Article published in:
The locus of linguistic variation
Edited by Constantine Lignos, Laurel MacKenzie and Meredith Tamminga
[Linguistic Variation 16:2] 2016
► pp. 247266
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2003The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005Holmberg’s generalization and cyclic linearization. Remarks on Fox and Pesetsky. Theoretical Linguistics 31(1–2). 95–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Catherine N
1994Relative pronouns in it-clefts: The last seven centuries. Language Variation and Change 6(02). 179–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily
2013Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
2015Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Science 67(1). 1–48.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight Le Merton
1971The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Marilyn Ford
2010Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1). 168–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
2011The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 22(3). 423–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia
2002She say, she go, she be like: Verbs of quotation over time in African American Vernacular English. American Speech 77(1). 3–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole
2002Particle verbs in English: Syntax, information structure and intonation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel
1995Particles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs, 74–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Alex
Durham, Mercedes, Bill Haddican, Eytan Zweig, Daniel Ezra Johnson, Zipporah Baker, David Cockeram, Esther Danks & Louise Tyler
2011Constant linguistic effects in the diffusion of be like. Journal of English Linguistics 40(4). 316–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elenbaas, Maatje Barbara
2007The synchronic and diachronic syntax of the English verb-particle combination, vol. 1491. LOT.Google Scholar
Engels, Eva & Sten Vikner
2013Object shift and remnant VP-topicalisation: Danish and Swedish verb particles and let-causatives. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36(2). 219–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny & David Pesetsky
2005Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31(1–2). 1–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef, Jonathan Gress-Wright & Joel Wallenberg
2009Phonological rule change: The constant rate effect. In Proceedings of NELS, vol. 401.
Gries, Stefan T
2001A multifactorial analysis of syntactic variation: Particle movement revisited. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 8(1). 33–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory
1980Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 1–36. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2007The scope of generalization in phonology. Talk given at Workshp on Variation, Gradience and Frequency in Phonology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Haddican, Bill & Anders Holmberg
2012Object movement symmetries in British English dialects: Experimental evidence for a mixed case/locality approach. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15(3). 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Four kinds of object symmetry. In Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds.), Complex visibles out there. Proceedings of the olomouc linguistics colloquium 2014. Language use and linguistic structure, Palacký University.Google Scholar
Haddican, Bill & Daniel Ezra Johnson
2012Effects on the particle verb alternation across English dialects. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(2). 5.Google Scholar
2014Focus effects on particle placement in English and the left periphery of PP. Proceedings of NELS 43 (2).Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A
2004Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
1986Word order and syntactic features. Stockholm University dissertation.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Christer Platzack
1995The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Arthur, Peter Trudgill & Dominic Watt
2005English accents and dialects: An introduction to social and regional varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle
1991Object positions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9(4). 577–636. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kallel, Amel
2007The loss of negative concord in Standard English: Internal factors. Language Variation and Change 19(1). 27–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1985Principles of particle constructions. In Jacqueline. Guéron, Hans-Georg Obenauer, & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Grammatical representation, 101–140. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S
1998Overt vs. covert movements. Syntax 1(2). 128–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1989Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3). 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Morphosyntactic variation. In Katharine Beals (ed.), Papers from the 30th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on variation and linguistic theory. 180–201. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Cathy Small
1978Grammatical ideology and its effect on speech. In David Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods, 45–55. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lohse, Barbara, John A Hawkins & Thomas Wasow
2004Domain minimization in the English verb-particle constructions. Language 80(2). 238–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melnick, Robin, T. Florian Jaeger & Thomas Wasow
2011Speakers employ fine-grained probabilistic knowledge. Talk given at LSA Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1999Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc
2004Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic: A case study in symmetrical syntax. University of Cambridge dissertation.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin
1997What moves where when in which language? MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice
1993The rate of phrase structure change in the history of Yiddish. Language Variation and Change 5(3). 257–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter
2001Structure, alignment and optimality in Swedish. CSLI.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
1996The optionality of particle shift. Working papers in Scandinavian syntax 571. 47–75.Google Scholar
2010Spatial P in English. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs, 127–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tortora, Christina & Marcel den Dikken
2010Subject agreement variation: Support for the configurational approach. Lingua 120(5). 1089–1108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

2021. Be like and the Constant Rate Effect: from the bottom to the top of the S-curve. English Language and Linguistics 25:2  pp. 281 ff. Crossref logo
Haddican, Bill, Cecelia Cutler, Michael Newman & Christina Tortora
2022. Cross-speaker covariation across six vocalic changes in New York City English. American Speech  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Haddican, Bill & Anders Holmberg
2019. Object symmetry effects in Germanic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:1  pp. 91 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.