Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 40:1 (2017) ► pp. 1–39

The case for alveolar fricative rhotics with evidence from Nusu

| Payap University
| Payap University
Cross-linguistically, fricatives are the rarest types of rhotics, found in a few African and European languages (Ladefoged & Maddieson 1996) and as allophones in some Romance languages (Jesus & Shadle 2005; Recasens 2002; Bradley 2006; Colantoni 2006). Acoustic data from Nusu, phonotactic reasoning, and a cognate comparison demonstrate the presence of alveolar fricative rhotics in Tibeto-Burman. The Nusu rhotic appears in syllable-initial position as the first or second consonant and can be realized as alveolar approximants [ɹ] or [ɹʲ], non-sibilant voiced and voiceless fricatives [ɹ̝, ɹ̥], as well as voiced sibilant [ʐ]. In other studies on Nusu, these fricative rhotics have sometimes been reported as retroflex voiced sibilants (Sun & Lu 1986; Fu 1991), but intra-speaker and cross-variety comparison point to classification as rhotics. Evidence from other Tibeto-Burman languages suggests that alveolar fricative rhotics are not limited to Nusu. Together these data challenge the tradition of generally interpreting alveolar fricatives as sibilants.
Keywords: Nusu, rhotics, fricatives, sibilants
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Phonological evidence for a Nusu rhotic
    • 2.1Phonotactic evidence
    • 2.2Shared phonetic features
  • 3.Acoustic distinctions of approximants, fricatives, and sibilants
    • 3.1Approximant vs. fricative
    • 3.2Fricative vs. sibilant
  • 4.Phonetic realizations of the Nusu rhotic
    • 4.1Approximants
    • 4.2Fricatives
    • 4.3Distinction from sibilants
  • 5.Further evidence for fricative rhotics in Tibeto-Burman
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 03 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.40.1.01ike
References

