Cover not available
Article published In:
Partitives cross-linguistically: Dimensions of variation
Edited by Silvia Luraghi and Petra Sleeman
[Linguistic Variation 23:1] 2023
► pp. 28–74

The second genitive in the history of Russian and across its dialects

| Russian Aсademy of Sciences
ORCID logo | HSE University

In this paper, we provide a survey of the diachronic development of the Russian second genitive (Gen2). As endpoints of this development, we consider data from Russian dialects representing different dialect groups. Assumedly, the expansion of Gen2 started off as ‘recycling’ of the genitive of a declension type that became obsolete already in the pre-written period. Nouns of this declension type were adopted by another declension, carrying their old genitive over as a variant form. This alternative ending started spreading, always as a variant, to other nouns in the adoptive declension. As the survey of the literature shows, in the course of this expansion new constraints evolved, including phonological, morphophonological, phonotactic, syntactic and semantic conditioning. While there is no declension class or even individual nouns where Gen2 became the only option, it expanded to different extents in different dialects. We believe that the diversity of functions associated with the form, the range of language-internal factors driving its expansion, as well as the current geographic distribution of constraints on its formation weaken the claim that emergence of Gen2 as a morphological category dedicated to partitive was due to contact with the languages of the Circumbaltic area, a suggestion made on a macro-areal basis and also based on comparison with the northern dialects alone. While we cannot argue that the data we present disproves the contact factor, we would at least expect that the increased granularity of dialectal data would provide some data to support it. This is not what happens, which we consider to be an argument against contact-induced change.

The aim of the paper is two-fold: to present a synopsis of the discussions of the history of Gen2 and a survey of the data on the use of Gen2 in the dialects, both firsthand and available from the literature; and to question the role of contact in the emergence of the new category of Gen2 in Russian.

Keywords: Russian, Russian dialects, genitive, partitive, morphological recycling, language contact, pattern borrowing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Gen2 in Standard Russian
  • 3.The Common Slavic *ŭ-declension
  • 4.The history of Gen2 in written Russian sources
  • 5.Data from the dialects
    • 5.1Inflectional scope
    • 5.2Lexical scope
    • 5.3Morphophonological conditions
    • 5.4Syntactic conditions
      • 5.4.1Possessive constructions
      • 5.4.2Lower numerals
      • 5.4.3Prepositional uses
      • 5.4.4Pseudo-partitive genitive
      • 5.4.5Independent genitive
      • 5.4.6Interim summary
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • Abbreviations
  • Appendix
  • References
Published online: 31 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.21004.ter
References
Bernstein, Samuil B.
1974 Ocherk sravnitelnoj grammatiki slavjanskix jazykov. Cheredovanija. Imennyje osnovy. [A survey of the comparative grammar of Slavic. Alternations. Nominal stems]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette
2017 Areal Sound Patterns: From Perceptual Magnets to Stone Soup. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, 88–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breu, Walter
1994 Der Faktor Sprachkontakt in einer dynamischen Typologie des Slavischen. Hans Robert Mehlig (ed.) Slavistische Linguistik 1993, Munich. 41–64.Google Scholar
Britain, David & Peter Trudgill
2005 New dialect formation and contact-induced reallocation: Three case studies from the English Fens. International Journal of English Studies 5.11. 183–209.Google Scholar
Britain, David
1997 Dialect contact, focusing and phonological rule complexity: the koineisation of Fenland English. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics: A selection of papers from NWAVE 25, 41. 141–169Google Scholar
Bromlej, Sofja V. & Lidia N. Bulatova
1972 Ocherki morfologii russkikh govorov [Essays on morphology of Russian dialects]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville
2008 Determining morphosyntactic feature values: the case of case. In: Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations: papers in honour of Bernard Comrie, 1–34. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2016 Thoughts on language-specific and crosslinguistic entities. Linguistic Typology 2016; 20(2). 427–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Michael, Ruprecht von Waldenfels, Aleksandra Ter-Avanesova, Polina Kazakova, Ilya Schurov, Ekaterina Gerasimenko, Daria Ignatenko, Ekaterina Makhlina, Maria Tsfasman, Samira Verhees, Alexei Vinyar, Vasilisa Zhigulskaya, Maria Ovsjannikova, Sergei Say & Nina Dobrushina
2019 Dialect loss in the Russian North: modeling change across variables. Language Variation and Change. Vol. 31. No. 3. 353–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Michael
2014 The second genitive in Russian. In: Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds). Partitive cases and related categories, 347–377. Berlin, NY: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DARJA
1986–2004 Dialektologicheskiy atlas russkogo jazyka. Centr evropejskoy chasti SSSR. Vypusk I. Fonetika. 1986. Vypusk II. Morfologija. 1989. Vypusk III, chast’ 1. Leksika. 1997. Chast’ 2. Sintaksis i leksika. 2004. Avanesov, R. I., Bromlej, S. V., Kuzmina, I. B., Morakhovskaya, O. N. (Eds.), [Dialectological Atlas of Russian. Central European Part of the USSR. Issue I. Phonetics. Issue II. Morphology. Issue III, Part 1. Lexicon. Part 2. Lexicon and Syntax], Moscow: Vinogradov Institute of the Russian Language Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Dyachenko, Svetlana V., Elena G. Zhidkova, Anna V. Malysheva, Roman V. Ronko & Alexandra V. Ter-Avanesova
2018 Ekspedicija v Opočetskij rajon Pskovskoj oblasti [Fieldtrip to the Opočka municipality of the Pskov district]. Russkij jazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii 2(36) 2018 257–312.Google Scholar
Diels, Paul
1963 Altkirchenslavische Grammatik, I-II1. Heidelberg: Sammlung slavischer Lehr-und Handbücher.Google Scholar
Eckert, Rainer
1963 Osnovy na -u- v praslavjanskom jazyke [*u-stems in Common Slavic]. Uchenye zapiski Instituta slavianovedenija. Vol. 271. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences. 3–133.Google Scholar
Es’kova, Natalja A.
2008 Normy russkogo literaturnogo jazyka XVIII-XIX vekov. Udarenie. Grammatičeskie formy. Varianty slov. Slovar’. Pojasnitel’nye stat’i. [Norms of Standard Russian in the 18th to 19th century. Stress, inflection, variation. Vocabulary. Explanatory notes] Moscow: Rukopisnye pamjatniki Drevnej Rusi.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2010 Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies. Language 861. 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helimski, Eugene
2006 The “Northwestern” Group of Finno-Ugric Languages and its Heritage in the Place Names and Substratum Vocabulary of the Russian North. In Juhani Nuorluoto (ed.) Slavica Helsingiensia 27. The Slavicization of the Russian North. Mechanisms and Chronology. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. 109–127.Google Scholar
Khaburgaev, Georgij A.
1990 Ocherki istoricheskoy morfologii russkogo jazyka. Imena [A survey of the historical morphology of Russian. Nouns]. Moscow: Moscow State Univeristy.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Bernhard Wälchli
2001 The Circum-Baltic Languages: An Areal-Typological Approach. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.) The Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact, vol. 21: Grammar and Typology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. 615–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotkov, Sergej I.
1962 Juzhnovelikorusskoe narechie v XVII stoletii. Fonetika i morfologija [The southern dialect of Russian in the 17th century. Phonetics and Morphology]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Krylov, Sergei & Aleksandra Ter-Avanesova
2019 Database of Russian Dialects. Available at [URL]
Krys’ko, Vadim B.
2020 Imennoe sklonenie [Nominal declension]. In: Krys’ko, V. B. (ed). Istoricheskaya grammatika russkogo jazyka [Historical grammar of Russian]. 105–134. Moscow: Azbukovnik.Google Scholar
Kuzmina, Irina B.
1993 Sintaksis russkih govorov v lingvogeograficheskom aspekte [Syntax of Russian dialects in a linguageographical perspective]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Kuznecov, Petr S.
1959 Ocherki istoricheskoj morfologii russkogo jazyka [A survey of historical grammar of Russian]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1990 How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 261. 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lunt, Horace G.
1974 Old Church Slavonic grammar (6th edition). The Hague/Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Seppo Kittilä
2014 Typology and diachrony of partitive case markers. In: Luraghi, Silvia & Seppo Kittilä (eds.) Partitive cases and related categories 541: 17–62. Berlin, NY: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malysheva, Anna V.
2018 Genitivnoe markirovanie kolichestvennyh pokazatelej glagola v severnorusskih govorah [Genitive of the verbal quantifiers in the dialects of the North]. In: Sergei A. Myznikov (ed.) Leksicheskij atlas russkih narodnyh govorov [Lexical atlas of Russian dialects]. Materialy i issledovanija. 269–284. Saint Petersburg: ILI RAN.Google Scholar
Malysheva, Anna V. & Roman V. Ronko
2020 Russkij objektnyj genitiv pri otricanii po dannym dialektnykh korpusov i ustnogo korpusa NKRJA [Russian genitive of direct object with negation: data from dialect corpora and from the spoken subcorpus of the Russian National Corpus]. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 41: 25–54.Google Scholar
Markova, Nina V.
1991 Roditel’nyj padež sub”ekta v onežskix govorax [Subject genitive in the Onego dialects]. In Azarx, Julia S. (ed.), Sovremennye russkie govory [Modern Russian Dialects], 134–41. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Matveev, Aleksandr K.
2001 Substratnaja toponimija Russkogo Severa [Substrate toponimics of the Russian North]. Part 1. Ekaterinburg: Ural University.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1961 Études sur ľétymologie et le vocabulaire du vieux slave. Part II. Paris: Librairie Émile Bouillon.Google Scholar
Mustajoki, Arto
2006 Pochemu narodu mnogo, ili novyje nabljudenija nad upotrebleniem vtorogo roditelnogo padezha v sovremennom russkom jazyke [Why narodu mnogo, or some new observations on the use of the second genitive case in Modern Russian]. In Arto Mustajoki & Olga Pussinen (eds.), Integrum: tochnye metody i gumanitarnye nauki, 216–269. Moscow: Letnij sad.Google Scholar
Obnorskij, Sergej P.
1927 Imennoe sklonenie v russkom jazyke. 1. Edinstvennoe chislo [Nominal declension in Russian. The Singular]. Leningrad: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk.Google Scholar
Ossovetsij, Iosif A.
1969 Slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo narodnogo govora (derevnja Deulino Ryazanskogo rajona Ryazanskoj oblasti) [A dictionary of a contemporary Russian dialect (village of Deulino of the Rjazan municipality of Ryazan district]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Polivanova, Anna K.
2013 Staroslavjanskij jazyk. Grammatika, Slovari. [Old Church Slavonic. Grammar and dictionaries] Moscow: Universitet Dmitrija Pozharskogo.Google Scholar
Ronko, Roman, Elena Volf, Maria Grebyonkina, Maria Ershova, Anna Okhapkina, Anna Khadasevich & Valeria Morozova
2019 Corpus of Opochka dialects. Moscow: Linguistic Convergence Laboratory, NRU HSE; V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute Russian Academy of Science (Available online at URL: [URL])
Sankoff, Gillian & Hélène Blondeau
2007 Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language, 560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seržant, Ilja A.
2014 The independent partitive genitive in North Russian. In Björn Wiemer & Ilja Seržant (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Dialectology: The area of North, Northwest Russian and Belarusian vernaculars, Slavica Bergensia 131. 270–329. Bergen: University of Bergen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 The independent partitive as an Eastern Circum-Baltic isogloss. Journal of Language Contact 8.21. 341–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shakhmatov, Alexej A.
1957 Istoricheskaya morfologija russkogo jazyka [Historical morphology of Russian]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo Ministerstva Prosveščenija RSFSR.Google Scholar
Shulga, Marija V.
1978 Paradigma tipa medъ v drevnerusskoj pismennosti [Paradigm type medъ in Old Russian writing]. In Ruben I. Avanesov (ed.). Issledovanija po istoricheskoy morfologii russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Ryo Otoguro
2005 Limits to case: a critical survey of the notion. In Mengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds.) Competition and variation in natural languages: the case for case, 119–145. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ter-Avanesova, Aleksandra, Fedor Balabin, Svetlana Dyachenko, Anna Malysheva, Anastasia Panova & Valeria Morozova
2019 Corpus of the Malinino dialect. Moscow: Linguistic Convergence Laboratory, NRU HSE; V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Science. (Available online at URL: [URL])
Unbegaun, Boris
1935 La langue russe au XVII siècle. Vol. 11 Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
van Wijk, Nicolaus
1957 (1931) Geschichte der altkirchenslavischen Sprache. Vol. 11. Laut- und Formenlehre. Berlin-Leipzig. (quoted via the Russian translation in Nicolaus van Wijk 1957 Istorija staroslavjanskogo jazyka. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury.)Google Scholar
Zalizniak, Andrej A.
1967 Russkoje imennoje slovoizmenenie [Russian nominal inflection]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
2004 Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt [Old Novgorod Dialect]. Moscow: JaSK.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Dobrushina, Nina & Elena Sokur
2022. Spoken Corpora of Slavic Languages. Russian Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.