Article published In:
Linguistic Variation
Vol. 15:2 (2015) ► pp.225290
References
Abels, Klaus
2012The Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry 431. 229–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, David, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas
(eds.) 2004Peripheries. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2006Left-dislocation (including CLLD). In Everaert & van Riemsdijk (eds.), 668–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexopoulou, Theodora, Edit Doron & Caroline Heycock
2004Broad subjects and clitic left-dislocation. In Adger et al. (eds.), 329–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1994Clitic dependencies in Modern Greek. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Salzburg.
1997Clitic left-dislocation and contrastive left-dislocation. In Anagnostopoulou et al. (eds.), 151–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts
(eds.) 1997Materials on left-dislocation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoun, Joseph & Elabbas Benmamoun
1998Minimality, reconstruction, and PF-movement. Linguistic Inquiry 291. 569–597. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnaudova, Olga
2002Clitic left-dislocation and argument structure in Bulgarian. In Jindřich Toman (ed.), Proceedings of FASL 101, 23–46. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Arregi, Karlos
2003Clitic left-dislocation is contrastive topicalization. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 91. 31–44.Google Scholar
2010Ellipsis in split questions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 281. 539–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Emmon & George M. Horn
1976Remarks on “conditions on transformations”. Linguistic Inquiry 71. 265–299.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1996On the structural position of themes and goals. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 7–34. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C
2001The natures of nonconfigurationality. In Mark R. Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, 407–438. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar
1995Null subjects. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT. DOI logo
2000Clitics: A window into the null-subject property. In João Costa (ed.), Essays in Portuguese comparative syntax, 31–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barros, Matthew, Patrick D. Elliott & Gary Thoms
2014There is no island repair. Ms., Rutgers University, University College London and University of Edinburgh.
Belletti, Adriana
2006Extending doubling to non-local domains: Complete vs. partial copying + deletion and related reconstruction issues. In Brandt & Fuß (eds.), 129–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola
2001The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax, 39–64. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto
2004Topic, focus, and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Marc Richards
2006True optionality: When the grammar doesn’t mind. In Cedric Boeckx (ed.), Minimalist essays, Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics today, vol. 911, 35–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan
1999Adverbs: The hierarchy paradox. GLOT International 41. 27–28.Google Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano
2007Criterial positions and left periphery in Italian. Nanzan Linguistics 31. 35–70.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
Borer, Hagit
1984Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Patrick & Eric Fuß
(eds.) 2006Form, structure, and grammar. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Sam A. Mchombo
1987Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chicheŵa. Language 631. 741–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2015Non-constituent coordination: Prosody, not movement. UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 211. article 5.
Brunetti, Lisa
2003‘Information’ focus movement in Italian and contextual constraints on ellipsis. In Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 221, 95–108. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2013Syntax, information structure, and prosody. In Marcel den Dikken (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, 860–896. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1997Subjects and clause structure. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative syntax, 33–63. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke
1999The typology of structural deficiency: On the three grammatical classes. In Clitics in the languages of Europe, 145–234. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo
2000Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus 121. 93–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Laura J. Downing
2009Where’s the topic in Zulu? The Linguistic Review 261. 207–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1977On W H-movement. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow, & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1995The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Michael Ken-stowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007Approaching UG from below. In Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? 1–29. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik
1993The theory of principles and parameters. In Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax, 506–569. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra
2013Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much and why. Linguistic Inquiry 441. 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1983‘Topic’ constructions in some European languages and ‘connectedness’. In Konrad Ehlich & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Connectedness in sentence, discourse and text, 7–41. Tilburg: KUB.Google Scholar
1990Types of A-bar dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi
2009The cartography of syntactic structures. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 51–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris
1997Local economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
(ed.) 2009Alternatives to cartography. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Ellipsis, identity, and accomodation. Ms., HU Brussels/KU Leuven.
Cruschina, Silvio
2010Syntactic extraposition and clitic resumption in Italian. Lingua 1201. 50–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Cat, Cécile
2007French dislocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Yordanka Kavalova
2007Parentheticals: An introduction. In Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Del Gobbo, Francesca
2003Appositives at the interfaces. Irvine: Doctoral Dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida
1991Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives, and dislocation structures. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
den Dikken, Marcel, André Meinunger & Chris Wilder
2000Pseudoclefts and ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 541. 41–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewald, Anika
2012Spontansprachliche Versetzungsstrukturen im Deutschen. Doctoral Disser-tation, University of Cologne.
