Cover not available
Article published In:
Three Factors and Beyond: Language development and impairment
Edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Linguistic Variation 13:2] 2013
► pp. 155–186

Tense and aspect in Cypriot Greek Down Syndrome

Developmental patterns and coping strategies

| University of Cyprus and Massachusetts Institute of Technology

This study examines the production of tense and aspect of Cypriot Greek adults diagnosed with Down Syndrome and children with typical language development. Despite the evidently low IQ scores, and comparatively lower MLU scores, the performance of Cypriot Greek adults with Down Syndrome with tense and aspect is almost at ceiling with 95.7% accuracy for tense and 97.2% for aspect. These results suggest that at least certain aspects of the Down Syndrome grammatical system (e.g. inflectional marking) can be (fully) acquired. It was observed that both groups have developed three coping strategies, when not using a verb as targeted or expected; they either (i) use an alternative feature value, (ii) omit the entire verb, or quite rarely (iii) omit the inflectional suffix. Inconsistencies in the results across different languages suggest that cross-linguistic differences potentially related to the inflectional system of each language might be responsible for the different realization of problematic performance. Keywords: Down Syndrome; language development; inflectional marking; tense; aspect

Published online: 21 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.13.2.02chr
References
Antinucci, F. & R. Miller
1976 How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language 31. 167–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & J. Hafitz
1980 Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language 56(2). 386–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bol, G. & K. Kasparian
2009 The production of pronouns in Dutch children with developmental language disorders: A comparison between children with SLI, hearing impairment, and Down’s syndrome. Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics 23(9). 631–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caselli, M.C., L. Monaco, M. Trasciani & S. Vicari
2008 Language in Italian children with Down syndrome and with specific language impairment. Neuropsychology 221. 27–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R.S
1995 Language development in children and adolescents with Down syndrome. In Paul Fletcher & Brian MacWhinney (eds.), The handbook of child language, 664–689. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Chapman, R.S., H. Seung, S.E. Schwartz & E. Kay-Raining Bird
1998 Language skills of children and adolescents with Down syndrome: II. Production deficits. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 411. 861–873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cholmain, C.N
1994 Working on phonology with young children with Down syndrome. Journal of Clinical Speech and Language Studies 11. 14–35.Google Scholar
Christodoulou, C
2011 Cypriot-Greek down syndrome: Their grammar and its interfaces. Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C.
Clahsen, H., M. Ring & C. Temple
2004 Lexical and morphological skills in English-speaking children with Williams syndrome. In Susanne Bartke & Julia Siegmuller (eds.), Williams syndrome across languages, 221–244. Amsterdam; The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B
1976 Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delidaki, S. & S. Varlokosta
2003 Testing the Aspect First Hypothesis: A preliminary investigation into the comprehension of tense in child Greek. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 291. 73–84.Google Scholar
Dodd, B
1976 A comparison of the phonological systems of mental age matched, normal, severely subnormal and Down’s syndrome children. The British Journal of Disorders of Communication 111. 27–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eadie, P.A., M.E. Fey, J.M. Douglas & C.L. Parsons
2002 Profiles of grammatical morphology and sentence imitation in children with specific language impairment and Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 451. 720–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, C.J
2006 Down’s syndrome – Critical genes in a critical region. Nature 4411. 582–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J
1983 The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A., R. Gelman & L. Gleitman
1994 The course of language learning in children with Down syndrome. In H. Tager-Flusberg (ed.), Constraints on language acquisition: Studies of atypical children, 91–141. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Galeote, M., P. Soto, E. Checa, A. Gomez & E. Lamela
2008 The acquisition of productive vocabulary in Spanish children with Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 331. 292–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galeote, M., P. Soto, E. Sebastián, E. Checa & C. Sanchez-Palacios
2013 Early grammatical development in Spanish children with Down syndrome. Journal of Child Language 411. 111–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemper, T
1988 Neuropathology of Down syndrome. In L. Nadel (ed.), The psychobiology of Down syndrome, 269–289. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kumin, L
2001 Speech intelligibility in individuals with Down syndrome: A framework for targeting specific factors for assessment and treatment. Down Syndrome Quarterly 61. 1.Google Scholar
Kumin, L., C. Councill & M. Goodman
1994 A longitudinal study of the emergence of phonemes in children with Down syndrome. Journal of Communication Disorders 271. 293–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laws, G. & D.V.M. Bishop
2003 A comparison of language abilities in adolescents with Down syndrome and children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 461. 1324–1339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L
2000 Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marinis, T
2003 The acquisition of the DP in Modern Greek. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, L.E., J.T. Richtsmeier, J. Leszl & R.H. Reeves
2004 A chromosome 21 critical region does not cause specific Down syndrome phenotypes. Science 3061. 687–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perovic, A
2006 Syntactic deficit in Down syndrome: More evidence for the modular organisation of language. Lingua 1161. 1616–1630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, M.L. & K. Wexler
1996 Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 391. 1239–1257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ring, M. & H. Clahsen
2005b Morphosyntax in Down’s syndrome: Is the extended optional infinitive hypothesis an option? Stem-, Spraak-en Taalpathologie 131. 3–13.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L
1994 Early null subjects and root null subjects. Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross-linguistic Perspectives 21. 249–272.Google Scholar
Rondal, J. & A. Comblain
1996 Language in adults with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice 4(1). 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanoudaki, E. & S. Varlokosta
2014 Pronoun comprehension in Down syndrome: Deviance or delay? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 571. 1442–1452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaner-Wolles, C
2004 Spared domain-specific cognitive capacities? Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. In S. Bartke & J. Siehmüller (eds.), Williams syndrome across languages, 93–122. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. & I. Tsimpli
1995 The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stathopoulou, N
2009 The linguistic profile of Greek individuals with Down syndrome: Evidence from syntactic and morphological phenomena. Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex. Colchester, Essex.
Stathopoulou, N. & H. Clahsen
2010 The perfective past tense in Greek adolescents with Down syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 241. 870–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephany, U
(1981): Verbal grammar in early modern Greek child language. In P.S. Dale & D. Ingram (eds.), Child Language: An International Perspective, 45–57. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C
1980 Phonological analysis of four Down’s syndrome children. Applied Psycholinguistics 11. 31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 Speech development of infants and children with Down syndrome. In J. Darby (ed.), Speech Evaluation in Medicine, 341–360. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
2001 Down syndrome phonology: Developmental patterns and intervention strategies. Down Syndrome Research and Practice 71. 93–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E
2008 Language-specific effects of task demands on the manifestation of specific language impairment: A comparison of English and Icelandic. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 511. 922–937. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsakiridou, M
2006 The linguistic profile of Down’s syndrome subjects: Evidence from Wh-movement construction. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics, University College of London 141. 227–248.Google Scholar
Varlokosta, S
1994 Issues on modern Greek sentential complementation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland. College Park, Maryland.
Varlokosta, S., A. Vainikka & B. Rohrbacher
1996 Root infinitives without infinitives. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vols 1 and 21. 816–827.
Van Borsel, J
1996 Articulation in Down’s syndrome adolescents and adults. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 311. 415–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vicari, S., M.C. Caselli & F. Tonucci
2000 Asynchrony of lexical and morphosyntactic development in children with Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia 381. 634–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vicari, S., M.C. Caselli, C. Gagliardi, F. Tonucci & V. Volterra
2002 Language acquisition in special populations: A comparison between Down and Williams syndromes. Neuropsychologia 401. 2461–2470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K
1994 Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In David Lightfoot & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Verb movement, 305–362. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zagona, K
2003 Tense and anaphora: Is there a tense-specific theory of coreference? In Andrew Barss (ed.), Anaphora: A reference guide, 140–171. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Christodoulou, Christiana & Kleanthes K. Grohmann
2018. From First Steps to Full Acquisition: Comprehension of Subjunctive Clauses in Bilectal Children With Down Syndrome and Typical Language Development. Frontiers in Communication 3 DOI logo
Christodoulou, Christiana & Kenneth Wexler
2023. Copula Omission in Down Syndrome. Language Learning and Development 19:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Katsarou, Dimitra & Georgia Andreou
2022. Morphosyntactic abilities in young children with Down syndrome: Evidence from the Greek language. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 57:5 ► pp. 937 ff. DOI logo
Loveall, Susan J., Marie Moore Channell, Leonard Abbeduto & Frances A. Conners
2019. Verb production by individuals with Down syndrome during narration. Research in Developmental Disabilities 85 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Mashaqba, Bassil, Eman Al Khalaf, Anas Huneety & Haneen Abu Sa’aleek
2023. Subject-verb agreement inflection in Arabic-speaking individuals with Down syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.