Article published in:
A micro-perspective on Verb Second in Romance and Germanic
Edited by Christine Meklenborg Salvesen
[Linguistic Variation 19:1] 2019
► pp. 4781
References

[ p. 77 ]References

Adams, Marianne
1987 ‘From Old French to the Theory of pro-drop’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alber, Birgit
1994Indizi per l’esistenza di uno split-CP nelle lingue germaniche. In: G. Borgato (ed.), Teoria del linguaggio e analisi linguistica. XX Incontro di grammatica generativa, 3–23. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Anderssen, Merete & Westergaard, Marit
2010Frequency and Economy in the Acquisition of Variable Word Order. Lingua: 2569–2588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Axel, Kathrin
2007Studies on Old High German Syntax. Left Sentence Periphery, Verb Placement and Verb Second. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004 ‘Aspects of the low IP area’, In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008The CP of clefts. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33. 191–204.Google Scholar
2013Revisiting the CP of Clefts. In Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann: Discourse and Grammar. From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, 91–114. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola
2006A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance. In Raffaella Zanuttini (ed.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense and clausal architecture, 53–86. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola and Cecilia Poletto
2004Topic, Focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano & Cecilia Poletto
2016Syntactic and Prosodic Effects of Information Structure in Romance. In Caroline Féry and Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), in Handout of Information structure, 642–662. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo
2008Die diachronische Syntax des Zimbrischen. Tuebingen: Günter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo & Alessandra Tomaselli
2007The loss of V2 phenomena in Cimbrian. Linguistische Berichte 210. 209–228.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Andrea Padovan & Alessandra Tomaselli
2013Linguistische Berichte. Sonderheft 19.Google Scholar
2012A binary system of complementizers in Cimbrian relative clauses. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 90. 1–21.Google Scholar
Bosco, Ilaria
1999Christlike unt korze dottrina. Un’analisi sintattica della lingua cimbra del XVII secolo. Padova: Padova University dissertation.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo
2001Proper Binding Condition Effects are Phase Impenetrability Condition Effects. In: Kim Minjoo &Uri Strauss, Proceedings of NELS 31, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Cocchi, G., and C. Poletto
2007Complementizer deletion and complementizer doubling, in C. Picchi and A. Pona (eds.), Proceedings of the XXXII Incontro di Grammatica generativa, Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica – Università di Firenze, 49–62. Alessandria: Ed. dell’Ors.Google Scholar
[ p. 78 ]
Costa, João
2001The Emergence of Unmarked Word Order. In Geraldine Legendre, Jane Grimshaw, and Sten Vikner (eds), Optimality- Theoretic Syntax, 171–203. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2011Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuss, Eric
2003On the historical core of V2 in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26. 195–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Word order and language change. On the interface between syntax and morphology. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi
1997Tense and aspect: from semantics to morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther & Cecilia Poletto
2011Hidden verb second: The case of Cimbrian. In Michael T. Putnam (ed.), Studies on German-Language islands, 301–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther
2008The Left Clausal Periphery: Clitic Left Dislocation in Italian and Left Dislocation in German. In Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn (eds), Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, 49–94. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1997Negative inversion and the structure of CP. Paper presented at the Linguistic Colloquium, University of Wuppertal.
Hoekstra, Eric
1993Dialectal variation inside CP as parametric variation, Linguistische Berichte 5.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A.
