Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 15:1 (2015) ► pp.116–140

Blocking effects and non-clause bound reflexives in Mandarin and American English

A sub-set of languages with non-clause bound (NCB) reflexives exhibits Blocking effects. In these languages, a NCB reflexive is “blocked” from corefering with a higher subject when a lower subject does not agree with a higher subject for person. Accounting for Blocking effects has been challenging. Recently, researchers have posited a functional head that encodes point of view or sentience (e.g. Huang & Liu 2001; Tenny 2006; Chou 2012). However, these analyses do not account for all available data. Here, I offer a small modification to the most recent analysis of this type that accounts for available data by conforming to Chomsky’s cyclic transfer system (2007, 2008). I also provide exploratory data that suggests that (i) NCB reflexives exist in American English and (ii) they unexpectedly exhibit Blocking effects. Finally, I illustrate that the modified analysis for Mandarin also accounts for the distribution of NCB reflexives in American English.
Keywords: non-clause bound reflexives, functional head, American English, Blocking effects


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 21 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15.1.04los
References (48)
Asudeh, Ash & Frank Keller. 2001. Experimental evidence for a predication-based binding theory. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 371. 1–14.Google Scholar
Baker, C.L. 1995. Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 71(1). 63–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banfield, Ann. 1973. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language 10(1). 1–39.Google Scholar
Bard, Ellen G., Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72(1). 32–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baylis, Adriane L. 2007. Perceptions of audible nasal air emission in speakers with cleft palate: a comparative study of listener judgments. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989. Anaphora and attitudes de se. Semantics and Contextual Expression 111. 1–31.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 2007. Approaching UG from Below. Interfaces + Recursion = Language? New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2008. On Phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (ed.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chou, C.-T. Tim. 2012. Syntax-pragmatics interface: Mandarin Chinese wh-the-hell and Point-of-View Operator. Syntax 15(1). 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: lts role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 101. 141–177.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter & Gabriella Hermon. 2005. Long distance reflexives in Singapore Malay: An apparent typological anomaly. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 112–187.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon & C.-T. James Huang. 2001. Long-distance reflexives: The state of the art. In Peter Cole, Gabriella Hermon & C.-T. James Huang (eds.), Syntax & semantics: Long distance reflexives, xiii–xivi. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter & Li-May Sung. 1994. Head movement and long distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 251. 355–406.Google Scholar
Cowart, Wayne. 1997. Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Engen, Trygg. 1971. Psychophysics II: Scaling methods. In J.W. Kling & L. Riggs (ed.), Woodworth and Schlossberg’s experimental psychology, 47–86. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 2003. Language change in variation and formal syntax. American Speech Supplement 88(1). 223–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finer, Daniel. 1991. Binding parameters in second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language, 351–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finer, Daniel & Ellen Broselow. 1986. Second language acquisition of reflexive-binding. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society (NELS) 161. 154–168.Google Scholar
Gärtner, Hans Martin & Markus Steinbach. 2006. A skeptical note on the syntax of speech acts and point of view. Form, Structure, Grammar. 213–222.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 1984. Toward a theory of long-distance anaphora: A GB approach. The Linguistic Review 3(4). 302–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline & Liliane Haegeman. 2012. Je est un autre. Subject positions, point of view and the neuter pronoun tet in West Flemish. In Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Functional heads, 69–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1974. Les Pronoms Logophoriques [Logophoric Pronouns]. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 691. 287–310.Google Scholar
Harris, Jesse A. 2012. Processing perspectives. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
He, Xiao & Elsi Kaiser. 2011. What ‘I’ Can Tell You about the Chinese Reflexive Ziji. Poster presented at the 85th Annual LSA Meeting . Pittsburgh, PA, January 6–9, 2011.
Hirakawa, Makiko. 1990. A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research 61. 60–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James & C.-S. Luther Liu. 2001. Logophoricity, attitudes and ziji at the interface. In Peter Cole, Gabriella Hermon & C.-T. James Huang (ed.), Syntax & semantics: Long distance reflexives, 141–196. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James & C.-C. Jane Tang. 1991. The local nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese. In Jan Koster & Eric Reuland (eds.), Long distance anaphora. 263–282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yun-Hua. 1984. Chinese Reflexives. Studies in English Literature and Linguistics 101.163–188.Google Scholar
IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Keller, Frank & Ash Asudeh. 2001. Constraints on linguistic coreference: Structural vs. pragmatic factors. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society. 483–488.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Jeffrey Lidz. 2001. A (covert) long distance anaphor in English. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 20 Proceedings , 318–331. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Loss, Sara. 2014. Iron Range English Reflexive Pronouns. In Raffaella Zanutinni & Laurence Horn (ed.), Micro-syntactic variation in North American English, PAGES. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magenau, Keller. 1994. Anaphora: A formal and functional phenomenon. Unpublished MS.
Maling, Joan. 1986. Non-clause-bounded reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 7(3). 211–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Ivan Sag. 1992. Anaphors in English and the scope of the Binding Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 23(2). 261–303.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 241. 657–720.Google Scholar
Ross, Jon. R. 1970. On declarative sentences. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (ed.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 222–272. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1). 29–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. 2011. Linguistic evidence and grammatical theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2.2. 206–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anne-Marie Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar 11. 315–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Stanley Smith. 1956. The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes: Loudness. The American Journal of Psychology 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tenny, Carol. 2006. Evidentiality, experiencers, and the syntax of sentience in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(3). 245–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Liejiong. 1993. The long-distance binding of ziji. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 21(4). 123–141.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2008. Encoding the addressee in the syntax: Evidence from English imperative subjects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(1). 185–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1989. Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language 65(4). 695–727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar