Chapter published in:
Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond
Edited by Herbert L. Colston, Teenie Matlock and Gerard J. Steen
[Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 9] 2022
► pp. 157190
References
Alibali, M. W., Boncoddo, R., & Hostetter, A.
(2014) Gesture in reasoning: An embodied perspective. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 150–159). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., & Zeschel, A.
(2010) Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 5 (1), 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
(2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59 , 617–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B. K.
(2005) Mental simulation in literal and figurative language understanding. In S. Coulson & B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Eds.), The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought (pp. 255–280). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, A.
(2012) Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H.
(2011) Rethinking gesture phases: Articulatory features of gestural movement? Semiotica, 184 (4), 53–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L.
(2008) Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied-LInguistic Approach (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010a) The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Science and the Humanities (pp. 77–94). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2010b) Metaphors and discourse activity. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Science and the Humanities (pp. 77–94). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A.
(2006) The emergence of metaphor in discourse Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 671–690. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N.
(2009) The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24 (2), 63–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D.
(2013) Development of metaphorical thinking: The role of language. In M. Borkent, B. Dancygier, & J. Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the Creative Mind (pp. 3–18). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2014) Experiential origins of mental metaphors: Language, culture, and the body. In M. J. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The Power of Metaphor: Examining its Influence on Social Life (pp. 249–268). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A.
(1998) Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and Cognition (pp. 189–204). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(2010) Multimodal metaphor analysis. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Science and the Humanities (pp. 195–216). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2013) Cognitive Linguistics. Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (pp. 182–201). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Cognitive Lingustics, gesture studies and multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (4), 603–618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard, 13 (s1), 20160048. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C.
(Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L.
(2015) Using Figurative Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(2016) Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (4), 479–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H.
(2019) The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’ Connor, M. C.
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of Let alone . Language, 64 (3), 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(1992) What do idioms really mean?. Journal of Memory and Language 31 , 485–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Why idioms are not dead metaphors. In C. Cacciari & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms, Processing Structure and Interpretation (pp. 57–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1994) The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain and Language, 84 , 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Embodiment in Metaphorical Imagination. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding Cognition. The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking (pp. 65–92). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, New York, etc.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and Social World, 1 (1), 26–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Metaphors, snowflakes, and termite nests. How nature creates such beautiful things. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martínez, M. Sanchez-García, & A. M. Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in Use. Context, Culture and Communication (pp. 347–371). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Metaphoric cognition as social activity: Dissolving the divide between metaphor in thought and communication. Metaphor and the Social World, 3 , 54–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Metaphor, language and dynamical systems. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language (pp. 56–69). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Bogdanovich, J. M., Sykes, J. R., & Barr, D. J.
(1997) Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37 , 141–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Cameron, L.
(2008) The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 9 (1–2), 64–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Gould, J., & Andric, M.
(2006) Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible. Imagination, Cognition, & Personality, 25 , 221–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Lima, P. L. C., & Francozo, E.
(2004) Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36 , 1189–1210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Matlock, T.
(2008) Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 161–176). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & O’Brien, J.
(1990) Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 36 , 35–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E.
(2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford, etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2019) Explain me this: Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2004) Extending Collostructional Analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9 , 27–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B.
(2017) Embodiment and discourse: Dimensions and dynamics of contemporary metaphor theory. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor. Embodied Cognition and Discourse (pp. 1–23). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, T.
(2017) Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory. Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1), 20160042. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hostetter, A., & Alibali, M.
(2008) Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15 (3), 495–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. A.
(Ed.) (2013) Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn. The Essential Reader. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kappelhoff, H., & Müller, C.
(2011) Embodied meaning construction. Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and in feature film. Metaphor and the Social Word. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A.
(1988) How gestures can become like words. In F. Poyatos (Ed.), Cross-Cultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication. (pp. 131–141).Google Scholar
(2004) Gesture: Visual Action as Utterance. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2009) Metaphor, Culture, and Discourse: The Pressure of Coherence. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and Discourse (pp. 11–24). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd Edition. (pp. 202–251). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1999) Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(2000) A dynamic usage based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language (pp. 1–64). Stanford, CA: CSLI-Publications.Google Scholar
McNeill, D.
(1992) Hand and Mind. What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Introduction In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 1–10). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Gesture and Thought. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., & Duncan, S. D.
(2000) Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and Gesture. Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, I.
(2010) Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions (pp. 351–385). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2013) The exbodied mind. Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. (pp. 750–779). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moon, R.
(1998) Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English. A Corpus-Based Approach. Auckland: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C.
(2008a) Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking. A Dynamic View. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008b) What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C., & Cienki, A.
(2009) Metaphor, gestures, and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 293–321). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Müller, C., & Tag, S.
(2010) The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 10 (6), 85–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, N., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(1990) Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 119 , 315–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ningelgen, J., & Auer, P.
(2017) Is there a multimodal cnstruction based on non-deictic so in German? Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1), 20160051. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, G., Sag, I. A., & Wasow, T.
(1994) Idioms. Language, 70 (3), 491–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez, F. J.
(2017) Metaphor and other cognitive operations in interaction: From basicity to complexity. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor. Embodied Cognition and Discourse. (pp. 138–159). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J.
(2000) English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment? In D. Glynn & K. Fischer (Eds.), Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-Driven Approaches. (pp. 101–133). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Why cognitive linguistics must embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (4), 543–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) The Dynamics of the Linguistic System. Usage, Conventionalization, and Entrenchment. Oxford, etc.: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoonjans, S.
(2017) Multimodal Construction Grammar issues are Construction Grammar issues. Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1), 20160050. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, F., & Turner, M.
(2013) Multimodal Construction Grammar. In M. Borkent, B. Dancygier, & J. Hinnell (Eds.), Language and the Creative Mind. Stanford: CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(2008) The Paradox of Metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23 (4), 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical thought Cognitive Semiotics, 5 (1–2), 179–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Flach, S.
(2017) The corpus-based perspective on entrenchment. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. (pp. 101–127). Berlin/Washington, DC: de Gruyter Mouton and APA. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T.
(2005) Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and LinguisticTheory, 1(1), 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
(2007) Looking at space to study mental spaces. Co-speech gesture as a crucial data source in cognitive linguistics. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 201–224). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M.
(2014) Language, gesture and bodily stance: Grammar as a multi-modal system. Вестник Челябинского государственного университета, 336 (7), 40–47.Google Scholar
Winter, B., & Matlock, T.
(2017) Primary Metaphors are both Cultural and Embodied. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodiment and Discourse (pp. 99–115). Cambridge, etc.: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziem, A.
(2017) Do we really need a Multimodal Construction Grammar? Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1), 20160095. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zima, E.
(2017) On the multimodality of [all the way from X PREP Y]. Linguistics Vanguard, 3 (s1), 20160055. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zima, E., & Bergs, A.
(2017) Towards a multimodal construction grammar. Special issue. In Linguistics Vanguard. A Multimodal Journal for the Language Sciences 3 (s1).Google Scholar
Zinken, J.
(2007) Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics, 18 (3), 445–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinken, J., & Musolff, A.
(2009) A Discourse-Centred Perspective on Metaphorical Meaning and Understanding. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and Discourse (pp. 1–8). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar