Cover not available
Introduction published In:
A micro-perspective on Verb Second in Romance and Germanic
Edited by Christine Meklenborg Salvesen
[Linguistic Variation 19:1] 2019
► pp. 1–15
Introduction

A micro-perspective on Verb-second in Romance and Germanic

| University of Oslo
The Verb-second (V2) phenomenon is one of the central issues of modern linguistic theory. This volume examines V2 from a micro-perspective, comparing various languages and periods. At the heart of the work presented here lies the clear assumption that Verb-second is by no means a unitary phenomenon, but rather a heterogenous and rich system that affects languages in various ways.
Article outline
  • 1.A linear model
  • 2.Typology
    • 2.1Old Romance
  • 3.A formal approach
    • 3.1Main-embedded asymmetries
    • 3.2CP-V2 and IP-V2
  • 4.Cartography
    • 4.1The bottleneck
    • 4.2Force-V2 and Fin-V2
  • 5.V2 violations
  • 6.This volume
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 24 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00010.mek
References (57)
Sources
The following Old French examples have been retrieved from the Base de français médiéval (ENS de Lyon 2016).
clari Robert de Clari: La Conquête de Constantinople. 1924, Philippe Lauer (ed). Paris: Champion. [URL]
eneas1 Anonymous: Eneas. 1925, Jean-Jacques Salverda de Grave (ed). Paris: Champion. [URL]
graal_cm Anonymous: Queste del saint Graal. 2013, Christiane Marchello-Nizia et Alexei Lavrentiev (eds). Lyon: EquipeBFM. [URL]
Examples from La Mort du roi Arthur have been retrieved from this volume:
MortArtu La Mort du roi Arthur. 2009, David F. Hult (ed), Paris: Livre de Poche. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
References
Adams, Marianne. 1989. Verb second effects in Medieval French. In C. Kirschner and J. DeCesaris, editors, Studies in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Seventeenth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (XVII. LSRL), Rutgers University, 27–29 March 1987, Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 4 Current Issues in Linguistic Theory; 601, pages 1–33. J. Benjamins, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Axel, Katrin. 2007. Studies on Old High German Syntax. Number 112 in Linguistik Aktuell. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 2006. A Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance. In Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger, and Paul H. Portner, editors, Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: negation, tense, and clausal architecture, pages 53–86. Georgetown University Press, Washington D.C..Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola and Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, Focus, and V2. In Luigi Rizzi, editor, The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, volume 2 of Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, pages 52–75. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo and Luigi Rizzi. 2008. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besten, Hans den. 1983. On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. In Werner Abraham, editor, On the formal syntax of the Westgermania: papers from the “3rd Groningen Grammar Talks” Groningen, January 1981, Linguistik aktuell, pages 47–132. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eide, Kristin Melum. 2011. Norwegian (non-V2) declaratives, resumptive elements, and the Wackernagel position. Nordic Journal ofLinguistics, 34 (2):179–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eide, Kristin Melum and Hilde Sollid. 2011. Norwegian main clause declaratives: variation within and across grammars. In Peter Siemund, editor, Linguistic Universals and Language Variation, pages 317–350. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eide, Kristine Gunn. 2006. Word order structures and unaccusative verbs in classical and modern Portuguese: the reorganisation of information structure. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar
2016 ENS de Lyon, Laboratoire IHRIM. Bfm – base de français médiéval en ligne. Digital corpus: [URL], 2016.
Foulet, Lucien. 1930. Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Champion, Paris, 3e edition.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara and Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, editors, On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greco, Ciro and Liliane Haegeman. in press. Frame setters and the microvariation of subject-initial v2. In Rebecca Woods, Sam Wolfe, and Theresa Biberauer, editors, Rethinking V2. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1996. Verb second, the split CP, and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP, 41:135–175.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Ciro Greco. 2018a. West flemish v3 and the interaction of syntax and discourse. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 21(1):1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. Main clause external constituents and the derivation of subject-initial verb second. Nederlandse taalkunde, 23 (1):23–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb Second. In T. Kiss and A. Alexiadou, editors, Syntax – an International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research, HSK Series. Walter de Gruyter Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan and Sandra Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 41:465–497.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2009. Embedded clauses with main clause word order in mainland scandinavian. LingBuzz.Google Scholar
. 2015. The force of V2 revisited. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 181:139–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A.. 2002. Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Number 465 in Linguistische Arbeiten. Max Niemayer Verlag, Tübingen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1995. Indo-european Origins of Germanic Syntax. In Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, editors, Clause Structure and Language Change, Oxford studies in comparative syntax. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Klævik-Pettersen, Espen Johan. 2018. Inversion, V-to-C, and verb-seond: An investigation into the syntax and word order of Old French and Late Latin. PhD thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie. 2007. Clausal architecture in Early Old French. Lingua, 1171:289–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Late latin verb second: The sentential word order of the itinerarium egeriae. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 161:163–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, Éric. 2007a. À propos des propri’et’es germaniques de l’ancien français. Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa/Ottawa Papers in Linguistics, 351:107–136.Google Scholar
Mathieu, ’Eric. 2007b. À propos des propri’et’es germaniques de l’ancien français. Cahiers linguistiques d’Ottawa/Ottawa Papers in Linguistics, 351:107–136.Google Scholar
Østbø, Christine Bjerkan. 2007. The function word ‘så’ and Norwegian CP syntax. Handout.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2002. The left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance dialects: a new view on V2 and V3. In Susanne van der Kleij Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips, editor, Syntactic Microvariation. The Meertens Institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
. 2014. Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rinke, Esther and Jürgen M. Meisel. 2009. Subject inversion in Old French: Syntax and Information Structure. In G. A. Kaiser and E.-M. Remberger, editors, Proceedings of the Workshop “Null-subjects, expletives, and locatives in Romance”, number Arbeitspapier 123 in Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, pages 93–130. Universität Konstanz, Constance.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Liliane Haegeman, editor, Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Kluwer international handbooks of linguistics; vol. 11, pages 281–337. Kluwer, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. On the Position “Int(errogative)” in the Left Periphery of the Clause. In Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, editors, Current Studies in Italian Syntax, pages 287–296. Elsevier, Oxford.Google Scholar
. 2002. Locality and Left Periphery. In A. Belletti, editor, Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, volume 31. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2004. The C-system in Brythonic Celtic Languages, V2 and the EPP. In Luigi Rizzi, editor, The Structure ofCP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, volume 2 of Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, pages 297–328. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian G.. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: a Comparative History of English and French. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory; vol. 281. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eirikur and Hoskuldur Thrainsson. 1990. On icelandic word order once more. Syntax and Semantics, 241:3–40.Google Scholar
Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg. in press. Resumptive Particles and Verb Second. In Rebecca Woods, Sam Wolfe, and Theresa Biberauer, editors, Rethinking V2. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg and George Walkden. 2017. Diagnosing embedded V2 in Old French and Old English. In Eric Mathieu and Robert Truswell, editors, From Micro-change to Macro-change. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2004. La formazione della struttura di frase romanza: ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fur romanische Philologie; Bd. 3231. Max Niemeyer, Tübingen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Bonnie D. and Sten Vikner. 1996. The Verb always leaves IP in V2 clauses. In Luigi Rizzi and Adriana Belletti, editors, Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, pages 244–302. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2012. A comparative study of word order in old romance. Folia Linguistica, 46(2):23–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skårup, Povl. 1975. Les premieres zones de la proposition en ancien franais : essai de syntaxe de position. Revue Romane, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, R.. 1892. Zur Stellung des Verbums im Altfranzösischen. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, XVI1:289–307.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara S.. 1997. Syntactic Change in Medieval French: Verb-Second and Null Subjects. Studies in natural language and linguistic theory; vol. 411. Kluwer, Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura, Lorenzo Renzi, and Paola Benincà. 1985. Typologie des Pronoms Sujets dans les Langues Romanes. In Linguistique descriptive: Phon’etique, morphologie et lexique. Actes du XVIIe Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes, Aix-en-Provence: Universit’e de Provence.Google Scholar
Walkden, George. 2015. Verb-third in early West Germanic: a comparative perspective. In Theresa Biberauer and George Walkden, editors, Syntax over time, pages 236–248. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Kristine Bentzen, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson, and þorbjörg Hróarsdóttir. 2009. On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua, 1191:1914–1938. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Sam. 2015a. Medieval Sardinian: New Evidence for Syntactic Change from Latin to Romance. In Dag T. T. Haug, editor, Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected Papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo 5–9 August 2013, pages 303–324. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. Microvariation in Medieval Romance Syntax, A Comparative Study. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
. 2018. Verb Second in Medieval Romance. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1991. Clitics in dutch: evidence for the position of infl. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik, 331(71–92).Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Catasso, Nicholas, Marco Coniglio & Chiara De Bastiani
2022. Interface phenomena and language change. In Language Change at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 275], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.