Cover not available
Article published In:
Three Factors and Beyond: Socio-syntax and language acquisition
Edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann
[Linguistic Variation 14:1] 2014
► pp. 69–108

Developments in the acquisition of Wh-interrogatives in Cypriot Greek

| University of Cyprus
| Cyprus Acquisition Team
This cross-sectional study investigates the acquisition of the interpretation of syntactic and semantic aspects of wh-questions by Cypriot Greek-speaking children aged 4 to 9 years. Two experimental tools were employed, a question–picture-matching task examining the comprehension of D-linked and non-D-linked questions for subject and object, and a question-after-picture task examining the comprehension of the notion of exhaustivity in single and multiple wh-questions. The results from these experiments are interpreted in light of current theoretical advances and cross-linguistic comparisons. The apparent discrepancies found in the development of Greek Cypriot children’s comprehension of wh-questions and exhaustivity are put in perspective with their particular linguistic environment – diglossia, in which children grow up with two varieties, Cypriot Greek and Standard Modern Greek. Keywords: bilectalism; D(iscourse)-linking; first language acquisition; multiple wh-questions; single wh-questions
Published online: 25 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.14.1.04var
References (70)
Alexopoulou, T. & F. Keller. 2013. What vs. who and which: Kind-denoting fillers and the complexity of whether-islands. In J. Sprouse & N. Hornstein.(eds.), Experimental syntax and island effects, 310–340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A. & E. Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 161. 491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, K., M. Kambanaros, K.K. Grohmann & N. Katsos. Forthcoming. Is bilectalism similar to bilingualism? An investigation into children’s vocabulary and executive control skills. In W. Orman & M.J. Valleau (eds.), BUCLD 38: Proceedings of the 38th annual Boston University conference on language development, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Arvaniti, A. 2010. Linguistic practices in Cyprus and the emergence of Cypriot standard Greek. Mediterranean Language Review 171. 15–45.Google Scholar
. 2006. Erasure as a means of maintaining diglossia in Cyprus. San Diego Linguistic Papers 21. 25–38.Google Scholar
Avrutin, S. 2000. Comprehension of discourse-linked and non-discourse-linked questions by children and Broca’s aphasics. In Y. Grodzinsky, P.L. Shapiro & D. Swinney (eds.), Language and the Brain, 295–313. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. 2001. Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C. & K. K. Grohmann (eds.). 2013. The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 361. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1986b. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
COST Action A33. (2006–2010). Research network ‘Cross-linguistically robust stages of children’s linguistic performance with applications to the diagnosis of specific language impairment’. Brussels: COST Office, [URL]Google Scholar
Crain, S. & D. Lillo-Martin. 1999. Linguistic theory and language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cairns, H.S. & J.R. Hsu. 1978. Who, why, when, and how: A development study. Journal of Child Language 5(3). 477–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Vincenzi, M., L. Arduino, L. Cicarelli & R. Job. 1999. Parsing strategies in children’s comprehension of interrogative sentences. Proceedings of ECCS ‘99 – European Conference on Cognitive Science, 301–308. Siena: Istituto de Psicologia.
Friedmann, N., A. Belletti & L. Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 1191. 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N. & H. Lavi. 2006. On the order of acquisition of A-movement, wh-movement and V–C movement. In A. Belletti, E. Bennati, C. Chesi, E. Di Domenico & I. Ferrari (eds.), Language acquisition and development, 211–217. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N. & R. Novogrodsky. 2011. Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of wh-questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua 1211. 367–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fyndanis, V., S. Varlokosta & K. Tsapkini. 2010. Exploring wh-questions in agrammatism: Evidence from Greek. Journal of Neurolinguistics 231. 644–662. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgiafentis, M. & Α. Sfakianaki. 2004. Syntax interacts with prosody: The VOS order in Greek. Lingua 1141. 935–961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groenendijk, J., & M. Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Grohmann, K.K. This volume. Introducing socio-syntax and language acquisition.
. In press. Towards comparative bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
. 2014. CAT research on object clitic placement: Where we are now. In K.K. Grohmann & T. Neokleous (eds.), Developments in the acquisition of clitics, 1–40. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2011. Some directions for the systematic investigation of the acquisition of Cypriot Greek: A new perspective on production abilities from object clitic placement. In E. Rinke & T. Kupisch (eds.), The development of grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change, 179–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, K.K. & E. Leivada. In press. Language acquisition in bilectal environments: Competing motivations, metalinguistic awareness, and the socio-syntax of development hypothesis. In M. Katerbow & G. de Vogelaer (eds.), Variation in language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2012. Interface ingredients of dialect design: Bi-x, socio-syntax of development, and the grammar of Cypriot Greek. In A.M. Di Sciullo (ed.), Towards a biolinguistic understanding of grammar: Essays on interfaces, 239–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, K.K., P. Panagiotidis & S. Tsiplakou. 2006. Properties of wh-question formation in Cypriot Greek. In M. Janse, B.D. Joseph & A. Ralli (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Modern Greek dialects and linguistic theory (Mytilene, Greece: 30 September–3 October 2004), 83–98. Patras: University of Patras.Google Scholar
Grohmann, K.K. & E. Papadopoulou. 2011. Question (able) issues in Cypriot Greek. Linguistic Analysis 371. 8–38.Google Scholar
Guasti, M.T. 2004. Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Heizmann, T. 2007. Children’s acquisition of exhaustivity in clefts. In H. Caunt-Nulton, S. Kulatilake & I.-h. Woo (eds.), BUCLD 31: Proceedings of the 31st annual Boston University conference on language development, 298–309. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, C. & J. Hartman. 2006. Some (wh-)questions concerning passive interactions. In Proceedings of the Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Kambanaros, M., K.K. Grohmann & M. Michaelides. 2013. [ = Kambanaros, et al. 2013a]. Lexical retrieval for nouns and verbs in typically developing bilectal children. First Language 331. 182–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kambanaros, M., K.K. Grohmann, M. Michaelides & E. Theodorou. 2014. On the nature of verb–noun dissociations in bilectal SLI: A psycholinguistic perspective from Greek. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 171. 169–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. [ = Kambanaros, et al. 2013b]. Comparing multilingual children with SLI to their bilectal peers: Evidence from object and action picture naming. International Journal of Multilingualism 101. 60–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leivada, E., E. Papadopoulou & N. Pavlou. 2013. The gray area of acceptability judgments: Clefts and exhaustivity in Cypriot Greek. In K.U. Ihemere (ed.), Language contact: A multidimensional perspective, 59–86. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
van der Lely, H.K.J., M. Jones & C.R. Marshall. 2011. Who did Buzz see somebody? Grammaticality judgement of wh-questions in typically developing children and children with grammatical-SLI. Lingua 1211. 408–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerantzini, M., S. Varlokosta, D. Papadopoulou & R. Bastiaanse. 2014. Wh-questions and relative clauses in Greek agrammatism: Evidence from comprehension and production. Aphasiology 281. 490–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulou, E. 2014. Acquisition of wh-questions: Evidence from Cypriot Greek. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Essex.
Paradis, J. 2005. Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a second language: Implications of similarities with specific language impairment. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools 361. 172–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlou, N. 2012. Pied-piping in wh-questions: What do children say about it? MA thesis, University of York.
. 2010. Inda mbu, nambu or ine ti pu? Acquiring complex structures in Cypriot Greek. In A. Botinis (ed.), Proceedings of ISCA tutorial and research workshop in experimental linguistics, 141–144. Athens: ISCAL and University of Athens.Google Scholar
Penner, Z. 1994. Asking questions without CPs? On the acquisition of wh questions in Bernese Swiss German and standard German. In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (ed.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar, 177–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In E.J. Reuland & A.G.B. ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I. 1985. Word order in modern Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 831. 113–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. 2004. Locality and the left periphery. In A. Belletti (ed.), The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3: Structures and beyond, 223–251. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. 2007. The prism of grammar: How child language illuminates humanism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roeper, T., P. Schulz, B.Z. Pearson & I. Reckling. 2007. From singleton to exhaustive: The acquisition of wh-. In M. Becker & A. McKenzie (eds.), Proceedings of SULA 3: Semantics of under-represented languages in the Americas, 87–102. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. & K.K Grohmann. Forthcoming. Canaries in a coal mine: Native speakerhood and other factors as predictors of moribundity, death, and diglossic shift in Cypriot Greek. Mediterranean Language Review.
