Cover not available
To be specified published In:
Language Teaching for Young Learners
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.111–138
Survey article

Making the most of an early start to L2 instruction

| University of Salzburg
| Trinity College Dublin
Research over more than forty years has shown consistently that earlier L2 starters do not in the long term maintain the linguistic advantage of an early start over older starters. What, then, in the light of the widespread setting aside of the evidence regarding the apparent uselessness of an early start, is one to advise in respect of early L2 instruction? In this paper we discuss four factors which emerge as perhaps having relevance in this regard: the role of (bi)literacy skills, the role of language learning motivation, the role of factors relating to the transition from primary to secondary school, and the role of intensity of L2 instruction. We suggest that there are a number of broader macro-institutional factors, such as the impact of classroom experiences, that may impede the goal sought by the offering of numerous years of continued FL instruction.
Keywords: age factor, young learners, intensity, L2 motivation, literacy, bilingual advantage
Article outline
  • 1.Literacy skills, previous languages and interdependence
    • Summary
  • 2.The motivational dimension of early instructed FL learning
    • Summary
  • 3.Transition from primary to secondary school
    • Summary
  • 4.Intensity versus quantity of instruction
    • Summary
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 17 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00009.pfe
References (112)
References
Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & de Bot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 75–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alderson, J. C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? In J. C. Alderson, & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 1–24). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Artieda, G., Roquet, H., & Nicolás-Conesa, F. (2017). The impact of age and exposure on EFL achievement in two learning contexts: formal instruction and formal instruction + content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avineri, N., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Bridging the language gap. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 25(1), 66–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baetens Beardsmore, H. (2002). The significance of CLIL/EMILE. In D. Marsh (ed.), CLIL/EMILE the European Dimension (pp. 24–26). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Berthele, R. (2017). Assessing heritage languages and interdependence: Why and how? In R. Berthele & A. Lambelet (Eds.), Interdependence or independence? Heritage and school language literacy development in migrant children (pp. 189–201). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berthele, R., & Lambelet, A. (2017a). Interdependence or independence? Heritage and school language literacy development in migrant children. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2017b). Investigating interdependence and literacy development in heritage language speakers: Theoretical and methodological considerations. In R. Berthele & A. Lambelet (Eds.), Interdependence or independence? Heritage and school language literacy development in migrant children (pp. 1–26). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blondin, C., Candelier, M., Edelenbos, P., Johnstone, R., Kubanek-German, A., & Taeschner, T. (1998). Foreign languages in primary and pre-school education: A review of recent research within the European Union. London, UK: CILT.Google Scholar
Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 391, 523–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2004). Teaching English as a third language: The effect of attitudes and motivation. In C. Hoffmann, & J. Ytsma (Eds.), Trilingualism in family, school and community (pp. 202–218). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, G. N. (2014). Transition in modern languages from primary to secondary school: the challenge of change. Language Learning Journal, 42(3), 242–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, L., & White, J. (2011). An intensive look at intensity in language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 106–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Closing the gap: Intensity and proficiency. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning (pp. 45–65). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Courtney, L., Graham, S., Tonkyn, A., & Marinis, T. (2015). Individual differences in early language learning: A study of English learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 38(6), 824–847. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL: A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 97–111). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, UK: CUP.Google Scholar
Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners’ motivational profiles and their motivated learning behaviour. Language Learning, 55(4), 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (1976). The influence of bilingualism on cognitive growth: A synthesis of research findings and explanatory hypotheses. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 91, 1–43.Google Scholar
