Article published in:
Register Variation and Syntactic Theory
Edited by Diane Massam and Tim Stowell
[Linguistic Variation 17:2] 2017
► pp. 309346
References

[ p. 341 ]References

Åfarli, Tor & Chet Creider
1987Nonsubject pro-drop in Norwegian. Linguistic Inquiry 18(2). 339–345.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
1998Parametrizing AGR. Word order, V-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(3). 491–539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
1990 Accessing noun-phrase antecedents . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Axel, Katrin
2007 Studies on Old High German syntax: left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar
1995 Null subjects: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2009Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica 63(1). 2–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Pro as a minimal NP: towards a unified approach to pro-drop. http://​lingbuzz​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/001949, accessed 13 August 2014.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson
2003The change that never happened: the story of oblique subjects. Journal of Linguistics 39(3). 439–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1984 comp in Bavarian syntax. Linguistic Review 3. 209–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
2008Introduction. In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation , 1–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1986I-subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3). 375–416.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Pauline Harries & Nigel Vincent
2016Growing syntax: the development of a DP in North Germanic. Language 92(1). e1–e37 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne & Melissa Farasyn
2016Nullsubjekte im Mittelniederdeutschen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 138(4). 524–559.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke
1996Deficient pronouns: a view from Germanic. A study in the unified description of Germanic and Romance. In Höskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein & Steve Peter (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax , vol. II, 21–65. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999The typology of structural deficiency: a case study on the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe , 145–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2004Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: the cartography of syntactic structures , 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007Approaching UG from Below. In Uli Säuerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics , 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory , 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Melvyn
2010Thematic null subjects and accessibility. Studia Linguistica 64(3). 271–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marko & Eva Schlachter
2014Referential properties of the full and reduced forms of the definite article in German: A diachronic survey. In Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in Germanic and Romance languages , 142–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen 2015 Grammaticalization in the North: noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars . Berlin: Language Science Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bastiani, Chiara
2014 Die Entwicklung des definiten Artikels im Althochdeutschen unter einer semantischen Perspektive . Ca’ Foscari University of Venice MA thesis.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko
2002Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33(3). 409–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015When and why can 1st and 2nd person pronouns be bound variables? In Patrick Grosz, Pritty Patel-Grosz & Igor Yanovich (eds.), The semantics of pronouns. Proceedings of the special session of the 40th North East Linguistics Society . 1–50. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof
2003Syntaktisk variation i nordiska nominalfraser. In Øystein Alexander Vangsnes, Anders Holmberg & Lars-Olof Delsing (eds.), Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen , 11–64. Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
Demske, Ulrike
2001 Merkmale und relationen. Diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase des Deutschen . Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duguine, Maia
2013 Null arguments and linguistic variation: a minimalist analysis of pro-drop: University of the Basque country/Université de Nantes PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Dyvik, Helge
1979Omkring fremveksten av artiklene i norsk. Språklig markering av referensielle forutsetninger. Maal og Minne 1(2). 40–78.Google Scholar
Elbourne, Paul
2005 Situations and individuals . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur & J. Barðdal
2005Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language 84(4). 824–881. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje
1990 Syntactic change. Toward a theory of historical syntax . Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001The notion of oblique subject and its status in the history of Icelandic. In J.T. Faarlund (ed.), Grammatical relations in change , 99–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 The syntax of Old Norse: with a survey of the inflectional morphology and a complete bibliography . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013The pro cycle. In Elly van Gelderen, Jóhanna Barðdal & Michela Cennamo (eds.), Argument structure in flux. The Naples-Capri papers , 257–284. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Svein Lie & Kjell Ivar Vannebo
1997 Norsk referansegrammatikk . Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Falk, Hjalmar & Alf Torp
1900 Dansk-norskens syntax i historisk fremstilling . Kristiania: H. Aschehoug & Co.Google Scholar
Farrell, Patrick
1990Null objects in Brazilian Portuguese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8. 325–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, M. & R. Hinterhölzl
2007Types of topics in German and Italian. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form , 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2007Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(4). 691–743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2000 A history of English reflexive pronouns. Person, self, and interpretability . John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Grammaticalization as economy . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly 2013Null subjects in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 44. 271–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi
1997 Tense and aspect. From semantics to morphosyntax . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1978How does a language acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language , vol. 3. Word structure, 47–82. Stanford Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Håberg, Live
2010 Den preproprielle artikkelen i norsk: ei undersøking av namneartiklar i Kvæfjord, Gausdal og Voss . Universitetet i Oslo MA thesis.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1990Understood subjects in English diaries. Mulitilingua 9(2). 157–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Adult null subjects in non pro-drop languages. In Marc-Ariel Friedemann & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax , 129–169. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Marjo van Koppen
2012Complementizer agreement and the relation between C and T. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3). 441–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hægstad, Marius
1922Um maalet i Óláfs saga hins helga. Delag. samling i Uppsala, no. 8 fol. In Oscar Albert Johnsen (ed.), Olafs saga hins helga. Efter pergamenthaandskrift i Uppsala Universitetsbibliotek, Delagardieske samling nr. 8II , XXVIII–LVII. Kristiania: Dybwad.Google Scholar
Hagland, Jan Ragnar
2013Gammalislandsk og gammalnorsk språk. In Odd Einar Haugen (ed.), Handbok i norrøn filologi , 600–639. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Håkansson, David
2008 Syntaktisk variation och förändring. En studie av subjektslösa satser i fornsvenska: Lunds universitet dissertation.Google Scholar
2013Null referential subjects in the history of Swedish. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3(2). 155–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugan, Jens
1998Passiv av norrøne dobbelt objekt-konstruksjonar og subjektspørsmålet. Norsk lingvistisk tidsskrift 16. 157–184.Google Scholar
Haugen, Odd Einar & Åslaug Ommundsen
2010Nye blikk på homilieboka. In Odd Einar Haugen & Åslaug Ommundsen (eds.), Vår eldste bok. skrift, miljø og biletbruk i den norske homilieboka , Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
Heltoft, Lars
2012Zero expression of arguments in Old Danish. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 44(2). 169–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höhn, Georg
2015Demonstratives and personal pronouns. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 8. 84–105.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2005Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4). 533–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Null subject parameters. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation. Null subjects in minimalist theory , 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2016Null subjects in Finnish and the typology of pro-drop. http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/003138, accessed 23 Sept 2016.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Sandra Thompson
1973On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4). 465–497.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan
2000 Anaphora: a cross-linguistic approach . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Indrebø, G.
1931Innleiding. In G. Indrebø (ed.), Gamal norsk homiliebok , *5–*64. Oslo: Jacob Dybwad.Google Scholar
Iversen, Ragnvald
1972 Norrøn grammatikk . Oslo: Tano.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi 2006Just any pronoun anywhere? Pronouns and “new” demonstratives in Norwegian. In Torgrim Solstad, Atle Grønn & Dag Haug (eds.), A festschrift for Kjell Johan Sæbø – in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the celebration of his 50th birthday , 91–106. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
2008aPsykologiske demonstrativer. In Janne Bondi Johannessen & Kristin Hagen (eds.), Språk i Oslo. Ny forskning omkring talespråk , 63–77. Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
2008bThe pronominal psychological demonstrative in Scandinavian: its syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 31(2). 161–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, Oscar Albert
1992Indledning. In Oscar Albert Johnsen (ed.), Olafs saga hins helga. Efter pergamenthaandskrift i Uppsala Universitetsbibliotek, Delagardieske samling nr. 8II , I–XXVII. Oslo: DybwadGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit
2005 Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The force of V2 revisited. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 18. 139–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
2000 Parameters and universals . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kinn, Kari
2011Overt non-referential subjects and subject-verb agreement in Middle Norwegian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 88. 21–50.Google Scholar
2016Null subjects in the history of Norwegian, University of Oslo PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Kinn, Kari, Kristian A. Rusten & George Walkden
2016Null subjects in early Icelandic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28(1). 31–78. Crossref.Google Scholar
de Korte, Siebe
2008 Dutch topic drop as a PF phenomenon . University of Amsterdam MA thesis.Google Scholar
Leijström, Gunnar
1934 Om obestämda artikeln. Et bidrag til nordisk språkhistorie . Stockholm: Hugo Geber.Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
1985Definites. Journal of Semantics 4. 279–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
1994Reference and proper names: a theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Erik
2007 Gränsöverskridande koordination. Syntaktisk förändring i äldre svenska: Göteborgs Universitet PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2010 Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mørck, Endre
1994The distribution of subject properties and the acquisition of subjecthood in the West Scandinavian languages. In Toril Swan, Endre Mørck & Olaf Jansen Westwik (eds.), Language change and language structure. Older Germanic languages in a comparative perspective , 159–194. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mörnsjö, Maria
2002 V1 declaratives in spoken Swedish. Syntax, information structure and prosodic pattern: Lund University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Mundal, Else
2004Sagalitteraturen. In Odd Einar Haugen (ed.), Handbok i norrøn filologi , 267–302.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendrői
2007Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4). 671–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, Marius
1894Udeladelse af subjekt; “subjektløse” sætninger i det norrøne sprog (den klassiske sagastil). Arkiv för nordisk filologi 10, ny följd 6(1). 1–25.Google Scholar
1905 Norrøn syntax . Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Nygård, Mari
2013 Discourse ellipsis in spontaneously spoken Norwegian: Norwegian University of Science and Technology dissertation.Google Scholar
Ottosson, Kjartan 2002Old Nordic: a definition and delimitation of the period. In Oscar Bandle, Kurt Braunmüller, Ernst Håkon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann & Ulf Telemann (eds.), The Nordic languages. An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages , vol. 1, 787–793. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ouali, Hamid
2008On C-to-T ϕ-feature transfer: the nature of Agreement and Anti-Agreement in Berber. In Roberta D’Allesandro, Susann Fischer & Gunnar Hrafn Hrafn-bjargarson (eds.), Agreement restrictions , 159–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer
1986 COMP, INFL and Germanic word order. In Lars Hellan & Kirsti Koch Christensen (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian syntax , 185–234. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 Svenskans inre grammatik – det minimalistiska programmet. En introduktion till modern generativ grammatik . Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2006Parallel phases: a study on the high and low perihery of Old Italian. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation , 261–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul
1969On so-called “pronouns” in English. In David A. Reibel & Sanford A. Schane (eds.), Modern studies in English: readings in transformational grammar , 201–226. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew
2004 Minimalist syntax. Exploring the structure of English . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar , 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010a Agreement and head movement. Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bA deletion analysis of null subjects. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation. Null subjects in minimalist theory , 58–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anders Holmberg
2010Introduction: parameters in minimalist theory. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation. Null subjects in minimalist theory , 1–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur
1995Quirky subjects in Old Icelandic. In H.Á. Sigurðsson (ed.), Papers from the twelfth Scandinavian conference on linguistics , University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Rosenkvist, H.
2009Referential null subjects in Germanic languages – an overview. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84. 151–180.Google Scholar
Rusten, Kristian A.
2010 A study of empty referential pronominal subjects in Old English . University of Bergen MA thesis.Google Scholar
2013Empty Referential Subjects in Old English Prose: a quantitative analysis. English Studies 94(8). 970–992. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rusten, Kristian A. & George Walkden
2016Null subjects in Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 1–35.Google Scholar
Seip, Didrik Arup
1929 Den legendariske olavssaga og fagrskinna . Oslo: Dybwad.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
1993Argument-drop in Old Icelandic. Lingua 89. 247–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The syntax of person, tense, and speech features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16(1). 219–251.Google Scholar
2006The Icelandic noun phrase. Central traits. Arkiv for nordisk filologi 121(193–236).Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann 2011Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42(2). 267–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014About pronouns. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 92. 65–98.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann & Verner Egerland
2009Impersonal null-subjects in Icelandic and elsewhere. Studia Linguistica 63(1). 158–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
1989 Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic . Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University.Google Scholar
Stausland Johnsen, Sverre
2016Null subjects, preproprial articles, and the syntactic structure of Old Norwegian pronouns. Norsk lingvistisk tidsskrift 34. 183–217.Google Scholar
Stjernholm, Karine
2008 Subjektsellipser: fins pro i norsk talespråk? University of Oslo MA thesis.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
1980 On the nominative island condition, vacuous application and the that-trace filter . Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2007 The Syntax of Icelandic . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur & Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir
1986Pro-drop, topic-drop. Where do Old and Modern Icelandic fit in? In Östen Dahl & Anders Holmberg (eds.), Scandinavian syntax , 150–161. University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Trutkowski, Ewa
2011Referential null subjects in German. In Chris Cummins, Chi-Hé Elder, Thomas Godard, Morgan Macleod, Elaine Schmidt & George Walkden (eds.), Proceedings of the sixth Cambridge postgraduate conference in linguistics (CamLing) , 206–217. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute for Language Research.Google Scholar
Vainikka, Anne & Yonata Levy
1999Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17(3). 613–671. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George
2013Null subjects in Old English. Language Variation and Change 25. 155–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic . Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Andrew
2012Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics 16(1). 105–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Helmut
2005Inflected complementizers in Continental West Germanic dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 72. 148–166.Google Scholar
Wendt, Bo-A.
2006Vykortsstil i verkligheten. Elliptiskt och icke satsformat språkbruk i vykort. In Sofia Ask, Gunilla Byrman, Solveig Hammarbäck, Maria Lindgren & Per Stille (eds.), Lekt och lärt. Vänskrift till Jan Einarsson , 244–295. Växjö: University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggen, Geir
1975Utelatelse av setningsledd. Norskrift 3. 1–47.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kinn, Kari
2016. Referential vs. non-referential null subjects in Middle Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39:3  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.