Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Teaching for Young Learners
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp.28–51
 

An early start in primary EFL education and the role of teacher qualification and teaching quality

| University of Duisburg-Essen
| University of Magdeburg
| Technische Universität Dortmund
This study investigates the receptive L2 proficiency of early and late starters in primary EFL education in the German context. Thus, the L2 reading and listening proficiency of primary EFL learners was assessed at the end of primary schooling in year 4 in two German federal states with different ages of onset. A special focus of the study is on indicators of teaching quality as well as teacher qualification. The study did not find significant differences in the receptive L2 proficiency between early starters and late startes. When controlling for teaching quality or teacher qualification the earlier age of onset or increased amount of exposure did not explain variance in learners’ receptive EFL skills. However, supportive climate as an aspect of teaching quality correlates positively and significantly with learners’ EFL proficiency. In addition, there is a small advantage for children taught by teachers with a major in EFL.
Keywords: foreign language education, English as a foreign language, primary school, teaching quality, teacher qualification, age of onset
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Primary EFL education in Germany
    • 1.2Teacher qualification in primary EFL education
    • 1.3Teaching quality in primary EFL education
    • 1.4Prior studies on an early start in primary EFL education
    • 1.5Prior studies on the relationship between teacher qualification and teaching quality
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Aims of the study and research questions
    • 2.2Research design, instruments and sample
    • 2.3Data analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Comparison of means
    • 3.2Multilevel regression modeling
  • 4.Summary and discussion
  • 5.Limitations
  • 6.Conclusion and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19002.wil
References (54)
References
Blömeke, S., Olsen, R. V., & Suhl, U. (2016). Relation of student achievement to the quality of their teachers and instructional quality. In T. Nilsen & J.-E. Gustafsson (Eds.), IEA research for education. Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes: Relationships across countries, cohorts and time (pp. 21–50). Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brophy, J. (1999). Teaching. Brussels: International Academy of Education.Google Scholar
Civinini, C. (2017a). Not-so-bright and early: Education policy makers have been emphasising the importance of starting foreign language learning early… but could it be a waste of time? EL Gazette, 2017(6). Retrieved from <[URL]>
(2017b). ‘Don’t give up on Germany’s early start policies’, says academic: Prof Eva Wilden says there is not enough evidence to suggest the programmes will fail. EL Gazette, 2017(7). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2010). Teacher credentials and student achievement in high school: A cross-subjet analysis with student fixed effects. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 655–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortina, K. S., & Thames, M. H. (2013). Teacher education in Germany. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Vol. 8. Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project (pp. 49–62). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In J. F. Kroll (Ed.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Deters-Philipp, A.-C. (2017). Teacher language in German EFL classrooms at primary level: An interview study. In E. Wilden & R. Porsch (Eds.), The professional development of primary EFL teachers: National and international research (pp. 209–222). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
(2018). Lehrersprache im Englischunterricht an deutschen Grundschulen. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Dörr, S. (2018). Lehrer- und Schülersprache im Englischunterricht der bayerischen Mittelschule. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Enever, J. (2018). Policy and Politics in Global Primary English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Grundschulunterricht aus Schüler-, Lehrer- und Beobachterperspektive: Zusammenhänge und Vorhersage von Lernerfolg. Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie, 28(3), 127–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmke, A. (2015). Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts (6th. ed.). Seelze-Velber: Kallmeyer.Google Scholar
