Constituent polysemy and interpretational diversity in attested English novel compounds
We explore variation in the interpretation of attested novel compound nouns in English, especially the contribution of constituent polysemy to this diversity. Our results show that effects of polysemy are pervasive in compound interpretation, contributing both to interpretational diversity and to perceived difficulty of interpretation. The higher the uncertainty about the concept represented by the head noun, based on existing compounds with that head, the greater the diversity of interpretations across speakers and the more difficult, on average, they find it to come up with a meaning.
Article outline
- Background
- Creating a database
- Materials
- Participants
- Procedure
- Study 1: How much diversity is there in the interpretation of attested novel compounds?
- Qualitative coding of free paraphrases
- Quantitative measures of interpretational diversity
- Results
- Study 2: What role does constituent polysemy play in the diversity of compound interpretation?
- Quantitative analysis
- Qualitative analysis
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
References
Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A. & Zanchetta, E.
(
2009)
The wacky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora.
Language Resources and Evaluation 43(3), 209–226.


Bell, M. J. & Schäfer, M.
(
2013)
Semantic transparency: challenges for distributional semantics. In
Proceedings of IWCS 2013 Workshop Towards a Formal Distributional Semantics, (pp. 1–10). Association for Computational Linguistics.

Bell, M. J. & Schäfer, M.
(
2016)
Modelling semantic transparency.
Morphology 26(2), 157–199.


Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H. J. & Schreuder, R.
(
1991)
The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds.
Memory & Cognition 19(4), 341–352.


Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H. J. & Schreuder, R.
(
1993)
Processing novel compounds: Evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns.
Memory & Cognition 21(2), 235–246.


Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
(
2014)
Conceptual composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun compounds. In
B. H. Ross (Ed.),
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 591 pp. 97–130). Elsevier Inc.: Academic Press.

Libben, G.
(
2014)
The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective.
Cognitive Neuropsychology 31(1–2), 8–25.


Maguire, P., E. Wisniewski, & G. Storms
(
2010)
A corpus study of semantic patterns in compounding.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(1), 49–73.


Mullaly, A., Gagné, C., Spalding, T. L. & Marchak, K.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A.
(
1998)
The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms.
[URL]
Ryder, M. E.
(
1994)
Ordered chaos: The interpretation of English noun-noun compounds. University of California Press.

Spalding, T. L., Gagné, C. L., Mullaly, A. & Ji, H.
(
2010)
Relation-based interpretation of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach. In
S. Olsen (Ed.),
New Impulses in Word-Formation, (pp. 283–315). Hamburg: Buske.

Wisniewski, E. J.
(
1996)
Construal and similarity in conceptual combination.
Journal of Memory and Language 35(3), 434–453.


Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Günther, Fritz & Marco Marelli
2021.
CAOSS and transcendence: Modeling role-dependent constituent meanings in compounds.
Morphology 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.