Cover not available
Article published In:
The locus of linguistic variation
Edited by Constantine Lignos, Laurel MacKenzie and Meredith Tamminga
[Linguistic Variation 16:2] 2016
► pp. 300–336

The dynamics of variation in individuals

This paper examines the factors conditioning the production of linguistic variables in real time by individual speakers: what we term the dynamics of variation in individuals. We propose a framework that recognizes three types of factors conditioning variation: sociostylistic, internal linguistic, and psychophysiological. We develop two main points against this background. The first is that sequences of variants produced by individuals display systematic patterns that can be understood in terms of sociostylistic conditioning and psychophysiological conditioning. The second is that psychophysiological conditioning and internal linguistic conditioning are distinct in their mental implementations; this claim has implications for understanding the locality of the factors conditioning alternations, the universality and language-specificity of variation, and the general question of whether grammar and language use are distinct. Questions about the dynamics of variation in individuals are set against community-centered perspectives to argue that findings in the two domains, though differing in explanatory focus, can ultimately be mutually informative.
Keywords: dynamics, quantitative, sociolinguistic cognition, variation, language use, locality, alternations
Published online: 27 January 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.16.2.06tam
References (121)
Abramowicz, Lukasz. 2007. Sociolinguistics meets Exemplar Theory: Frequency and recency effects in (ing). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 131. 27–37.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Phillip L. 1988. Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology 117(3). 288–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allum, Paul H. & Linda Wheeldon. 2007. Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33(4). 791–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babel, Molly. 2012. Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics 401. 177–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Alan. 1986. Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert. 2013. The quantitative paradigm. In J.K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 85–107. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermudez-Otero, Ricardo. 2013. Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 181. 355–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Tatiana Nikitina. 2009. The gradience of the dative alternation. In Linda Uyechi & Lian-Hee Wee (eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, 161–184. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Brewer, Gene A. & Nash Unsworth. 2012. Individual differences in the effects of retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language 661. 407–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Richard. 1992. Pronominal and null subject variation in Spanish: Constraints, dialects, and functional compensation. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard & Nydia Flores-Ferran. 2004. Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context 1(1). 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. New directions in sociolinguistic cognition. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2). 31–39.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta & David Sankoff. 1974. Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50(2). 333–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Thomas Wasow. 1998. Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology 37(3). 201–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Lynn & Graeme Trousdale. 2009. Exploring the role of token frequency in phonological change: Evidence from TH-fronting in east-central Scotland. English Language and Linguistics 13(1). 33–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Lynn & Liam Walsh. 2014. Recency effects on word-medial /t/ in New Zealand English: initial observations. Poster presented at the 15th Australasian International Speech Science and Technology Conference , Christchurch, New Zealand.
Coetzee, Andries & Joe Pater. 2011. The place of variation in phonological theory. In John A. Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, & Alan C.L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn, 401–434. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daneman, Meredyth. 1991. Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20(6). 445–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie & Jennifer Hay. 2012. Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 241. 59–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 411. 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Lucy & William J. Hardcastle. 2002. Categorical and gradient properties of assimilation in alveolar to velar sequences: Evidence from EPG and EMA data. Journal of Phonetics 30(3). 373–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David. 2008. Variation and morphosyntactic theory: Competition fractionated. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(1). 59–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010a. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. Stem alternations and stem distributions. Ms., University of Pennsylvania; [URL].Google Scholar
. 2013. Morphemes and morphophonological loci. In Alec Marantz & Ora Matushansky (eds.), Distributed morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, 151–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & David Poeppel. 2015. Towards a computational(ist) neurobiology of language: Correlational, integrated, and explanatory neurolinguistics. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 30(4). 357–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam. 2014. Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua 1421. 27–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farnetani, Edda & Daniel Recasens. 2010. Coarticulation and connected speech processes. In William J. Hardcastle, John Laver, & Fiona E. Gibbon (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 316–352. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farrar, Kimberly & Mari C. Jones. 2002. Introduction. In Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch (eds.), Language change, 1–18. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W. 1991. The quiet demise of variable rules. American Speech 66(1). 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda. 1991. Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language 30(2). 210- 233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef. 2012. Redevelopment of a morphological class. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(1). 77–86.Google Scholar
German, J.S., K. Carlson & J.B. Pierrehumbert. 2013. Reassignment of consonant allophones in rapid dialect acquisition. Journal of Phonetics 41(3). 228–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, Daniel. 2012. A computational approach to conversational style. Paper presented at NWAV 41 .
Gries, Stefan Th. 2005. Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34(4). 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 1980. Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, chap. 1, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1991a. Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 31. 223–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991b. Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 31. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. & Charles Boberg. 1997. Inherent variability and the obligatory contour principle. Language Variation and Change 91. 149–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, Robert J. & Pashiera N. Barkhuysen. 2006. Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(1–3). 181–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Joan Bresnan. 2006. Spoken syntax: The phonetics of giving a hand in New Zealand English. The Linguistic Review 23(3). 321–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoit, Jeannette D., Nancy Pearl Solomon & Thomas J. Hixon. 1993. Effect of lung volume on voice onset time (VOT). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 36(3). 516–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoole, Philip, Noel Nguyen-Trong & William Hardcastle. 1993. A comparative investigation of coarticulation in fricatives: Electropalatographic, electromagnetic, and acoustic data. Language and Speech 36(2–3). 235–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houston, Ann. 1985. Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (ING). University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian & Neal E. Snider. 2013. Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition 1271. 57–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemper, Susan, Ruth E. Herman & Cindy H.T. Lian. 2003. The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: Talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech of noise. Psychology and Aging 18(2). 181–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemper, Susan & Aaron Sumner. 2001. The structure of verbal abilities in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging 16(2). 312–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Ruth, France Martineau & Raymond Mougeon. 2011. The interplay of internal and external factors in grammatical change: First person plural pronouns in French. Language 87(3). 470–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1972. Explanation in phonology. In Stanley Peters (ed.), Goals of linguistic theory, 189–227. Cinnaminson, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kutik, Elanah J., William E. Cooper & Suzanne Boyce. 1983. Declination of fundamental frequency in speakers production of parenthetical and main clauses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73(5). 1731–1738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4). 715–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979. Locating the frontier between social and psychological factors in linguistic variation. In Charles J. Fillmore, Daniel Kempler, & William S.-Y. Yang (eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior, chap. 18, 327–340. Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 11. 85–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The anatomy of style-shifting. In Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, chap. 5, 85–108. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2006[1966]. The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. What is to be learned: The community as the focus of social cognition. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10(2). 265–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The sociophonetic orientation of the language learner. In Chiara Celata & Silvia Calamai (eds.), Advances in sociophonetics, 17–29. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg. 2006. The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash, Maya Ravindranath, Tracey Weldon, Maciej Baranowski & Naomi Nagy. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4). 431–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Paul Cohen, Clarence Robins & John Lewis. 1968. A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Final report, Cooperative Research Project 3288, vols. I and II1.Google Scholar
Levelt, William J.M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Shevaun & Colin Phillips. 2015. Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Reasearch 441. 27–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Alvin M., Franklin S. Cooper, Donald P. Shankweiler & Michael Studdert-Kennedy. 1967. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 74(6). 431–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Laurel. 2012. Locating variation above the phonology. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2013. Variation in English auxiliary realization: A new take on contraction. Language Variation and Change 25(1). 17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015a. Opacity over time: Charting the paths of fricative voicing in English plurals. Paper presented at The Second Edinburgh Symposium on Historical Phonology , University of Edinburgh, December 4.
. 2015b. Production planning effects on variable contraction in English. Paper presented at NWAV 44 , University of Toronto, October 23.
Manuel, Sharon Y. 1990. The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88(3). 1286–1298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marr, David. 1982. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, David H. 2001. Respiratory markers of conversational interaction. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44(1). 128–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G.A. & N. Chomsky. 1963. Finitary models of language users. Handbook of mathematical psychology 21. 419–491.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review 63(2). 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Namy, Laura L., Lynne C. Nygaard & Denise Sauerteig. 2002. Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(4). 422–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oushiro, Livia. 2016. Social and structural constraints in lectal cohesion. Lingua 172–1731. 116–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oushiro, Livia & Gregory R. Guy. 2015. The effect of salience on co-variation in Brazilian Portuguese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2).Google Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S. 2006. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4). 2382–2393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S., Kelly Jordan, Rolliene Mallari, Caitlin Scanlon & Eva Lewandowski. 2013. Phonetic convergence in shadowed speech: The relation between acoustic and perceptual measures. Journal of Memory and Language 69(3). 183–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pardo, J.S., R. Gibbons, A. Suppes & R.M. Krauss. 2012. Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics 40(1). 190–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paster, Mary. 2006. Phonological conditions on affixation. University of California at Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter L. 1991. Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: (td)-deletion and past-marking in the Jamaican mesolect. Language Variation and Change 3(2). 171–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. & Victor S. Ferreira. 2008. Structural priming: A critical review. Psycholinguistic Bulletin 134(3). 427–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. & Simon Garrod. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 271. 169–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. In Laboratory phonology VII1, 101–139. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2007. Three sources of stylistic meaning. In Proceedings of SALSA 2007 .
Poeppel, David & David Embick. 2005. Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In Ann Cutler (ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 1980. Deletion and disambiguation in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language 56(2). 371–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Variable concord and sentential plural marking in Puerto Rican Spanish. Hispanic Review 52(2). 205–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Power, M.J. 1985. Sentence production and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37(3). 367–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2004. Three kinds of sociolinguistics: A psycholinguistic perspective. In Carmen Fought (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections, 140–158. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saito, Satoru & Alan D. Baddeley. 2004. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: Exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 57(7). 1309–1340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, D. & S. Laberge. 1978. Statistical dependence among successive occurrences of a variable in discourse. In David Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods, chap. 8, 119–126. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Scarborough, Rebecca. 2013. Neighborhood-conditioned patterns in phonetic detail: Relating coarticulation and hyperarticulation. Journal of Phonetics 41(6). 491–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherre, M.M.P. 2001. Phrase-level parallelism effect on noun phrase number agreement. Language Variation and Change 13(01). 91–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scherre, M.M.P. & A.J. Naro. 1991. Marking in discourse: “Birds of a feather”. Language Variation and Change 31. 23–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 31. 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani & Ben Rampton. 2011. Lectal focusing in interaction: A new methodology for the study of superdiverse speech. Queen Mary’s Occasional Papers Advancing Linguistics 21. 1–22.Google Scholar
Slevc, L. Robert. 2011. Saying what’s on your mind: Working memory effects on sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37(6). 1503–1514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Squires, Lauren. 2013. It don’t go both ways: Limited bidirectionality in sociolinguistic perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(2). 200–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Gwilym Pryce, Claire Timmins & Barrie Gunter. 2013. Television can also be a factor in language change: Evidence from an urban dialect. Language 89(3). 501–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2004. Someth[in]’s go[ing] on!: Variable ing at ground zero. In G. Eklund S. Fidell, L.H. Hansen, A. Karstadt, B. Nordberg, E. Sundergren, M. Thelander, B.-L. Gunnarsson, & L. Bergström (ed.), Language variation in Europe: Papers from the Second International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, ICLAVE 2, 390–403. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Rosalind Temple. 2005. New perspectives on an ol’ variable: (t,d) in British English. Language Variation and Change 171. 281–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith. 2014. Persistence in the production of linguistic variation. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2015. Modulation of the following segment effect on coronal stop deletion. Paper presented at NWAV 44 , University of Toronto, October 23.
Tamminga, Meredith & Josef Fruehwald. 2013. Deconstructing TD deletion. Paper presented at NWAV 42 , University of Pittsburgh/Carnegie Mellon University, October 17–20.
Tamminga, Meredith & Laurel MacKenzie. 2014. Elaborating extragrammatical effects on variation. Paper presented at the Linguistics Society of America annual meeting , Minneapolis.
Tamminga, Meredith, Christopher Ahern & Aaron Ecay. 2016. Generalized additive mixed models for intraspeaker variation. Linguistics Vanguard 2(s1). 33–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, James, Morgan Sonderegger & Michael Wagner. 2015. Production planning and coronal stop deletion in spontaneous speech. Paper presented at the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , Glasgow, UK, August 9.
Tilsen, Sam. 2012. Utterance preparation and stress clash: Planning prosodic alternations. In Suzanne Fuchs, Melanie Weirich, Daniel Pape, & Pascal Perrier (eds.), Speech production and perception vol. 1: Speech planning and dynamics, 119–156. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Torgerson, Eivind & Paul Kerswill. 2004. Internal and external motivation in phonetic change: Dialect levelling outcomes for an English vowel shift. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1). 23–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, Catherine E. 2007. Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change 191. 101–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Michael. 2011. Production planning constraints on allomorphy. Canadian Acoustics 39(3).Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans. 2012. Real-time evidence for age-grad(ing) in late adolescence. Language Variation and Change 241. 179–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiner, E. Judith & William Labov. 1983. Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19(1). 29–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W.P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, 97–195. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Zellner, Brigitte. 1994. Pauses and the temporal structure of speech. In É ric Keller (ed.), Fundamentals of speech synthesis and speech recognition, 41–62. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zellou, Georgia, Delphine Dahan & David Embick. 2016. Imitation of coarticulatory vowel nasality across words and time. Ms., U.C. Davis and University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C. 2000. Phonetic alignment constraints: Consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian. Journal of Phonetics 28(1). 69–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (29)

Cited by 29 other publications

Chatten, Alicia, Kimberley Baxter, Erwanne Mas, Jailyn Peña, Guy Tabachnick, Daniel Duncan & Laurel MacKenzie
2024. “I’ve Always Spoke Like This, You See”: Preterite-to-Participle Leveling in American and British Englishes. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage 99:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Dubois, Tanguy, Magali Paquot & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2024. Future-time reference in spoken EFL. Journal of Second Language Studies DOI logo
Hartmann, Stefan & Olaf Mikkelsen
2024. Future constructions in English and Norwegian. Languages in Contrast 24:2 ► pp. 170 ff. DOI logo
Kul, Malgorzata
2024. Perception of reduced forms in English by non-native users of English. Frontiers in Psychology 15 DOI logo
Sharma, Devyani
2024. Testing sociolinguistic theory and methods in world Englishes. World Englishes DOI logo
Gilbert, Madeline
2023. Conflicting standards and variability: Spirantization in two varieties of Uruguayan Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Kendall, Tyler, Nicolai Pharao, Jane Stuart-Smith & Charlotte Vaughn
2023. Advancements of phonetics in the 21st century: Theoretical issues in sociophonetics. Journal of Phonetics 98 ► pp. 101226 ff. DOI logo
ZAHLER, SARA
2023. Some Issues in Usage‐Based Methods. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Eiswirth, Mirjam Elisabeth & Felix Bergmann
2022. Variation and change in the sociophonetic variable ing in format ties. Interactional Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Engel, Alexandra & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2022. Variable grammars are variable across registers: future temporal reference in English. Language Variation and Change 34:3 ► pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana & Matthew Goldrick
2021. Variable pronunciations reveal dynamic intra-speaker variation in speech planning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:4 ► pp. 1365 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Yoonjeong, Louis Goldstein, Benjamin Parrell & Dani Byrd
2021. Who converges? Variation reveals individual speaker adaptability. Speech Communication 131 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Liang, Yiming, Pascal Amsili & Heather Burnett
2021. New ways of analyzing complementizer drop in Montréal French: Exploration of cognitive factors. Language Variation and Change 33:3 ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
Moore, Emma & Sarah Spencer
2021. “It just sounds proper common”: Exploring the social meanings expressed by nonstandard grammar. Linguistics and Education 63 ► pp. 100933 ff. DOI logo
Takano, Shoji
2021. Lifespan “Changes from Above” in the Standardization of Japanese Regional Dialects: Levels of Grammar, Lexical Properties and Community Characteristics. Language Variation and Change 33:3 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Villarreal, Dan, Lynn Clark, Jennifer Hay & Kevin Watson
2021. Gender separation and the speech community: Rhoticity in early 20th century Southland New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 33:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2020. The initiation and incrementation of sound change: Community-oriented momentum-sensitive learning. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Bleaman, Isaac L.
2020. Implicit Standardization in a Minority Language Community: Real-Time Syntactic Change among Hasidic Yiddish Writers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3 DOI logo
Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana, Meghan Clayards & Michael Wagner
2020. Predictability modulates pronunciation variants through speech planning effects: A case study on coronal stop realizations. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 11:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Blaxter, Tam, Kate Beeching, Richard Coates, James Murphy & Emily Robinson
2019. Each p[ɚ]son does it th[εː] way: Rhoticity variation and the community grammar. Language Variation and Change 31:1 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Schmitz, Katrin & Anna-Lena Scherger
2019. Effects of age and education on variable but native heritage grammars: Theoretical and empirical implications for the Null Subject Parameter. Applied Linguistics Review 10:4 ► pp. 443 ff. DOI logo
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller & Laura Rosseel
2019. Variation-Based Distance and Similarity Modeling: A Case Study in World Englishes. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2 DOI logo
Grafmiller, Jason & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2018. Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change 30:3 ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Yoonjeong, Samantha Gordon Danner, Benjamin Parrell, Sungbok Lee, Louis Goldstein, Dani Byrd & Nicholas D. Duran
2018. Articulatory, acoustic, and prosodic accommodation in a cooperative maze navigation task. PLOS ONE 13:8 ► pp. e0201444 ff. DOI logo
Tamminga, Meredith
2018. Modulation of the following segment effect on English coronal stop deletion by syntactic boundaries. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
Tamminga, Meredith
2021. Social Meaning and the Temporal Dynamics of Sound Changes. In Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation, ► pp. 338 ff. DOI logo
MacKenzie, Laurel
2017. Frequency effects over the lifespan: a case study of Attenborough’s r’s. Linguistics Vanguard 3:1 DOI logo
MacKenzie, Laurel
2019. Perturbing the community grammar: Individual differences and community-level constraints on sociolinguistic variation. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 DOI logo
Tamminga, Meredith, Christopher Ahern & Aaron Ecay
2016. Generalized Additive Mixed Models for intraspeaker variation. Linguistics Vanguard 2:s1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.