References

Ballard, Elaine & Donna Starks
2004 Liquids: Laterals and rhotics or much more? Mushin, Ilana. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. 2004.
Benedict, Paul K.
1976 Rhyming dictionary of Written Burmese. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 3(1): 1–93. Accessed via STEDT database http://​stedt​.berkeley​.edu​/search/ (4 June 2016).
Bradley, David
1978 Proto-Loloish [Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph Series 39]. Bangkok: Craftsman Press.Google Scholar
2012 The characteristics of the Burmish family of Tibeto-Burman. Language and Linguistics 13(1): 171–192.Google Scholar
Bradley, Travis G.
2006 Phonetic realizations of /sr/ clusters in Latin American Spanish. In Manuel Díaz-Campos (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonetics and Phonology, 1–13 2006 Somerville, MA, Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Catford, John Cunnison
2001 On Rs, rhotacism and paleophony. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 311: 171–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chirkova, Katia & Zev Handel
2013 Fricativization of high vowels and glides in Ersu, Lisu, and related languages. Paper presented at the 3rd Workshop on the Tibeto-Burman languages of Sichuan, Paris, 2–4 September.
Clements, George N.
1990 The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In John Kingston & Mary E. Beckman (eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology, I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, 283–333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, Laura & Jeffrey Steele
2005 Liquid asymmetries in French and Spanish. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 241.1–14.Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura
2006 Increasing periodicity to reduce similarity: an acoustic account of deassibilation in rhotics. In Manuel Díaz-Campos (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonetics and Phonology, 22–34. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Coupe, Alexander Robertson
2007 A Grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Qingxia
1989 Field Notebook (Nusu A). (unpublished ms. contributed to STEDT). Accessed via STEDT database http://​stedt​.berkeley​.edu​/search/ (5 November 2016).
Dai, Qingxia & Huang Bufan
1992 A Tibeto-Burman Lexicon. Beijing: Central Institute of Minorities. Accessed via STEDT database http://​stedt​.berkeley​.edu​/search/ (20 August 2014).
Deshpande, Madhav M.
1978 Genesis of Ṛgvedic retroflexion: A historical and sociolinguistic investigation. In Madhav M. Deshpande & Peter Edwin Hook (eds.), Aryan and Non-Aryan in India, 235–315. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for South and Southeastern Asian Studies, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Driem, George van
1990 The fall and rise of the phoneme /r/ in Eastern Kiranti: Sound change in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African studies 53(1): 83–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, San
2007 The Phonology of Standard Chinese. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dvořák, Věra
2010 Voicing assimilation in Czech. Rutgers Working Papers in Linguistics 31: 115–144.Google Scholar
Evers, Vincent, Henning Reetz & Aditi Lahiri
1998 Crosslinguistic acoustic categorization of sibilants independent of phonological status. Journal of Phonetics 261: 345–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Ailan
1991 Nuyu (The Nu language). In Dai Qingxia, Huang Bufan, Fu Ailan, Renzengwangmu & Liu Juhuang (eds), Zang Mianyu shiwu zhong (Fifteen Tibeto-Burman Languages), 223–248. Beijing: Yanshan Chubanshe. (Bijiang-Miangu Township)Google Scholar
Gafos, Adamantios I.
2013 The Articulatory Basis of Locality in Phonology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, Paul Barthmaier, & Kathy Sands
2002 A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32(2): 141–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Silke
2002 Retroflexion and retraction revised. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 281: 13–25.Google Scholar
Huang, Bufan & Dai Qingxia
(eds) 1992 Zangmianyuzu yuyan cihui 《藏緬語族語言詞匯》(A Tibeto-Burman Lexicon). Beijing: Central Institute of Minorities. Accessed via STEDT database http://​stedt​.berkeley​.edu​/search/ (26 February 2016).
Jesus, Luis M. T. & Christine H. Shadle
2005 Acoustic analysis of European Portuguese uvular [χ, ʁ] and voiceless tapped alveolar [ɾ̥] fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 351: 27–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jongman, Allard, Ratree Wayland & Serena Wong
2000 Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108(3): 1252–1263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Klaus J.
1990 Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: Phonological facts and phonetic explanations. In William J. Hardcastle and Alain Machal (eds), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, 69–92. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson
1996 The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lee, Sang-Im
2011 Spectral analysis of Mandarin Chinese sibilant fricatives. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Lee-Kim, Sang-Im
2014 Revisiting Mandarin ‘apical vowels’: An articulatory and acoustic study. Journal of the International Phonetics Association 44(3): 261–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Fangfang, Jan Edwards, & Mary E. Beckman
2007 Spectral measures for sibilant fricatives of English, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese. Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 41: 917–920.Google Scholar
Lindau, Mona
1985 The story of /r/. In Victoria Fromkin (ed.), Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Peter Ladefoged, 157–168. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lubbe, Melissa
2007 Para Naga orthography statement. Ms, Payap University.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian
1984 Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magnuson, Thomas
2007 The story of /r/ in two vocal tracts. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, 6–10 August 2007, Saarbrucken, Germany
Martínez-Celdrán, Eugenio
2004 Problems in the classification of approximants. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34(2): 201–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Muminovic, Damra & Olle Engstrand
2001 /r/ in some Swedish dialects: Preliminary observations. Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics Working Papers 491: 120–123.Google Scholar
Osborne, Rosalind Anne
2009 Who’s who in Kmhmu’: Referring Expressions and Participant Identification in Selected Kmhmu’ Narrative Texts. MA thesis Payap University, Chiang Mai.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel
2002 Weakening and strengthening in Romance revisited. Italian Journal of Linguistics 141: 327–373.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Aina Espinosa
2007 Phonetic typology and positional allophones for alveolar rhotics in Catalan. Phonetica 641: 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roengpitya, Rungpat
1997 Glottal stop and glottalization in Lai (connected speech). Linguistcs of the Tibeto-Burman Area 20(2): 21–56.Google Scholar
Shadle, Christine H.
1990 Articulatory-acoustic relationships in fricative consonants. In William Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, 187–211. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shadle, Christine H. & Sheila J. Mair
1996 Quantifying spectral characteristics of fricatives. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language 96(3): 1521–1524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solnit, David B.
1992 Glottalized consonants as a genetic feature in Southeast Asia. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 25(1): 95–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Hongkai & Liu Lu
1986 A brief overview of the language of the Nu nationality (Nusu language). Brief Overview of Minority Languages of China Series. Nationalities Press. Beijing.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai et al.
1991 Zangmianyu yuyin he cihui (Tibeto-Burman phonology and lexicon). Chinese Social Sciences Press. Accessed via STEDT database http://​stedt​.berkeley​.edu​/search/ (20 August 2014).
Svantesson, Jan-Olof
1986 Acoustic analysis of Chinese Fricatives and Affricates. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 14(1): 53–70.Google Scholar
Toda, Martine, Shinji Maeda, & Kiyoshi Honda
2010 Formant-cavity affiliation in sibilant fricatives. In Susanne Fuchs, Marzena Zygis, Martine Toda, & Christine Shadle (eds), Turbulent Sounds: An Interdisciplinary Guide, 343–374. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, John C.
1970 Local Accents in England and Wales. Journal of Linguistics 6(2).231–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, Chris P.
2001 Preliminary Phonological Analysis of the Limi Dialect of Humla Bhotia. MA thesis, University of Helsinki. https://​helda​.helsinki​.fi​/handle​/10138​/19353
Whitley, M. Stanley
2003 Rhotic representation: Problems and proposals. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 331: 81–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Richard
2001 The phonology of /r/. In Distinctive Feature Theory, Alan T. Hall (ed.), 335–368. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Xinhui, Carol Y. Espy-Wilson, Suzanne Boyce, Mark Tiede, Christy Holland & Ann Choe
2008 A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of “retroflex" and “bunched" American English /r/. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 123(6): 4466–4481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Full-text

The case for alveolar fricative rhotics with evidence from Nusu
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Chabot, Alex
2019. What’s wrong with being a rhotic?. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.