Article published in:
Metaphor in Specialist Discourse
Edited by J. Berenike Herrmann and Tony Berber Sardinha
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 4] 2015
► pp. 79100
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Kwon, Iksoo
2019. Conceptual metaphors and performativity in the Sunshine Policy. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1  pp. 275 ff. Crossref logo
Montoro, Rocío
2016. The year’s work in stylistics 2015. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 25:4  pp. 376 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Billig, M.
(2008) The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalisation. Discourse and Society, 19, 783–800. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canton, R.
(2010) Not another medical model: Using metaphor and analogy to explore crime and criminal justice. British Journal of Community Justice, 8(1), 40–57.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.
(2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Deignan, A.
(2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D.
(2001) The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
(1994) An introduction to functional grammar. Oxford: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Francis, G.
(2001) Pattern grammar: A corpus driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(2003) Metaphor and War: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Available at: http://​ftp​.funet​.fi​/pub​/sci​/neural​/neuroprose​/lakoff​.war​.ps​.Z
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980, 2003) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Little, W., Onions, C.T., Friedrichsen, G.W. Salisbury, Fowler, H.W., & Coulson, J.
(1973) The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on historical principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Louw, W.
(1993) Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of john sinclair (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McAra, L.
(2008) Crime, Criminology and Criminal Justice in Scotland, European Journal of Criminology, 5(4), 481–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pragglejaz group (Cameron, L., Cienki, A., Crisp, P., Deignan, A., Gibbs, R., Grady, J., Kövecses, Z., Low, G., Semino, E., & Steen, G.
) (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D.
(1993) Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 137–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M.
(2007) WordSmith Tools v.5. [Computer software].
Scottish Prisons Commission
(2008) Scotland’s choice: Report of the Scottish prison commission. available online: http://​www​.scotland​.gov​.uk​/About​/spc.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Todd, Z., & Low, G.
(2010) A selective survey of research practice in published articles using metaphor analysis. In L. Cameron, & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 26–41). London: Equinox.Google Scholar