Cover not available
Article published In:
A typology of the mass/count distinction in Brazil and its relevance for mass/count theories
Edited by Suzi Lima and Susan Rothstein
[Linguistic Variation 20:2] 2020
► pp. 271–287

Maxakalí has suppletion, numerals and associatives but no plurals

| Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
| Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
The Maxakalí language lacks additive plurals (akin to dog-s) on nouns, but has associative plurals, and a large set of suppletive verbs that indicate whether the internal argument is plural or not. Although it has no plural marking, Maxakalí distinguishes between count nouns and mass nouns. The former can be followed by numerals, while the latter must be coerced or occur with container words. Only count nouns can be distinguished between singular and plural with verbal number. Mass nouns always require plural verbal number. Count nouns are compatible with words like ‘many’ indicating cardinality, while mass nouns are compatible with words like ‘big’ for volume. Granulated substances have variable behavior, depending on whether treated as a whole or as several individuated items. Numerals in Maxakalí show an unusual pattern, whereby 1–3 are treated as unaccusative verbs, and 4 and up, being loanwords, are treated as unergative verbs.
Keywords: Maxakalí, plural marking, verbal suppletion, associative plurals, count/mass distinction, container-words, loanword numerals
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Numerical systems
  • 3.Count and mass nouns
    • 3.1Number
    • 3.2Plurality
      • 3.2.1Associative plural
      • 3.2.2Verbal number
    • 3.3Quantity words, volume and cardinality
    • 3.4Measuring
  • 4.Event counting
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 1 October 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00020.nev
References (35)
References
Araújo, Gabriel Antunes. 2000. Fonologia e morfologia da língua Maxakalí. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas dissertation.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark Cleland & Livia Camargo-Souza. In press. Switch reference in American languages: A synthetic overview. In Daniel Siddiqi (ed.). Routledge Handbook of American Languages.
Bale, Alan & Jessica Coon. 2014. Classifiers are for numerals, not for nouns: Consequences for the mass / count distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 45 (4). 695–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campos, Carlos Sandro de Oliveira. 2009. Morfofonêmica e morfossintaxe do Maxakalí. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal Minas Gerais thesis.Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica. 2018. Building verbs in Chuj: Consequences for the nature of roots. To appear. Journal of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Angelis, Wilmar. 2004. Concordância verbal de número em Kaingáng: Algumas pistas. Liames 41. 71–81.Google Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny. Count/mass distinctions across languages. In Maienborn, Claudia, Klaus von Heusinger and Paul Portner (eds.) 2012, Semantics (HSK 33.3), de Gruyter, 2559–2580.Google Scholar
Gudschinsky, Sarah, Harold Popovich & Frances Popovich. 1970. Native reaction and phonetic similarity in Maxakalí phonology. Language 461. 77–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2014. Hiaki verbal number suppletion really is suppletion: Talk given at ROOTS IV workshop, NYU, 24 April 2014. [URL]
Johns, Alana. 1992. Deriving ergativity. Linguistic Inquiry 23(1). 57–87.Google Scholar
Lima, Suzi & Susan Rothstein. 2016. The count/mass distinction questionnaire.Google Scholar
Link, Godehard. 1983. The Logical Analysis of Plural and Mass Terms: a Lattice- Theoretical Approach. In Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, 302–323. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, Kimiko & Satoshi Tomioka. 2004. Japanese plurals are exceptional. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13(2). 113–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew & Mário André Coelho da Silva. 2017. Maxakalí nasality and field recording with earbud microphony. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 25 (3). 1011–1042. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paraíso, Maria Hilda Baqueiro. 1994. Amixokori, Pataxo, Monoxo, Kumanoxo, Kutaxo, Kutatoi, Maxakali, Malali e Makoni: Povos indígenas diferenciados ou subgrupos de uma mesma nação? Uma proposta de reflexão. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia 41. 173–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Deuscreide Gonçalves. 1992. Alguns aspectos gramaticais da língua Maxakalí. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais dissertation.Google Scholar
Pereira, Sílvia Siqueira. 2012. Estrutura e processamento da alternância causativa na língua indígena Maxakalí. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro dissertation.Google Scholar
. In press. Switch reference in Maxakalí. In Marcelo Silveira (ed.), VIII Macro-Jê: Língua, Cultura e Reflexões. Londrina: Editora UEL.
Popovich, Andrew Harold. 1967. Large grammatical units and the space-time setting in Maxakalí. Atas do Simpósio sôbre a Biota Amazônica 21. 195–199.Google Scholar
. 1985. Discourse phonology of Maxakalí: a multilevel, multiunit approach. Arlington: University of Texas dissertation.Google Scholar
. 1986. The nominal reference system of Maxakalí. In Ursula Wiesemann (ed.), Pronominal Systems, 351–358. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
. n/d. Conjunções em Maxakalí. Manuscript.
Rodrigues, Aryon Dall’Igna. Nasalização e fronteira de palavra em Maxakalí. Anais do V Encontro Nacional de Lingüística 21. 305–311.
Sândalo, Filomena. 2017. Uma nota sobre medir e contar com palavras emprestadas do português no Kadiwéu. Linguíʃtica 13 (3). 110–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, Mário André Coelho. 2015. A coda consonantal em Maxakalí. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas dissertation.Google Scholar
Silva, Mário André Coelho & Andrew Nevins. 2014. Ethnosociophonology and consonant lenition in Maxakalí. Linguíʃtica 10 (2). 47–60.Google Scholar
Sistema de Informação da Atenção à Saúde Indígena (SIASI). 2013. Dados populacionais indígenas por diversos parâmetros de análise. [URL]. (11 September 2017.)
Stateva, Penka & Arthur Stepanov. 2017. Two “many” words in Slovenian: Experimental evidence for pragmatic strengthening. Acta Linguistica Academica 64(3). 435–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Abigail. 2018. Plural verbs, participant number, and Agree. Proceedings of the 35th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. Wm. G. Bennett et al., 391–398. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba. 2006. Suppletion in verb paradigms: Bits and pieces of the puzzle. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetzels, Willem Leo. 1995. Oclusivas intrusivas em Maxacalí. In Willem Leo Wetzels (ed.), Estudos Fonológicos das Línguas Indígenas Brasileiras, 85–102. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ.Google Scholar
. 2009. Nasal harmony and the representation of nasality in Maxakali. In Andrea Calabrese & Willem Leo Wetzels (eds.), Loan Phonology, 241–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetzels, Willem Leo & Willebrord Sluyters. 1995. Formação de Raiz, Formação de Glide e ‘Decrowding’ Fonético em Maxacalí. In Willem Leo Wetzels (ed.), Estudos Fonológicos das Línguas Indígenas Brasileiras, 103–149. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, Andrea. 2008. Bare nouns and number in Dëne Sųłiné. Natural Language Semantics 161, 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Nascimento, Márcia, Gean Damulakis & Suzi Lima
2023. Número e a Distinção Contável/massivo em Kaingang. Signum: Estudos da Linguagem 25:3 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.