Helmke, T., Helmke, A., Schrader, F.-W., Wagner, W., Nold, G., & Schröder, K. (2008). Die Videostudie des Englischunterrichts. In DESI-Konsortium (Ed.), Beltz Pädagogik. Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch: Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie (pp. 345–363). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, L., & Richter, D. (2016). Aspekte der Aus- und Fortbildung von Deutsch- und Englischlehrkräften im Ländervergleich. In P. Stanat, K. Böhme, S. Schipolowski, & N. Haag (Eds.), IQB-Bildungstrend 2015: Sprachliche Kompetenzen am Ende der 9. Jahrgangsstufe im zweiten Ländervergleich (pp. 481–507). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Hopp, H., Kieseier, T., Vogelbacher, M., & Thoma, D. (2018). Cognitive and linguistic profiles in early foreign language vocabulary and grammar. In T. Piske & A. Steinlen (Eds.), Cognition and second language acquisition: Research on bilingual and regular language programs. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Jaekel, N., Schurig, M., Florian, M., & Ritter, M. (2017). From early starters to late finishers? A longitudinal study of early foreign language learning in school. Language Learning, 561, 1–29.Google Scholar
Kerstan, T. (2008). No murks, please. Stoppt den Fremdsprachenunterricht an Grundschulen! Zeit Online (17.12.2008). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Keßler, J.-U. (2009). Englisch ab Klasse 1: Zu früh? Zu wenig erforscht? Wirkungslos? – Zu wichtig! Schule NRW, 9(4), 158–162.Google Scholar
Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 137–160). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Kolb, A. (2009). To be continued? Der Übergang von der Primar- zur Sekundarstufe aus der Perspektive von Lehrkräften. In C. Lütge, A. I. Kollenrott, B. Ziegenmeyer, & G. Fellmann (Eds.), Empirische Fremdsprachenforschung – Konzepte und Perspektiven (pp. 85–98). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2011). Kontinuität und Brüche: Der Übergang von der Primar- zur Sekundarstufe im Englischunterricht aus der Perspektive von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung, 22(2), 145–175.Google Scholar
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24(1), 35–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leon, J., Medina-Garrido, E., & Núñez, J. L. (2017). Teaching quality in math class: The development of a scale and the analysis of its relationship with engagement and achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 895. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leucht, M., Prieβ-Buchheit, J., Pant, H. A., & Köller, O. (2013). Sometimes less is more: Educational effectiveness of English as a foreign language instruction in German classrooms. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(4), 435–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology. European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 86–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, P. (2006). Englisch-Hörverstehen am Ende der Grundschulzeit. In W. Bos & M. Pietsch (Eds.), KESS 4 – Kompetenzen und Einstellungen von Schülerinnen und Schülern am Ende der Jahrgangsstufe 4 in Hamburger Grundschulen (pp. 203–224). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
MSWNRW. (2008). Richtlinien und Lehrpläne für die Grundschule in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Düsseldorf: MSWNRW.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (Ed.). (2006). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Input and long-term effects of starting age in foreign language learning. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(2), 113–133.Google Scholar
Myles, F., & Mitchell, R. (2012). Learning French from ages 5, 7, and 11: An investigation into starting ages, rates and routes of learning amongst early foreign language learners. ESRC End of Award Report. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar
NKM. (2006). Kerncurriculum für die Grundschule. Schuljahrgänge 3–4. Hannover: Niedersächsisches Kultusministerium.Google Scholar
Pfenninger, S. E. (2014). The literacy factor in the optimal age discussion: A five-year longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 217–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfenninger, S. E., & Singleton, D. M. (2017). Beyond age effects in instructional L2 learning: Revisiting the age factor. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piske, T. (2017). The earlier, the better? Some critical remarks on current EFL teaching to young learners and their implications for foreign language teacher education. In E. Wilden & R. Porsch (Eds.), The professional development of primary EFL teachers: National and international research (pp. 45–57). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Porsch, R. (2019). Fachfremdes Unterrichten in Deutschland: Welche Rolle spielt die Lehrerbildung?. In R. Porsch & B. Rösken-Winter (Eds.), Professionelles Handeln im fachfremd erteilten Mathematikunterricht: Empirische Befunde und Fortbildungskonzepte (pp. 29–47). Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum.Google Scholar
Porsch, R., & Wendt, H. (2017). Mathematikunterricht und Studienschwerpunkte der Lehrkräfte: Gibt es Auswirkungen auf die Mathematikleistungen von Grundschülerinnen und -schülern?: Nationale Befunde aus TIMSS 2011. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 45(2), 115–135.Google Scholar
