Article published in:
Variation in phonology
Edited by Péter Szigetvári
[Linguistic Variation 20:1] 2020
► pp. 332
Anttila, Arto
2002Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20(1). 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette & Andrew Wedel
2009Inhibited Sound Change: An evolutionary approach to lexical competition. Diachronica 26(2). 143–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Joe Pater
2016Convergence properties of a gradual learning algorithm for Harmonic Grammar. In John McCarthy & Joe Pater (eds.), Harmonic grammar and harmonic serialism, London: Equinox Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2010Praat: doing phonetics by computer Computer program.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2001Phonology and language use, vol. 941. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J. & David Sankoff
1974Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50(2). 333–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle
1968The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. & Elizabeth V. Hume
1995The Internal Organization of Speech Sounds. In Goldsmith, John (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 245–306. Cambridge Massachusetts: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Feldman, Naomi & Thomas L. Griffiths
2007A rational account of the perceptual magnet effect. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Gervain, Judit & Jacques Mehler
2010Speech perception and language acquisition in the first year of life. Annual review of psychology 611. 191–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gouskova, Maria
2003Deriving economy: Syncope in Optimality Theory: Graduate Linguistics Student Association, University of Massachusetts dissertation.Google Scholar
Halácsy, Péter, András Kornai, László Németh, András Rung, István Szakadát & Viktor Trón
2004Creating open language resources for Hungarian In Proceedings of Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 203–210.Google Scholar
Harris, John
1990Segmental complexity and phonological government. Phonology 7(01). 255–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
1995Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Kie Zuraw, Péter Siptár & Zsuzsa Cziráky Londe
2009Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Language 851. 822–863. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles Francis
1955A manual of phonology. Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Armin Mester
1999The Phonological Lexicon. In Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, 62–100. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Abby
2011How much homophony is normal? Journal of linguistics 47(03). 631–671. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul
1978Variable rules, community grammar, and linguistic change. In David Sankoff (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods, 71–83. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul & Chad K. McDaniel
1979On the logic of variable rules. Language in society 8(2–3). 151–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Alvin M., Katherine Safford Harris, Howard S. Hoffman & Belver C. Griffith
1957The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology 54(5). 358–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mády, Katalin
2010Shortening of long high vowels in Hungarian: a perceptual loss? In Proceedings of Sociophonetics at the crossroads of speech variation, processing and communication, Pisa.Google Scholar
Mády, Katalin & Uwe D. Reichel
2007Quantity distinction in the Hungarian vowel system – just theory or also reality? In Proceedings of International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, http://​www​.phonetik​.uni​-muenchen​.de​/~mady​/#p​_pub.
Martin, Andrew, Sharon Peperkamp & Emmanuel Dupoux
2013Learning phonemes with a proto-lexicon. Cognitive Science 37(1). 103–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André
1952Function, structure, and sound change. Word 8(1). 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1968Phonetics and linguistic evolution 464–487.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Alan Prince
1993Generalized alignment. In Yearbook of morphology 1993, 79–153. Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mielke, Jeff
2008The Emergence of Distinctive Features. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nádasdy, Ádám & Péter Siptár
1994A magánhangzók. In Kiefer Ferenc (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan, vol. 21. Fonológia, 42–182. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J.
1981The listener as a source of sound change. Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior 178–203.Google Scholar
1993Sound change as nature’s speech perception experiment. Speech Communication 13(1). 155–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe
1994Against the underlying specification of an ‘exceptional’ English stress pattern. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 131.Google Scholar
2000Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17(2). 237–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Exceptions in optimality theory: Typology and learnability. In Conference on Redefining Elicitation: Novel Data in Phonological Theory.Google Scholar
2009Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science 33(6). 999–1035. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
2001Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of lexical structure, 137–157. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
1993. 2004Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas
2003Covert Feature Effects. In WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, vol. 221, 398–422.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David & William Labov
1979On the uses of variable rules. Language in society 8(2–3). 189–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2000The Phonology of Hungarian. The Phonology of the World’s languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca
1999Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. In Matthew Gordon (ed.), Papers in Phonology, vol. 31 UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 25–146. Los Angeles: UCLA Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, Michael, Alvin Liberman, Katherine Harris & Franklin Cooper
1970Motor theory of speech perception: a reply to Lane’s critical review. Psychological Review 771. 234–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szabó, Ildikó Emese
2015Phonotactics of word-final vowels – Predictability of exceptional patterns in Hungarian. Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest MA thesis.Google Scholar
Törkenczy, Miklós
2006The Phonotactics of Hungarian: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest Dsc dissertation.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai
1939Grundzüge der Phonologie. Prague. [Bd 7, der Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague.]. English transl. by C. Baltaxe (1969) Principles of phonology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wedel, Andrew
2004Self-organization and categorical behavior in phonology: UC Santa Cruz dissertation.Google Scholar
Wedel, Andrew, Scott Jackson & Abby Kaplan
2013aFunctional load and the lexicon: Evidence that syntactic category and frequency relationships in minimal lemma pairs predict the loss of phoneme contrasts in language change. Language and speech 56(3). 395–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew, Abby Kaplan & Scott Jackson
2013bHigh functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study. Cognition 128(2). 179–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Werker, Janet F. & Richard C. Tees
1984Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant behavior and development 7(1). 49–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, James, Megha Sundara, Yun Jung Kim & Adam J. Chong
2014Infant learning of phonological alternations is biased by phonetic similarity. In Poster presentation at the 65th Workshop on Learning Biases in Natural and Artificial Language Acquisition at the Annual meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain.Google Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley
1949Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least-Effort. Addison-Wesley, Reading.Google Scholar