Cover not available
Article published In:
Three Factors and Beyond: Language development and impairment
Edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Linguistic Variation 13:2] 2013
► pp. 187–216

Perfective – imperfective

Development of aspectual distinctions in Greek specific language impairment*

Tense morphology has been found to be cross-linguistically vulnerable in specific language impairment (SLI). Research on the development of aspect is rather limited and results are quite inconsistent; some studies suggest that aspect appears intact (Leonard et al. 2003), while others report severe deficits (Fletcher et al. 2005). The present study is the first one to examine the comprehension and production of aspectual distinctions in Greek SLI. Forty children participated in the study; eight children with SLI (mean age: 6;7), sixteen age-matched typically developing children (mean age: 6;6) and sixteen language-matched typically developing children (mean age: 4;5). Our results provide evidence that the development of aspectual distinctions in Greek SLI seems to be delayed rather than deviant, as it follows the asymmetrical pattern described for earlier stages of typical development; perfective aspect is fully acquired, whereas interpretation of imperfective aspect is still inadequate (Kazanina & Phillips 2003; van Hout 2005).
Published online: 21 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.13.2.03kon
References (60)
Bar-Shalom, E. 2002. Tense and aspect in early child Russian. Language Acquisition 101. 321–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., K. Lifter & J. Hafitz. 1980. Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language 56(2). 386–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. & J. Dalalakis. 1999. Tense and agreement in Greek SLI: A case study. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 241. 1–25.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
COST Action A33. 2006–2010. Cross-linguistically robust stages of children’s linguistic performance with applications to the diagnosis of specific language impairment. Brussels: COST Office, [URL].Google Scholar
Crain, S., & R. Thornton. 1998. Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments in the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Delidaki, S. 2006. The acquisition of tense and aspect in child Greek. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Reading.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – DSM-5. 2013. American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. & L. Dunn. 1981. Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P., L. Leonard, S. Stokes & A.M.-Y. Wong. 2005. The expression of aspect in Cantonese-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 481. 621–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N. & R. Novogrodsky. 2004. The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 311. 661–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagarina, N., K. Abrosova, D. Andjelcović, G. Hržica, D. Kiebzak-Mandera, K. Konstantzou, M. Kovacevic, J. Kuvac-Kraljević & M. Savić. 2010. Production and comprehension of aspectual distinctions in Slavic languages and Greek. Poster, COST Action A33, Final conference: Let the children speak: learning of critical language skills across 25 languages. 22–24.01.2010, London.
Garçia del Réal, I. in press. Asymmetries in the acquisition of perfective and imperfective in Spanish: Comprehension vs. production. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America.
Garçia del Réal, I. & M.J. Ezeizabarrena. 2012. Comprehension of grammatical and lexical aspect in Spanish and Basque. In S. Ferré, Ph. Prévost, L. Tuller & R. Zebib (eds.), Selected proceedings of the romance turn IV workshop on the acquisition of romance languages, 82–103. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Georgas, D.D., I.N. Paraskevopoulos, I.G. Bezevegis & N.D. Giannitsas. 1997. Eliniko WISC-III: Wechsler klimakes noimosinis ja pedja [Greek WISC-III: Wechsler intelligence scale for children]. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar
Hamann, C., S. Ohayon, S. Dubé, U.H. Frauenfelder, L. Rizzi, M. Starke & P. Zesiger. 2003. Aspects of grammatical development in young French children with SLI. Developmental Science 61. 151–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammill, D.D., J.K. Voress & N.A. Pearson. 1993. DTVP-2. Austin, Texas: Pro-ed Publ.Google Scholar
Holton, D., P. Mackridge & I. Philippaki-Warburton. 1999. Grammar of modern Greek. Athens: Patakis Publications.Google Scholar
Hodgson, M. 2003. The acquisition of Spanish perfective aspect: A study on children’s production and comprehension. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 291. 105–117.Google Scholar
van Hout, A. 2005. Imperfect imperfectives: On the acquisition of aspect in Polish. In P. Kempchinky & R. Slabakova (eds.), Aspectual inquiries, 317–344. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Optimal and non-optimal interpretations in the acquisition of Dutch past tenses. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni & M. Umeda (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), 159–170. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. 2008. Acquiring perfectivity and telicity in Dutch, Italian and Polish. Lingua 1181. 1740–1765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hout, A., K. Harrigan & J.G. de Villiers. 2010. Asymmetries in the acquisition of definite and indefinite noun phrases. In P. Hendriks & Ch. Koster (eds.), Special Issue on Asymmetries in child language. Lingua 120(8). 1973–1990.Google Scholar
van Hout, A., N. Gagarina, W. Dressler, et al. in preparation. Learning to understand aspect across 12 languages.
Jakubowicz, C., L. Nash, C. Rigaut & C.-L. Gerard. 1998. Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition 71. 113–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., L. Nash & M. van der Velde. 1999. Inflection and past tense morphology in French specific language impairment. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 289–300. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
International Classification of Diseases, 10th Ed.-ICD-10. 1990. WHO.Google Scholar
Kaltsa, M. 2012. The acquisition of telicity in the native language. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Kazanina, N. & C. Phillips. 2003. Russian children’s knowledge of aspectual distinctions. In B. Beachley, A. Brown & F. Conlin (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 390–401. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Klairis, C. & G. Babiniotis. 2005. Grammar of modern Greek. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar
Klein, W. 1995. A time relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 681. 525–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konstantzou, K., A. van Hout & S. Varlokosta. 2011. Perfective – imperfective: Asymmetrical development of the aspectual distinction in Greek child language. Oral talk, GALA 2011. 06–08.09.2011, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Kunnari, S., T. Savinainen-Makkonen, L. Leonard, L. Makinen, A.-K. Tolonen, M. Luotonen & E. Leinonen. 2011. Children with specific language impairment in Finnish: The use of tense and agreement inflections. Journal of Child Language 381. 999–1027. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. 1998. Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., P. Deevy, C.A. Miller, M. Charest, R. Kurtz & L. Rauf. 2003. The use of grammatical morphemes reflecting aspect and modality by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language 301. 769–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L., P. Deevy, R. Kurtz, L. Krantz Chorev, A. Owen, E. Polite, P. Elam & E. Finneran. 2007. Lexical aspect and the use of very morphology by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 501. 759–777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. & P. Deevy. 2010. Tense and aspect in sentence interpretation by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language 371. 397–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L., A. Lukacs & B. Kas. 2012. Tense and aspect in childhood language impairment: Contributions from Hungarian. Applied Psycholinguistics 331. 305–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mastropavlou, M. 2010. Morphophonological salience as a compensatory means for deficits in the acquisition of past tense in SLI. Journal of Communication Disorders 431. 175–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsuo, A. 2009. Young children’s understanding of ongoing vs. completion in imperfective and perfective participle. Linguistics 47(3). 743–757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, S. & V. Yip. 1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mozer, A. 2009. Aspect and tense in the history of Greek, 2nd edn. Parousia Monograph Series no. 79. Athens: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.Google Scholar
Ralli, A. 2005. Morphologia. Athens: Patakis Publications.Google Scholar
Rice, M.L. & K. Wexler. 1996. Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 391. 1239–1257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, P., Z. Penner & K. Wymann. 2002. Comprehension of resultative verbs in normally developing and language impaired children. In F. Windsor, M.L. Kelly & N. Hewlett (eds.), Investigations in clinical phonetics and linguistics, 115–129. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schulz, P. & A. Wittek. 2003. Opening doors and sweeping floors: What children with Specific Language Impairment know about telic and atelic verbs. In B. Beachley, A. Brown & F. Colin (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th BUCLD, 727–738. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y., D. Slobin & R.M. Weist. 1998. Introduction to the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Special issue of First Language. DOI logo
Simos, P.G., G.D. Sideridis, A. Protopapas & A. Mouzaki. 2011. Psychometric characteristics of a receptive vocabulary test for Greek elementary students. Assessment for Effective Intervention 37(1). 34–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., K. Koutsandreas & H. Clahsen. 2012. The perfective past tense in Greek children with specific language impairment. Morphology 221. 143–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M.T. & E. Pierpont. 2005. Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex 411. 399–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J. & V. Christian. 2000. Lexical word formation in children with grammatical SLI: A grammar-specific versus an input-processing deficit? Cognition 751. 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J. & M.T. Ullman. 2001. Past tense morphology in specifically language impaired and normally developing children. Language and Cognitive Processes 19(2/3). 177–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinnitskaya, I. & K. Wexler. 2001. The role of pragmatics in the development of Russian aspect. First Language 211. 143–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, L. 2002. Understanding completion entailments in the absence of agency cues. Journal of Child Language 291. 109–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weist, R.M. 1983. Prefix versus suffix information processing in the comprehension of tense and aspect. Journal of Child Language 101. 85–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weist, R.M., H. Wysocka & P. Lyytinen. 1991. A cross-linguistic perspective on the development of temporal systems. Journal of Child Language 181. 67–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, I.L., V.G. Steiner & R.E. Pond. 1992. PLS-3: Preschool language scale-3. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Kyuchukov, Hristo, Jill de Villiers, Yanwan Zhu & Iris Zhong
2024. Assessing the acquisition of Romani in Roma children. Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Alexiadou, Artemis & Vasiliki Rizou
2023. The use of periphrasis for the expression of aspect by Greek heritage speakers. Register Studies 5:1 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Paspali, Anastasia, Vasiliki Rizou & Artemis Alexiadou
2022. Aspect in Heritage Greek: evidence from elicited production and online judgments. Applied Psycholinguistics 43:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Fyndanis, Valantis & Charalambos Themistocleous
2019. Are there prototypical associations between time frames and aspectual values? Evidence from Greek aphasia and healthy ageing. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 33:1-2 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Peristeri, Eleni, Maria Andreou & Ianthi M. Tsimpli
2017. Syntactic and Story Structure Complexity in the Narratives of High- and Low-Language Ability Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Frontiers in Psychology 8 DOI logo
Konstantzou, Katerina
2015. Development of Grammatical Aspect in Specific Language Impairment: Evidence from an Experimental Design with Video Stimuli. Procedia Computer Science 65 ► pp. 510 ff. DOI logo
Varlokosta, Spyridoula & Michaela Nerantzini
2015. The acquisition of past tense by Greek-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment. In Specific Language Impairment [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 58], ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.