Cover not available
To be specified published In:
Romance Parsed Corpora
Edited by Christina Tortora, Beatrice Santorini and Frances Blanchette
[Linguistic Variation 18:1] 2018
► pp. 144–196
Regular article

Merging verb cluster variation

| Universiteit Leiden
| Nederlandse Taalunie
| Meertens Instituut

In this paper we argue that verb clusters in Dutch varieties are merged and linearized in fully ascending (1-2-3) or fully descending (3-2-1) orders. We argue that verb clusters that deviate from these orders involve non-verbal material: adjectival participles, or nominal infinitives. As a result, our approach does not involve any unmotivated movements that are specific for verb clusters.

Support for our analysis comes from (i) the interpretation of verb clusters; (ii) the fact that order variation depends on the types of verbs involved, which can be explained by selectional requirements of the verbs; and (iii) the geographic co-occurrence patterns of various orders. First, the 1-3-2 and 3-1-2 orders are argued to be ascending orders with a non-verbal 3. Indeed these orders occur in grammars that have ascending, rather than descending, verb clusters. Secondly, the 1-3-2 order is argued to be an interrupted V1-V2 cluster with a non-verbal 3. Indeed, this order is most common in the region where non-verbal material can interrupt the verb cluster.

Our analysis of word order variation in verb clusters in terms of principles of grammar is further supported by an experiment in which we asked a large number of speakers distributed over the Dutch language area to rank all logically possible orders, including orders that are not common in their own variety of Dutch. The results demonstrate that speakers apply their syntactic knowledge to rank verb cluster orders that they do not use themselves. We argue that this knowledge cannot be due to familiarity with the various orders.

Keywords: verb clusters, varieties of Dutch and Frisian, base-generation, merge, language variation, adjectival participles, nominal infinitives, particles, geographic distribution
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Verb cluster formation
  • 3.Two-verb clusters
  • 4.Three-verb clusters
    • 4.1Clusters with two modal auxiliaries
    • 4.2Clusters with a modal auxiliary and a perfect auxiliary
    • 4.3Clusters with a perfect auxiliary and an aspectual auxiliary
    • 4.4A comparison of the three types of 3-verb clusters
  • 5.The analysis of the order in the verb cluster
    • 5.1The order V2-V1-V3 does not exist (14i)
    • 5.2The order V3-V1-V2 does not exist (14vi)
    • 5.3The order V2-V3-V1 does not exist (14iv)
    • 5.4The orders V1-V2-V3 and V3-V2-V1
  • 6.V1-V3-V2
    • 6.1Participles
    • 6.2Nominalization
    • 6.3Summary of V1-V3-V2
  • 7.Verb cluster intuitions
    • 7.1Method
    • 7.2Scores for verb cluster orders
    • 7.3Familiarity
    • 7.4Grammar
      • V2-V3-V1 and V2-V1-V3
      • V1-V2-V3 and V3-V2-V1
      • V3-V1-V2 and V1-V3-V2
  • 8.Summary & conclusion
    • 8.1Summary
    • 8.2Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00008.bar
References

References

Abels, Klaus
2011 Hierarchy-order relations in the Germanic verb cluster and in the noun phrase. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 53(2). 1–28.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2003 Participles and Voice. In A. Alexiadou, M. Rathert & A. von Stechow (eds.), Perfect explorations, 1–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Augustinus, Liesbeth
2015 Complement Raising and Cluster Formation in Dutch. A Treebank-supported Investigation. PhD dissertation. KU Leuven.Google Scholar
Bader, Markus & Tanja Schmid
2009, Verb clusters in colloquial German. In Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 121. 175–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bader, Markus, Tanja Schmid & Jana Häussler
2009 Optionality in verb cluster formation. In Susanne Winkler & Sam Featherston (eds.), The fruits of empirical linguistics 21. 37–58. Berlin: de Gruyter DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts
1989 Passive Arguments Raised. In Linguistic Inquiry 201. 219–252.Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef
2002 Review of Verbal Complexes. (Current studies in linguistics series; 34) by Hilda Koopman, Anna Szabolcsi. In Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6(1). 53–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Word order variation in three-verb clusters and the division of labour between generative linguistics and sociolinguistics. In Leonie Cornips & Karen Corrigan (eds.), Syntax and Variation. Reconciling the Biological and the Social. (Vol. 2651. 233–264). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef, Hans J. Bennis, Gunther de Vogelaer, Magda Devos & Margreet H. van der Ham
2005 Syntactische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten Deel I / Syntactic atlas of the Dutch dialects Volume I. [SAND-I]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef, Johan van der Auwera, Hans Bennis, Eefje J. Boef, Gunther De Vogelaer & Margreet H. van der Ham
2008 Syntactische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten Deel II / Syntactic atlas of the Dutch dialects Volume II. [SAND-II] Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef
2008 Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling. An Introduction. In Sjef Barbiers, Olaf Koeneman, Marika Lekakou & Margreet van der Ham (eds.), Microvariation in Syntactic Doubling 361. 1–34. (Syntax and Semantics). Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008a Werkwoordclusters en de grammatica van de rechterperiferie. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 13(2). 160–187.Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef & Hans J. Bennis
2010 De plaats van het werkwoord in zuid en noord. In Johan de Caluwe & Jacques van Keymeulen (eds.), Voor Magda. Artikelen voor Magda Devos bij haar afscheid van de Universiteit Gent. (25–42). Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
Bech, Gunnar
1955 Studien über das deutsche Verbum infinitum. Kopenhagen: MunksgaardGoogle Scholar
Bennis, Hans J.
1979 Appositie en de interne struktuur van de NP. In Spektator 81, 209–228.Google Scholar
1990 TI: a note on modal passives . In Joan Mascaro & Marina Nespor (eds). Grammar in Progress, 33–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 Theoretische aspecten van partikelvooropplaatsing. TABU 211, 89–95.Google Scholar
1992 Long head movement: The position of particles in the verbal cluster in Dutch. In Reineke Bok-Bennema & Roeland van Hout (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 37–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans J. & Pim Wehrmann
1990 On the categorial status of present participles. In Reineke Bok-Bennema & Peter Coopmans (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 1–11. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den & Hans Broekhuis
1989 Woordvolgorde in de werkwoordelijke eindreeks. GLOT 121, 79–137.Google Scholar
Blom, Corrien
2005 Complex Predicates in Dutch. Diss. Amsterdam: LOT-series 111.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert E.
2002 Constructional idioms, morphology and the Dutch lexicon. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 141. 301–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandner, Ellen, Martin Salzmann & Gerhard Schaden
2016 Zur Syntax und Semantik des doppelten Perfekts aus alemannischer Sicht. In Alexandra N. Lenz & Frans Patock (eds.), Syntaktische Variation: Areallinguistische Perspektiven, 13–46. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan W.
1982 The Passive in Lexical Theory. In Joan W. Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations, 3–86. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. & Peter Trudgill
1998 Dialectology, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2001 Derivation by Phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2001 “Restructuring” and functional structure. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 111. 45–127.Google Scholar
Coussé, Evie
2008 Motivaties voor volgordevariatie. Een diachrone studie van werkwoordvolgorde in het Nederlands. PhD dissertation. Ghent University.Google Scholar
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van
2017 A quantitative analysis of syntactic microvariation. Word order in Dutch verb clusters. Unpublished manuscript, KU Leuven.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den
1995 Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dros-Hendriks, Lotte
2018). Not another book on verb raising (working title). PhD Dissertation. Leiden University. LOT Number 487.
Embick, David
2004 On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English. In Linguistic Inquiry, 35(3). 355–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evers, Arnold
1975 The transformational cycle of Dutch and German, PhD Dissertation. University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
2003 Verbal clusters and cluster-creepers. In Pieter Seuren & Gerard Kempen (eds.): Verb constructions in German and Dutch, 43–89. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Vraag aan de Westgermaanse Dialectvergelijking. Nederlandse Taalkunde 13(2). 188–192.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1990 Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Henk van Riemsdijk
1986 Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting verbs. In Linguistic Inquiry, 171. 417–466.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland
2006 Scrambling, remnant movement, and restructuring in West Germanic. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun, Monic Lansu & Marion Westerduin
1987 Complexe verba. GLOT 101. 661–710.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf, Marika Lekakou & Sjef Barbiers
2011 Perfect Doubling. Linguistic Variation, 11(1). 35–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Anna Szabolcsi
2000 Verbal complexes. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraak, Albert & Willem G. Klooster
1968 Syntaxis. Culemborg / Keulen: Stam-Kemperman.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1994 The event argument and the structure of verbs. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
2000 Building statives. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on aspect, 385–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
1980 On the organization of the lexicon. PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad
1994 Complex predicates. Diss. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Fred Weerman
1993 The balance between syntax and morphology: Dutch particles and resultatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 111. 433–475 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, Anita
1953 De plaats van hulpwerkwoord, verleden deelwoord en infinitief in de Nederlandse bijzin. Leuven: Symons.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995 Zero syntax. Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Tal Siloni
2005 The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. In Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3). 389–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk van
1982 A note on Case Absorption. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 28–29. 72–83.Google Scholar
Salzmann, Martin
2011 Resolving the movement paradox in Verb Projection Raising. In favor of base-generation and covert predicate raising. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 81, Paris: CSSP.Google Scholar
Schmid, Tanja & Ralf Vogel
2004 Dialectal variation in German 3-verb clusters. In Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 71. 235–274, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
2003 Representation theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2004 Syntactic vs. post-syntactic movement. Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 284–295.Google Scholar
2006 Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume V1, Article 75, 229–343. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Restructuring cross-linguistically. In Thuy Bui & Deniz Özyıldız eds. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 45 Amherst University of Massachusetts, GLSA 227 240
2017. Verb Clusters, Verb Raising and Restructuring. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk eds. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Second edition John Wiley and Sons, Inc. DOI logo
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
1993 Dutch syntax: A minimalist approach. PhD dissertation. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
1996 Verb clusters in Continental West Germanic dialects. In James Black & Virginia Motapanyane (eds.), Microparametric syntax and dialect variation, 229–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Top-down derivation, recursion, and the model of grammar. In Andres Trotzke & Josef Bayer (eds.), Syntactic complexity across interfaces. [31] (Interface Explorations; Vol. 301). 25–42 Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Bader, Markus
2021. Acceptability Studies in (Non-English) Germanic Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Syntax, ► pp. 477 ff. DOI logo
Bader, Markus
2021. Analyzing free variation with harmony – A case study of verb-cluster serialization. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 39:3 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Barbiers, Sjef
2020. Laboratoriumzinnen in het tijdperk van de kwantitatieve taalkunde. Nederlandse Taalkunde 25:2 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Bogaards, Maarten, Ronny Boogaart & Sjef Barbiers
2022. The syntax of progressive and ingressiveaanhet-constructions in Dutch. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Salzmann, Martin
2019. On the limits of variation in Continental West-Germanic verb clusters: evidence from VP-stranding, extraposition and displaced morphology for the existence of clusters with 213 order. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.