. 2013. Discrete bilectalism: Towards co-overt prestige and diglossic shift in Cyprus. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2241. 119–142.Google Scholar
Rowland, C.F. & J.M. Pine. 2000. Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘What children do know?’. Journal of Child Language 271. 157–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, P. 2013. Wer versteht wann was? Sprachverstehen im frühen Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen am Beispiel der w-Fragen. In A. Deppermann (ed.), Das Deutsch der Migranten, 313–338. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010a. Who answered what to whom? On children’s understanding of exhaustive questions. Paper presented at the conference ‘Let the children speak: Learning of critical language skills across 25 languages’, Wellcome Trust, London.
. 2010b. Some notes on semantics and SLI. In J. Costa, A. Castro, M. Lobo & F. Pratas (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2009, 391–406. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Schulz, P. & Z. Penner. 2002. The emergence of exhaustivity in wh-questions: Evidence from normal and impaired language acquisition in German. Paper presented at the workshop ‘Cooperations in research on specific language impairment’, Groningen.
Schulz, P. & T. Roeper. 2011. Acquisition of exhaustivity in wh-questions: A semantic dimension of SLI?. Lingua 1211. 383–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S. 2006. Developmental perspectives on specific language impairment: Evidence from the production of wh-questions by Greek SLI children over time. Advances in Speech–language Pathology 81. 384–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. & H. Sinclair. 1975. Comprehension of questions by children between 5 and 9. Linguistics 13(151). 17–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stromswold, K. 1995. The acquisition of subject and object wh-questions. Language Acquisition 41. 5–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theodorou, E. 2013. Specific language impairment in Cypriot Greek: Diagnostic and experimental investigations. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Cyprus.
Theodorou, E. & K.K. Grohmann. In press. Object clitics in Cypriot Greek children with SLI. Lingua.
Tracy, R. 1994. Raising questions: Formal and functional aspects of the acquisition of wh-questions in German. In R. Tracy & E. Lattey (eds.), How tolerant is universal grammar: Essays on language learnability and language variation, 1–34. Tübingen: Narr. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M. 1990. The clause structure and word order of Modern Greek. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 226–255.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M. & M. Mastropavlou. 2007. Feature interpretability in L2 acquisition and SLI: Greek clitics and determiners. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition, 142–183. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tyack, D. & D. Ingram. 1977. Children’s production and comprehension of questions. Journal of Child Language 41. 211–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valian, V. & L. Casey. 2003. Young children’s acquisition of wh-questions: The role of structured input. Journal of Child Language 301. 117–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varlokosta, S., M. Nerantzini & D. Papadopoulou. Forthcoming. Comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition: A test for relativized minimality. Journal of Child Language.
Varlokosta, S., M. Nerantzini, D. Papadopoulou, R. Bastiaanse & A. Beretta. To appear. Minimality effects in agrammatic comprehension: The role of lexical restriction and feature impoverishment. Lingua.
Wilhelm, A. & K. Hanna. 1992. On the acquisition of WH-questions. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics 151. 87–102.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Theodorou, Elena, Ioannis Vogindroukas, Eleni Giannakou, Lamprini Tsouti & Ioannis Phinikettos
2023. Telling Personal Narratives: Comparing Stories Told by 10-Year-Old Speakers of Cypriot Greek Dialect and of Standard Modern Greek. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 75:6 ► pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
Christodoulou, Christiana & Kleanthes K. Grohmann
2018. From First Steps to Full Acquisition: Comprehension of Subjunctive Clauses in Bilectal Children With Down Syndrome and Typical Language Development. Frontiers in Communication 3 DOI logo
Rombough, Kelly & Rosalind Thornton
2018. Probing morphological, syntactic and pragmatic knowledge through answers to wh-questions in children with SLI. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 20:2 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Sauerland, Uli, Kleanthes K. Grohmann, Maria Teresa Guasti, Darinka Anđelković, Reili Argus, Sharon Armon-Lotem, Fabrizio Arosio, Larisa Avram, João Costa, Ineta Dabašinskienė, Kristine de López, Daniela Gatt, Helen Grech, Ewa Haman, Angeliek van Hout, Gordana Hrzica, Judith Kainhofer, Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, Sari Kunnari, Melita Kovačević, Jelena Kuvac Kraljević, Katarzyna Lipowska, Sandrine Mejias, Maša Popović, Jurate Ruzaite, Maja Savić, Anca Sevcenco, Spyridoula Varlokosta, Marina Varnava & Kazuko Yatsushiro
2016. How do 5-year-olds understand questions? Differences in languages across Europe. First Language 36:3 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.