Dobashi, Yoshihito
2003Phonological phrasing and syntactic derivation. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University.
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
1990Clitic-doubling, wh-movement and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry 211. 351–397.Google Scholar
Downing, Bruce T
1970Syntactic structure and phonological phrasing in English. Austin: Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas.
Downing, Laura J
2011The prosody of ‘dislocation’ in selected Bantu languages. Lingua 1211. 772–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
2004Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In Adger et al. (eds.), 75–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escobar, Linda
1997Clitic left-dislocation and other relatives. In Anagnostopoulou et al. (eds.), 233–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everaert, Martin & Henk van Riemsdijk
(eds.) 2006The Blackwell companion to syntax. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2006On pure syntax. In Brandt & Fuß (eds.), 137–158.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert, Reinhold Kliegl & Matthias Schlesewsky
Fanselow, Gisbert & Denisa Lenertová
2011Left peripheral focus: Mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 291. 169–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldhausen, Ingo
2008The prosody–syntax interface in Catalan. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Potsdam.
2014The intonation of left-dislocations in Spanish and other Romance languages. Habilitation thesis, University of Frankfurt.
Fiengo, Robert & Robert May
1994Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frascarelli, Mara
1997The phonology of focus and topic in Italian. The Linguistic Review 141. 221–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000The syntax–phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner
1993Syntaktische Bedingungen für die semantische Interpretation. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2004Notes on the syntax and the pragmatics of German left-dislocation. In Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds.), The syntax and semantics of the left periphery, 203–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Comparing remarks on German left-dislocation and Italian Clitic left-dislocation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Information Structure in the Theory of Grammar and in Language Acquisition, University of Lund, September 19 2009.
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2000Negative… concord? Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 181. 457–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther
2008The left clausal periphery: Clitic left-dislocation in Italian and left-dislocation in German. In Shaer et al. (eds.), 49–94.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K
2003Prolific domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guentchéva, Zlatka
2008Object clitic-doubling constructions and topicality in Bulgarian. In Kallulli & Tasmowski (eds.), 203–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Haaften, Ton, Rik Smits & Jan Vat
1983Left-dislocation, connectedness, and reconstruction. In Werner Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of the West Germania, 133–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma, & Takao Yagi (eds.), Aspects of modern English linguistics, 232–254. Toyko: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Halpern, Aaron L
1998Clitics. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 101–122. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hamlaoui, Fatima & Emmanuel-Moselly Makasso
2013Object left-dislocation, topicalization and the syntax–phonology mapping of intonation phrases in Bàsàá. Ms., ZAS Berlin.
Heycock, Caroline
2006Embedded root phenomena. In Everaert & van Riemsdijk (eds.), 174–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric
1999On D-pronouns and the movement of topic features. Folia Linguistica 331. 59–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015Verb-second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax, 342–383. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine
1995Clitics and island effects. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 11–30.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine & Anthony S. Kroch
1992The licensing of CP-recursion and its relevance to the Germanic verb-second phenomenon. Working Papers in Scandinavian Linguistics 501. 1–25.Google Scholar
İnce, Atakan
2012Fragment answers and islands. Syntax 151. 181–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janse, Mark
2008Clitic doubling from Ancient to Asia Minor Greek. In Kallulli & Tasmowski (eds.), 165–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina & Liliane Tasmowski
(eds.) 2008Clitic doubling in the Balkan languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanerva, Jonni M
1990Focusing on phonological phrases in Chichewa. In Sharon Inkelas & Draga Zec (eds.), The phonology–syntax connection, 145–161. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S
1975French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István & Irene Vogel
1990Focus and phonological structure. Paper presented at GLOW, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan
1978Why subject sentences don’t exist. In Samuel Jay Keyser (ed.), Recent transformational studies in European languages, 53–64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana
2004Word order in topic–focus structures in the Balkan languages. Venice: Ms., Università Ca’ Foscari.Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana & Guglielmo Cinque
2008Clitic reduplication constructions in Bulgarian. In Kallulli & Tasmowski (eds.), 257–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kučerová, Ivona & Ad Neeleman
(eds.) 2012Contrasts and positions in information structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard
2001When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Minjoo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 31, vol. 21, 301–320. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Lipták, Anikó
2011The structure of the topic field in Hungarian. In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), Mapping the left periphery, 163–198. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipták, Anikó & Luis Vicente
2009Pronominal doubling under VP-topicalization. Lingua 1191. 650–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López, Luis
2003Steps for a well-adjusted dislocation. Studia Linguistica 571. 193–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
To appear. Dislocations. In Caroline Féry & Shin Ishihara (eds.) The Oxford handbook of information structure Oxford Oxford University Press
Manzini, Rita
2010The structure and interpretation of (Romance) complementizers. In Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), The complementizer phase. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2001The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004aFragments and ellipsis. Linguistics & Philosophy 271. 661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004bResumptivity and non-movement. Studies in Greek Linguistics 241. 471–481.Google Scholar
To appear. Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Tanja Temmerman (eds.) The Oxford handbook of ellipsis Oxford Oxford University Press
Mollica, Fabio
2010Korrelate im Deutschen und im Italienischen. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jerry
1973Sentence fragments and the notion “sentence”. In Braj Kachru, Robert Lees, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli, & Sol Saporta (eds.), Issues in linguistics, 719–751. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Hans Van de Koot
2008Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 111. 137–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
1986Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Nilsen, Øystein
2003Eliminating positions: Syntax and semantics of sentence modification. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Ott, Dennis
2012aLocal instability: Split topicalization and quantifier float in German. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012bMovement and ellipsis in contrastive left-dislocation. In Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennett (eds.), Proceedings of WC-CFL 301, 281–291. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2014An ellipsis approach to Contrastive Left-dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 451. 269–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Ellipsis in appositives. Ms., University of Ottawa.
Ott, Dennis & Edgar Onea
In press. On the form and meaning of appositives. In Proceedings of NELS 45. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Ott, Dennis & Volker Struckmeier
In press. Deletion in clausal ellipsis: Remnants in the middle field. In Proceedings of PLC 39.
Ott, Dennis & Mark de Vries
2014A biclausal analysis of right-dislocation. In Hsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole, & Amanda Rysling (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 43, vol. 21, 41–54. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2015Right-dislocation as deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory (online). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Bum-Sik
2005Island-insensitive fragment answers in Korean. In John Alderete, Chung Hye Han, & Alexei Kochetov (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 241, 317–325. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2004Topic and focus as linear notions: Evidence from Italian and Russian. Lingua 1141. 325–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Peter
1999On the boundaries of syntax. In Peter Collins & David Lee (eds.), The clause in English, 229–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2002The left periphery of V2 rhaetoromance dialects: A new view on V2 and V3. In Susanne van der Kleij, Sjef Barbiers, & Leonie Cornips (eds.), Syntactic microvariation, 214–242. Amsterdam: The Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo E
1996Towards a unfication of topic constructions. Santa Barbara: Ms., University of California.Google Scholar
Repp, Sophie & Heiner Drenhaus
2015Intonation influences processing and recall of left-dislocation sentences by indicating topic vs. focus status of dislocated referent. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 301. 324–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk
1997Left-dislocation. In Anagnostopoulou et al. (eds.), 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael S
1989Topic islands and the subjacency parameter. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 341. 145–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodman, Robert
1997On left-dislocation. In Anagnostopoulou et al. (eds.), 31–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1967Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
1969Guess who? In Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green, & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 252–286. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
1973aA fake NP squish. In Charles-James N. Bailey & Roger W. Shuy (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English, 96–140. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1973bSlifting. In Maurice Gross, Morris Hell, & Marcel Schützenberger (eds.), The formal analysis of natural languages, 133–169. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1986Infinite syntax! Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Roussou, Anna
2010Selecting complementizers. Lingua 1201. 582–603. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubio, Carlos
2012Topics first: A derivational approach to CLLD topicalization in Romance. Paper presented at Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages 42, Southern Utah University.