(1978). Bilingualism and the development of metalinguistic awareness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9(2), 131–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). An introductory reader to the writings of Jim Cummins. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 726–753). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Zarobe, Y. R., & Jiménez Catalán, R. M. (2009). Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Driscoll, P. (1999). Teaching modern foreign languages in the primary school. Andover, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Egiguren, I. (2006). Atzerriko hizkunktza goiztiarraren eragina gaitasun eleaniztunean (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (Ed.). (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. (2004). What do we know about bilingual education for majority language students. In T. K. Bhatia, & W. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism and multiculturalism (pp. 547–576). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1993). Linguistic and cognitive correlates of academic skills in first and second languages. Language Learning, 43(1), 5–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzales, R. D. (2010). Motivation orientation in foreign language learning: The case of Filipino students learning foreign languages. TESOL Journal, 31, 3–28.Google Scholar
Goorhuis-Brouwer, S., & de Bot, K. (2010). Impact of early English language teaching on L1 and L2 development in children in Dutch schools. International Journal of Bilingualism, 141, 289–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goriot, C., Denessen, E., Bakker, J., & Droop, M. (2016). Benefits of being bilingual? The relationship between pupils’ perceptions of teachers’ appreciation of their home language and executive functioning. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(6), 700–713. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, S., Courtney, L., Tonkyn, A., & Marinis, T. (2016). Motivational trajectories for early language learning across the primary-secondary school transition. British Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 682–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiligsmann, P., Galand, B., Mettewie, L., Meunier, F., Szmalec, A., & van Goethem, K. (2013). Assessing content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Linguistic, cognitive and educational perspectives (Unpublished research project). Université catholique de Louvain and Université de Namur.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18(3), 193–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaekel, N., Schurig, M., Florian, M., & Ritter, M. (2017). From early starters to late finishers? A longitudinal study of early foreign language learning in school. Language Learning, 67(3), 631–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeong-Won, L., & Schallert, D. L. (1997). The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the threshold hypothesis in an EFL context. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 713–739. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. (2016). Transition from primary to secondary language learning: Using an assessment for learning approach to unpack pupils’ ‘suitcases of skills and abilities’. Babylonia, 21, 79–83.Google Scholar
Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J. (Eds.). (2015). Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanno, Y. (2007). ELT policy directions in multilingual Japan. In J. Cummins, & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching. Part one (pp. 63–74). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kersten, K., Rohde, A., Schelletter, C., & Steinlen, A. (Eds.). (2010). Bilingual preschools. Vol. I: Learning and development. Vol II: Best practices. Trier, Germany: WVT.Google Scholar
Kovelman, I., Baker, S. A., & Petitto, L.-A. (2008). Age of first bilingual language exposure as a new window into bilingual reading development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 203–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krompàk, E. (2017). Promoting multilingualism through heritage language courses: New perspectives on the transfer effect. In R. Berthele, & A. Lambelet (Eds.), Interdependence or independence? Heritage and school language literacy development in migrant children (pp. 142–161). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lamb, M. (2012). A self system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural setting. Language Learning, 62(4), 997–1023. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second language research, 24(1), 35–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasagabaster, D. (2011). English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. (2000). Classroom second language acquisition research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 431–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections. Evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 418–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, A., Peters, M., & Wesche, M. (2004). Le bain linguistique: Programme intensif de francais langue seconde a Ottawa. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(3), 373–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 521, 537–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maillat, D. (2010). The pragmatics of L2 in CLIL. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms (pp. 39–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin-Jones, M., & Romaine, S. (1986). Semilingualism – A half-baked Theory of Communicative Competence. Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 26–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsh, D. (Ed.). (2002). CLIL/EMILE the European dimension. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Masgoret, A. M., Bernaus, M., & Gardner, R. C. (2001). Examining the role of attitudes and motivation outside the formal classroom: A test of the mini-AMTB for children. In Z. Dörnyei, & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 281–296). Hawai’i, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1990). The relationship between first and second languages: Language proficiency and language aptitude. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, & M. Swain (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 158–174). Cambridge, UK: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehisto, P. (2008). CLIL counterweights: Recognising and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 11, 93–119.Google Scholar
Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (1993). Investigation of attitudes and motivation in early foreign language learning. In M. Vilke, & Y. Vrhovac (Eds.), Children and foreign languages (pp. 45–71). Zagreb, Croatia: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zagreb.Google Scholar
Mihaljević Djigunović, J., & Krevelj, L. S. (2010). Instructed early SLA: Development of attitudes. SRAZ, 541, 127–146.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moser, U., Bayer, N., & Tomasik, M. J. (2017). Language skill transfer effects: Moving from heritage language to school language in kindergarten. In R. Berthele, & A. Lambelet (Eds.), Interdependence or independence? Heritage and school language literacy development in migrant children (pp. 120–141). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyer, A. (2004). Age, accent and experience in second language acquisition: An integrated approach to critical period inquiry. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2000). Bilingualism and trilingualism in school students in Catalonia. In J. Cenoz, & U. Jessner (Eds.), English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language (pp. 157–178). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 578–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Time and timing in CLIL: A comparative approach to language gains. In M. Juan-Garau, & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 87–104). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C., & Singleton, D. (2011). A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching, 44(1), 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C., & Tragant, E. (2001). Motivation and attitudes towards L2: Some effects of age and instruction. In S. Forster-Cohen, & A. Nizegorodcew (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook (Vol. 11, pp. 211–224). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C., Tragant, E., & Camuñas, M. (2015). Transition: Continuity or a fresh start? APAC Quarterly, 891, 11–16.Google Scholar
Netten, J., & Germain, C. (2004). Theoretical and research foundations of intensive French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(3), 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieminen, L., & Ullakonoja, R. (2017). The development of Russian heritage pupils’ writing proficiency in Finnish and Russian. In R. Berthele, & A. Lambelet (Eds.), Interdependence or independence? Heritage and school language literacy development in migrant children (pp. 162–188). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolov, M. (1999). ‘Why do you learn English?’ ‘Because the teacher is very short.’ A study of Hungarian children’s language learning motivation. Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Students’ and teachers’ feedback on diagnostic tests for young EFL learners: Implications for classrooms. In M. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 249–266). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolov, M., & Mihaljevic Djigunovic, J. (2011). All shades of every color: An overview of early teaching and learning of foreign languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C., & Juan-Garau, M. (2010). To CLIL or not to CLIL: From bilingualism to multilingualism in Catalan/Spanish communities. In D. Lasagabaster, & Y. R. de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp. 115–138). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Peters, Martine. (2000). Le bain linguistique: Une innovation pour le programme de francais de base. Apprentissage et Socialisation, 20(2), 71–86.Google Scholar
Pfenninger, S. E. (2016). All good things come in threes: Early English learning, CLIL and motivation in Switzerland. Cahiers de l‘ILSL, 481, 119–147. (Special issue, Patricia Ronan (Ed.), Perspectives on English in Switzerland).Google Scholar
(in press). Age meets multilingualism: Influence of starting age on L3 acquisition across different learner populations. In C. Bardel & L. Sanchez (eds.), EuroSLA Studies.
