Cover not available
Article published In:
Register Variation and Syntactic Theory
Edited by Diane Massam and Tim Stowell
[Linguistic Variation 17:2] 2017
► pp. 309–346
Regular article

Null arguments in old Norwegian

Interaction between pronouns and the functional categories of the clause

In this paper I propose a new analysis of null arguments in Old Norwegian. I argue that the option of null realization in Old Norwegian correlates with a distinction between φP and DP pronouns in the sense of Déchaine & Wiltschko (2002), and that this distribution can be captured by a version of pronoun deletion (Roberts 2010b). On a more general, theoretical level, I argue that both the structure of pronouns and that of the functional domains C, T and v influence the null argument properties of a language. Thus, null arguments, but also blocking of null arguments in non-null-argument languages like Modern Norwegian and English, may be derived in different ways.
Keywords: syntax, null arguments, syntactic variation, historical linguistics, Norwegian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Old Norwegian: definition and data
  • 3.Principles of excerption
    • 3.1Extracting null arguments
    • 3.2One or more types of null arguments?
    • 3.3The position of null arguments and rendering of linguistic examples
  • 4.Null arguments in Old Norwegian: empirical observations
    • 4.1Syntactic environments
    • 4.2Clause type
    • 4.3Person features
  • 5.A syntactic analysis: only φPs can be deleted
    • 5.1The framework of Déchaine & Wiltschko (2002)
    • 5.2Pronouns in Old Norwegian
      • 5.2.11st and 2nd person pronouns as DPs
      • 5.2.23rd person pronouns as φPs
    • 5.3Derivation of null pronouns: the deletion analysis of Roberts (2010b)
    • 5.4Deletion in Old Norwegian
  • 6.Some cross-linguistic perspectives
    • 6.1Old Norwegian vs. Modern Norwegian
    • 6.2Old Norwegian vs. English
    • 6.3Old Norwegian vs. other early Germanic languages
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 January 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.15018.kin
References (123)
References
Åfarli, Tor & Chet Creider. 1987. Nonsubject pro-drop in Norwegian. Linguistic Inquiry 18(2). 339–345.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parametrizing AGR. Word order, V-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16(3). 491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar. 1995. Null subjects: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2009. Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica 63(1). 2–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Pro as a minimal NP: towards a unified approach to pro-drop. [URL], accessed 13 August 2014.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson. 2003. The change that never happened: the story of oblique subjects. Journal of Linguistics 39(3). 439–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1984. comp in Bavarian syntax. Linguistic Review 31. 209–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa. 2008. Introduction. In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation , 1–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1986. I-subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3). 375–416.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Pauline Harries & Nigel Vincent. 2016. Growing syntax: the development of a DP in North Germanic. Language 92(1). e1–e37 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne & Melissa Farasyn. 2016. Nullsubjekte im Mittelniederdeutschen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 138(4). 524–559.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Michal Starke. 1996. Deficient pronouns: a view from Germanic. A study in the unified description of Germanic and Romance. In Höskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein & Steve Peter (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax , vol. II1, 21–65. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: a case study on the three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe , 145–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: the cartography of syntactic structures , 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. Approaching UG from Below. In Uli Säuerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics , 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory , 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Melvyn. 2010. Thematic null subjects and accessibility. Studia Linguistica 64(3). 271–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marko & Eva Schlachter. 2014. Referential properties of the full and reduced forms of the definite article in German: A diachronic survey. In Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in Germanic and Romance languages , 142–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2015. Grammaticalization in the North: noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars . Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bastiani, Chiara. 2014. Die Entwicklung des definiten Artikels im Althochdeutschen unter einer semantischen Perspektive . Ca’ Foscari University of Venice MA thesis.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Martina Wiltschko. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33(3). 409–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. When and why can 1st and 2nd person pronouns be bound variables? In Patrick Grosz, Pritty Patel-Grosz & Igor Yanovich (eds.), The semantics of pronouns. Proceedings of the special session of the 40th North East Linguistics Society . 1–50. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 2003. Syntaktisk variation i nordiska nominalfraser. In Øystein Alexander Vangsnes, Anders Holmberg & Lars-Olof Delsing (eds.), Dialektsyntaktiska studier av den nordiska nominalfrasen , 11–64. Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
