Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Teaching for Young Learners
Vol. 5:1 (2023) ► pp.7–29

L1 use and patterns of interaction of young EFL learners in a collaborative writing task

| Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU)
Research on L1 use among young EFL learners is scarce and has been mainly conducted with oral tasks, while collaborative writing (CW) tasks have been underexplored. CW provides learners with many opportunities for L2 development, especially when they work in collaborative patterns of interaction. In research with young EFL learners, the relationship between L1 use, CW and patterns of interaction has not been studied yet, and it is important to assess the extent to which the patterns of interaction formed in CW tasks play a role in L1 use by these learners, because these three factors have been claimed to impact L2 development. Thus, this study examines whether the patterns of interaction formed played a role in the L1 use and functions of 56 young EFL learners while they worked on a CW task at two different times. The findings indicated that these EFL learners showed mainly parallel/passive or collaborative patterns of interaction at both testing times, that the L1 was used mainly for metacognitive issues, although differences existed from pattern to pattern, and that a collaborative pattern of interaction resulted in more L1 use. The results are discussed following the pedagogical implications of these findings for the EFL classroom.
Keywords: L1 use, patterns of interaction, young learners, collaborative writing, EFL
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Collaborative writing and L1 use
  • 3.L1 use in EFL young settings
  • 4.Patterns of interaction and L2 development
  • 5.The study
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Materials and procedure
    • 5.3Data analysis
  • 6.Results
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 2 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.22010.azk
References (35)
References
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2009). Oral interaction in task-based EFL learning: The use of the L1 as a cognitive tool. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47 (3), 325–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aufa, F., & Storch, N. (2021). Learner interaction in blended collaborative L2 writing activities. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning (pp. 151–175). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2017). Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 17 (4), 480–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azkarai, A., & Kopinska, M. (2020). Young EFL learners and collaborative writing: A study on patterns of interaction, engagement in LREs, and task motivation. System, 94 1, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basterrechea, M., & Leeser, M. (2019). Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awareness, 28 (2), 97–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y. G., & Zeng, W. (2015). Young foreign language learners’ interactional development in task-based paired assessment in their first and foreign languages: A case of English learners in China. Education 3–13, 43 (3), 292–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2020). Child EFL grammar learning through a collaborative writings task. In W. Suzuki, & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 20–39). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: when form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness, 30 (1), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De la Fuente, M. J., & Goldenberg, C. (2022). Understanding the role of the first language (L1) in instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): Effects of using a principled approach to L1 in the beginner foreign language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 26 (5), 943–962. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DiCamilla, F. J., & Antón, M. (2012). Functions of L1 in the collaborative interaction of beginning and advanced second language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22 (2), 160–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, K. (2009). Principles and practices of L1/L2 use in the Japanese university EFL classroom. JALT Journal, 31 (1), 63–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21 (3), 354–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P. (2018). Child task-based interaction in EFL settings: Research and challenges. International Journal of English Studies, 18 (2), 119–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Hidalgo, M. (2017). L1 use among young EFL mainstream and CLIL learners in task-supported interaction. System, 67 1, 132–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2016). Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: An exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal, 44 (4), 451–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Child EFL interaction; age, instructional setting and development. In J. Enever & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Researching the complexity of early language learning in instructed context (pp. 249–268). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 80 1, 165–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imaz Agirre, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2013). Gender agreement in L3 English by Basque/Spanish bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3 (4), 415–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
JASP Team (2020). JASP Version 0.14.1. [Computer software].Google Scholar
Martínez-Adrián, M., & Arratibel-Irazusta, I. (2020). The interface between task-modality and the use of previously known languages in young CLIL English learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10 (3), 473–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolov, M., & Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2011). All shades of every color: An overview of early teaching and learning of foreign languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31 1, 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2021). Pair dynamics and language-related episodes in child EFL task-based peer interaction. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3 (2), 189–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pladevall-Ballester, E., & Vraciu, A. (2017). Exploring early EFL: L1 use in oral narratives by CLIL and non-CLIL primary school learners. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 124–148). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). EFL child peer interaction: measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10 (3), 449–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interactions in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52 (1), 119–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52 (1), 40–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2003). Is there a role for the use of the L1 in an L2 setting? TESOL Quarterly, 37 (4), 760–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Continuum.Google Scholar
Swan, M., & Smith, B. (1987). Learner English: A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, L., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2010). Pair interaction and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33 (3), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R., & Jackson, S. (1998). Ethical dimensions of child memory research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12 (3), 218–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vraciu, A., & E. Pladevall-Ballester. (2020). L1 use in peer interaction: exploring time and proficiency pairing effects in primary school EFL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, M. (2018). Collaborative writing in the EFL classroom: The effects of L1 and L2 use. System, 76 1, 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Understanding L1 and L2 interaction in collaborative writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis. Language Teaching Research, 25 (3), 338–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Azkarai, Agurtzane & Asier Calzada
2024. A multi-faceted view of engagement with language: a study with young EFL learners working on a collaborative writing task. Classroom Discourse ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Calzada, Asier & Agurtzane Azkarai
2024. Exploring learner-related variables in child collaborative writing: interaction mindset, willingness to communicate and proficiency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.