Porsch, R., & Whanell, R. (2019). Out-of-field teaching affecting students and learning: What is known and unknown. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field”: International perspectives on teaching as a non-specialist (pp. 179–191). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Porsch, R., & Wilden, E. (2017). The introduction of EFL in primary education in Germany: A view from implementation research. In E. Wilden & R. Porsch (Eds.), The professional development of primary EFL teachers: National and international research (pp. 59–75). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Rasch, G. (1960[1980]). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, M., Florian, M., & Lewandowska, Z. (2015). Materialien für den Englischunterricht: Ganz In. Mit Ganztag mehr Zukunft. Das neue Ganztagsgymnasium NRW. Praxishefte. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Rixon, S. (2013). British Council survey of policy and practice in primary English language teaching worldwide. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Rossa, H. (2013). Effective language teaching: Wie kann mein Unterricht gelingen? Wie kann ich meine Schüler(innen) dabei unterstützen, die Fremdsprache zu entdecken, zu entschlüsseln und selbst kommunikativ zu nutzen? Die Grundschulzeitschrift, 2671, 29–31.Google Scholar
Sachse, K. A., Haag, N., & Weirich, S. (2016). Testdesign und Auswertung des IQB-Bildungstrends 2015: Technische Grundlagen. In P. Stanat, K. Böhme, S. Schipolowski, & N. Haag (Eds.), IQB-Bildungstrend 2015: Sprachliche Kompetenzen am Ende der 9. Jahrgangsstufe im zweiten Ländervergleich (pp. 509–526). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Steinlen, A., & Piske, T. (2018). Deutsch- und Englischleistungen von Kindern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund im bilingualen Unterricht und im Fremdsprachenunterricht: Ein Vergleich. In A. Ballis & N. Hodaie (Eds.), Perspektiven auf Mehrsprachigkeit: Individuum – Bildung – Gesellschaft (pp. 85–97). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thaler, E. (2014). Kognitive Aktivierung & Hattie & Fremdsprachenunterricht. Praxis Fremdsprachenunterricht, 2014(6), 5–6.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2013). Assessing age of onset effects in (early) child L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 74–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S., Persson, L., Prins, T., & de Bot, K. (2015). An investigation of factors affecting early foreign language learning in the Netherlands. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 527–548.Google Scholar
Wendt, H., & Bos, W. (Eds.). (2015). Auf dem Weg zum Ganztagsgymnasium: Erste Ergebnisse der wissenschaftlichen Begleitforschung zum Projekt Ganz In. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Wilden, E., & Porsch, R. (2016). Learning EFL from year 1 or year 3? A comparative study on children’s EFL listening and reading comprehension at the end of primary education. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 191–212). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilden, E., Porsch, R., & Ritter, M. (2013). Je früher desto besser? – Frühbeginnender Englischunterricht ab Klasse 1 oder 3 und seine Auswirkungen auf das Hör- und Leseverstehen. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung, 24(2), 171–201.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Belayneh, Kassahun Dejene & Woldie Belachew
2024. TSPCK-Based instruction and academic achievement of grade 11 students on chemical kinetics and equilibrium. Cogent Education 11:1 DOI logo
Inostroza, Maria-Jesus, Cristhian Perez-Villalobos & Pia Tabalí
2024. Chilean Primary Learners’ Motivation and Attitude towards English as a Foreign Language. Education Sciences 14:3 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Porsch, Raphaela, Stefan Schipolowski, Camilla Rjosk & Karoline A. Sachse
2023. Effects of an early start in learning English as a foreign language on reading and listening comprehension in Year 9. Language Teaching for Young Learners 5:2 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Sanfo, Jean-Baptiste M.B. & Inoussa Malgoubri
2023. Teaching quality and student learning achievements in Ethiopian primary education: How effective is instructional quality in closing socioeconomic learning achievement inequalities?. International Journal of Educational Development 99 ► pp. 102759 ff. DOI logo
Porsch, Raphaela & Eva Wilden
2022. Teaching English Out-of-Field in Primary School: Differences in Professional Characteristics and Effects on Self-Assessed Instructional Quality. In Out-of-Field Teaching Across Teaching Disciplines and Contexts, ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Bao, Lei & Ping Yu
2021. Evaluation Method of Online and Offline Hybrid Teaching Quality of Physical Education Based on Mobile Edge Computing. Mobile Networks and Applications 26:5 ► pp. 2188 ff. DOI logo
Wilden, Eva
2021. Fachspezifische Aspekte von Unterrichtsqualität im Schulfach Englisch. Unterrichtswissenschaft 49:2 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Wilden, Eva & Raphaela Porsch
2019. The impact of teaching quality and learning time on primary EFL learners’receptive proficiency. AILA Review 32 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Wilden, Eva & Raphaela Porsch
2020. A critical analysis of the German public debate about an early start in primary foreign language education. Language Teaching for Young Learners 2:2 ► pp. 192 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.