Cover not available
Review published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:2 (2015) ► pp.319–323
Book review

Picus Sizhi Ding. A grammar of Pumi

Reviewed by
Published online: 11 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.38.2.10jac
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2012 The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16.3. 435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daudey, Henriëtte
2014a A grammar of Wadu Pumi: LaTrobe University dissertation.Google Scholar
2014b Volition and control in Wadu Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37:1. 75–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Review of ‘A Grammar of Pumi’. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 44.1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2012 Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16.3. 529–564.Google Scholar
Ding, Picus
1998 Fundamentals of Prinmi (Pumi): A Tibeto-Burman language of northwestern Yunnan: Australian National University dissertation.Google Scholar
2001 The pitch-accent system of Niuwozi Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24.2. 57–83.Google Scholar
2003 Prinmi: a sketch of Niuwozi. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 588–601. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006 A typological study of tonal systems of Japanese and Prinmi: Towards a definition of pitch-accent languages. Journal of Universal Language 7.1. 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 The Use of Perception Tests in Studying the Tonal System of Prinmi Dialects: A Speaker-centered Approach to Descriptive Linguistics. Language Documentation and Conservation 1.2. 154–181.Google Scholar
2014 A grammar of Prinmi. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ding, Picus & Caroline Féry
2014 Word Order, Information Structure and Intonation of Discontinuous Nominal Constructions in Cantonese. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 43.2. 110–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fù, Àilán
1998 普米語動詞的語法範疇 Pǔmǐyǔ dòngcí de yǔfǎ fànchóu (The Categories of the Pumi Verb). 北京：中國文史出版社 Běijīng: Zhōngguó wénshǐ chūbǎnshè.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun
2014 Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112.1. 44–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2012 “Mirativity” does not exist: hdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16.3. 389–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2011a A panchronic study of aspirated fricatives, with new evidence from Pumi. Lingua 121.9. 1518–1538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b Tonal alternations in the Pumi verbal system. Language and Linguistics 12.2. 359–392.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Anton Antonov, Yunfan Lai & Lobsang Nima
2014 Person marking in Stau. Himalayan Linguistics 13.1. 82–92.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2015 The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113.3. 271–285.Google Scholar
Lù, Shàozūn
2001 普米語方言研究 Pŭǔmĭyǔ fāngyán yánjiū (A study on Pumi dialectology). Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1997 Dayang Pumi phonology and adumbrations of comparative Qiangic. Mon-Khmer Studies 271. 171–213.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd, Martine Mazaudon, Alexis Michaud, Séverine Guillaume, Alexandre François & Evangelia Adamou
2014 Documenting and researching endangered languages: the Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 81. 119–135.Google Scholar
Michaud, Alexis, Guillaume Jacques & Robert Rankin
2012 Historical transfer of nasality between consonantal onset and vowel: from C to V or from V to C? Diachronica 29.2. 201–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy LaPolla
2014 Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37.2. 240–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar