Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Teaching for Young Learners
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp.52–72

Child EFL learners’ attitudes towards a collaborative writing task

An exploratory study

 | Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
 | Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
The way learners engage with tasks can crucially impact on learning opportunities and, therefore, more attention is now being devoted to task affect. This study examines the attitudes of an underresearched population, child EFL learners, towards a collaborative dictogloss task. Thirty-two Spanish EFL children (ages 11–12) completed the task in pairs and small groups at their school, and an attitude questionnaire one week after. Results show that learners had a positive attitude towards L1 and L2 writing, collaboration in the classroom, and the task itself, regardless of their grouping condition. Although these children did not mention in their responses any explicit grammar gains as a result of the task, they considered the blend of the written and oral mode and the opportunities for peer assistance to be beneficial. These results are encouraging for the promotion of collaborative writing tasks with young learners in communicative contexts.
Keywords: children, EFL, L2 writing, collaboration, attitudes, dictogloss
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Output and collaborative writing
    • 2.2Attitudes
  • 3.Research questions
  • 4.Materials and methods
    • 4.1Context and participants
    • 4.2Design and procedures
    • 4.3Data analysis
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusions and pedagogical implications
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 2 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19008.cal
References (48)
References
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Aula Blasco, J. (2016). The relationship between writing anxiety, writing self-efficacy, and Spanish EFL students’ use of metacognitive writing strategies: A case study. Journal of English Studies, 14(0), 7–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basterrechea, M., & García Mayo, M. P. (2013). Language-related episodes during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners. In K. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts (pp. 25–43). Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
Becker, C., & Roos, J. (2016). An approach to creative speaking activities in the young learners’ classroom. Education Inquiry, 7(1), 9–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cambridge English Language Assessment (2014). Cambridge English Movers (YLE Movers). Volume 1. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019). A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System, 821, 83–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enever, J. (Ed.). (2018). Policy and politics in global primary English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2012). First European survey on languages competences. Final report. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 497–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Dobao, A., & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41(2), 365–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P. (2008). The acquisition of four nongeneric uses of the article the by Spanish EFL learners. System, 36(4), 550–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Dictogloss technique. In J. I. Liontas, T. International Association, & M. Delli Carpini (Eds.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(forthcoming). ‘Are you coming back? It was fun’ turning ethical and methodological challenges into opportunities in task-based research with children. In A. Pinter & K. Kuchah (Eds.), Ethical and methodological issues in researching young language learners in school contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
García Mayo, M. P., & Azkarai, A. (2016). EFL task-based interaction: Does task modality impact on language-related episodes? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2019). Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 801, 165–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Villarreal Olaizola, I. (2011). The development of suppletive and affixal tense and agreement morphemes in the L3 English of Basque-Spanish bilinguals. Second Language Research, 27(1), 129–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Zeitler, N. (2017). Lexical language-related episodes in pair and small group work. International Journal of English Studies, 17(1), 61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil, M. C. (2002). Spanish students in British universities: Developing a support resource to improve their academic writing skills. Presented at the Setting the Agenda: Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies in Higher Education conference, Manchester.
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 24.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the Output Hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 168–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. (2008). An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, C. (2017). Tasks, affect and second language performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 657–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, O. P., & Maarof, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in summary writing: Student perceptions and problems. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 901, 599–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (2011). Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mozaffari, S. H. (2017). Comparing student-selected and teacher-assigned pairs on collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 496–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinter, A. (2011). Children learning second languages. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shak, J. (2006). Children using dictogloss to focus on form. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 5(2), 47–62.Google Scholar
Shak, J., & Gardner, S. (2008). Young learner perspectives on four focus-on-form tasks. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 387–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, T. (1992). L1 vs L2 writing; ESL graduate students’ perceptions. TESL Canada Journal, 27–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Collaborative writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(01), 40–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & M. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1993). The Output Hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 158–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). The Output Hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French Immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (20)

Cited by 20 other publications

Azkarai, Agurtzane & Asier Calzada
2024. A multi-faceted view of engagement with language: a study with young EFL learners working on a collaborative writing task. Classroom Discourse ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & Agurtzane Azkarai
2024. Exploring learner-related variables in child collaborative writing: interaction mindset, willingness to communicate and proficiency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
del Pilar García Mayo, María
2024. Dictogloss Technique. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
García Mayo, María del Pilar
2021. Editorial. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Mayo, María del Pilar García
2021. Child Interaction in Task-Supported EFL/CLIL Contexts. In The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Delgado-Garza, Paloma & María del Pilar García Mayo
2024. Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo
Kos, Tomáš
2023. A teacher-researcher snapshot of task-based peer interactions in EFL secondary school classrooms in Germany. Language Teaching for Young Learners 5:2 ► pp. 170 ff. DOI logo
Olioumtsevits, Konstantina, Despina Papadopoulou & Theodoros Marinis
2023. Second language grammar learning in refugee children. Pedagogical Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
Udeshinee, W. A. Piyumi, Ola Knutsson & Sirkku Männikkö-Barbutiu
2023. Text Chat-Mediated Dynamic Assessment Towards Self-Regulation in Language Learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gallardo-del-Puerto, Francisco & María Martínez-Adrián
2022. Task-modality effects on young learners’ language-related episodes in collaborative dialogue. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 480 ff. DOI logo
Mhd Zain, Nur Anis Zarifah, Nurul Athirah Hamdan, Nurul Izzah Abdul Razak, Hafidin Mujahid Hamidhan, Saher Ail Mohmmad Alsabbah & Ahmad Zamir Che Daud
2022. Pre-writing Interventions for Developmental Disabilities and Typically Developing Children: A Scoping Review. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 18:s15 ► pp. 387 ff. DOI logo
Roothooft, Hanne, Amparo Lázaro-Ibarrola & Bram Bulté
2022. Task repetition and corrective feedback via models and direct corrections among young EFL writers: Draft quality and task motivation. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Villarreal, Izaskun & Amparo Lázaro-Ibarrola
2022. Models in collaborative writing among CLIL learners of English in primary school: Linguistic outcomes and motivation matters. System 110 ► pp. 102922 ff. DOI logo
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian & Michael H. Long
2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching, DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2021. Effects of proficiency and collaborative work on child EFL individual dictogloss writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo
2023. Chapter 4. Do task repetition and pretask focus on form instruction impact collaborative writing performance?. In L2 Collaborative Writing in Diverse Learning Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 59], ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Martínez-Adrián, María & Francisco Gallardo-del-Puerto
2021. Task modality and language-related episodes in young learners: An attempt to manage accuracy and editing. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Martínez-Adrián, María, M. Juncal Gutiérrez-Mangado, Francisco Gallardo-del-Puerto & María Basterrechea
2021. Language-related episodes by young CLIL learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Roca de Larios, Julio, Francisco Javier García Hernández & Yvette Coyle
2021. A theoretically-grounded classification of EFL children’s formulation strategies in collaborative writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2 ► pp. 300 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Child L2 Writers [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 32], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.