Beyond affectedness – partitive objects and degrees of agenthood in Ancient Greek
In several ancient and modern Indo-European languages, the partitive-genitive may be used in place of the accusative to encode the second argument of two-place verbs. In Ancient Greek the two types of object encoding can alternate with change-of-state verbs, alternation being viewed as connected with degrees of patient affectedness: the partitive-genitive encodes partially affected objects. Alternation also extends to experiential verbs, which are typically characterized by a low degree of transitivity and do not imply any change of state of the object-stimulus. Rather than concentrating on the implications of case alternation on the construal of the object, I consider the effects of variation on the whole construction, and argue that genitive vs. accusative marking of the object (NomGen vs. NomAcc constructions) reflects the construal of the subject-experiencer. While the different construal of the experiencer in terms of degrees of control cross-linguistically often results in non-nominative encoding of the experiencer, in Ancient Greek it is object encoding that affects the construal of the experiencer and reflects a scale based on possible control. The distribution of constructions with experiential verbs shows that NomAcc is typical of verbs of sight, thought, intellectual knowledge and emotions connected to sight and awareness, such as wonder and fear. NomGen is connected with touch, smell, taste, memory, forgetfulness, care and desire. In the in-between area, verbs of hearing, learning and verbs of affection may feature both accusative and genitive encoding, thus constituting a fuzzy transition area. The connection between sight and other experiential verbs that feature accusative encoding reflects an embodied conceptualization of experiential situations.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.NomACC/NomGen alternation along the sub-hierarchy of patient affectedness
- 3.NomACC/NomGen alternation along the sub-hierarchy of agentivity
- 3.1Perception, sensation and volition
- 3.2Cognition
- 3.3Emotion
- 4.Connections between the two sub-hierachies
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
- List of Abbreviations
-
References
References (43)
References
Aldai, Gontzal and Søren Wichmann. 2018. Statistical observations on hierarchies of transitivity. Folia Lingüistica 52(2): 249–281. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bertolín Cebrián, Reyes. 1996. Die Verben des Denkens Bei Homer. Innsbruck: Verlag des Institutes der Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chantraine, Pierre. 1953. Grammaire Homérique II1: Syntaxe. Paris: Klincksieck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chantraine, Pierre. 1977. Dictionnaire Étymologique de la Langue Grecque. Paris: Klincksieck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chappell, Hilary & Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2019. Optional and alternating case marking: Typology and diachrony. Language and Linguistics Compass 13(3). e12311. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conti, Luz. 2010a. Synchronie und Diachronie des Altgriechischen Genitivs als Semisubjekt. Historische Sprachforschungen 1211. 2008(2010): 94–113.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conti, Luz. 2010b. Análisis del Dativo en Construcciones Impersonales: los Conceptos de Sujeto y de Semisujeto en Griego Antiguo. Emerita – Revista de Linguistica y Filología Clasica 78(2): 249–273. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conti, Luz and Silvia Luraghi. 2014. The Ancient Greek Partitive Genitive in Typological Perspective. In: Silvia Luraghi and Tuomas Huumo (eds.). Partitive Case and Related Categories, pp. 443–476. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Eystein. 2014. Partitive Subjects and Objects in Indo-Iranian and beyond. In: Silvia Luraghi and Tuomas Huumo (eds.). Partitive Case and Related Categories, pp. 417–441. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daniel, Michael. 2014. The second genitive in Russian. In: Silvia Luraghi and Tuomas Huumo (eds). Partitive cases and related categories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 347–377. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Darwin, Charles R. 1872. Expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: Albemarle. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ekman, Paul and Wallace Friesen. 2003. Unmasking the face. Cambridge (Mass.): Malor Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fridlund, Alan. 1994. Human facial expression. An evolutionary view. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giusti, Giuliana and Petra Sleeman. 2021. Partitive elements in the languages of Europe. An advancement in the understanding of a multifaceted phenomenon. In: Petra Sleeman & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Partitive determiners, partitive pronouns and partitive case. Berlin: Mouton DeGruyter, 2–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath and Bradley Taylor (eds.). 