Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Teaching for Young Learners
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp.101–130

How teachers promote young language learners’ engagement

Lesson form and lesson quality

| Waseda University
| Doshisha University
Teachers of young learners often seek guidance on how best to engage and motivate their students. In this study, we aimed to document engaging teacher practices in the context of foreign language classes in Japanese elementary schools. We surveyed 16 public elementary school foreign language classes in western Japan using quantitative (questionnaire; external rating) and qualitative (naturalistic observation) tools grounded in self-determination theory. Classes were sorted into three groups of high, middle, and low teacher support based on student surveys, and observed for practices that influenced student engagement in each tercile. Results indicate that students are most responsive in classrooms involving teacher warmth and strictness, homeroom teacher involvement, appropriate pacing, instructional clarity, and a balance of activities. We offer descriptions of how these practices were employed, with implications for classroom practice and teacher training.
Keywords: engagement, foreign language, mixed-methods, motivation, classroom practice
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Engagement
    • 2.2Autonomy support and structure
    • 2.3Engaging instruction in foreign language education
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants and setting
    • 3.2Instruments
      • Supportive and structured teaching
      • Intrinsic motivation
      • External ratings of engagement
    • 3.3Observation procedures
    • 3.4Analyses
      • Quantitative analyses
      • Qualitative analyses
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Quantitative results
    • 4.2Qualitative results: Autonomy support
      • 4.2.1Homeroom teacher involvement
      • 4.2.2Warm/strict teaching
    • 4.3Qualitative results: Structure
      • 4.3.1Signals for Meaning vs. English “paint job”
      • 4.3.2Repetition, demonstration, and simplification
    • 4.4Qualitative results: Combined autonomy support and structure
      • 4.4.1Predictable interactive routines
      • 4.4.2Progressive games vs. game upon game
      • 4.4.3Keep it short vs. overextension
      • 4.4.4Balance of activities
    • 4.5Exemplary incidents
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Limitations
  • 6.Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 2 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19009.oga
References (63)
References
Aline, D., & Hosoda, Y. (2006). Team teaching participation patterns of homeroom teachers in English activities classes in Japanese public elementary schools. JALT Journal, 28(1), 5–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brophy, J. E. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.) New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G. (2005). Comparative perspectives towards communicative activities among elementary school teachers in South Korea, Japan and Taiwan. Language Teaching Research, 9(4), 423–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). English language education among young learners in East Asia: A review of current research (2004–2014). Language Teaching, 48(3), 303–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carreira, J. M. (2011). Relationship between motivation for learning EFL and intrinsic motivation for learning in general among Japanese elementary school students. System, 39(1), 90–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carreira, J. M., Ozaki, K., & Maeda, T. (2013). Motivational model of English learning among elementary school students in Japan. System, 41(3), 706–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cave, P. (2007). Primary school in Japan: Self, individuality and learning in elementary education. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copland, F., Garton, S., & Burns, A. (2014). Challenges in teaching English to young learners: Global perspectives and local realities. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 738–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copland, F., & Garton, S. (2014). Key themes and future directions in teaching English to young learners: Introduction to the Special Issue. ELT Journal, 68(3), 223–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornelius-White, J. D., & Harbaugh, A. (2009). Learner centered instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cozby, P. C., & Bates, S. C. (2012). Methods in behavioral research. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and application (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Csizer, K. (1998). Ten commandments for motivating language learners: Results of an empirical study. Language Teaching Research, 2(3), 203–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fennelly, M., & Luxton, R. (2011). Are they ready? On the verge of compulsory English, elementary school teachers lack confidence. The Language Teacher, 35(2), 19–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garton, S., Copland, F., & Burns, A. (2011). Investigating global practices in teaching English to young learners (British Council ELT Research Paper 11–01). London: British Council.Google Scholar
Good, T., & Brophy, J. (2008). Looking in classrooms (10th Ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Guilloteaux, M.-J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2019). Reexamining the role of vision in second language motivation: A preregistered conceptual replication of You, Dörnyei, and Csizér (2016). Language Learning, 1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy-support or structure but autonomy-support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Japan Statistics Bureau (2016). Japan statistical yearbook 2016. Available from <[URL]>
Kang, J. S., & Crandall, J. (2014). Teaching young learners English. New York, NY: Heinle Cengage.Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1) 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemov, D. (2015). Teach like a champion 2.0. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
McEown, M. S., & Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q. (2019). Self-determination for all language learners. System, 102–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEown, M. S., & Takeuchi, O. (2012). Motivational strategies in EFL classrooms: How do teachers impact students’ motivation? Innovation in language learning and teaching, 8(1), 20–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MEXT. (2008). Shogakkou gakushuu shidou youryou kaisetu: Gaikokugo katsudouhen [Explanatory commentary for the elementary school curriculum guidelines: Foreign language activities]. Tokyo: Kyouiku Shuppan.Google Scholar
. (2012). Hi, friends! 1. Tokyo: Kyouiku Shuppan.Google Scholar
Nakao, K. (2009). Shogakko English learning environments: The ALT role. In A. M. Stoke (Ed.), JALT 2008 Conference Proceedings (pp. 137–147). Tokyo: JALT.Google Scholar
