Article In:
Language Teaching for Young Learners: Online-First Articles

Mentoring task-based language teaching as an innovation in an Indonesian secondary school

| Universitas Negeri Medan
| Curtin University
This article seeks to address a lack of research documenting how mentoring can help teachers to introduce TBLT in an Asian context. We report a whole semester project in an Indonesian secondary school where a mentor (an experienced teacher-educator) worked with a teacher, who was used to a structural approach, to introduce task-based language teaching (TBLT) into his classroom. We describe how the mentoring was set up and carried out to pre-empt problems that evaluation studies have shown can arise with TBLT. To evaluate to what extent the mentoring was successful, we conducted a case study employing qualitative and quantitative data collection methods, examining the extent to which the mentoring enabled the teacher to implement TBLT and whether the TBLT resulted in greater learning than in a traditional, structural-oriented classroom. The main findings were that the teacher was successful in transitioning to TBLT as evidenced in his ability to design his own tasks and by the kinds of questions he asked, the strategic use of the learners’ L1 and focus-on-form during the performance of the tasks (i.e., the kinds of interactional features fundamental to TBLT). Another finding was that the learners in the TBLT class also demonstrated greater language development than a comparable structural-oriented class. We utilize the evidence collected from the teacher’s implementation of TBLT to discuss the mentoring that took place and to identify ways of improving it.
Keywords: task-based language teaching, secondary school, innovation, mentoring
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Innovating with TBLT
    • 2.2Mentoring an innovation
  • 3.Context of the study
    • Instructional context
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Participants
      • The mentor
      • The protégé teacher and his students
      • The traditional teacher and her class
      • Informed consent form
    • 4.2The mentoring process
      • Workshop
      • Materials
    • 4.3Data collection
      • Observations and video recordings
      • Reflective journal
      • Teacher interviews
      • Language tests
  • 5.Findings
    • 5.1The teacher’s tasks
    • 5.2Interactional features of the lessons
      • Use of the L1
      • The teacher’s questions
      • Focus-on-form
      • Listening test
      • Reading test
      • Speaking test
      • Story-telling test
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
    • 7.1The mentor’s reflections
    • 7.2Limitations
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (37)
References
Adams, P. (2012). Developing possibilities and potentialities: A mentorship handbook for educators. Alberta Education.Google Scholar
Awaya, A., McEwan, H., Heyler, D., Linsky, S., Lum, D., & Wakukawa, P. (2003). Mentoring as a journey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19 (1), 45–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aydin, D., & Arslan, S. (2022). Teacher mentoring: Definitions, expectations and experiences from international EFL teachers. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7 (1), 181–197. [URL]. DOI logo
Beretta, A. (1990). Implementation of the Bangalore project. Applied Linguistics, 11 (4), 321–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31 1, 36–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38 (4), 639–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
East, M. (2014). Encouraging innovation in a modern foreign language initial teacher education programme: What do beginning teachers make of task-based language teaching?. The Language Learning Journal, 42(3), 261–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 (3), 221–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 511, 281–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R., & Tolosa, C. (2022). Pedagogical realities of implementing task-based language teaching. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fullan, M. G. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50 (6), 12–12.Google Scholar
Gray, C. (2001). Mentor development in the education of modern language teachers. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G., & Lindberg, I. (1988). What’s the question? Investigating questions in second language classrooms. AILA Review, 5 1, 73–88.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the new millennium. Theory into Practice, 39 (1), 50–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, R. (2013). Task-Based Language Teaching: Responses from Chinese teachers of English. TESL-EJ, 16 (4), 1–21. [URL]
Huling, L., & Resta, V. (2001). Teacher mentoring as professional development. ERIC Digest, 1 (1), 1–6. [URL]
Jeon, I. J., & Hahn, J. W. (2006). Exploring EFL teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching: A case study of Korean secondary school classroom practice. Asian EFL Journal, 8 (1), 123–143. [URL]
Li, D. (1998). “It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine”: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (4), 677–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlewood, W. (2014). Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here?. Language Teaching, 47 (3), 349–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karavas-Doukas, K. (2014). Evaluating the implementation of educational innovations: lessons from the past. In P. R. Dickins & K. Germaine (Eds.), Managing evaluation and innovation in language teaching (pp. 25–50). Routledge.Google Scholar
Long, M., & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268–285). Newbury House.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (1994). Curricular Innovation: Issues and Problems. Applied Language Learning, 5 (2), 1–30. [URL]
Murray, M., & Owen, M. (1991). Beyond the myths of mentoring: How to facilitate an effective mentoring program. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samimy, K. & Kobayashi, C. (2004). Toward the development of intercultural competence: Theoretical and pedagogical implications for Japanese English teachers. JALT Journal, 26 (2), 245–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saputro, T. H., Hima, A. N., & Farah, R. R. (2021). Benefits and challenges of doing task-based language teaching in Indonesia: Teachers’ perception. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 7 (1), 131–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it?. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10 (1), 4–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todd, R. W. (2006). Continuing change after the innovation. System, 34 (1), 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2009). Mediating between predetermined order and complete chaos. The role of the teacher in task-based language education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 264–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 164–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., & Verhelst, M. (Eds.) (2007). Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar