Tani (Mirish) Branch in Tibeto-Burman. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Sun, Hongkai, et al.
1991 Zàngmiǎnyǔ yǔyīn hé cíhuì [Tibeto-Burman Phonology and Lexicon]. Beijing: Chinese Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Tame, Ramya
2011  An Ethnographic Study of the Bangrus of Kurung Kumey District of Arunachal Pradesh. MPhil. dissertation, University of Arunachal Pradesh, Doimukh
2012 Bangrus of Arunachal Pradesh: An ethnographic profile. International Journal of Social Science Tomorrow 1(3): 1–12.Google Scholar
2013 Tribal culture and folklore of Arunachal Pradesh: A study in Kurung Kumey district. International Journal of Research in Sociology and Social Anthropology 1(2): 26–30.Google Scholar
VanBik, Kenneth
2009 Proto-Kuki-Chin: A reconstructed ancestor of the Kuki-Chin languages [STEDT Monograph Series 8]. Berkeley CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Bodt, Timotheus Adrianus
2021. The Duhumbi perspective on Proto-Western Kho-Bwa onsets. Journal of Historical Linguistics 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gerber, Pascal
2020. Areal features in Gongduk, Bjokapakha and Black Mountain Mönpa phonology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Post, Mark W.
2019. Topographical Deixis in Trans‐Himalayan (Sino‐Tibetan) Languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 117:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Post, Mark W.
2020. The distribution, reconstruction and varied fates of topographical deixis in Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan). Diachronica 37:3 ► pp. 368 ff. DOI logo
Ramya, Tame
2020. Attitude Towards Bangru Language of Arunachal Pradesh: The Natives’ Perspective. Dera Natung Government College Research Journal 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Mei-Shin, Timotheus A. Bodt & Tiago Tresoldi
2022. Bayesian phylogenetics illuminate shallower relationships among Trans-Himalayan languages in the Tibet-Arunachal area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 45:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.