Article published in:
Semantics and Psychology of Complex Words
Edited by Christina L. Gagné and Thomas L. Spalding
[The Mental Lexicon 15:1] 2020
► pp. 420


Arndt-Lappe, S.
(2014) Analogy in suffix rivalry: The case of English -ity and -ness . English Language and Linguistics, 18(3), 497–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M.
(2016) Competition and the lexicon. In A. Elia, C. Iacobino, & M. Voghera (Eds.), Livelli di analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia: Atti del XLVII congresso internazionale della società di linguistica italiana (pp. 39–52). Bulzoni.Google Scholar
(2019) Competitors and alternants in linguistic morphology. In F. Rainer, F. Gardani, W. U. Dressler, & H. Ch. Luschützky (Eds.), Competition in inflection and word-formation (pp. 39–66). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L.
(2004) The function of word-formation and the inflection-derivation distinction. In H. Aertsen, M. Hannay, & R. Lyall (Eds.), Words and their places: A festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie (pp. 283–292). Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I.
(2013) The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L., Valera, S., & Díaz-Negrillo, A.
(2010) Affixation vs. conversion: The resolution of conflicting patterns. In F. Rainer, W. U. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, & H. Ch. Luschützky (Eds.), Variation and change in morphology: Selected papers from the 13th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2008 (pp. 15–32). Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cetnarowska, B.
(1993) The syntax, semantics and derivation of bare nominalisations in English. Uniwersytet Śląski.Google Scholar
Davies, M.
(2018) The 14-billion-word iWeb corpus (2017). Retrieved from https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/iWeb
(2020) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 1 billion words (1990–2019). Retrieved from https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/coca
Díaz-Negrillo, A.
(2017) On the identification of competition in English derivational morphemes: The case of -dom, -hood and -ship . In J. Santana-Lario & S. Valera (Eds.), Competing patterns in English affixation (pp. 119–161). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dietz, K.
(2015) Historical word-formation in English. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe, Volume 3 (pp. 1914–1930). De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
(2014) Making new words: Morphological derivation in English. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Alcaina, C., & Čermák, J.
(2018) Derivational paradigms and competition in English: A diachronic study on competing causative verbs and their derivatives. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 15(3), 69–97.Google Scholar
François, Ch.
(2004) International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics. De Gruyter Saur. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardani, F., Rainer, F., & Luschützky, H. Ch.
(2019) Competition in morphology: A historical outline. In F. Rainer, F. Gardani, W. U. Dressler, & H. Ch. Luschützky (Eds.), Competition in inflection and word-formation (pp. 3–36). Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grabias, M.
(2016) The development of -free and its competition with the suffix -less: A corpus-based study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Liverpool). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. Th.
(2003a) Testing the sub-test: An analysis of English -ic and -ical adjectives. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(1), 31–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003b) Isn’t that fantabulous? How similarity motivates intentional morphological blends in English. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 415–428). CSLI.Google Scholar
(2012) Quantitative corpus data on blend formation: Psycho- and cognitive-linguistic perspectives. In V. Renner, F. Maniez, & P. J. L. Arnaud (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending (pp. 145–167). Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, D.
(1986) The problem of productivity in word formation. Linguistics, 24(3), 585–600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Semantics and vocabulary. In R. M. Hogg (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, Volume 1: The beginnings to 1066 (pp. 290–408). Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaunisto, M.
(2009) The rivalry between English adjectives ending in -ive and -ory . In R. W. McConchie, A. Honkapohja, & J. Tyrkkö (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 symposium on new approaches in English historical lexis (HEL-LEX 2) (pp. 74–87). Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Körtvélyessy, L.
(2014) Evaluative derivation. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology (pp. 296–316). Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, H. -S.
(1997) Negative prefixation from 1300 to 1800: A case study in in- /un- variation. ICAME Journal, 21, 21–42.Google Scholar
Lara-Clares, C.
(2017) Competition in Present Day English nominalization by zero-affixation vs. -ation . In J. Santana-Lario & S. Valera (Eds.), Competing patterns in English affixation (pp. 207–244). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lara-Clares, C., & Thompson, P.
(2019) Nominal competition in present-day English affixation: Zero-affixation vs. -ness with the semantic category stative . SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 16(2), 25–49.Google Scholar
Lieber, R.
(2012) Semantics of derivational morphology. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, Volume 3 (pp. 2098–2119). De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) The semantics of transposition. Morphology, 25(4), 353–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) English nouns: The ecology of nominalization. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, M.
(2010) American English iz-infixation: Interaction of phonology, metrics and rhyme. The University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics, 25, 159–172.Google Scholar
Lindsay, M., & Aronoff, M.
(2013) Natural selection in self-organizing morphological systems. In N. Hathout, F. Montermini, & J. Tseng (Eds.), Morphology in Toulouse: Selected proceedings of Décembrettes 7 (Toulouse, 2–3 December 2010) (pp. 133–153). LINCOM.Google Scholar
Luria, S. E., Gould, S. J., & Singer, S.
(1981) A view of life. Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
Merlini Barbaresi, L.
(2008) Extra-grammatical morphology: English reduplicatives. In J. Douthwaite & D. Pezzini (Eds.), Words in action: Diachronic and synchronic approaches to English discourse – Studies in honour of Ermanno Barisone (pp. 228–241). ECIG.Google Scholar
Nagano, A.
(2008a) Conversion and back-formation in English: Toward a theory of morpheme-based morphology. Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
(2008b) Categorial change of conversion and the process of relisting. English Linguistics, 25(2), 369–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Naya, R.
(2017) Competition in word-formation: Deverbal nominalization by -ment vs. conversion. JELS, 34, 271–277.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from https://​www​.oed​.com
Plag, I.
(1999) Morphological productivity: Structural constraints in English derivation. Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Word-formation in English, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rainer, F., Gardani, F., Dressler, W. U., & Luschützky, H. Ch.
(2019) Competition in inflection and word-formation. Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renner, V.
(2006) Les composés coordinatifs en anglais contemporain (Doctoral dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2). Retrieved from https://​tel​.archives​-ouvertes​.fr​/tel​-00565046​/file​/Renner2006​.pdf
(2015) Lexical blending as wordplay. In A. Zirker & E. Winter-Froemel (Eds.), Wordplay and metalinguistic/metadiscursive reflection: Authors, contexts, techniques, and meta-reflection (pp. 119–133). De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) French and English lexical blends in contrast. Languages in Contrast, 19(1), 27–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, A., & Renner, V.
(2019) New lexical blends in The Simpsons: A formal analysis of English nonce formations and their French translations. Lexis, 14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M.
in press). La création néonymique par transfert paradigmatique : dénominations, métaphores et idéologies. In M. B. Villar Díaz, J. C. De Hoyos, P. Dury, J. Makri-Morel, & V. Renner Eds. La néologie des langues romanes : nouvelles approches, dynamiques et enjeux Peter Lang
Santana-Lario, J., & Valera, S.
(2017) Competing patterns in English affixation. Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H. -J.
(2016) English morphology and word-formation, 3rd ed. Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Sherman, D.
(1975) Noun-verb stress alternation: An example of the lexical diffusion of sound change in English. Linguistics, 13(159), 43–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J.
(2001) Hypocoristics of place-names in Australian English. In D. Blair & P. Collins (Eds.), English in Australia (pp. 89–112). Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sonderegger, M., & Niyogi, P.
(2013) Variation and change in English noun/verb pair stress: Data and dynamical systems models. In A. C. L. Yu (Ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization (pp. 262–284). Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, P.
(2017) Competition in natural languages. In J. Santana-Lario & S. Valera (Eds.), Competing patterns in English affixation (pp. 15–31). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ungerer, F.
(2003) The conceptual function of derivational word-formation in English. Anglia, 120(4), 534–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, A. C. L.
(2004) Reduplication in English Homeric infixation. In K. Moulton & M. Wolf (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th North East Linguistics Society (pp. 619–633). GLSA.Google Scholar