Rullmann, Hotze & Jan-Wouter Zwart
1996On saying dat . In Language and cognition 5. Year- book 1995 of the Research Group of Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics of the University of Groningen, 179–194. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2006When right-dislocation meets the left periphery. A unified analysis of Italian non-final focus. Lingua 1161. 836–873. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
2001Syntax–phonology interface. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 15407–15412. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Sentence phonology. In William Frawley & William Bright (eds.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, 41–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005Comments on international phrases in English. In Sónia Frota, Marina Vigário, & Maria João Freitas (eds.), Prosodies, 11–58. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011The syntax–phonology interface. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, & Alan C.L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 435–484. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter
1984Syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns. Amherst: Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Shaer, Benjamin, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, & Claudia Maienborn
(eds.) 2008Dislocated elements in discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin
& Werner Frey 2004“Integrated” and “non-integrated” left-peripheral elements in German and English. In Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey, & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Proceedings of the dislocated elements workshop, 465–502. Berlin: Zentrum für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Anne
2008aThe left periphery. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008bResumption in Czech left-dislocation: The syntax–phonology interface. In Andrei Antonenko, John F. Bailyn, & Christina Y. Bethin (eds.), Proceedings of FASL 161, 407–422. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita
2003The lexical preverbal subject in a Romance null-subject language: Where are thou? In Rafael Núñez-Cedeño, Luis López, & Richard Cameron (eds.), A Romance perspective on language knowledge and use, 341–358. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Left-dislocations with and without epithets. Probus 181. 127–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taglicht, Josef
1998Constraints on international phrasing in English. Journal of Linguistics 341. 181–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Temmerman, Tanja
2013The syntax of Dutch embedded fragment answers: On the PF-theory of islands and the WH/sluicing correlation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 311. 235–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2007The syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo
Torrego, Esther
1984On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 151. 103–129.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
1999On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 301. 219–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Intonation phrases and speech acts. In Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott, & Mark de Vries (eds.), Parenthesis and ellipsis, 301–349. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tsakali, Vina & Elena Anagnostopoulou
Vallduví, Enric
2002L’oració com a unitat informativa. In Joan Sol‘a, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró, & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds.), Gramàtica del Català contempo-rani, 1221–1279. Barcelona: Editorial Empúries.Google Scholar
van der Spuy, Andrew
1993Dislocated noun phrases in Nguni. Lingua 901. 335–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Villa-García, Julio
2012Recomplementation and locality of movement in Spanish. Probus 241. 257–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villalba, Xavier
2000The syntax of sentence periphery. Doctoral Dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
de Vries, Mark
2007Invisible constituents? Parentheses as b-merged adverbial phrases. In Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 203–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Michael
2012Contrastive topics decomposed. Semantics and Pragmatics 51. 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
1997aExtraposition, identification, and precedence. In Dorothee Beermann, David LeBlanc, & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Rightward movement, 357–395. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997bParasitic operators in German left-dislocations. In Anagnostopoulou et al. (eds.), 307–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie
1997Contrastive dislocation in Dutch and Icelandic. In Anagnostopoulou et al. (eds.), 119–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeller, Jochen
2004Left-dislocation in Zulu. Ms., University of KwaZulu-Natal.
2006On clitic left-dislocation in Zulu. Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 181. 131–156.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
2009Uncharted territory? Towards a non-cartographic account of Germanic syntax. In Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger, & Florian Schäfer (eds.), Advances in comparative Germanic syntax, 59–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Abels, Klaus
2019. On “sluicing” with apparent massive pied-piping. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:4  pp. 1205 ff. DOI logo
BASSONG, PAUL ROGER
2021. Mismatching nominals and the small clause hypothesis. Journal of Linguistics 57:4  pp. 737 ff. DOI logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2022. Topicalization, Dislocation and Clitic Resumption. Studia Linguistica 76:2  pp. 354 ff. DOI logo
De Clercq, Karen & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd
2019. Negation and the functional sequence. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:2  pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Fernández‐Sánchez, Javier & Dennis Ott
2020. Dislocations. Language and Linguistics Compass 14:9 DOI logo
Jung, Wonsuk
2023. THE SYNTAX OF TWO TYPES OF GAPPING IN SPANISH*. Studia Linguistica 77:1  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Ott, Dennis
2018. VP-fronting: Movement vs. dislocation. The Linguistic Review 0:0 DOI logo
Rodríguez Ramalle, Teresa María
2023. Evidential Adverbs and Polarity: A Study from Spanish. Languages 8:4  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Suárez-Palma, Imanol
2023. Middle-Passive Constructions, Dative Possessors, and Word Order in Spanish. Languages 9:1  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Villa-García, Julio
2019. Recomplementation in English and Spanish: Delineating the CP space. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Villa-García, Julio
2023. Hanging Topic Left Dislocations as extrasentential constituents: toward a paratactic account. Evidence from English and Spanish. The Linguistic Review 40:2  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
VILLA-GARCÍA, JULIO & DENNIS OTT
2022. Recomplementation as a paratactic phenomenon: Evidence from Spanish and English. Journal of Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.