Article published in:
Research on EFL learning by young children in Spain
Edited by María del Pilar García Mayo
[Language Teaching for Young Learners 3:2] 2021
► pp. 337362
References
Beacco, J. C.
(2010) Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling Necessary for Teaching/Learning History (End of Obligatory Education). Strasbourg: Language Policy Division, Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Benelli, B., Belacchi, C., Gini, G., & Lucangeli, D.
(2006) ‘To define means to say what you know about things’: The development of definitional skills as metalinguistic acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 33(1), 71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, B. B.
(1999) Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campillo, J. M., Sánchez, R., & Miralles, P.
(2019) Primary teachers’ perceptions of CLIL implementation in Spain. English Language Teaching, 12(4), 149–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe CM/Rec
(2014) Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the importance of competences in the language(s) of schooling for equity and quality in education and for educational success. Retrieved on 25 December, 2018 from https://​search​.coe​.int​/cm​/Pages​/result​_details​.aspx​?ObjectID​=09000016805c6105
Cummins, J.
(1981) The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework. Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University.Google Scholar
Cummins, J., Swain, M., Nakajima, K., Handscombe, J., Green, D., & Tran, C.
(1984) Linguistic interdependence among Japanese and Vietnamese immigrant students. In C. Rivera (Ed.), Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment: Research and application (pp. 60–81). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C., Bauer-Marschallinger, S., Brückl-Mackey, K., Hofmann, V., Hopf, J., Kröss, L. M., & Lechner, L.
(2018) Cognitive discourse functions in Austrian CLIL lessons: towards an empirical validation of the CDF construct. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 61, 29–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escobar Urmeneta, C., & Evnitskaya, N.
(2014) Do you know Actimel?’ The adaptive nature of dialogic teacher-led discussions in the CLIL science classroom: A case study. Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 165–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evnitskaya, N., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2020) Cognitive discourse functions in CLIL classrooms: Eliciting and analysing students’ oral categorizations in science and history. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(2007) Language and education. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2014) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Hodder. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
He, Q. & Forey, G.
(2018) Meaning-making in a secondary science classroom: A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global developments in literacy research for science education. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, V., & Hopf, J.
(2015) An analysis of cognitive discourse functions in Austrian CLIL biology lessons (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Vienna. Retrieved from http://​othes​.univie​.ac​.at​/37658/
Hughes, S. P., & Madrid, D.
(2020) The effects of CLIL on content knowledge in monolingual contexts. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 48–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, I., & Wheadon, C.
(2015) Peer assessment using comparative and absolute judgement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 471, 93–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
(1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lemke, J.
(2003) Teaching all the languages of science: Words, symbols, images, and actions. Retrieved from www​.jaylemke​.com​/science​-education/
Lin, A. M.
(2016) Language across the curriculum & CLIL in English as an additional language (EAL) contexts: Theory and practice. Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R.
(2012) The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Lo, Y. Y., Lin, A. M. Y., & Liu, Y.
(2020) Exploring content and language co-construction in CLIL with semantic waves. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Madrid, D.
(2011) Monolingual and bilingual students’ competence in social sciences. In D. Madrid & S. Hughes (Eds.), Studies in Bilingual Education (pp. 195–222). Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malakoff, M. E.
(1988) The effect of language of instruction on reasoning in bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9(1), 17–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marinellie, S. A.
(2009) The content of children’s definitions: The oral-written distinction. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 25(1), 89–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Veel, R.
(1998) Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Maton, K.
(2013) Making semantic waves: A key to cumulative knowledge-building. Linguistics and Education, 241, 8–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) Semantic waves: Context, complexity and academic discourse. In J. R. Martin, K. Maton & Y. J. Doran (Eds.), Accessing academic discourse: Systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory (pp. 59–85). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maton, K., & Doran, Y. J.
(2017) Semantic density: A translation device for revealing complexity of knowledge practices in discourse, part 1 – wording. Onomázein: Revista de Lingüística, Filología y Traducción de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 11, 46–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, E., & Scott, P.
(2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. London: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Nashaat-Sobhy, N., & Llinares, A.
(2020) CLIL students’ definitions of historical terms. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikula, T.
(2017) What’s the moment thingy?’– On the emergence of subject-specific knowledge in CLIL classroom interaction. In J. Langman & H. Hansen-Thomas (Eds.), Discourse analytic perspectives on STEM education. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M.
(2008) Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. In Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session Companion Volume, 13–16. Columbus, OH: Association for Computational Linguistics. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, A.
(2012) The method of adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy & Practice, 191, 281–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pladevall-Ballester, E., & Vallbona, A.
(2016) CLIL in minimal input contexts: A longitudinal study of primary school learners’ receptive skills. System, 581, 37–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sato, M., & Loewen, S.
(2019) Do teachers care about research? The research–pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal, 73(1), 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J.
(2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C., Cancino, H., Temple, D., & Schley, S.
(1990) Giving formal definitions: A linguistic or metalinguistic skill. In E. Bialystock (Ed.), Language processing and language awareness by bilingual children (pp. 90–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, L.
(1985) English for science and technology: A discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vollmer, J. H.
(2010) Items for a description of linguistic competence in the language of schooling necessary for learning/teaching sciences (at the end of compulsory education): An approach with reference points. Language and school subjects: linguistic dimensions of knowledge building in school curricula (2). Language Policy Division. Directorate of Education and Languages, DGIV. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R., & McCabe, A.
(2020) Expressing evaluation across disciplines in primary and secondary CLIL writing: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. & Brown, G. T. L.
(2016) Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 581, 149–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar