Article published In:
The Mental LexiconVol. 10:3 (2015) ► pp.435–457
Segmented binaural presentation as a means to examine lexical substructure
We present an auditory presentation technique called segmented binaural presentation. The technique builds on the dichotic listening paradigm (Shankweiler & Studdert-Kennedy, 1967; Studdert-Kennedy & Shankweiler, 1970) and segmented lexical presentation (Libben, 2003; Betram, Kuperman, Baayen, & Hyönä, 2011). The technique allows the first part of a word to be presented to one ear and the second part of the word to be presented to the other ear. The experimenter may thus manipulate whether a stimulus is segmented in this binaural manner and, if it is segmented, the location of the binaural segmentation within the word. We discuss how the technique may be implemented on the Macintosh platform, using PsyScope and freely available software for audio file creation. We also report on a test implementation of the technique using suffixed and compound English words in a lexical decision task. Results suggest that the technique differentiates between segmentation that occurs within and between compound constituents.
References (38)
Audacity Team. (2013). Audacity®(Version 2.0.5). [Computer program]. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from [URL]
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–9, [URL].
Bertram, R., Kuperman, V., Baayen, R.H., & Hyönä, J. (2011). The hyphen as a segmentation cue in triconstituent compound processing: It’s getting better all the time. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 52(6), 530–544. 
Brysbaert, M., Vitu, F., & Schroyens, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and the Optimal Viewing Position Effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition. Neuropsychology, 10(3), 385–395.
Brysbaert, M., & Nazir, T. (2005). Visual constraints in written word recognition: Evidence from the optimal viewing-position effect. Journal of Research in Reading, 281, 216–228.
Cohen, J.D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25(2), 257–271.
Cohen, L., & Mehler, J. (1996). Click monitoring revisited: An on-line study of sentence comprehension. Memory & cognition, 24(1), 94–102.
Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W.E. Cooper & E.C.T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 113–134). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Faust, M., Kravetz, S., & Babkoff, H. (1993). Hemispheric specialization or reading habits: Evidence from lexical decision research with Hebrew words and sentences. Brain and Language, 441, 254–263.
Fodor, J.A., & Bever, T.G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 41, 414–420.
Gordon, D.P., & Zatorre, R.J. (1981). A right-ear advantage for dichotic listening in bilingual children. Brain and Language, 13(2), 389–396.
Holmes, V.M., & Forster, K.I. (1972). Click location and syntactic structure. Perception & Psychophysics, 12(1), 9–15.
Hugdahl, K. (2011). Fifty years of dichotic listening research – Still going and going and… Brain and Cognition, 761, 211–213.
. (2000). Lateralization of cognitive processing in the brain. Acta Psychologica, 1051, 211–235.
Ip, K., & Hoosain, R. (1993). Dichotic listening of Chinese and English words. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 36(3), 140–143.
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–633.
Kimura, D. (2011). From ear to brain. Brain and Cognition, 761, 214–217.
. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 31, 163–168.
. (1966). Dual functional asymmetry of the brain in visual perception. Neuropsychologia, 41, 275–285.
. (1961a). Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 151, 156–165.
. (1961b). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 151, 166–170.
Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D.E. (1960). Perception of sequence in auditory events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 162–170.
Laine, M., & Koivisto, M. (1998). Lexical access to inflected words as measured by lateralized visual lexical decision. Psychological Research, 611, 220–229.
Leff, A. (2004). A historical review of the representation of the visual field in primary visual cortex with special reference to the neural mechanisms underlying macular sparing. Brain and Language, 881, 268–278.
Libben, G. (2003). Morphological Parsing and Morphological Structure. In E.M.H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross language studies (pp. 221–239). New York: Kluwer Academic.
Moen, I. (1993). Functional lateralization of the perception of Norwegian Word Tones – Evidence from a dichotic listening Experiment. Brain and Language, 44(4), 400–413.
Meyers, J.E., Roberts, R.J., Bayless, J.D., Volkert, K., & Evitts, P.E. (2002). Dichotic listening: expanded norms and clinical application. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(1), 79–90.
O’Regan, J.K., & Jacobs, A.M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 181, 185–197.
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Reber, A.S. (1973). Locating clicks in sentences: Left, center, and right. Perception and Psychophysics, 13(1), 133–138.
Saetrevik, B., & Hugdahl, K. (2007). Priming inhibits the right ear advantage in dichotic listening: Implications for auditory laterality. Neuropsychologia, 451, 282–287.
Shankweiler, D., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Identification of consonants and vowels presented to left and right ears. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 191, 59–63.
Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Shankweiler, D. (1970). Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 481, 579–594.
Tremblay, A., & Ransijn, J. (2013). LMERConvenienceFunctions: A suite of functions to back-fit fixed effects and forward-fit random effects, as well as other miscellaneous functions. R package version 21.5. [URL]
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J.A. (2001). Dichotic perception of Mandarin tones by Chinese and American listeners. Brain and Language, 78(3), 332–348.
Westerhausen, R., Moosmann, M., Alho, K., Medvedev, S., Hamalainen, H., & Hugdahl, K. (2009). Top-down and bottom-up interaction: Manipulating the dichotic listening ear advantages. Brain Research, 12501, 183–189
Wexler, B.E., & Halwes, T. (1983). Increasing the power of dichotic methods: The fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia, 211, 59–66.
Young, A.W., & Ellis, A.W. (1985). Different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual hemifields. Brain and Language, 241, 326–358.