2013. Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL], Accessed on 2021-01-12)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Transitivity prominence. In: Andrej L. Malchukov and Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook, vol. 11, 131–147. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Havers, Wilhelm. 1924. Eine syntaktische Sonderstellung griechischer und lateinischer Neutra. Glotta 13(3): 171–189.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hettrich, Heinrich. 2014. Some remarks on the adverbal genitive in Rigvedic Sanskrit. In: Jared Klein and Elizabeth Tucker (eds.). Vedic and Sanskrit Historical Linguistics, pp. 129–152. New Delhi: Motilal Banarshidas.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoop, Helen de & Andrej Malchukov. 2008. Case-marking strategies. Linguistic Inquiry 391. 565–587. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Humbert, Jean. 1960. Syntaxe Grecque. Paris: Klincksieck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iemmolo, Giorgio. 2013. Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding. STUF: Language Typology and Universals 66(3). 378–403. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iemmolo, Giorgio and Gerson Klumpp. 2014. Introduction. Linguistics 52(2): 271–279. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luraghi, Silvia. 2011. Two theoretical approaches to cases in comparison. In: Thomas Krisch and Thomas Lindner (eds.). Akten der 13.Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Wiesbaden: Reichert, 331–341.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luraghi, Silvia. 2020. Experiential verbs in Homeric Greek: A constructional approach. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luraghi, Silvia and Seppo Kittilä. 2014. The typology and diachrony of partitives. In: Silvia Luraghi and Tuomas Huumo (eds.). Partitive Case and Related Categories, 17–62. Berlin: Mouton DeGruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luraghi, Silvia and Chiara Zanchi. 2018. Double accusative constructions and ditransitives in Ancient Greek. In: Agnes Korn and Andrej Malchukov (eds) Ditransitive constructions in a cross-linguistic perspective, pp. 13–35. Wiesbaden: Reichert.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andreej L. 2005. Case Pattern Splits, Verb Types and Construction Competition. In: Mengistu Amberber and Helen de Hoop (eds.). Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case, pp. 73–117. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andreej L. and Bernard Comrie (eds). 2015. Valency Classes in the World’s Languages. Vols 1, 21 Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mette, Hans Joachim. 1961. ‘Schauen’ und ‘Staunen’. Glotta 391: 49–71.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Napoli, Maria. 2010. The case for the partitive case: the contribution of Ancient Greek. Transactions of the Philological Society 108(1): 15–40. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reh, Mechthild and Christiane Simon. 1998. Experiens-Konstruktionen in Mande Sprachen, in: Mechthild Reh, Christiane Simon and Katrin Koops (eds.) Experiens Kodierung in afrikanischen Sprachen typologisch gesehen: Formen und ihre Motivierungen, pp. 41–88. Hamburg: Institut für Afrikanistik und Äthiopistik.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sausa, Eleonora. 2015. Argument Structure Construction in Homeric Greek. A Study on Bivalent verbs. PhD thesis. University of Pavia.
Schwyzer, Eduard. 1950. Griechische Grammatik. Band 2. Syntax und Syntaktische Stilistik. Albert Debrunner (ed.). München: Beck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tamm, Anne. 2014. The Partitive Concept versus Linguistic Partitives: From Abstract Concepts to Evidentiality in the Uralic Languages In: Silvia Luraghi and Tuomas Huumo (eds.). Partitive Case and Related Categories, 90–151. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ter-Avanesova, Aleksandra and Michael Daniel (this vol.). The Second Genitive in the history of Russian and across its dialects.
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1985. Remarks on Transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 211: 385–396. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 2015. The hierarchy of two-place predicates: Its limitations. In Andrej Malchukov and Bernard Comrie (eds.). Valency classes in the world’s languages, 1575–1603. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Viberg, Åke. 1984. The Verbs of Perception: a Typological Study. Linguistics 211: 123–162.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1999. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Sleeman, Petra
2024.
Introduction
Partitive Constructions and Partitive Elements
. In
Partitive Constructions and Partitive Elements Within and Across Language Borders in Europe
,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.