Article published in:
Variation in phonology
Edited by Péter Szigetvári
[Linguistic Variation 20:1] 2020
► pp. 102–135

Degree modification across categories in Afrikaans

| Stellenbosch University
| Utrecht University
| Leiden University
| Utrecht University
The paper presents an analysis of the Afrikaans degree modifier baie ‘very/much/many’. Baie appears to be a single lexical item with a wide distribution in terms of the categories of gradable predicate with which it can combine. However, the paper shows that two syntactically distinct instances of baie should be distinguished. These instances of baie portion out the modification of different grammatical categories between them: one, a head, exclusively modifies gradable adjectives, and the other, an adjunct, modifies the remaining categories of gradable predicate.
Keywords: degree modification, gradability, Afrikaans
Published online: 15 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.17004.ber
References

References

Abney, Steven P.
1987 The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Massachusetts: MIT PhD.Google Scholar
Bauermeester, Eunice Marietha
2007 Die Kaapse Slawe in Kultuurhistoriese Perspektief: 1652–1838. Pretoria: University of Pretoria MA.Google Scholar
Berghoff, Robyn
2016 Cross-categorial degree modification in Afrikaans: An analysis of the high-degree modifier ‘baie’. Utrecht: Utrecht University MA.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
2002 Verb second in Afrikaans: Is this a unitary phenomenon? Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 34. 19–69.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972 Degree words. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bylinina, Lisa & Yasutada Sudo
2015 Varieties of intensification. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(3). 881–895. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox & Eivind Torgersen
2011 Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2). 151–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny
2013 Grammaticalisation in social context: The emergence of a new English pronoun. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(5). 608–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert
1990 The syntax of left branch constructions: Tilburg University PhD.Google Scholar
1997a The internal syntax of the Dutch extended adjectival projection. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 289–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997b Much-support as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 28(1). 119–164.Google Scholar
Davids, Achmat
1990 Words the Cape slaves made: A socio-historical-linguistic study. South African Journal of Linguistics 8(1). 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1967 The logical form of action sentences. In Nicholsa Resche (ed.) The logic of decision and action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny
1997 Quantifiers and selection. Leiden: University of Leiden PhD.Google Scholar
2008 Adjectives and degree modification. In Louise McNally & Christopher Kennedy (eds.), Adverbs and adjectives: Syntax, semantics, and discourse (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 18), 123–155. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny, Ad Neeleman & van de Koot, Hans
1998 Degree expressions and the autonomy of syntax. Leiden University/University College London.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Amélia P. & Janet Lloyd
2003 Portuguese: An essential grammar (Routledge Essential Grammars). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1977 X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 2.) Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.Google Scholar
1991 Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41(1). 9–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1994 The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher
1999 Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Matushansky, O.
2002 Tipping the scales: The syntax of scalarity in the complement of seem. Syntax 5(3). 219–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNabb, Yaron
2012 The syntax and semantics of degree modification. Chicago: University of Chicago PhD.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad, van de Koot, Hans & Jenny Doetjes
2004 Degree expressions. Linguistic Review 21. 1–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2006 Van suffix tot telwoord tot bijwoord: degrammaticalisering en (re)grammaticalisering van tig. In TABU 35, 33–60.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel, Bernard D. Clerck & Timothy Colleman
2014 The emergence of non-canonical degree modifiers in non-standard varieties of Dutch: A constructionalization perspective. In Boogaart Ronny, Colleman Timothy & Rutten Gijsbert (eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar, 207–250. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Özyıldız, Deniz
in press. Quantifiers in Turkish. http://​deniz​.fr​/pdfs​/quantifiers​.pdf. (28 February, 2017.) Crossref
Quirk, Randolph
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Raidt, Edith Hildegard
1982 Afrikaans en sy Europese Verlede. Cape Town: Nasou Beperk.Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica
2008 A degree account of exclamatives. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 18. 601–618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Solt, Stephanie
2010 Much support and more. In M. Aloni, H. Bastiaanse, T. de Jager, & K. Schulz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 446–455). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2008 The position of adjectives and other phrasal modifiers in the decomposition of DP. In Louise McNally & Christopher Kennedy (eds.), Adverbs and adjectives: Syntax, semantics, and discourse (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa DeMena
1984 Parameters and effects of word order variation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Natsuko
2001 Degree words and scalar structure in Japanese. Lingua 111(1). 29–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957 Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2): 143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1981 Argument structure and morphology. Linguistic Review 1: 81–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
1992 X’-syntax-X’-semantics. Utrecht: Utrecht University PhD.Google Scholar
2000 External arguments. In Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane B. Grimshaw. Lexical specification and insertion. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 429–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
2006a Much ado about a lot. Retrieved from http://​itre​.cis​.upenn​.edu​/~myl​/languagelog​/archives​/002990​.html
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Berghoff, Robyn
2020. Evaluativity in the Afrikaans Equative and Excessive Constructions. Language Matters 51:2 ► pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Niina Ning
2020. Low predicate inversion in Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.