Review published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 38:2 (2015) ► pp. 319323
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2012The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16.3. 435–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daudey, Henriëtte
2014aA grammar of Wadu Pumi: LaTrobe University dissertation.Google Scholar
2014bVolition and control in Wadu Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37:1. 75–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Review of ‘A Grammar of Pumi’. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 44.1. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16.3. 529–564.Google Scholar
Ding, Picus
1998Fundamentals of Prinmi (Pumi): A Tibeto-Burman language of northwestern Yunnan: Australian National University dissertation.Google Scholar
2001The pitch-accent system of Niuwozi Pumi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24.2. 57–83.Google Scholar
2003Prinmi: a sketch of Niuwozi. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 588–601. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006A typological study of tonal systems of Japanese and Prinmi: Towards a definition of pitch-accent languages. Journal of Universal Language 7.1. 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The Use of Perception Tests in Studying the Tonal System of Prinmi Dialects: A Speaker-centered Approach to Descriptive Linguistics. Language Documentation and Conservation 1.2. 154–181.Google Scholar
2014A grammar of Prinmi. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Picus & Caroline Féry
2014Word Order, Information Structure and Intonation of Discontinuous Nominal Constructions in Cantonese. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 43.2. 110–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fù, Àilán
1998普米語動詞的語法範疇 Pǔmǐyǔ dòngcí de yǔfǎ fànchóu (The Categories of the Pumi Verb). 北京:中國文史出版社 Běijīng: Zhōngguó wénshǐ chūbǎnshè.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun
2014Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112.1. 44–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2012“Mirativity” does not exist: hdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16.3. 389–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2011aA panchronic study of aspirated fricatives, with new evidence from Pumi. Lingua 121.9. 1518–1538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011bTonal alternations in the Pumi verbal system. Language and Linguistics 12.2. 359–392.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Anton Antonov, Yunfan Lai & Lobsang Nima
2014Person marking in Stau. Himalayan Linguistics 13.1. 82–92.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2015The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113.3. 271–285.Google Scholar
Lù, Shàozūn
2001普米語方言研究 Pŭǔmĭyǔ fāngyán yánjiū (A study on Pumi dialectology). Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1997Dayang Pumi phonology and adumbrations of comparative Qiangic. Mon-Khmer Studies 271. 171–213.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd, Martine Mazaudon, Alexis Michaud, Séverine Guillaume, Alexandre François & Evangelia Adamou
2014Documenting and researching endangered languages: the Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 81. 119–135.Google Scholar
Michaud, Alexis, Guillaume Jacques & Robert Rankin
2012Historical transfer of nasality between consonantal onset and vowel: from C to V or from V to C? Diachronica 29.2. 201–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy LaPolla
2014Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37.2. 240–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar