Article published in:
Semantics and Psychology of Complex Words
Edited by Christina L. Gagné and Thomas L. Spalding
[The Mental Lexicon 15:1] 2020
► pp. 42–61

Constituent polysemy and interpretational diversity in attested English novel compounds

| Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
| Anglia Ruskin University
We explore variation in the interpretation of attested novel compound nouns in English, especially the contribution of constituent polysemy to this diversity. Our results show that effects of polysemy are pervasive in compound interpretation, contributing both to interpretational diversity and to perceived difficulty of interpretation. The higher the uncertainty about the concept represented by the head noun, based on existing compounds with that head, the greater the diversity of interpretations across speakers and the more difficult, on average, they find it to come up with a meaning.
Keywords: novel compound, compound noun, compound interpretation, constituent polysemy, constituent family, conceptual combination
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 30 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.00013.sch

Full-text

Constituent polysemy and interpretational diversity in attested English novel compounds
References

References

Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A. & Zanchetta, E.
(2009) The wacky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 43(3), 209–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M. J.
(2011) At the boundary of morphology and syntax. Noun noun constructions in English. In A. Galani, G. Hicks, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.) Morphology and its Interfaces (pp. 137–168). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M. J. & Schäfer, M.
(2013) Semantic transparency: challenges for distributional semantics. In Proceedings of IWCS 2013 Workshop Towards a Formal Distributional Semantics, (pp. 1–10). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
(2016) Modelling semantic transparency. Morphology 26(2), 157–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coolen, R., Van Jaarsveld, H. J. & Schreuder, R.
(1991) The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition 19(4), 341–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Processing novel compounds: Evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns. Memory & Cognition 21(2), 235–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L.
(2014) Conceptual composition: The role of relational competition in the comprehension of modifier-noun phrases and noun-noun compounds. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 59 pp. 97–130). Elsevier Inc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Libben, G.
(2014) The nature of compounds: A psychocentric perspective. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31(1–2), 8–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, P., E. Wisniewski, & G. Storms
(2010) A corpus study of semantic patterns in compounding. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(1), 49–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mullaly, A., Gagné, C., Spalding, T. L. & Marchak, K.
(2010) Examining ambiguous adjectives in adjective-noun phrases: Evidence for representation as a shared core-meaning with sense specialization. The Mental Lexicon 5. 87–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A.
(1998) The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://​www​.usf​.edu​/FreeAssociation/
Ryder, M. E.
(1994) Ordered chaos: The interpretation of English noun-noun compounds. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Spalding, T. L., Gagné, C. L., Mullaly, A. & Ji, H.
(2010) Relation-based interpretation of noun-noun phrases: A new theoretical approach. In S. Olsen (Ed.), New Impulses in Word-Formation, (pp. 283–315). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Wisniewski, E. J.
(1996) Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language 35(3), 434–453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar