Cover not available
Article published In:
Three Factors and Beyond: Socio-syntax and language acquisition
Edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Linguistic Variation 14:1] 2014
► pp. 69–108

Developments in the acquisition of Wh-interrogatives in Cypriot Greek

| University of Cyprus
| Cyprus Acquisition Team

This cross-sectional study investigates the acquisition of the interpretation of syntactic and semantic aspects of wh-questions by Cypriot Greek-speaking children aged 4 to 9 years. Two experimental tools were employed, a question–picture-matching task examining the comprehension of D-linked and non-D-linked questions for subject and object, and a question-after-picture task examining the comprehension of the notion of exhaustivity in single and multiple wh-questions. The results from these experiments are interpreted in light of current theoretical advances and cross-linguistic comparisons. The apparent discrepancies found in the development of Greek Cypriot children’s comprehension of wh-questions and exhaustivity are put in perspective with their particular linguistic environment – diglossia, in which children grow up with two varieties, Cypriot Greek and Standard Modern Greek. Keywords: bilectalism; D(iscourse)-linking; first language acquisition; multiple wh-questions; single wh-questions

Published online: 25 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.14.1.04var
References
Alexopoulou, T. & F. Keller
2013 What vs. who and which: Kind-denoting fillers and the complexity of whether-islands. In J. Sprouse & N. Hornstein.(eds.), Experimental syntax and island effects, 310–340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A. & E. Anagnostopoulou
1998 Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 161. 491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, K., M. Kambanaros, K.K. Grohmann & N. Katsos
Forthcoming. Is bilectalism similar to bilingualism? An investigation into children’s vocabulary and executive control skills. In W. Orman & M.J. Valleau (eds.) BUCLD 38: Proceedings of the 38th annual Boston University conference on language development Somerville, MA Cascadilla Press
Arvaniti, A
2010 Linguistic practices in Cyprus and the emergence of Cypriot standard Greek. Mediterranean Language Review 171. 15–45.Google Scholar
2006 Erasure as a means of maintaining diglossia in Cyprus. San Diego Linguistic Papers 21. 25–38.Google Scholar
Avrutin, S
2000 Comprehension of discourse-linked and non-discourse-linked questions by children and Broca’s aphasics. In Y. Grodzinsky, P.L. Shapiro & D. Swinney (eds.), Language and the Brain, 295–313. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E
2001 Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C
. & K. K. Grohmann (eds.) 2013 The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
2005 Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 361. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986a Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986b Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
COST Action A33
(2006–2010) Research network ‘Cross-linguistically robust stages of children’s linguistic performance with applications to the diagnosis of specific language impairment’. Brussels: COST Office, [URL]Google Scholar
Crain, S. & D. Lillo-Martin
1999 Linguistic theory and language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cairns, H.S. & J.R. Hsu
1978 Who, why, when, and how: A development study. Journal of Child Language 5(3). 477–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vincenzi, M., L. Arduino, L. Cicarelli & R. Job
1999 Parsing strategies in children’s comprehension of interrogative sentences. Proceedings of ECCS ‘99 – European Conference on Cognitive Science, 301–308. Siena: Istituto de Psicologia.
Friedmann, N., A. Belletti & L. Rizzi
2009 Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 1191. 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N. & H. Lavi
2006 On the order of acquisition of A-movement, wh-movement and V–C movement. In A. Belletti, E. Bennati, C. Chesi, E. Di Domenico & I. Ferrari (eds.), Language acquisition and development, 211–217. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N. & R. Novogrodsky
2011 Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of wh-questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua 1211. 367–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fyndanis, V., S. Varlokosta & K. Tsapkini
2010 Exploring wh-questions in agrammatism: Evidence from Greek. Journal of Neurolinguistics 231. 644–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgiafentis, M. & Α. Sfakianaki
2004 Syntax interacts with prosody: The VOS order in Greek. Lingua 1141. 935–961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groenendijk, J., & M. Stokhof
1984 Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Grohmann, K.K
This volume. Introducing socio-syntax and language acquisition.
In press. Towards comparative bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
2014 CAT research on object clitic placement: Where we are now. In K.K. Grohmann & T. Neokleous (eds.), Developments in the acquisition of clitics, 1–40. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2011 Some directions for the systematic investigation of the acquisition of Cypriot Greek: A new perspective on production abilities from object clitic placement. In E. Rinke & T. Kupisch (eds.), The development of grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change, 179–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, K.K. & E. Leivada
In press. Language acquisition in bilectal environments: Competing motivations, metalinguistic awareness, and the socio-syntax of development hypothesis. In M. Katerbow & G. de Vogelaer (eds.) Variation in language acquisition Amsterdam John Benjamins
2012 Interface ingredients of dialect design: Bi-x, socio-syntax of development, and the grammar of Cypriot Greek. In A.M. Di Sciullo (ed.), Towards a biolinguistic understanding of grammar: Essays on interfaces, 239–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, K.K., P. Panagiotidis & S. Tsiplakou
2006 Properties of wh-question formation in Cypriot Greek. In M. Janse, B.D. Joseph & A. Ralli (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Modern Greek dialects and linguistic theory (Mytilene, Greece: 30 September–3 October 2004), 83–98. Patras: University of Patras.Google Scholar
Grohmann, K.K. & E. Papadopoulou
2011 Question (able) issues in Cypriot Greek. Linguistic Analysis 371. 8–38.Google Scholar
Guasti, M.T
2004 Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heizmann, T
2007 Children’s acquisition of exhaustivity in clefts. In H. Caunt-Nulton, S. Kulatilake & I.-h. Woo (eds.), BUCLD 31: Proceedings of the 31st annual Boston University conference on language development, 298–309. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, C. & J. Hartman
2006 Some (wh-)questions concerning passive interactions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Kambanaros, M., K.K. Grohmann & M. Michaelides
2013 [ = Kambanaros, et al. 2013a]. Lexical retrieval for nouns and verbs in typically developing bilectal children. First Language 331. 182–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kambanaros, M., K.K. Grohmann, M. Michaelides & E. Theodorou
2014 On the nature of verb–noun dissociations in bilectal SLI: A psycholinguistic perspective from Greek. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 171. 169–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 [ = Kambanaros, et al. 2013b]. Comparing multilingual children with SLI to their bilectal peers: Evidence from object and action picture naming. International Journal of Multilingualism 101. 60–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leivada, E., E. Papadopoulou & N. Pavlou
2013 The gray area of acceptability judgments: Clefts and exhaustivity in Cypriot Greek. In K.U. Ihemere (ed.), Language contact: A multidimensional perspective, 59–86. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J., M. Jones & C.R. Marshall
2011 Who did Buzz see somebody? Grammaticality judgement of wh-questions in typically developing children and children with grammatical-SLI. Lingua 1211. 408–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerantzini, M., S. Varlokosta, D. Papadopoulou & R. Bastiaanse
2014 Wh-questions and relative clauses in Greek agrammatism: Evidence from comprehension and production. Aphasiology 281. 490–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulou, E
2014 Acquisition of wh-questions: Evidence from Cypriot Greek. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Essex.
Paradis, J
2005 Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a second language: Implications of similarities with specific language impairment. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools 361. 172–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlou, N
2012 Pied-piping in wh-questions: What do children say about it? MA thesis, University of York.
2010 Inda mbu, nambu or ine ti pu? Acquiring complex structures in Cypriot Greek. In A. Botinis (ed.), Proceedings of ISCA tutorial and research workshop in experimental linguistics, 141–144. Athens: ISCAL and University of Athens.Google Scholar
Penner, Z
1994 Asking questions without CPs? On the acquisition of wh questions in Bernese Swiss German and standard German. In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (ed.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 177–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D
1987 Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In E.J. Reuland & A.G.B. ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I
1985 Word order in modern Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 831. 113–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L
2004 Locality and the left periphery. In A. Belletti (ed.), The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3: Structures and beyond, 223–251. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, T
2007 The prism of grammar: How child language illuminates humanism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeper, T., P. Schulz, B.Z. Pearson & I. Reckling
2007 From singleton to exhaustive: The acquisition of wh-. In M. Becker & A. McKenzie (eds.), Proceedings of SULA 3: Semantics of under-represented languages in the Americas, 87–102. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. & K.K Grohmann
Forthcoming. Canaries in a coal mine: Native speakerhood and other factors as predictors of moribundity, death, and diglossic shift in Cypriot Greek. Mediterranean Language Review.
2013 Discrete bilectalism: Towards co-overt prestige and diglossic shift in Cyprus. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2241. 119–142.Google Scholar
Rowland, C.F. & J.M. Pine
2000 Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘What children do know?’. Journal of Child Language 271. 157–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, P
2013 Wer versteht wann was? Sprachverstehen im frühen Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen am Beispiel der w-Fragen. In A. Deppermann (ed.), Das Deutsch der Migranten, 313–338. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010a Who answered what to whom? On children’s understanding of exhaustive questions. Paper presented at the conference ‘Let the children speak: Learning of critical language skills across 25 languages’, Wellcome Trust, London.
2010b Some notes on semantics and SLI. In J. Costa, A. Castro, M. Lobo & F. Pratas (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2009, 391–406. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Schulz, P. & Z. Penner
2002 The emergence of exhaustivity in wh-questions: Evidence from normal and impaired language acquisition in German. Paper presented at the workshop ‘Cooperations in research on specific language impairment’, Groningen.
Schulz, P. & T. Roeper
2011 Acquisition of exhaustivity in wh-questions: A semantic dimension of SLI?. Lingua 1211. 383–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S
2006 Developmental perspectives on specific language impairment: Evidence from the production of wh-questions by Greek SLI children over time. Advances in Speech–language Pathology 81. 384–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. & H. Sinclair
1975 Comprehension of questions by children between 5 and 9. Linguistics 13(151). 17–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stromswold, K
1995 The acquisition of subject and object wh-questions. Language Acquisition 41. 5–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theodorou, E
2013 Specific language impairment in Cypriot Greek: Diagnostic and experimental investigations. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Cyprus.
Theodorou, E. & K.K. Grohmann
In press. Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI. Lingua.
Tracy, R
1994 Raising questions: Formal and functional aspects of the acquisition of wh-questions in German. In R. Tracy & E. Lattey (eds.), How tolerant is universal grammar: Essays on language learnability and language variation, 1–34. Tübingen: Narr. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M
1990 The clause structure and word order of Modern Greek. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 226–255.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M. & M. Mastropavlou
2007 Feature interpretability in L2 acquisition and SLI: Greek clitics and determiners. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition, 142–183. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tyack, D. & D. Ingram
1977 Children’s production and comprehension of questions. Journal of Child Language 41. 211–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valian, V. & L. Casey
2003 Young children’s acquisition of wh-questions: The role of structured input. Journal of Child Language 301. 117–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varlokosta, S., M. Nerantzini & D. Papadopoulou
Forthcoming. Comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition: A test for relativized minimality. Journal of Child Language.
Varlokosta, S., M. Nerantzini, D. Papadopoulou, R. Bastiaanse & A. Beretta
To appear. Minimality effects in agrammatic comprehension: The role of lexical restriction and feature impoverishment. Lingua.
Wilhelm, A. & K. Hanna
1992 On the acquisition of WH-questions. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics 151. 87–102.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Christodoulou, Christiana & Kleanthes K. Grohmann
2018. From First Steps to Full Acquisition: Comprehension of Subjunctive Clauses in Bilectal Children With Down Syndrome and Typical Language Development. Frontiers in Communication 3 DOI logo
Rombough, Kelly & Rosalind Thornton
2018. Probing morphological, syntactic and pragmatic knowledge through answers to wh-questions in children with SLI. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 20:2 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Sauerland, Uli, Kleanthes K. Grohmann, Maria Teresa Guasti, Darinka Anđelković, Reili Argus, Sharon Armon-Lotem, Fabrizio Arosio, Larisa Avram, João Costa, Ineta Dabašinskienė, Kristine de López, Daniela Gatt, Helen Grech, Ewa Haman, Angeliek van Hout, Gordana Hrzica, Judith Kainhofer, Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, Sari Kunnari, Melita Kovačević, Jelena Kuvac Kraljević, Katarzyna Lipowska, Sandrine Mejias, Maša Popović, Jurate Ruzaite, Maja Savić, Anca Sevcenco, Spyridoula Varlokosta, Marina Varnava & Kazuko Yatsushiro
2016. How do 5-year-olds understand questions? Differences in languages across Europe. First Language 36:3 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Theodorou, Elena, Ioannis Vogindroukas, Eleni Giannakou, Lamprini Tsouti & Ioannis Phinikettos
2023. Telling Personal Narratives: Comparing Stories Told by 10-Year-Old Speakers of Cypriot Greek Dialect and of Standard Modern Greek. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 75:6 ► pp. 401 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.