Pfenninger, S. E., & Singleton, D. (2016a). Affect trumps age: A person-in-context relational view of age and motivation in SLA. Second Language Research. Prepublished 15 January, 2016. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). The age factor in the foreign language class: What do learners think? Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition (TAPSLA), 2(1), 7–23.Google Scholar
Pfenninger, S. E., & J. Lendl. (2017). Transitional woes: On the impact of L2 input continuity from primary to secondary school. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 443–470. (Special issue, T. Angelovska (Ed.), L2 Grammar Acquisition). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfenninger, S. E., & Singleton, D. (2017). Beyond age effects in instructional L2 learning: Revisiting the age factor. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Starting age overshadowed: The primacy of differential environmental and family support effects on L2 attainment in an instructional context. Language Learning. 69(S1), 207–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pica, T. (2011). Second language acquisition research: Applied and applicable orientations to practical questions and concerns. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 21, pp. 257–273). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 291, 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riehl, C. M. (2013). Sprachkontaktforschung: Eine Einführung (3rd ed.). Tübingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar
Singleton, D., & Ryan, L. (2004). Language acquisition: The age factor (2nd ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & van Gelderen, A. (2009). Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning, teaching, and researching writing in foreign language contexts (pp. 77–101). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R., van Gelderen, A., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic fluency, linguistic knowledge and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53(1), 165–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R., van Gelderen, A., Stoel, R., Hulstijn, J., & de Glopper, K. (2011). Modeling the development of L1 and EFL writing proficiency of secondary school students. Language Learning, 61(1), 31–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R., & Munoz, C. (2007). Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL? System, 35(3), 305–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1989). Intensive ESL programs in Quebec primary schools. TESL Canada Journal, 71, 11–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R. (2012). Individual differences in L2 learning and long-term L1-L2 relationships. Language Learning, 62 (Suppl. 2), 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2009). Long-term crosslinguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning, 59(1), 203–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, C., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49(4), 1114–1128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2017). Raising children’s metalinguistic awareness to enhance classroom second language learning. In M. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 22–48). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tragant, E. (2006). Language learning motivation and age. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 237–268). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Truniger, M. (1998). Sprachenkonzept Schweiz. Zum Unterricht in Migrationssprachen (Nicht-Landessprachen) innerhalb des Gesamtsprachenkonzepts. Retrieved from < [URL]> (22 October, 2018).
Ushioda, E. (2008). Motivation and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 19–34). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In D. Zoltán, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215–228). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Motivation and ELT: Global issues and local concerns. In E. Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation: Language learning and professional challenges (pp. 1–17). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
(2014). Context and complex dynamic systems theory. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 47–54). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yun, Y. (2005). Factors explaining EFL learners’ performance in a timed essay writing test: A structural equation modeling approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Vanhove, J. (2013). The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition: A statistical critique and a reanalysis. Plos One, 8(7), e69172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015, 16 October). The problem with cutting up continuous variables and what to do when things aren’t linear [Blog post]. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Verspoor, M. H., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.). (2015). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vesterbacka, S. (1991). Elever i Språkbadskola, Social Bakgrund och Tidig Språkutveckling [Summary, children in immersion programme, home background and early language development: Issues and strategies]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wesche, M., Toews-Janzen, M., & MacFarlane, A. (1996). Comparative outcomes and impacts of early, middle and late entry French immersion options: Review of recent research and annotated bibliography. Toronto, Canada: OISE/UT Press.Google Scholar
Williams, M., Burden, R. L., & Lanvers, U. (2002). French is the language of love and stuff: Student perceptions of issues related to motivation in learning a foreign language. British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 503–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Frank Schmid, Silvia
2024. The communicative CLIL classroom. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 12:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Ruth, Elin
2024. EFL teacher beliefs about collaborative writing at Swedish primary school. Education Inquiry ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Estrada-Chichón, José Luis & Roberto Sánchez-Cabrero
2023. Cultural Awareness in Pre-Service Early Childhood Teacher Training: A Catalogue of British Cultural Elements in Peppa Pig. Education Sciences 13:10 ► pp. 1021 ff. DOI logo
Fleta, M. Teresa
2023. Language and Content Learning Through Oracy at Pre-primary Education and in CLIL-Based Contexts. In Handbook of CLIL in Pre-primary Education [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ], ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Whiting, Sue B. & Chloë Ruth Marshall
2023. Foreign language provision in English primary schools: making evidence-based pedagogical choices. Frontiers in Education 8 DOI logo
Jaekel, Nils, Isabelle van Ackern, Michael Schurig & Ritter Markus
2022. Investigating the transition from elementary to secondary school: student perspectives of the continuum and receptive language proficiency. The Language Learning Journal 50:6 ► pp. 747 ff. DOI logo
Singleton, David & Colin J. Flynn
2021. Language aptitude, language interaction and age of language learning. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 12:2 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.