Nakao, K., Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., & Fryer, L. K. (2019). Expanding Japanese elementary school English education: Native and nonnative speaking team-teachers’ perspectives on team-teaching quality. The Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education of Waseda University, 291, 17–31.Google Scholar
Nakata, Y. (2009). Intrinsic motivation in the EFL school context: A retrospective study of English learning experiences in Japanese elementary schools. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(4), 263–291.Google Scholar
(2015). Insider-outsider perspective: Revisiting the conceptual framework of research methodology in language teacher education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(2), 166–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naoyama, Y. (2011). Eigo nooto 1 wo katsuyoushita eigo katsudou no jugyou [English activities lessons using English Note 1]. Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
Nikolov, M. (1999). “Why do you learn English?’ ‘Because the teacher is short.’ A study of Hungarian children”s foreign language learning motivation. Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noels, K. A. (2001). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners’ orientations and perceptions of their teachers’ communication style. Language Learning, 51(1), 107–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 102–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., & Fryer, L. K. (2018). Schools can improve motivational quality: Profile transitions across early foreign language learning experiences. Motivation and Emotion, 42(4), 527–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., & Nakata, Y. (2014a). Optimizing new language use by employing young learners’ own language. ELT Journal, 68(4), 410–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014b). Supplementing the elementary foreign language course of study with a self-determination framework. International Journal of Curriculum Development and Practice, 16(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
(2015). Structure also supports autonomy: Measuring and defining autonomy-supportive teaching in Japanese elementary foreign language classes. Japanese Psychological Research, 57(3), 167–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Engagement, gender, and motivation: A predictive model for Japanese young language learners. System, 651, 151–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., Nakata, Y., Parker, P. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Motivating young language learners: A longitudinal model of self-determined motivation in elementary school foreign language classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 491, 140–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 50–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinter, A. (2011). Children learning second languages. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Boston, MA: Springer US. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reeve, J., Cole, S. G., & Olson, B. C. (1986). The Zeigarnik effect and intrinsic motivation: Are they the same? Motivation and Emotion, 10(3), 233–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 571, 749–761. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schön, D., Boyer, M., Moreno, S., Besson, M., Peretz, I., & Kolinsky, R. (2008). Songs as an aid for language acquisition. Cognition, 106(2), 975–983. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherlock, Z. (2016). Japans textbook inequality: How cultural bias affects foreign language acquisition. Power and Education, 8(1), 73–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
StataCorp. (2013). Stata statistical software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 242–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2009). Playing to learn: A review of physical games in second language acquisition. Simulation & Gaming, 40(5), 645–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willingham, D. (2009). Why don’t students like school? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Wu, X. (2003). Intrinsic motivation and young language learners: The impact of the classroom environment. System, 31(4), 501–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Chen, Sian & Linqiang Tang
2024. EFL teachers’ engagement: The impact of well-being and emotion regulation. Heliyon 10:5 ► pp. e27338 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Zhihan
2024. Primary school teachers are immune: a journey in the sea of psychological well-being, buoyancy, and engagement. BMC Psychology 12:1 DOI logo
Dao, Phung
2024. Teacher’s Voices About Learner Engagement in Online L2 Classroom. In Learner Engagement in Online Second Language Classrooms, ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Dao, Phung, Trang Le Diem Bui & Mai Xuan Nhat Chi Nguyen
2024. Public primary school teachers’ perceptions and assessment of young learners’ engagement. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Ha, Thanh Bich Loan
2024. Exploring Self-Determination Theory in ELT: A Content Analysis of Research Trends between 2020 and 2024. ICTE Conference Proceedings 5 ► pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Ma, Yue
2023. A Lenz into the predictive power of language teacher emotion regulation and self-evaluation on L2 grit, teaching style preferences, and work engagement: a case of Chinese EFL instructors. BMC Psychology 11:1 DOI logo
Pishghadam, Reza, Ali Derakhshan, Kiyana Zhaleh & Liqqa Habeb Al-Obaydi
2023. Students’ willingness to attend EFL classes with respect to teachers’ credibility, stroke, and success: A cross-cultural study of Iranian and Iraqi students’ perceptions. Current Psychology 42:5 ► pp. 4065 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Xiaoqiu, Deborah M. Dugdale, Xin Wei & Wenjuan Mi
2023. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Predict Young Learner Online Learning Engagement. American Journal of Distance Education 37:3 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Shiyao Ashlee, Phil Hiver & Ali H. Al-Hoorie
2023. Dynamic engagement: A longitudinal dual-process, reciprocal-effects model of teacher motivational practice and L2 student engagement. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Zhou, Shiyao Ashlee, Phil Hiver & Yongyan Zheng
2023. Modeling Intra- and Inter-individual Changes in L2 Classroom Engagement. Applied Linguistics 44:6 ► pp. 1047 ff. DOI logo
Al-Hoorie, Ali H., W.L. Quint Oga-Baldwin, Phil Hiver & Joseph P. Vitta
2022. Self-determination mini-theories in second language learning: A systematic review of three decades of research. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Deng, Juan, Tahereh Heydarnejad, Fariba Farhangi & Ayman Farid Khafaga
2022. Delving into the relationship between teacher emotion regulation, self-efficacy, engagement, and anger: A focus on English as a foreign language teachers. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Trinh Quoc Lap, Nguyen Mai Thy & Le Thanh Thao
2022. Using Storytelling: From EFL Teachers’ Perceptions to Young Learners’ Reading Performance. rEFLections 29:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.