2002Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Kampen, Jacqueline
2010Typological Guidance in the Acquisition of V2 Dutch. Lingua 120 (2): 264–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van
1987Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
2015Was für ein Hauptsatzphänomen ist V2? Talk delivered at the V2 Workshop Wuppertal 24.07.2015.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2003 ‘Il sistema completivo dei dialetti meridionali. La doppia serie di complementatori’, Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 27: 89–147.Google Scholar
2007Old Neapolitan Word Order: Some Initial Observations. In A. L. Lepschy, A. Tosi (eds), Languages of Italy: Histories and dictionaries, Ravena, Longo, 119–146.Google Scholar
2008Satisfying V2 in early romance: Merge vs. move. Journal of Linguistics 44. 437–470. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1995Why UG Needs a Learning Theory: Triggering Verb Movement. In Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts (eds), Clause Structure and Language Change, 31–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1999The Development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David & Marit Westergaard
2007Language Acquisition and Language Change: Interrelationships. In Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (5): 396–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 79 ]
Lohnstein, Horst
In press. The grammatical basis of verb second – the case of German. In Rebecca Woods, Sam Wolfe & Theresa Biberauer, Rethinking Verb Second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manzini, Maria Rita & Leonardo Savoia
2005I dialetti italiani e romanci: morfosintassi generativa, vol. 3. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Oniga, Renato
2014Latin. A linguistic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paoli, Sandra
2007The fine structure of the left periphery: COMPs and subjects: Evidence from Romance. Lingua 117. 1057–1079. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrova, Svetlana
2015Free word order in Germanic: Insights from object order in Middle Low German. Linguistische Berichte 244, 355–382.Google Scholar
Poeppel, David & Kenneth Wexler
1993The Full Competence Hypothesis of Clause Structure in Early German. Language 69: 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2000The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001Complementizer deletion and verb movement in standard Italian. In: Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 265–286. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2002The left-periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance dialects: A new view on V2 and V3. In Sief Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds.), Syntactic microvariation, 214–42. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
2006Parallel phases: A study of the high and low periphery of Old Italian. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 261–95. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Word order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, C.
2015 ‘Word order in the Old Italian DP’, in U. Shlonsky (ed.), The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 109–127. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2016Which clues for which V2. In Ermenegildo Bidese, Federica Cognola & Manuela Caterina Moroni (eds.), Theoretical approaches to linguistic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Alessandra Tomaselli
2002La sintassi del soggetto nullo nelle isole tedescofone del Veneto: Cimbro e sappadino a confronto. In Gianna Marcato (ed.), La dialettologia oltre il 2001. Atti del convegno di Sappada/Plodn (Belluno) 1–5 Luglio 2001, 237–252. Padova: Padova Unipress.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
2016Consecutive so … V2-clauses in German. In Ingo Reich und Augustin Speyer (eds), Co- and subordination in German and other languages, 285–318. Hamburg: Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Renzi, Lorenzo & Giampaolo Salvi
2010Grammatica dell’Italiano Antico. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther
2007Syntaktische Variation aus synchronischer und diachronischer Perspektive. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1996Residual Verb Second and the Wh-criterion. In Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads. Essays in Comparative Syntax, 63–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative grammar, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 80 ]
Roberts, Ian
1993Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, I.
2004The C-system in Brythonnic Celtic languages, V2, and the EPP. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, 297–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Nina
2010Zur historischen Entwicklung des Komplementierers dass im Germanischen. PhD Thesis University of Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Schwartz Bonnie, D. & Sten Vikner
1989All Verb Second Clauses are CPs. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 43, 27–49.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna
2005A corpus-based study of null subjects in Old French and Old Occitan. In Claus D. Putsch, Johannes Kabatek & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Corpora and Diachronic Linguistics, 359–74. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Vance, B.
1989Null Subjects and Syntactic Change in Medieval French. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Vanelli, L.
1998I dialetti italiani settentrionali nel panorama romanzo. Studi di sintassi e morfologia. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wanner, Dieter
1995Les subordonnées à double complémentateur en roman medieval. In Giovanni Ruffino (ed.), Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Romanza, Section 1., 421–433.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit
2008Acquisition and Change: On the Robustness of the Triggering Experience for Word Order Cues. Lingua. vol. 118 (12). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative. Germanic Linguistics 12. 49–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Word order and finiteness in acquisition: A study of English and Norwegian wh-questions. In Kristin Melum Eide (ed.) Finiteness Matters: On finiteness-related phenomena in natural languages, p. 255–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Sam
2015Microvariation in Medieval Romance syntax: A comparative approach. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles
2000Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
(1997): Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 81 ]