Article published in:
Metaphor and Communication
Edited by Elisabetta Gola and Francesca Ervas
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 5] 2016
► pp. 147170
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Findlay, Holly & Gareth Carrol
2018. Contributions of semantic richness to the processing of idioms. The Mental Lexicon 13:3  pp. 311 ff. Crossref logo
Hart, Christopher
2018. ‘Riots engulfed the city’: An experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourses of disorder. Discourse & Society 29:3  pp. 279 ff. Crossref logo
Ojha, Amitash, Elisabetta Gola & Bipin Indurkhya
2018. Are Hybrid Pictorial Metaphors Perceived More Strongly Than Pictorial Similes?. Metaphor and Symbol 33:4  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo
Ojha, Amitash & Bipin Indurkhya
2020.  In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],  pp. 105 ff. Crossref logo
Ojha, Amitash, Bipin Indurkhya & Minho Lee
2017. Intelligence Level and the Allocation of Resources for Creative Tasks: A Pupillometry Study. Creativity Research Journal 29:1  pp. 78 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.



Bajo, M.T.
(1988) Semantic facilitation with pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 579–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J.A.
(2001) The utility of reverse transfers in metaphor, Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of cognitive science society (pp. 57–62). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bock, K., & Brewer, W.
(1980) Comprehension and memory of the literal and figurative meanings of proverbs, Journal of psycholinguistic Research, 9, 59–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E.S.P., Scarpa, P., Frackoviak, R.S.J.., et al.
(1994) The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of the figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117, 1241–1253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bullier, J.
(2001) Integrated model of visual processing, Brain Research Reviews, 36, 96–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caroll, N.
(1994) Visual metaphors. In J. Hintikka (Ed.), Aspects of metaphor (pp. 189–218). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carr, T., McCauley, C., Sperber, R.D., & Permelee, C.M.
(1982) Words, pictures and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification and the automaticity of information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(6), 757–777. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiappe, L.D., & Kennedy, J.M.
(2000) Are Metaphors Elliptical Similes? Journal of Psycholinguistic research, 29(4), 371–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiappe, D., Kennedy, J.M., & Smyykowski, T.
(2003) Reversibility, Aptness and the conventionality of metaphors and similes. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 85–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J.M., & Paivio, A.
(1991) Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Connor, K., & Kogan, N.
(1980) Topic-vehicle relations in metaphor: The issue of asymmetry. In R.P. Honeck & R.R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cognition and figurative language (pp. 283–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S.
(2009) Reading in the brain: The new science of how we read. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Durso, F.T., & Johnson, M.K.
(1980) The effects of orienting tasks on recognition, recall, and modality confusion of pictures and words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 416–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eviatar, Z., & Just, M.A.
(2006) Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 44(12), 2348–2359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(1996) Pictorial metaphor in advertising. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, L., & DeHart, G.
(1981) The cued recall of proverbs as a function of comprehension. Proceedings of the meeting of the psychonomic society . Chicago: Midwestern Psychological Association.
Gibbs, R., & Bogdonovich, J.
(1999) Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(1), 37–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gineste, M., Indurkhya, B., & Scart, V.
(2000) Emergence of features in metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(3), 117–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, W.R.
(1992) Picture naming. Cognition, 42, 61–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A.C., Millis, K.K., & Zwaan, R.A.
(1997) Discourse comprehension. Annual Review Psychology, 48, 163–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, A.F., & Zaidi, Q.
(2000) Perceptual assumptions and projective distortions in a three-dimensional shape illusion. Perception, 29, 171–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holt, L.E., & Beilock, S.L.
(2006) Expertise and its embodiment: Examining the impact of sensorimotor skill expertise on the representation of action-related text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 697–701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Indurkhya, B.
(2006) Emergent representations, interaction theory and the cognitive force of metaphor. New Ideas in Psychology, 24, 133–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Creativity in interpreting poetic metaphors. In T. Kusumi (Ed.), New directions in metaphor research (pp. 483–501). Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobo.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.G., & Malgady, R.G.
(1980) Toward a perceptual theory of metaphoric comprehension. Cognition and figurative language, 259–282.Google Scholar
Katz, A.
(1989) On choosing the vehicles of metaphors. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 486–499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Psychological studies of metaphor processing: Extensions to the placement of terms in semantic space. Poetics Today, 13, 607–632. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J.M.
(1982) Metaphor in pictures. Perception, 11, 589–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) What makes a metaphor stronger than simile? Metaphor and Symbol, 14(1), 63–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M., & Thompson, W.L.
(2003) When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 723–746. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M., Thompson, W.L., & Ganis, G.
(2006) The case for mental imagery. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landauer, T.K., & Dumais, S.T.
(1996) How come you know so much? From practical problem to theory. In D. Hermann, C. McEvoy, M. Johnson, & P. Hertel (Eds.), Basic and applied memory: Memory in context (pp. 105–126). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Malgady, R., & Johnson, M.
(1976) Modifiers in metaphors: Effects of constituent phrase similarity on the interpretation of figurative sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 43-52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malgady, R.G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Measurement of figurative language: Semantic feature models of comprehension and appreciation. In R.P. Honeck & R.R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cognition and figurative language (pp. 239–258). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Neisser, U.
(1976) Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Neuckles, M., & Janetzko, D.
(1997) The role of semantic similarity in the comprehension of Metaphor. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 578–583). Stanford, CA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nolan, R.
(1994) Distinguishing perceptual from conceptual categories. In R. Casati, B. Smith, & G. White (Eds.), Philosophy and the cognitive sciences (pp. 221–231). Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
O’Regan, K.J., & Noe, A.
(2001) A sensory motor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–1031. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A.
(1979) Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86, 161–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A.
(1986) Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paivio, A., & Clark, J.A.
(1986) The role of topic and vehicle imagery in metaphor comprehension. Communication and Cognition, 19(3-4), 367–387.Google Scholar
Pulvermuller, F.
(2005) Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(7), 576–582. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z.W.
(2002) Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(2), 157–237.Google Scholar
Richards, I.A.
(1936) The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schilperoord, J., Maes, A., & Ferdinandusse, H.
(2009) Perceptual and conceptual visual rhetoric. The case of symmetric object alignment. Metaphor and Symbol, 24, 155–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, G.L., Casey, J.D., & Seger, C.A.
(2007) Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes. Brain and Language, 100, 127–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M.
(1999) Support and interference effects in learning from multiple representations. In S. Bagnara (Ed.), European conference on cognitive science (pp. 447–452). 27th–30th Oct. 1999, Istituto di Psicologia Consiglio, Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Schnotz, W.
(2002) Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational psychology Review, 14(1), 101–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibata, M., Abe, J., Terao, A., & Miyamoto, T.
(2007) Neural mechanisms involved in the comprehension of metaphoric sentences: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1166, 92–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, R.D., McCauley, C., Ragain, R.D., & Weil, C.M.
(1979) Semantic priming effects and word processing. Memory & Cognition, 7, 339–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, N.J.T.
(2002) The false dichotomy of imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(2), 211.Google Scholar
(2009) Visual imagery and consciousness. In W.P. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consciousness (pp. 445–457). Amsterdam: Academic Press/Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C.
(1996) Speed of processing in the human visual system, Nature, 381, 520–522. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R.
(1981) Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 27–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1982) Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition, 11, 203–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G.
(1977) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trick, L., & Katz, A.
(1986) The domain interaction approach to metaphor processing: Relating individual differences and metaphor characteristics. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 1, 185–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanderwart, M.
(1984) Priming by pictures in lexical decision. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 67–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verbrugge, R.R., & McCarrell, N.S.
(1977) Metaphoric comprehension: Studies in reminding and resembling. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 494–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verbrugge, R.R.
(1980) Transformations in knowing: A realist view of metaphor. In R.P. Honeck & R.R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cognition and figurative language (pp. 87–125). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Walsh, P.
(1990) Imagery as a heuristic in the comprehension of metaphorical analogies. Representation, reasoning, analogy, and decision-making. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Werner, H., & Kaplan, B.
(1963) Symbol formation. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Van Weelden, L., Maes, A., Schilperoord, J., & Cozijn, R.
(2011) The role of shape in comparing objects: How perceptual similarity may affect visual metaphor processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(4), 272–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaidi, Q., & Griffiths, A.F.
(2002) Generic assumptions shared by visual perception and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 215–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimbardo, P.G., & Gerrig, J.R.
(2002) Perception, In D.J. Levitin (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R.A., Madden, C.J., Yaxley, R.H., & Aveyard, M.E.
(2004) Moving words: Dynamic mental representations in language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 28, 611–619.Google Scholar