This article provides a critical analysis of the language policy measures that were taken by the Flemish government
(Belgium) to improve the quality of the teaching of the national language (Dutch) in compulsory education in Flanders and in the Flemish
education system in Brussels. It builds on Van den Branden (2006a), which documented the
implementation of task-based language teaching (TBLT) in primary, secondary and adult education in Flanders in the period between 1995 and
2005. Focusing on primary education, this article examines the different periods and trends in the government’s attempts to push the
innovation of Dutch language education, and analyses its impact on the practice of teaching the language of schooling. The article
highlights the gradual shift in focus from introducing TBLT materials and supporting the individual teacher to mandating the design of a
school-wide language policy involving the whole school team, and from a top-down implementation to a more bottom-up driven, collaborative
innovation process. The major aim of the article is to identify the factors that impacted on the effects of the innovation policy, against
the backdrop of the growing influx of pupils who do not acquire Dutch (the main medium of instruction) as their mother tongue.
Barber, M., Kihn, P., & Moffit, A. (2011). Deliverology: From idea to implementation. Washington, DC: McKinsey & Company.
Berben, M. (2012). Hoe een taalbeleid het beleidsvoerend vermogen van je school kan verhogen. Impuls, 43(2), 88–98.
Berben, M., Callebaut, I., Colpin, M., Francois, S., Geerts, M., Goethals, M., Vander Meeren, K., Vandommele, G., Van Gorp, K., & Vanoosthuyze, S. (2007). TotemTaal. Themahandleiding en kopieerbladen 4A. Mechelen: Wolters Plantyn.
Berben, M., Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K. (2007). We’ll see what happens: Tasks on paper and tasks in a multilingual classroom. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 32–67). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Bogaert, N., Van Gorp, K., Bultynck, K., Lanssens, A., & Depauw, V. (2006). Task-based language teaching in science education and vocational training tasks. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 106–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breen, M. (1989). The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. In R. Johnson (Ed.), The Second Language Curriculum (pp. 187–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38 (4), 639–662.
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the Reading Wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 191, 5–51.
Colpin, M., & Van Gorp, K. (2007). Task-based writing in primary education: The development and evaluation of writing skills through writing tasks, learner and teacher support. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 194–234). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Devlieger, M., Goossens, G., Labath, T., & Denolf, B. (2003). Procesevaluatie Voorrangsbeleid Brussel. Leuven/Gent: Steunpunt ICO & Steunpunt Nederlands als tweede taal.
Devlieger, M., & Goossens, G. (2003). Productevaluatie Voorrangsbeleid Brussel. Leuven: Steunpunt Nederlands als tweede taal.
Devlieger, M., & Goossens, G. (2006). Evaluatie van vier jaar Voorrangsbeleid Brussel, een intensieve onderwijsvernieuwing in Brusselse Nederlandstalige basisscholen met een meertalige populatie. Leuven: Steunpunt Nederlands als tweede taal.
Devlieger, M., & Goossens, G. (2007). An assessment tool for the evaluation of teacher practice in powerful task-based language learning environments. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 92–130). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching. Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erlam, R. (2016). ‘I’m still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing language tasks. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 1–21.
Franck, E., & Nicaise, I. (2019). Ongelijkheden in het Vlaamse onderwijssysteem: verbetering in zicht? Een vergelijking tussen PISA 2003 en 2015, Report No. SONO/2017/1.3/3, Leuven: HIVA / SONO (Steunpunt Onderwijsonderzoek).
François, S. (2005). Naar een nieuwe taakgerichte taalmethode voor het basisonderwijs: behoeftenonderzoek (Unpublished research report). Leuven: Centre for Language and Education.
González-Lloret, M., & Nielson, K. (2015). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 191, 525–549.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kotter, J. P. (2007). Leading change. Why transformation efforts fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., Antoniou, P., Demetriou, D., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2015). The impact of school policy and stakeholders’ actions on student learning: A longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction, 361, 113–124.
Kubanyiova, M. (2012). Teacher development in action. Understanding language teachers’ conceptual change. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Littlewood, W. (2014). Communication-oriented teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here?Language Teaching, 471, 249–362.
Lokale inburgerings- en integratiemonitor (2019). Retrieved on 27 January, 2020 from [URL]
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Mourshed, M., Chijoke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Company.
Steunpunt toetsontwikkeling en peilingen (2019). Peiling Nederlands. Lezen, luisteren en schrijven in het basisonderwijs 2018. Leuven: Steunpunt toetsontwikkeling en peilingen.
Tielemans, K., Vandenbroeck, M., Bellens, K., Van Damme, J., & De Fraine, B. (2019). Het Vlaams Lager Onderwijs in PIRLS 2016. Begrijpend lezen in internationaal perspectief in vergelijking met 2006. Leuven: Centrum voor Onderwijseffectiviteit en – evaluatie, KU Leuven.
Vanbuel, M. (2020). Moving language barriers. A mixed-methods study of the implementation of school-based language policies in primary schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). KU Leuven.
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.) (2006a). Task-based language education: from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K. (2006b). Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden, Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K. (2006c). Training teachers: Task-based as well? In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 217–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K. (2009). Diffusion and Implementation of Innovations. In M. H. Long, & C. J. Doughty, The handbook of language teaching (pp. 659–672). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Van den Branden, K. (2016). The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 164–181.
Van den Branden, K. (2019). Rethinking schools and renewing energy for learning: Research, principles and practice. New York: Routledge.
Vandommele, G., Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K. (2018). Task-based language teaching. How task-based is it really? In V. Samuda, K. Van den Branden, & M. Bygate (Eds.), TBLT as a researched pedagogy (pp. 165–197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Droogenbroeck, F., Lemblé, H., Bongaerts, B., Spruyt, B., Siongers, J., & Kavadias, D. (2019). TALIS 2018 Vlaanderen – Volume I. Brussel: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Van Gorp, K. (2018). Task-based language assessment for L1 and L2 speakers in primary education. Designing a useful task-specification framework. In J. McE. Davis, J. Norris, M. Malone, T. McKay, & Y. A. Son (Eds.), Useful assessment and evaluation in language education (pp. 131–148). Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
Van Gorp, K. (in press). Designing a classroom-based TBLA framework for primary schools: Blurring the lines between teaching, learning and assessment. In M. H. Long & M. J. Ahmadian (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Gorp, K., Heidrich Uebel, E., & Giupponi, L. (forthcoming). Collaboration and Curriculum Development: The design of flexible modules in the Less Commonly Taught Languages Partnership. In A. R. Corin, C. Campbell & B. L. Leaver (Eds.), Open architecture curricular design: Courses and concepts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Van Gorp, K., & Versteden, P. (2020). Advising linguistically diverse schools on developing a school-wide language policy. In R. M. Beerkens, E. Le Pichon-Vorstman, J. D. ten Thije, & R. G. J. L. Supheert (Eds.), Enhancing intercultural communication in organizations: Insights from project advisors. Abingdon: Routledge.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
del-Olmo-Ibáñez, María-Teresa, María-Fernanda Medina-Beltrán & José Rovira-Collado
2023. Perception of Future Spanish Primary Education Teachers on Their Multicultural and Multilingual Competencies and the Sustainability of the Educational System. Sustainability 15:17 ► pp. 13123 ff.
Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia
2023. How We Teach—Usage-Based Methods. In Theory and Practice from a Cognitive Perspective, ► pp. 35 ff.
Tigchelaar, Magda, Virginia David, Amira Eldemerdash, Selena Protacio & Susan Piazza
2023. K-12 content teachers designing language tasks: A follow-up to Erlam, 2016. Language Teaching Research► pp. 136216882211484 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.