We explore variation in the interpretation of attested novel compound nouns in English, especially the contribution of constituent polysemy to this diversity. Our results show that effects of polysemy are pervasive in compound interpretation, contributing both to interpretational diversity and to perceived difficulty of interpretation. The higher the uncertainty about the concept represented by the head noun, based on existing compounds with that head, the greater the diversity of interpretations across speakers and the more difficult, on average, they find it to come up with a meaning.
Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A. & Zanchetta, E. (2009). The wacky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 43(3), 209–226.
Bell, M. J. & Schäfer, M. (2013). Semantic transparency: challenges for distributional semantics. In Proceedings of IWCS 2013 Workshop Towards a Formal Distributional Semantics, (pp. 1–10). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Bell, M. J. & Schäfer, M. (2016). Modelling semantic transparency. Morphology 26(2), 157–199.
Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H. J. & Schreuder, R. (1991). The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition 19(4), 341–352.
Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H. J. & Schreuder, R. (1993). Processing novel compounds: Evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns. Memory & Cognition 21(2), 235–246.
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2014). Conceptual composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun compounds. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 591 pp. 97–130). Elsevier Inc.: Academic Press.
Libben, G. (2014). The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31(1–2), 8–25.
Maguire, P., E. Wisniewski, & G. Storms. (2010). A corpus study of semantic patterns in compounding. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(1), 49–73.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. [URL]
Ryder, M. E. (1994). Ordered chaos: The interpretation of English noun-noun compounds. University of California Press.
Spalding, T. L., Gagné, C. L., Mullaly, A. & Ji, H. (2010). Relation-based interpretation of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach. In S. Olsen (Ed.), New Impulses in Word-Formation, (pp. 283–315). Hamburg: Buske.
Wisniewski, E. J. (1996). Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language 35(3), 434–453.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Chen, Phoebe, David Poeppel & Arianna Zuanazzi
2024. Meaning creation in novel noun-noun compounds: humans and language models. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 39:2 ► pp. 149 ff.
Pugacheva, Vasilisa & Fritz Günther
2024. Lexical choice and word formation in a taboo game paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language 135 ► pp. 104477 ff.
Günther, Fritz & Marco Marelli
2022. Patterns in CAOSS: Distributed representations predict variation in relational interpretations for familiar and novel compound words. Cognitive Psychology 134 ► pp. 101471 ff.
Günther, Fritz & Marco Marelli
2023. CAOSS and transcendence: Modeling role-dependent constituent meanings in compounds. Morphology 33:4 ► pp. 409 ff.
Libben, Gary
2022. From Lexicon to Flexicon: The Principles of Morphological Transcendence and Lexical Superstates in the Characterization of Words in the Mind. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.