Translation published In:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman AreaVol. 40:1 (2017) ► pp.90–122
Translation
The linguistic reconstruction of the past
The case of the Boro-Garo languages
Translated by
I will first describe (1) the linguistic situation in modern-day Assam (Northeast India) and the historical hypotheses that might explain it. These hypotheses are subjected to criticism. Next, I will analyse (2) in detail, the phonological concordances in the Tibeto-Burman languages and dialects of Central Assam that form the Boro-Garo group. I will present detailed criteria – the most detailed of all will concern the diphthongs – with examples, which will enable us to classify the languages. Using these criteria will also allow us to take advantage of certain ancient sources of information on dialects which are, in some cases, extinct. The study (3) of other Tibeto-Burman languages will consolidate our criteria and specify their historical development. Finally (4), I will propose a historical reconstruction of linguistic layers, after which (5) I will emphasise the importance of the distinction, central to our discussion, between language change and ethnic change (where cultural and physical anthropology follow distinct paths) before proposing a basis for a more general investigation of the Boro-Garo languages.
Northeastern India is home to a great number of languages, mainly from the Tibeto-Burman, Mon-Khmer, Tai and Indo-Aryan groups. This paper first summarises the current historical interpretations of this plethora, and concentrates on the Tibeto-Burman languages spoken in the lowlands, sc. the Boro-Garo subgroup. A phonological comparative assessment of the data provides a classification with definite criteria, and suggests historical interpretation. Central to this comparative study are the vowel systems, the analysis of which allows us to understand far better (and to use more appropriately) the older lexical lists from 1805. The result of this assessment is a new direction of research, when it appears that the Zeliangrong languages (traditionally taken as Southern Naga) offer a remarkable and certainly unexpected linguistic link between the Boro-Garo and the Kuki Chin (and Naga) languages. The paper exemplifies how language histories remain distinct from ethnic and political developments, and makes a useful contribution to a finer historical understanding of complex human situations.
Keywords: Tibeto-Burman, Boro-Garo, historical linguistics, Assam, Austroasiatic, ethnic history of Assam
Article outline
- Introduction by F. Jacquesson
- 1.The stratigraphic metaphor and the linguistic population of Assam
- 2.The Boro-Garo languages
- 3.External relations of Boro-Garo
- 4.The history of the Boro-Garo languages
- 5.The linguist and the logic of the groups
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References
Avouac, Jean-Philippe & P. De Wever
(eds.) 2002 Himalaya-Tibet,
le choc des continents. Paris: CNRS et Museum.
Benedict, Paul K.
1972 Sino-Tibetan. A
Conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
Bhat, D. N. Shankara
1968 Boro Vocabulary (With a
Grammatical Sketch) [Building Centenary and Silver Jubilee Series
59]. Poona: Deccan College.
Breugel, Seino van
2014 ‘A grammar of
Atong’. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Burling, R.
1959 Proto-Bodo. Language 351: 433–453.
1961 A
Garo Grammar. Poona: Deccan College.
Burling, Robbins (with U.V. Joseph
) 2006 ‘Comparative
phonology of the Boro-Garo languages’. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Linguistics.
Butler, John
1873 A
rough comparative vocabulary of some of the dialects spoken in the “Nágá Hills”
district’. Journal of the Asiatic Society of
Bengal (Calcutta) 42(1): App., I–XXIX.
Debbarma, Binoy
2001 Concise
Kokborok-English-Bengali Dictionary. Khumulwng: Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council.
Graham-Bower, Ursula
1946 Cycle-migration
of the Zemi-Nagas, North Cachar Hills, Assam. Man in
India XXVI1: 50–52.
1951 Naga
Path. London: John Murray.
Grierson, Sir George
(ed.) 1903–1928 Linguistic
survey of India, Vol. 3: Tibeto-Burman
Family. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing.
Gurdon, P. R. T.
1904 The
Morans. Journal of the Asiatic Society of
Bengal 731: 36–48.
Jacquesson, François
1999 Abrégé
d’histoire de l’Assam jusqu’à l’installation anglaise. Journal
Asiatique 287(1): 191–284.
2000 Deux
territoires d’histoire linguistique, le Brahmapoutre &
l’Iéniseï. BSLP 95(1): 343–388.
2005a Le Deuri: langue Tibéto-Birmane d’Assam [Collection de la Société de
Linguistique de
Paris]. Leuven: Peeters.
2005b Les
langues boro-garo. Essai de linguistique historique et comparative. Mémoire d’habilitation, Paris-3.
2006 ‘La
reconstruction linguistique du passé: Le cas des language Boro-Garo’. Bulletin de la Société de
Linguistique de Paris.
Jose, U. V.
2000 Rabha-English
Dictionary Khúrangnala. Guwahati: Don Bosco Publications.
Lorrain, J. H.
1950 Dictionary
of the Lushai Language. Calcutta: Asiatic Society.
MacFarlane, Alan & Iris MacFarlane
2003 Green
Gold: The Empire of Tea. London: Ebury Press.
Marak, H. W.
1975 Ku’bidik:
A Garo-English-Assamese Dictionary. Guwahati: Assam Academy for Cultural Relations.
Matisoff, James A.
2003 Handbook of
Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Mochari, Moniram
1985 Bodo-English
Dictionary. Kokrajhar: Bodo Catholic Youth Association.
Rongmei
Lexicon
1999 Imphal: Rongmei Literature Society.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Evans, Jonathan P.
2022. Classifiers in Dimasa and (in-)definite marking. Asian Languages and Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 181 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.