Article published in:
The locus of linguistic variation
Edited by Constantine Lignos, Laurel MacKenzie and Meredith Tamminga
[Linguistic Variation 16:2] 2016
► pp. 300–336

The dynamics of variation in individuals

This paper examines the factors conditioning the production of linguistic variables in real time by individual speakers: what we term the dynamics of variation in individuals. We propose a framework that recognizes three types of factors conditioning variation: sociostylistic, internal linguistic, and psychophysiological. We develop two main points against this background. The first is that sequences of variants produced by individuals display systematic patterns that can be understood in terms of sociostylistic conditioning and psychophysiological conditioning. The second is that psychophysiological conditioning and internal linguistic conditioning are distinct in their mental implementations; this claim has implications for understanding the locality of the factors conditioning alternations, the universality and language-specificity of variation, and the general question of whether grammar and language use are distinct. Questions about the dynamics of variation in individuals are set against community-centered perspectives to argue that findings in the two domains, though differing in explanatory focus, can ultimately be mutually informative.
Keywords: dynamics, quantitative, sociolinguistic cognition, variation, language use, locality, alternations
Published online: 27 January 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.16.2.06tam
References

References

Abramowicz, Lukasz
2007 Sociolinguistics meets Exemplar Theory: Frequency and recency effects in (ing). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13. 27–37.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Phillip L.
1988 Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology 117(3). 288–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allum, Paul H. & Linda Wheeldon
2007 Planning scope in spoken sentence production: The role of grammatical units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33(4). 791–810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Babel, Molly
2012 Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics 40. 177–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Alan
1986 Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, Robert
2013 The quantitative paradigm. In J.K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 85–107. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bermudez-Otero, Ricardo
2013 Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn
1986 Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18. 355–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Tatiana Nikitina
2009 The gradience of the dative alternation. In Linda Uyechi & Lian-Hee Wee (eds.), Reality exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, 161–184. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Brewer, Gene A. & Nash Unsworth
2012 Individual differences in the effects of retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language 66. 407–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Richard
1992 Pronominal and null subject variation in Spanish: Constraints, dialects, and functional compensation. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Cameron, Richard & Nydia Flores-Ferran
2004 Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context 1(1). 41–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
2010 New directions in sociolinguistic cognition. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2). 31–39.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta & David Sankoff
1974 Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50(2). 333–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986 Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Thomas Wasow
1998 Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology 37(3). 201–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Lynn & Graeme Trousdale
2009 Exploring the role of token frequency in phonological change: Evidence from TH-fronting in east-central Scotland. English Language and Linguistics 13(1). 33–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Lynn & Liam Walsh
2014 Recency effects on word-medial /t/ in New Zealand English: initial observations. Poster presented at the 15th Australasian International Speech Science and Technology Conference , Christchurch, New Zealand.
Coetzee, Andries & Joe Pater
2011 The place of variation in phonological theory. In John A. Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, & Alan C.L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn, 401–434. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, Meredyth
1991 Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20(6). 445–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie & Jennifer Hay
2012 Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 24. 59–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2012 Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41. 87–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Lucy & William J. Hardcastle
2002 Categorical and gradient properties of assimilation in alveolar to velar sequences: Evidence from EPG and EMA data. Journal of Phonetics 30(3). 373–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David
2008 Variation and morphosyntactic theory: Competition fractionated. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(1). 59–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b Stem alternations and stem distributions. Ms., University of Pennsylvania; http://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/˜embick​/stem​-ms​-10​.pdf.Google Scholar
2013 Morphemes and morphophonological loci. In Alec Marantz & Ora Matushansky (eds.), Distributed morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, 151–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & David Poeppel
2015 Towards a computational(ist) neurobiology of language: Correlational, integrated, and explanatory neurolinguistics. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 30(4). 357–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, Mirjam
2014 Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua 142. 27–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farnetani, Edda & Daniel Recasens
2010 Coarticulation and connected speech processes. In William J. Hardcastle, John Laver, & Fiona E. Gibbon (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 316–352. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farrar, Kimberly & Mari C. Jones
2002 Introduction. In Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch (eds.), Language change, 1–18. Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W.
1991 The quiet demise of variable rules. American Speech 66(1). 3–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda
1991 Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language 30(2). 210- 233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef
2012 Redevelopment of a morphological class. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18(1). 77–86.Google Scholar
German, J.S., K. Carlson & J.B. Pierrehumbert
2013 Reassignment of consonant allophones in rapid dialect acquisition. Journal of Phonetics 41(3). 228–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, Daniel
2012 A computational approach to conversational style. Paper presented at NWAV 41 .
Gries, Stefan Th
2005 Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34(4). 365–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
1980 Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, chap. 1, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1991a Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 3. 223–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991b Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 3. 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. & Charles Boberg
1997 Inherent variability and the obligatory contour principle. Language Variation and Change 9. 149–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, Robert J. & Pashiera N. Barkhuysen
2006 Language production and working memory: The case of subject-verb agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(1–3). 181–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Joan Bresnan
2006 Spoken syntax: The phonetics of giving a hand in New Zealand English. The Linguistic Review 23(3). 321–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoit, Jeannette D., Nancy Pearl Solomon & Thomas J. Hixon
1993 Effect of lung volume on voice onset time (VOT). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 36(3). 516–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoole, Philip, Noel Nguyen-Trong & William Hardcastle
1993 A comparative investigation of coarticulation in fricatives: Electropalatographic, electromagnetic, and acoustic data. Language and Speech 36(2–3). 235–260.Google Scholar
Houston, Ann
1985 Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (ING). University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian & Neal E. Snider
2013 Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime’s prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition 127. 57–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, Susan, Ruth E. Herman & Cindy H.T. Lian
2003 The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: Talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech of noise. Psychology and Aging 18(2). 181–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, Susan & Aaron Sumner
2001 The structure of verbal abilities in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging 16(2). 312–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, Ruth, France Martineau & Raymond Mougeon
2011 The interplay of internal and external factors in grammatical change: First person plural pronouns in French. Language 87(3). 470–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1972 Explanation in phonology. In Stanley Peters (ed.), Goals of linguistic theory, 189–227. Cinnaminson, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kutik, Elanah J., William E. Cooper & Suzanne Boyce
1983 Declination of fundamental frequency in speakers production of parenthetical and main clauses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73(5). 1731–1738. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1969 Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4). 715–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979 Locating the frontier between social and psychological factors in linguistic variation. In Charles J. Fillmore, Daniel Kempler, & William S.-Y. Yang (eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior, chap. 18, 327–340. Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989 The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1. 85–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 The anatomy of style-shifting. In Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, chap. 5, 85–108. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2006[1966] The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 What is to be learned: The community as the focus of social cognition. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10(2). 265–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 The sociophonetic orientation of the language learner. In Chiara Celata & Silvia Calamai (eds.), Advances in sociophonetics, 17–29. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg
2006 The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash, Maya Ravindranath, Tracey Weldon, Maciej Baranowski & Naomi Nagy
2011 Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4). 431–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Paul Cohen, Clarence Robins & John Lewis
1968 A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Final report, Cooperative Research Project 3288, vols. I and II.Google Scholar
Levelt, William J.M.
1989 Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Shevaun & Colin Phillips
2015 Aligning grammatical theories and language processing models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Reasearch 44. 27–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Alvin M., Franklin S. Cooper, Donald P. Shankweiler & Michael Studdert-Kennedy
1967 Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 74(6). 431–461. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Laurel
2012 Locating variation above the phonology. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
2013 Variation in English auxiliary realization: A new take on contraction. Language Variation and Change 25(1). 17–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015a Opacity over time: Charting the paths of fricative voicing in English plurals. Paper presented at The Second Edinburgh Symposium on Historical Phonology , University of Edinburgh, December 4.
2015b Production planning effects on variable contraction in English. Paper presented at NWAV 44 , University of Toronto, October 23.
Manuel, Sharon Y.
1990 The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88(3). 1286–1298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marr, David
1982 Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, David H.
2001 Respiratory markers of conversational interaction. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44(1). 128–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G.A. & N. Chomsky
1963 Finitary models of language users. Handbook of mathematical psychology 2. 419–491.Google Scholar
Miller, George A.
1956 The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review 63(2). 81–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Namy, Laura L., Lynne C. Nygaard & Denise Sauerteig
2002 Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21(4). 422–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oushiro, Livia
2016 Social and structural constraints in lectal cohesion. Lingua 172–173. 116–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oushiro, Livia & Gregory R. Guy
2015 The effect of salience on co-variation in Brazilian Portuguese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2).Google Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S.
2006 On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4). 2382–2393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S., Kelly Jordan, Rolliene Mallari, Caitlin Scanlon & Eva Lewandowski
2013 Phonetic convergence in shadowed speech: The relation between acoustic and perceptual measures. Journal of Memory and Language 69(3). 183–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, J.S., R. Gibbons, A. Suppes & R.M. Krauss
2012 Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics 40(1). 190–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paster, Mary
2006 Phonological conditions on affixation. University of California at Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter L.
1991 Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: (td)-deletion and past-marking in the Jamaican mesolect. Language Variation and Change 3(2). 171–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. & Victor S. Ferreira
2008 Structural priming: A critical review. Psycholinguistic Bulletin 134(3). 427–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. & Simon Garrod
2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27. 169–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
2002 Word-specific phonetics. In Laboratory phonology VII, 101–139. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J.
2007 Three sources of stylistic meaning. In Proceedings of SALSA 2007 .
Poeppel, David & David Embick
2005 Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In Ann Cutler (ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana
1980 Deletion and disambiguation in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language 56(2). 371–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984 Variable concord and sentential plural marking in Puerto Rican Spanish. Hispanic Review 52(2). 205–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Power, M.J.
1985 Sentence production and working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37(3). 367–385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R.
2004 Three kinds of sociolinguistics: A psycholinguistic perspective. In Carmen Fought (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections, 140–158. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saito, Satoru & Alan D. Baddeley
2004 Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: Exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 57(7). 1309–1340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, D. & S. Laberge
1978 Statistical dependence among successive occurrences of a variable in discourse. In David Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods, chap. 8, 119–126. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Scarborough, Rebecca
2013 Neighborhood-conditioned patterns in phonetic detail: Relating coarticulation and hyperarticulation. Journal of Phonetics 41(6). 491–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scherre, M.M.P.
2001 Phrase-level parallelism effect on noun phrase number agreement. Language Variation and Change 13(01). 91–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scherre, M.M.P. & A.J. Naro
1991 Marking in discourse: “Birds of a feather”. Language Variation and Change 3. 23–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
1986 On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 371–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani & Ben Rampton
2011 Lectal focusing in interaction: A new methodology for the study of superdiverse speech. Queen Mary’s Occasional Papers Advancing Linguistics 2. 1–22.Google Scholar
Slevc, L. Robert
2011 Saying what’s on your mind: Working memory effects on sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37(6). 1503–1514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Lauren
2013 It don’t go both ways: Limited bidirectionality in sociolinguistic perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(2). 200–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane, Gwilym Pryce, Claire Timmins & Barrie Gunter
2013 Television can also be a factor in language change: Evidence from an urban dialect. Language 89(3). 501–536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
2006 Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali
2004 Someth[in]’s go[ing] on!: Variable ing at ground zero. In G. Eklund S. Fidell, L.H. Hansen, A. Karstadt, B. Nordberg, E. Sundergren, M. Thelander, B.-L. Gunnarsson, & L. Bergström (ed.), Language variation in Europe: Papers from the Second International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, ICLAVE 2, 390–403. Department of Scandinavian Languages, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Rosalind Temple
2005 New perspectives on an ol’ variable: (t,d) in British English. Language Variation and Change 17. 281–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamminga, Meredith
2014 Persistence in the production of linguistic variation. University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
2015 Modulation of the following segment effect on coronal stop deletion. Paper presented at NWAV 44 , University of Toronto, October 23.
Tamminga, Meredith & Josef Fruehwald
2013 Deconstructing TD deletion. Paper presented at NWAV 42 , University of Pittsburgh/Carnegie Mellon University, October 17–20.
Tamminga, Meredith & Laurel MacKenzie
2014 Elaborating extragrammatical effects on variation. Paper presented at the Linguistics Society of America annual meeting , Minneapolis.
Tamminga, Meredith, Christopher Ahern & Aaron Ecay
2016 Generalized additive mixed models for intraspeaker variation. Linguistics Vanguard 2(s1). 33–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, James, Morgan Sonderegger & Michael Wagner
2015 Production planning and coronal stop deletion in spontaneous speech. Paper presented at the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , Glasgow, UK, August 9.
Tilsen, Sam
2012 Utterance preparation and stress clash: Planning prosodic alternations. In Suzanne Fuchs, Melanie Weirich, Daniel Pape, & Pascal Perrier (eds.), Speech production and perception vol. 1: Speech planning and dynamics, 119–156. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Torgerson, Eivind & Paul Kerswill
2004 Internal and external motivation in phonetic change: Dialect levelling outcomes for an English vowel shift. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1). 23–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Catherine E.
2007 Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change 19. 101–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Michael
2011 Production planning constraints on allomorphy. Canadian Acoustics 39(3).Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans
2012 Real-time evidence for age-grad(ing) in late adolescence. Language Variation and Change 24. 179–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, E. Judith & William Labov
1983 Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19(1). 29–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog
1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W.P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, 97–195. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Zellner, Brigitte
1994 Pauses and the temporal structure of speech. In É ric Keller (ed.), Fundamentals of speech synthesis and speech recognition, 41–62. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zellou, Georgia, Delphine Dahan & David Embick
2016 Imitation of coarticulatory vowel nasality across words and time. Ms., U.C. Davis and University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth C.
2000 Phonetic alignment constraints: Consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian. Journal of Phonetics 28(1). 69–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2020. The initiation and incrementation of sound change: Community-oriented momentum-sensitive learning. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 Crossref logo
Blaxter, Tam, Kate Beeching, Richard Coates, James Murphy & Emily Robinson
2019. Each p[ɚ]son does it th[εː] way: Rhoticity variation and the community grammar. Language Variation and Change 31:1 ► pp. 91 ff. Crossref logo
Bleaman, Isaac L.
2020. Implicit Standardization in a Minority Language Community: Real-Time Syntactic Change among Hasidic Yiddish Writers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3 Crossref logo
Caplan, Spencer & Kajsa Djärv
2019. What usage can tell us about grammar: Embedded verb second in Scandinavian. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo
Grafmiller, Jason & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2018. Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change 30:3 ► pp. 385 ff. Crossref logo
Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana, Meghan Clayards & Michael Wagner
2020. Predictability modulates pronunciation variants through speech planning effects: A case study on coronal stop realizations. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 11:1 ► pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana & Matthew Goldrick
2021. Variable pronunciations reveal dynamic intra-speaker variation in speech planning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:4 ► pp. 1365 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Yoonjeong, Louis Goldstein, Benjamin Parrell & Dani Byrd
2021. Who converges? Variation reveals individual speaker adaptability. Speech Communication 131 ► pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Yoonjeong, Samantha Gordon Danner, Benjamin Parrell, Sungbok Lee, Louis Goldstein, Dani Byrd & Nicholas D. Duran
2018. Articulatory, acoustic, and prosodic accommodation in a cooperative maze navigation task. PLOS ONE 13:8 ► pp. e0201444 ff. Crossref logo
MacKenzie, Laurel
2019. Perturbing the community grammar: Individual differences and community-level constraints on sociolinguistic variation. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo
Moore, Emma & Sarah Spencer
2021. “It just sounds proper common”: Exploring the social meanings expressed by nonstandard grammar. Linguistics and Education 63 ► pp. 100933 ff. Crossref logo
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller & Laura Rosseel
2019. Variation-Based Distance and Similarity Modeling: A Case Study in World Englishes. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2 Crossref logo
Tamminga, Meredith
2018. Modulation of the following segment effect on English coronal stop deletion by syntactic boundaries. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 Crossref logo
Tamminga, Meredith, Christopher Ahern & Aaron Ecay
2016. Generalized Additive Mixed Models for intraspeaker variation. Linguistics Vanguard 2:s1 Crossref logo
Villarreal, Dan, Lynn Clark, Jennifer Hay & Kevin Watson
2021. Gender separation and the speech community: Rhoticity in early 20th century Southland New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.