Cover not available
Article published In:
Variation in C: Comparative approaches to the Complementizer Phrase
Edited by Jacopo Garzonio and Silvia Rossi
[Linguistic Variation 18:2] 2018
► pp. 359–429
Regular article

Pragmatic effects of clitic doubling

Two kinds of object markers in Lubukusu

| Moi University
| Pomona College
| University of Missouri
Object markers (OMs) in Bantu languages have long been argued to be either incorporated pronouns or agreement morphemes, distinguished mainly by their ability (or not) to co-occur with (i.e. double) in situ objects. Lubukusu appears to be an instance of OMs-as-incorporated pronouns, as OMs in neutral discourse contexts cannot double in situ objects in a broad range of syntactic contexts. As we show, however, certain pragmatic contexts in fact do license OM-doubling; we demonstrate that OM-doubling in Lubukusu is licit only on a verum (focus) interpretation. We analyze OM-doubling within a Minimalist framework as the result of an Agree relation between the object and a verum-triggering Emphasis head (Emph°). The non-doubling OM results from an incorporation operation. We therefore claim that Lubukusu displays two distinct syntactic derivations of OMs (generating doubling and non-doubling) with the interpretive effects of OM-doubling arising from the semantic/pragmatic properties of Emph°.
Keywords: object marking, clitics, clitic doubling, verum focus, Bantu, Lubukusu
Article outline
  • 1.Relevant background
    • 1.1Introduction
    • 1.2Theoretical & analytical background
  • 2.Object marking in Lubukusu
    • 2.1OMs generally cannot double objects
    • 2.2Object marking in dislocation contexts
    • 2.3Object marking in non-declarative contexts
    • 2.4Challenging the pronoun incorporation analysis
  • 3.The pragmatic contexts of Lubukusu OM-doubling
    • 3.1Clarifying the interpretive effect of OM-doubling
      • 3.1.1OM-doubling is not licensed by contrast or focus
      • 3.1.2Addressing listener doubt and putting the issue to rest
      • 3.1.3OM-doubling as an expression of speaker confidence
      • 3.1.4Existing expectations/common ground is crucial to license OM-doubling
      • 3.1.5Licensing OM-doubling by foregrounding VP/VP-constituents
    • 3.2Intermediate summary: The conditions on Lubukusu OM-doubling
    • 3.3Use-conditional items and Lubukusu OM-doubling as verum
    • 3.4Two analytical options for Lubukusu
  • 4.Syntactic analysis: Two OMs in Lubukusu (and some supporting evidence)
    • 4.1The syntax of Lubukusu object marking
    • 4.2Constraints on the number of OMs
      • 4.2.1Restrictions to a single OM
      • 4.2.2A parallel situation: The interaction of OM and RFM
      • 4.2.3Another parallel: Locative objects
    • 4.3Object symmetry effects
      • 4.3.1Loss of symmetry effects in Lubukusu OM-Doubling
      • 4.3.2Toward explaining the loss of symmetry in OM-doubling
    • 4.4An exceptional instance of doubling
    • 4.5Some speculative comments on intransitive verbs
    • 4.6Explaining the remaining syntactic patterns
    • 4.7Against alternative syntactic accounts
  • 5.Conclusions and comparative theoretical consequences
    • 5.1Comments on pragmatics in the syntax
    • 5.2Summary of conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.00027.sik
References (108)
References
Abels, Klaus and Peter Muriungi. 2008. The focus marker in Kîîtharaka: Syntax and semantics. Lingua 1181: 287–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aboh, Enoch. 2004. The morphosyntax of complement-head sequences: Clause structure and word order patterns in Kwa. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adams, Nicki. 2010. The Zulu ditransitive verb phrase. Chicago: University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2006. Clitic doubling. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume 11, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 520–581. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. 1988a. Theta Theory and the Syntax of Applicatives in Chichewa, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 61: 353–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988b. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In Elements of grammar, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Agreement, Dislocation and Partial Configurationality. In Formal Approaches to Function, eds A. Carnie, H. Harley and M. Willie, 107–134. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. On the status of object markers in Bantu languages. Ms, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark and Chris Collins. 2006. Linkers and the internal structure of vP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 241: 307–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark and Ruth Kramer. 2016. Doubling clitics are pronouns: Reduce and interpret. Ms, Rutgers University and Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark, Ken Safir, and Justine Sikuku. 2012a. Sources of (A)symmetry in Bantu Double Object Constructions. In Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. Nathan Arnett and Ryan Bennett, 54–64. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. 2012b. On the Categories of Clausal Constituents in Lubukusu and Limits to their Selection. Afranaph Technical Report #8. [URL]
. 2013. Complex anaphora in Lubukusu. In Selected Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on African Linguistics, eds. Olanike Ola Orie and Karen W. Sanders, 196–206. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bax, Anna and Michael Diercks. 2012. Information structure constraints on object marking in Manyika. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Sciences 30.2: 185–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 1999. Italian/Romance Clitics: Structure and Derivation. In: Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk, 543–579. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Sam Mchombo. 1987. Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichêwa. Language 631:741–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan and Lioba Moshi. 1990. Object asymmetries in Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 211: 147–185.Google Scholar
Buell, Leston. 2005. Issues in Zulu morphosyntax. Los Angeles: UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2009. Evaluating the immediate postverbal position as a focus position in Zulu. In Selected proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: linguistic theory and African language documentation, eds. M. Matondo, F. McLaughlin, & E. Potsdam, 166–172. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Byarushengo, Ernest R., Larry M. Hyman, and Sarah Tenenbaum. 1976. Tone, accent and assertion in Haya. In Studies in Bantu tonology, ed. Larry M. Hyman, 183–205. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki. 2005. Agree and EPP in Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 231: 219–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstens, Vicki and Michael Diercks. 2013. Agreeing How? Implications for Theories of Agreement and Locality. Linguistic Inquiry 44.2: 179–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cechetto, Carlo. 2000. Doubling Structures and Reconstruction. Probus 121: 93–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen and Laura Downing. 2009. Where’s the topic in Zulu? The Linguistic Review 261: 207–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Andrew Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kan Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. Problems of Projection. Lingua 1301: 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2004. The agreement parameter. In Triggers, eds. Anne Breitbarth, Henk van Riemsdijk, 115–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The Linker in Khoisan Languages. Talk given at the 45th Annual Conference on African Linguistics at Kansas University. March, 2014.
Dalgish, Gerard M. 1986. /-a-/ reduction phenomena in Luyia. Studies in African Linguistics 171: 155–176.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logo
Diercks, Michael. 2010. Agreement with subjects in Lubukusu. Washington, DC: Georgetown University dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2011a. The morphosyntax of Lubukusu locative inversion and the parameterization of Agree. Lingua 1211: 702–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. Incorporating Location in Argument Structure: The Lubukusu Locative Clitic. In Selected Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African Languages and Linguistics Today, eds. E. Bokamba, R. Shosted, and B. T. Ayalew, 65–79. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. 2012. Parameterizing Case: Evidence from Bantu. Syntax 15.3: 253–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diercks, Michael and Kristen Hernández. Raising in Lutirichi. Ms, Pomona College.
Diercks, Michael, Rodrigo Ranero, and Mary Paster. 2014. Evidence for a Clitic Analysis of Object Markers in Kuria. In Selected Proceedings of the 44th Annual conference on African Linguistics, eds. Ruth Kramer, Elizabeth C. Zsiga, and One Tlale Boyer, 52–70. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Diercks, Michael and Meghana Rao. 2017. Upward-oriented complementizer agreement with subjects and objects in Kipsigis. Ms, Pomona College. To appear in the Proceedings of the 47th Annual Conference on African Linguistics.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro, and Ernest R. Byarushengo. 1977. On the notion of “direct object”. In Haya grammatical structure, eds. Ernest R. Byarushengo, Alessandro Duranti, and Larry M. Hyman, 45–71. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet, 2006. Information packaging in questions. In Bonami, Olivier and Patricia Cabredo-Hofherr (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, pp. 93–111. Papers from CSSP 2005. Available online at [URL]
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3, Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2013. Expressives and beyond: An introduction to varieties of conventional non-truth-conditional meaning. In Daniel Gutzmann and Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-Conditional Meaning, 1–58. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface (CRiSPI) 28 Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel and Elena Castroviejo Miró. 2011. The dimensions of verum. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, eds. O. Bonami and P. Cabredo Hofherr, 143–165. Available online at [URL]
Harizanov, Boris. 2014. Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface: A-movement and morphological merger in Bulgarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory: 32.4:1033–1088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina. 2013. Verum blocking effects in Chadic languages. Lingua 1361: 103–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Brent. 2006. The syntax and typology of Bantu relative clauses. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois dissertation.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. EPP: Object shift and stylistic fronting in Scandinavian. In WCCFL 20: Proceedings of the 20th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. K. Megerdoomian and L. A. Barel, 290–303. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N., 1992. Über verum-fokus im deutschen. In Jacobs, Joachim (ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, pp. 112–141. Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 1999. The interaction between focus and tone in Bantu. In The grammar of focus, eds. Georges Rebuschi and Laurie Tuller, 151–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry and John Watters. 1984. Auxiliary Focus. Studies in African Linguistics 15.3: 233–273.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21: 39–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina. 2000. Direct object clitic doubling in Albanian and Greek. In Beukema, F. & den Dikken, M. (eds) Clitic Phenomena in European Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 209–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Clitic doubling, agreement, and information structure: The case of Albanian. In Clitic doubling in the Balkan languages, eds. Dalina Kallulli and Liliane Tasmowski, 227–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason. 2008. The Grammar of Repetition: Nupe Grammar at the Syntax – Phonology Interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Ways of emphatic scope-taking: From emphatic assertion in Nupe to the grammar of emphasis. Lingua 1281: 51–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keach, Camillia. 1995. Subject and Object Markers as Agreement and Pronoun Incorporation in Swahili. In Theoretical Approaches to African Linguistics. Trends in African Linguistics 1, ed. Akinbiyi Akinlabi, 109–116. Trenton, NJ: Africa World.Google Scholar
Kinyalolo, Kasangati. 1991. Syntactic Dependencies and the Spec-Head Agreement Hypothesis in Kilega. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ruth. 2014. Clitic doubling or object agreement: An Amharic investigation. Natural Language & Linguistics Theory 321: 593–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Letsholo, Rose. 2013. Object Markers in Ikalanga. Linguistic Discovery 11.1: 105–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds). 2016. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Nineteenth edition. SIL International, Dallas. Online version: [URL]
Maho, Jouni. 2008. NUGL Online: the web version of the New Updated Guthrie List, a referential classification of the Bantu languages. Version dated March 25th, 2008. Available online at [URL]
Marantz, A. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marlo, Michael. 2009. Luyia Tonal Dialectology. Talk given at the University of Nairobi, December 16.
Marlo, Michael R. 2014. Exceptional patterns of object marking in Bantu. Studies in African Linguistics 431. 85–123.Google Scholar
2015a. Exceptional properties of the reflexive in Bantu languages. Nordic Journal of African Studies 241. 1–22.Google Scholar
Marlo, Michael. 2015b. On the number of object markers in Bantu languages. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 361. 1–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marten, Lutz and Nancy Kula. 2012. Object marking and morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30.2: 237–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marten, Lutz, Nancy Kula and Nhlanhla Thwala. 2007. Parameters of morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. Transactions of the Philological Society 1051: 253–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marten, Lutz and Deograsia Ramadhani. 2001. An overview of object marking in Kiluguru. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 111: 259–275.Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 371:69–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGinnis, Martha. 2001. Phases and the syntax of applicatives. In The Proceedings of NELS 31, Minjoo Kim and Uri Strauss (eds), 333–349. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Google Scholar
Mutonyi, Nasiombe. 2000. Aspects of Bukusu morphology and phonology. Columbus: The Ohio State University dissertation.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad, Elena Titov, Hans van de Koot, and Reiko Vermeulen. 2009. A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast. In Jeroen van Craenenbroek (ed.), Alternatives to Cartography, 15–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs omnivorous number. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 291: 939–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2012. Conventional implicatures and expressive content. In Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Vol. 31., eds. C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner, 2516–2536. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ranero Echeverría, Rodrigo. 2014. The Syntax and Semantics of Kuria /ne-/. B.A. thesis, Pomona College.Google Scholar
Ranero, Rodrigo. 2017. Deriving an object dislocation asymmetry in Luganda. To appear in the proceedings of ACAL 47.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering Trees. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riedel, Kristina. 2009a. The syntax of object marking in Sambaa: A comparative Bantu perspective. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2009b. Object marking in wh-questions in Bantu. In Selected Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, eds. Akinloye Ojo and Lioba Moshi, 67–76. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, L. Haegeman (ed), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and head movement. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero, Maribel and Chung-hye Han, 2004. On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 271: 609–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Safir, Ken and Justine Sikuku. 2011. Lubukusu Anaphora Sketch version 3.1++. In Ken Safir, ed., Afranaph Website, at URL [URL]
Schneider-Zioga, Patricia. 2014. Linking, Predication, & Symmetry: On the Syntax of the Linker in Kinande. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. Thomas Borer, Huilin Fang, Alfredo Garcia-Pardo, Peter Guekguezian, Brian Hsu, Charlie O’Hara, Iris Ouyang and Ulrike Steindl, 232–331. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Florian. 2007. Ex-situ focus in Kikuyu. In Focus strategies in African languages, eds. Enoch Aboh, Katharina Hartmann, and Malte Zimmerman, 139–160. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sikuku, Justine. 2011. Syntactic patterns of anaphoric relations in Lubukusu. Nairobi: University of Nairobi dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2012. Comparing Reflexive and Object marking in Lubukusu. For the Proceedings of the World Congress of African Linguistics. Afranaph Technical Report #10. [URL]
. 2014. Lubukusu Data. In K. Safir, Afranaph Database, at URL [URL]. Retrieved February 15, 2015.
Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. Clitic Constructions. In: Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, eds. Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, 213–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Storoshenko, Dennis Ryan. 2014. The Shona Reflexive – zvi as Default Object Agreement. Talk presented at the 4th International Conference on Bantu Linguistics (BANTU4): Berlin, Germany, April 2011.
Tenenbaum, Sarah. 1977. Left- and Right-Dislocations. In Haya grammatical structure, eds. Ernest R. Byarushengo, Alessandro Duranti, and Larry M. Hyman. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the Syntax of Clitic Placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 261: 79–124.Google Scholar
van der Spuy, Andrew. 1993. Dislocated noun phrases in Nguni. Lingua 901: 335–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Wal, Jenneke. 2015. Bantu object clitics as defective goals. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique LX(2–3), 277–296.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1994. Scandinavian object shift and West Germanic scrambling. In Studies on Scrambling, eds. Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk, 487–517. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Object shift. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol III, eds. Martin Everaert and Henk Van Riemsdijk, 392–436. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasike, Aggrey. 2007. The left periphery, wh-in-situ and A-bar movement in Lubukusu and other Bantu languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 2001. Conditions on object agreement in Ruwund (Bantu). In Indigenous languages ( University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20), ed. E. Benedicto, Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2009. On clitic left dislocation in Zulu. In Focus and Topic in African languages, ed. Sonja Ermisch, 131–156. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2012. Object Marking in isiZulu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Studies. 30.2: 219–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Argument prominence and agreement: explaining an unexpected object asymmetry in Zulu. Lingua 1561: 17–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zerbian, Sabine. 2006. Expression of information structure in the Bantu language Northern Sotho. Berlin: Humboldt University dissertation.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Zeller, Jochen
2024. Agreeing objects in Zulu can be indefinite and non-specific. Linguistics Vanguard 9:1 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Bloom Ström, Eva-Marie & Jochen Zeller
2023. Verum in Xhosa and Zulu (Nguni). Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 42:3 ► pp. 493 ff. DOI logo
Just, Erika
2023. Chapter 10. Differential indexing and information structure management. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Kerr, Elisabeth J. & Jenneke Van der Wal
2023. Indirect truth marking via backgrounding: evidence from Bantu. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 42:3 ► pp. 443 ff. DOI logo
Ma, Xiujie & Silvester Ron Simango
2023. The search for V-stranding VP ellipsis in isiXhosa. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 41:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Just, Erika & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2022. A corpus-based analysis of P indexing in Ruuli (Bantu, JE103). South African Journal of African Languages 42:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka & Theodore Levin
2021. Philippine Clitic Pronouns and the Lower Phase Edge. Linguistic Inquiry 52:2 ► pp. 408 ff. DOI logo
Gluckman, John
2021. Null Expletives and Embedded Clauses in Logoori. Syntax 24:3 ► pp. 334 ff. DOI logo
Holmberg, Anders, Michelle Sheehan & Jenneke van der Wal
2019. Movement from the Double Object Construction Is Not Fully Symmetrical. Linguistic Inquiry 50:4 ► pp. 677 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.