Demske, Ulrike. 2001. Merkmale und relationen. Diachrone Studien zur Nominalphrase des Deutschen . Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duguine, Maia. 2013. Null arguments and linguistic variation: a minimalist analysis of pro-drop: University of the Basque country/Université de Nantes PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Dyvik, Helge. 1979. Omkring fremveksten av artiklene i norsk. Språklig markering av referensielle forutsetninger. Maal og Minne 1(2). 40–78.Google Scholar
Elbourne, Paul. 2005. Situations and individuals . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur & J. Barðdal. 2005. Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language 84(4). 824–881. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic change. Toward a theory of historical syntax . Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The notion of oblique subject and its status in the history of Icelandic. In J.T. Faarlund (ed.), Grammatical relations in change , 99–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The syntax of Old Norse: with a survey of the inflectional morphology and a complete bibliography . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. The pro cycle. In Elly van Gelderen, Jóhanna Barðdal & Michela Cennamo (eds.), Argument structure in flux. The Naples-Capri papers , 257–284. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Svein Lie & Kjell Ivar Vannebo. 1997. Norsk referansegrammatikk . Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Falk, Hjalmar & Alf Torp. 1900. Dansk-norskens syntax i historisk fremstilling . Kristiania: H. Aschehoug & Co.Google Scholar
Farrell, Patrick. 1990. Null objects in Brazilian Portuguese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 81. 325–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, M. & R. Hinterhölzl. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form , 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(4). 691–743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2013. Null subjects in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 441. 271–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi. 1997. Tense and aspect. From semantics to morphosyntax . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language , vol. 31. Word structure, 47–82. Stanford Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Håberg, Live. 2010. Den preproprielle artikkelen i norsk: ei undersøking av namneartiklar i Kvæfjord, Gausdal og Voss . Universitetet i Oslo MA thesis.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1990. Understood subjects in English diaries. Mulitilingua 9(2). 157–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Adult null subjects in non pro-drop languages. In Marc-Ariel Friedemann & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), The acquisition of syntax , 129–169. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Marjo van Koppen. 2012. Complementizer agreement and the relation between C and T. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3). 441–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hægstad, Marius. 1922. Um maalet i Óláfs saga hins helga. Delag. samling i Uppsala, no. 8 fol. In Oscar Albert Johnsen (ed.), Olafs saga hins helga. Efter pergamenthaandskrift i Uppsala Universitetsbibliotek, Delagardieske samling nr. 8II , XXVIII–LVII. Kristiania: Dybwad.Google Scholar
Hagland, Jan Ragnar. 2013. Gammalislandsk og gammalnorsk språk. In Odd Einar Haugen (ed.), Handbok i norrøn filologi , 600–639. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Håkansson, David. 2008. Syntaktisk variation och förändring. En studie av subjektslösa satser i fornsvenska: Lunds universitet dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2013. Null referential subjects in the history of Swedish. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3(2). 155–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugan, Jens. 1998. Passiv av norrøne dobbelt objekt-konstruksjonar og subjektspørsmålet. Norsk lingvistisk tidsskrift 161. 157–184.Google Scholar
Haugen, Odd Einar & Åslaug Ommundsen. 2010. Nye blikk på homilieboka. In Odd Einar Haugen & Åslaug Ommundsen (eds.), Vår eldste bok. skrift, miljø og biletbruk i den norske homilieboka , Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
Heltoft, Lars. 2012. Zero expression of arguments in Old Danish. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 44(2). 169–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhn, Georg. 2015. Demonstratives and personal pronouns. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 81. 84–105.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4). 533–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Null subject parameters. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation. Null subjects in minimalist theory , 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. Null subjects in Finnish and the typology of pro-drop. [URL], accessed 23 Sept 2016.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Sandra Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4). 465–497.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: a cross-linguistic approach . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Indrebø, G. 1931. Innleiding. In G. Indrebø (ed.), Gamal norsk homiliebok , *5–*64. Oslo: Jacob Dybwad.Google Scholar
Iversen, Ragnvald. 1972. Norrøn grammatikk . Oslo: Tano.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 2006. Just any pronoun anywhere? Pronouns and “new” demonstratives in Norwegian. In Torgrim Solstad, Atle Grønn & Dag Haug (eds.), A festschrift for Kjell Johan Sæbø – in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the celebration of his 50th birthday , 91–106. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
. 2008a. Psykologiske demonstrativer. In Janne Bondi Johannessen & Kristin Hagen (eds.), Språk i Oslo. Ny forskning omkring talespråk , 63–77. Oslo: Novus forlag.Google Scholar
. 2008b. The pronominal psychological demonstrative in Scandinavian: its syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 31(2). 161–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, Oscar Albert. 1992. Indledning. In Oscar Albert Johnsen (ed.), Olafs saga hins helga. Efter pergamenthaandskrift i Uppsala Universitetsbibliotek, Delagardieske samling nr. 8II , I–XXVII. Oslo: DybwadGoogle Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The force of V2 revisited. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 181. 139–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and universals . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kinn, Kari. 2011. Overt non-referential subjects and subject-verb agreement in Middle Norwegian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 881. 21–50.Google Scholar
. 2016. Null subjects in the history of Norwegian, University of Oslo PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Kinn, Kari, Kristian A. Rusten & George Walkden. 2016. Null subjects in early Icelandic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28(1). 31–78. DOI logo.Google Scholar
de Korte, Siebe. 2008. Dutch topic drop as a PF phenomenon . University of Amsterdam MA thesis.Google Scholar
Leijström, Gunnar. 1934. Om obestämda artikeln. Et bidrag til nordisk språkhistorie . Stockholm: Hugo Geber.Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics 41. 279–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: a theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Erik. 2007. Gränsöverskridande koordination. Syntaktisk förändring i äldre svenska: Göteborgs Universitet PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse-configurational languages . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mørck, Endre. 1994. The distribution of subject properties and the acquisition of subjecthood in the West Scandinavian languages. In Toril Swan, Endre Mørck & Olaf Jansen Westwik (eds.), Language change and language structure. Older Germanic languages in a comparative perspective , 159–194. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mörnsjö, Maria. 2002. V1 declaratives in spoken Swedish. Syntax, information structure and prosodic pattern: Lund University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Mundal, Else. 2004. Sagalitteraturen. In Odd Einar Haugen (ed.), Handbok i norrøn filologi , 267–302.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendrői. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4). 671–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, Marius. 1894. Udeladelse af subjekt; “subjektløse” sætninger i det norrøne sprog (den klassiske sagastil). Arkiv för nordisk filologi 10, ny följd 6(1). 1–25.Google Scholar
. 1905. Norrøn syntax . Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Nygård, Mari. 2013. Discourse ellipsis in spontaneously spoken Norwegian: Norwegian University of Science and Technology dissertation.Google Scholar
Ottosson, Kjartan. 2002. Old Nordic: a definition and delimitation of the period. In Oscar Bandle, Kurt Braunmüller, Ernst Håkon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann & Ulf Telemann (eds.), The Nordic languages. An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages , vol. 11, 787–793. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ouali, Hamid. 2008. On C-to-T ϕ-feature transfer: the nature of Agreement and Anti-Agreement in Berber. In Roberta D’Allesandro, Susann Fischer & Gunnar Hrafn Hrafn-bjargarson (eds.), Agreement restrictions , 159–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer. 1986. COMP, INFL and Germanic word order. In Lars Hellan & Kirsti Koch Christensen (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian syntax , 185–234. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Svenskans inre grammatik – det minimalistiska programmet. En introduktion till modern generativ grammatik . Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2006. Parallel phases: a study on the high and low perihery of Old Italian. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation , 261–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul. 1969. On so-called “pronouns” in English. In David A. Reibel & Sanford A. Schane (eds.), Modern studies in English: readings in transformational grammar , 201–226. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist syntax. Exploring the structure of English . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar , 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010a. Agreement and head movement. Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation. Null subjects in minimalist theory , 58–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anders Holmberg. 2010. Introduction: parameters in minimalist theory. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation. Null subjects in minimalist theory , 1–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1995. Quirky subjects in Old Icelandic. In H.Á. Sigurðsson (ed.), Papers from the twelfth Scandinavian conference on linguistics , University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Rosenkvist, H. 2009. Referential null subjects in Germanic languages – an overview. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 841. 151–180.Google Scholar
Rusten, Kristian A. 2010. A study of empty referential pronominal subjects in Old English . University of Bergen MA thesis.Google Scholar
2013. Empty Referential Subjects in Old English Prose: a quantitative analysis. English Studies 94(8). 970–992. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rusten, Kristian A. & George Walkden. 2016. Null subjects in Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 1–35.Google Scholar
Seip, Didrik Arup. 1929. Den legendariske olavssaga og fagrskinna . Oslo: Dybwad.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993. Argument-drop in Old Icelandic. Lingua 891. 247–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The syntax of person, tense, and speech features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16(1). 219–251.Google Scholar
. 2006. The Icelandic noun phrase. Central traits. Arkiv for nordisk filologi 1211(193–236).Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2011. Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42(2). 267–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. About pronouns. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 921. 65–98.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann & Verner Egerland. 2009. Impersonal null-subjects in Icelandic and elsewhere. Studia Linguistica 63(1). 158–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1989. Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic . Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University.Google Scholar
Stausland Johnsen, Sverre. 2016. Null subjects, preproprial articles, and the syntactic structure of Old Norwegian pronouns. Norsk lingvistisk tidsskrift 341. 183–217.Google Scholar
Stjernholm, Karine. 2008. Subjektsellipser: fins pro i norsk talespråk? University of Oslo MA thesis.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 1980. On the nominative island condition, vacuous application and the that-trace filter . Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur & Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir. 1986. Pro-drop, topic-drop. Where do Old and Modern Icelandic fit in? In Östen Dahl & Anders Holmberg (eds.), Scandinavian syntax , 150–161. University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Trutkowski, Ewa. 2011. Referential null subjects in German. In Chris Cummins, Chi-Hé Elder, Thomas Godard, Morgan Macleod, Elaine Schmidt & George Walkden (eds.), Proceedings of the sixth Cambridge postgraduate conference in linguistics (CamLing) , 206–217. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute for Language Research.Google Scholar
Vainikka, Anne & Yonata Levy. 1999. Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 17(3). 613–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George. 2013. Null subjects in Old English. Language Variation and Change 251. 155–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic . Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weir, Andrew. 2012. Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics 16(1). 105–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Helmut. 2005. Inflected complementizers in Continental West Germanic dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 721. 148–166.Google Scholar
Wendt, Bo-A. 2006. Vykortsstil i verkligheten. Elliptiskt och icke satsformat språkbruk i vykort. In Sofia Ask, Gunilla Byrman, Solveig Hammarbäck, Maria Lindgren & Per Stille (eds.), Lekt och lärt. Vänskrift till Jan Einarsson , 244–295. Växjö: University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggen, Geir. 1975. Utelatelse av setningsledd. Norskrift 31. 1–47.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kinn, Kari
2016. Referential vs. non-referential null subjects in Middle Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39:3 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.